關於 cherry-picked ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#Opinion by Yeung Wai Hong 楊懷康｜"Even though Harris is outstandingly from ethnic minorities with two different ancestries, which probably instigates more Democrats to vote, the groups are already bagged by the Party. In consequence, , her skin color is not instrumental in gaining support from the wavering “non-partisans”- in Obama’s words. If she cannot be leveraged for drawing in voters from different territories, why is she the one among thousands of options?"

Read more: https://bit.ly/34Cvk0H

"賀錦麗的雙料少數族裔血統無疑突出，少數族裔已是民主黨的囊中之物，有她加盟即使能鼓動更多民主黨人投票，對爭取奧巴馬口中猶豫未決「黨外人士」的支持並無裨益。若無地域套戥之效，千揀萬揀何以偏偏揀中賀錦麗？"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP

#AppleDailyENG

#Opinion by Yeung Wai Hong 楊懷康｜"Even though Harris is outstandingly from ethnic minorities with two different ancestries, which probably instigates more Democrats to vote, the groups are already bagged by the Party. In consequence, , her skin color is not instrumental in gaining support from the wavering “non-partisans”- in Obama’s words. If she cannot be leveraged for drawing in voters from different territories, why is she the one among thousands of options?"

Read more: https://bit.ly/34Cvk0H

"賀錦麗的雙料少數族裔血統無疑突出，少數族裔已是民主黨的囊中之物，有她加盟即使能鼓動更多民主黨人投票，對爭取奧巴馬口中猶豫未決「黨外人士」的支持並無裨益。若無地域套戥之效，千揀萬揀何以偏偏揀中賀錦麗？"

強烈建議英文閱讀能力不錯的人，直接看Asker Jeukendrup博士的這篇文章：https://reurl.cc/e54RlL

你可以看到真正的受過嚴格科學研究訓練的人，是如何評論Game Changer這部紀錄片的「偽科學（pseudoscience）」諸多邏輯不通與歸因謬誤！

我過去在學術圈的訓練裡，教會我很重要的一件事情是，看到一個新的發現或命題，一定要去理解它的前因後果、理論推導過程、情境影響、樣本結構、研究限制等，只要有漏洞，這個新的發現就該懷疑它的可靠性！

所以當我在看Asker文章的這段話時，好像過去在學研究方法的回憶都跑出來了：「If you are engaged in pseudoscience you have an opinion and search for evidence that supports your view. You present all of this information and say: see this proves my theory is right. This is completely different from what science is, and does. Science does not prove anything. Science will bring us closer to the truth. Science will formulate a hypothesis and design a study to test this hypothesis. The results are critically discussed: arguments and counterarguments are carefully analysed. One study will not give the answer. Science is evaluated in the totality of evidence, not just the cherry picked studies that support your hypothesis. Science is scrutinised by experts whom may have different views, but objectively look at the data collected. 」

這就是我這次文章裡，寫了個「吃冰淇淋會變強」的由來，我示範了一個偽科學，要是理論不足，我還能再補XD.

另外，Asker的這句話相當好，該如何辨別真科學還是偽科學？

真科學不會操弄情緒，但偽科學會！

「Another difference between science and pseudoscience is that science is a very dry objective discussion of facts, whereas pseudoscience is all about emotion: fear, distrust, conspiracies, disbelief, anger…. None of this has anything to do with science. 」

最後，我跟Asker博士一樣不反對吃素，她女兒吃素，我有一個學生也吃素，尊重彼此的選擇，我只會提醒她吃素者要多留意蛋白質與營養品的補充，但也不要過度美化，吃素不一定全好，吃肉也不一定差，均衡飲食才是王道！

#J帥專欄