關於 france national symbol ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Don’t Be Naive! Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is Standing on the Side Against Human Civilization
　
Peaceful world order after WWII had been established upon the philosophy worshiping multilateralism. The cultural basis supporting such multilateralism contained an imagination believing in the ultimate good of the respect for diversity.
　
The Rise of China and the Naivete of EU
　
However, as time progressed into the Post-Cold War era of the 90's, globalization in trade became the dominant trend. Following the global embrace of multilateralism and respect for diversity, it was believed that China would have been influenced by open and positive values once she had participated in this big family of global trade. Indeed, China took advantage of its role as the "world factory" and gained a huge economic leap forward. After China joined the WTO in 2000, within seventeen to eighteen years, China had grown nine-fold compared in terms of its aggregate economic volume. Furthermore, it surpassed Germany in 2005 and Japan between 2009 and 2010, becoming the second-largest economy in the world.
　
In particular, due to the global financial crisis derived from the subprime mortgage in 2007 and Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy in 2008 in the United States, the PIGGS countries turned into victims in Europe. China thus took advantage of this crisis to expand its power, bridging China’s role as depicted in Hu JinTao's "China's peaceful rise" to that in Xi JinPing's "China dream." Finally, China has revealed its ambition to compete for the position as a world leader and a planner of a new world order. The United States has finally, recently woken up to this nightmare of Xi, who has long intended to use China's almighty economic power to achieve his political agenda and hegemony. Unfortunately, many EU countries who consider themselves as advanced, civilized, pro-human rights and respectful to diversification, such as Germany and France, still fail, or refuse, to see the CCP regime’s true color and remain extremely naive towards it.
　
Repulsion towards Vulgarity, Tolerance towards Violence
　
Ironically, the two leading EU countries, Germany and France, prefer a dictatorial emperor, Xi, over Trump elected by the Americans with their ballots. The two countries do not shy away from showing them disgusted by Trump’s vulgar behaviors, but reluctantly show intolerance towards Xi’s cruelty and dictatorship. As a result, the EU countries develop inconceivable and mysterious stubbornness: they loudly criticize countries practicing death penalty based on their own judicial system; however, they are generous and subdued when it comes to the violence happening in HongKong where the HongKong police and Chinese GongAn basically bypass all applicable, or reasonable, laws. We should find this contrast deeply disturbing.
　
Seeing CCP through the eyes of Mao
　
In fact, these european countries and the western world are deluded by the so-called “respect for diversity.” Let’s use the wisdom of the CCP’s spiritual leader, Mao Ze Dong, as a framework to rethink this diversity concept in civilization. In his work “Correct Handling of Contradictions Between People,” published in 1957, Mao clearly classified social contradictions into “contradictions of two different natures”: “contradictions between ourselves and the enemy” and “internal contradictions among the people”. Contradictions between ourselves and the enemy are antagonistic, for example the contradictions between the exploiting and the exploited classes; but contradictions among people is non-antagonistic. Therefore, the former can not be mediated and resolved, but the latter one can be. Mao further advocated that contradictions between ourselves and the enemy should be resolved by dictatorship, but contradictions between the people should be resolved by a method of “cooperation-criticism-cooperation.” In other words, incompatible contradictions between ourselves and the enemy can only be solved by suppression, but internal contradictions can be softened by cooperation.
　
Civilization and CCP - Two Incompatible Conflicting Systems
　
It is time for us to recognize that CCP, a sovereign of authoritarianism and digital dictatorship, should not have been regarded as a representation of the diversity of human civilization. Diversity should be defined based on a founded premise, i.e., a premise confined with certain agreements and consensus, necessary and beneficial for composing diversity. In fact, the value CCP stands for is against the universally accepted values of the world, just like the “incompatible contradictions between ourselves and the enemy”, as Mao said. As long as the existence of the CCP regime continues, human civilization will continue to be persecuted. It can be seen in the current situation of Hong Kong, where China approved the new bill of national security, thereby destroying the remaining freedom guaranteed to Hong Kongers, and assigned the “secret” police gangs to enforce the so-called “justice”.
　
To see the contracting natures of civilization and the CCP regime, we make an analogy with food. Normally, we respect other people’s choice for food. For instance, Ann prefers rice, Bob prefers noodles, John is a meat lover, Mary only eats seafood, etc. Although those four people have different choices of what they like to eat, they respect each other’s choices of food. However, when Daniel comes over and tells the group that he prefers to eat faeces and needs to be respected for his preference, we can start to see the ridiculousness in it. At first, the four people think eating faeces is a personal choice for Daniel, and Daniel can do whatever he/she wants as long as he/she does it at his/her home. The problem rises when Daniel starts to force other people to eat faeces, while the other four people think faeces is inedible, and should never be served on a plate.
　
The food analogy tells us that the CCP regime is inherently against human civilization. As a reasonable human being could not categorize feces as food, we should not be tricked to believe that the authoritarian regime of China can blend in and contribute to human civilization. The CCP regime is incompatible to human civilization just like we should not consider to eat a meal with feces in it. As the master of CCP, Mao, admitted, one can never resolve the contradiction between the authoritarian regime of China and human civilization. The existence of Chinese authoritarian regime is a symbol for deprivation of human civilization. For us to maintain and preserve human civilization, Chinese authoritarian regime must be eradicated. There is no room for the coexistence of the CCP regime and human civilization.
　　
Draw a Bottom Line to the Respect for Diversity
　
Therefore, among western countries, the United States have started or should start to realize that although diversity needs to be respected and tolerated, a reasonable bottom line should be drawn to such respect. Like what I have mentioned above, rice, noodles, meat, seafood and so on should be viewed as food; however, as we can all reasonably agree, feces should not be a part of the league. The United States is now acting to exclude “feces” from the democratic league and draw a bottom line for respect-worthy diversity. However, leading EU countries are still trapped in their fancy, unconditional acceptance to “respect for diversity.” Such respect is hypocritical, empty and baseless. Now, you should be able to understand why leftards in the EU would vigorously criticize death sentences executed under a legitimate judicial system but remain indifferent to the CCP regime’s merciless, relentless and oppressive killings. Namely, they simply set a wrong premise, including feces as an eligible option for “diversity.” As for those who embrace the CCP regime because of economic benefits, they do not even deserve to be viewed as EU leftards, but merely gold diggers in the EU.
　
--
　
Special Thanks to our supporters in North America for translation🙏

Commitment by the Arnault Family and LVMH Group for Notre-Dame de Paris
The Arnault family and the LVMH Group, in solidarity with this national tragedy, are committed to assist with the reconstruction of this extraordinary cathedral, symbol of France, its heritage and its unity.

They will donate a total sum of 200 million euros to the fund dedicated to the reconstruction of this architectural work, which is a core part of the French History.

In the meantime, the LVMH Group puts at the disposal of the State and the relevant authorities all its teams – including creative, architectural and financial specialists - to help with the long work of reconstruction and fundraising, which is already in progress.

#NotreDame #Paris

Credit: Gpesenti, CC BY-SA 3.0 / Picture cropped and turned in B&W
https://commons.wikimedia.org/…/File:Cath%C3%A9drale_Notre-…

台灣留學生在法國對習近平車隊舉台獨旗與呼口號，結果立刻被法國警方扣留，各國人民對政治人物的跨國抗議也不是新鮮事了，官方更粗暴的手段也不是沒出現過，然而對這次台灣留學生抗議行動的處理方式，更該讓全世界民主國家思考的是，你們為了中國而改變多少自己的信念與價值與社會規則？你們毀壞了你們自己立國根基，毀壞了最珍貴的寶物，就只為了跟中國做生意，這一切值得嗎？
做為台灣人，請大家給吳柏翰同學一個掌聲鼓勵！如果無法實質幫上他的現況，起碼也要去他臉書下面跟五毛還有投降主義鍵盤一戰啦

【在巴黎對習近平舉台獨旗行動聲明】
Déclaration d’invitation à manifester contre Xi à Paris
A Statement for Protest Against Xi in Paris
　
大家好，我是吳柏翰，台灣人，目前就讀Sciences Po。今天3月26日在聖日耳曼大道進行和平抗議，以下針對今日在巴黎對習近平車隊舉台獨旗此事發表聲明並對法國政府提出質疑。希望藉由此行動，向習近平以及全世界，展現台灣人堅定追求獨立、自由、民主的決心。同時針對法國國家憲兵（Gendarmerie Nationale）進行扣留、搜身並沒收台獨旗一事表達嚴正抗議。
　
Bonjour à tous et à toutes, je suis Po-Han Wu, un élève taïwanais étudiant à Science Po. Voici la déclaration sur mon action contre Xi Jinping et les actions du gouvernement français concernant son accueil. À travers ma déclaration, je souhaite démontrer à Xi Jinping et au monde la détermination du peuple taiwanais à marcher vers notre indépendance, la liberté et la démocratie. Je tiens également à protester contre la détention, la perquisition et la confiscation du drapeau de l'indépendance de Taïwan par la gendarmerie nationale française.
　
Hello everyone, my name is Po Han Wu, I am Taiwanese and I currently study at Sciences Po. The following is my statement of action against Xi Jinping and the irrational behavior of the French government. Through this contestation, I would like to show Xi Jinping and the world the determination of the Taiwanese people for the search of independence, freedom, and democracy. I would also like to express my objection against the detention, perquisition and the confiscation of the independent national flag of Taiwan by the French police force.
　
以下為聲明內容：
　
台灣目前是個事實上的自由民主國家(De facto country)，擁有獨立的政府、人民、領土及主權，在自由之家(Freedom House) 評比中，為亞洲僅次於日本最民主的國家，更是全球競爭力報告(WEF)中排名第13的國家，在民主自由、醫療、IC產業等領域，對於世界有極大貢獻。
　
但一直以來，中國不放棄統一台灣。軍事上將1000多枚飛彈對準台灣，並時時恐嚇以武力侵犯；在國際上處處打壓、矮化台灣，阻擾台灣參加世界衛生大會(WHO)、挖角台灣邦交國、逼迫國際航空公司將台灣改名為中國台灣、施壓東亞奧林匹克委員會（EAOC），決議取消台灣主辦之「2019 年東亞青年運動會」。近來更頻頻透過混合戰(Hybrid war)攻擊台灣，透過網軍放假消息，導致一位台灣外交官自殺身亡，也大量入資媒體，宣傳中國政治議程(Propaganda)，透過宣傳一國兩制企圖統一台灣。
　
因此，今天在巴黎，藉由對習近平車隊高舉台灣獨立旗，並呼喊台灣獨立、拒絕一國兩制等口號，希望在法國這塊象徵自由的土地上，向世界展現台灣人捍衛自由民主決心外，也向中國及習近平表達嚴正抗議，立即停止侵犯台灣。
　
然而，以自由、平等、博愛國家為榮的法國，今日卻成為獨裁政府的幫兇，企圖封鎖所有反對聲音，連只是站在路旁拿出旗幟呼喊口號進行和平示威的自由都沒有，這就是象徵自由的國度嗎？這就是法國政府面對抗議聲音的態度嗎？
　
今天在警備車上時，警察告訴我平常並不會這樣，可以自由抗議，更不會把我抓起來關在警車裡，但今天有高層指示必須封鎖所有抗議聲音。請問，高層是誰？是馬克宏在高呼自己是Jupiter之後，進一步向世界宣告向獨裁者看齊嗎？
　
自由(Liberté)一直以來作為法國最核心的價值，法國在今天背叛了自己，成為壓迫言論自由的加害者。為此，法國政府應該給個交代，為什麼法國政府可以阻擋對習近平的抗議？以什麼理由扣留、搜身和平抗議者並沒收物品？自由究竟是是法國必須貫徹的精神，還是只是可以為了獨裁者妥協的教條？今天法國羞辱了在象徵自由國度為自由而戰的台灣人，還是羞辱了法國自己。
　
【Version Française】
Ci-dessous, le contenu de ma déclaration :
　
Taïwan est actuellement un État de facto doté de son propre gouvernement, sa propre population, son propre territoire et sa propre souveraineté. Dans le rapport de la Freedom House, Taïwan est le pays le plus démocratique d’Asie après le Japon. Taïwan se classe aussi au 13ème rang de l’indice de compétitivité mondiale (WEF) et contribue grandement au monde dans les domaines de la démocratie, de la liberté, des soins médicaux et de l'industrie des circuits intégrés.
　
Mais la Chine n’a jamais renoncé au recours à la force pour rattacher Taïwan à son territoire. Sur le plan militaire, la Chine pointe sur Taïwan plus de 1 000 missiles et menace de prendre contrôle de l’île par la force. Pékin attaque sur de multiples fronts pour bouter l’île hors de l’arène internationale : en l’empêchant de participer à l'Assemblée mondiale de la santé (OMS), en lui arrachant un par un ses alliés diplomatiques, en faisant pression sur des entreprises internationales pour qu’elles classent Taïwan comme faisant partie de la Chine sur leurs sites internet, en faisant pression sur le Comité olympique de l'Asie de l'Est (EAOC) pour qu'il annule les "Jeux de la jeunesse de l'Asie de l'Est" organisés par Taïwan. Récemment, il y a également eu des attaques fréquentes à Taïwan par le biais de guerres hybrides qui ont conduit un diplomate taïwanais à se suicider. Ils ont également beaucoup investi dans les médias pour diffuser la propagande chinoise et tenter de promouvoir la formule ”un pays, deux systèmes”.
　
C'est pourquoi, aujourd'hui, à Paris, j'ai agité haut le drapeau de "l'indépendance de Taïwan" contre Xi Jinping, en scandant le slogan « Taïwan n'acceptera pas "un pays, deux systèmes" ». J'espère qu'en France, où la liberté est une symbole de la République, je puisse démontrer à la communauté internationale notre droit à préserver et continuer à construire un pays indépendant aux valeurs démocratiques. Dans le même temps, j'ai également réclamé solennellement à la Chine et à Xi Jinping l'arrêt de leur tentatives de contrôle sur Taiwan.
　
La France, qui porte « Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité » au coeur de ses valeurs est devenue aujourd’hui le complice d’un gouvernement autoritaire. La France a même été privée de la liberté de se tenir sur la route en agitant des drapeaux et en scandant des slogans. Elle a essayé de bloquer (toutes) les voix de l’opposition, ce qui est contraire à la façon dont le gouvernement français gère habituellement les manifestations.
　
La France, est-ce encore le pays qui symbolise la liberté?
　
Lorsque j’ai été détenu dans un fourgon de police, un policier lui-même m’a dit que d'habitude, le peuple peut manifester librement. En revanche, aujourd’hui, des instructions provenant de hauts niveaux du gouvernement ont été données, de sorte qu’on ne permette aucune manifestation lors de cette journée.
Je me permets de demander : Quels sont ces « hauts niveaux » ? D’où viennent ces instructions et qui ont donné ces instructions? Après avoir déclaré être Jupiter, Macron va-t-il sombrer dans l’autoritarisme ? La liberté a toujours été l’une des valeurs fondamentales de la France, mais aujourd’hui elle a trahi cette valeur en opprimant une liberté fondamentale : la liberté d’expression.
　
Ainsi, je me permets d’interroger le gouvernement français : pourquoi avez-vous bloqué la manifestation contre Xi Jinping et le système autoritaire qu’il incarne ? La liberté est-elle l'esprit que la France doit incarner ou est-ce juste un dogme qui peut être compromis pour accueillir des dictateurs ? La France a porté atteinte à la liberté des Taïwanais qui ont souhaité manifester dans la rue pour la liberté en s’opposant à un pouvoir autoritaire. Elle s’est, ce faisant, porté atteinte à elle-même.
　
La France, est-elle encore un pays à la hauteur du mot “liberté”, qu’elle prétend symboliser ?
　
　
　

【English Version】
The following is the arguments of the declaration：
　
Taiwan is currently a state de facto composed of its own government, population, territory, and sovereignty. According to the Freedom House index, Taiwan is the most democratic country in Asia only after Japan. Taiwan is ranked 13th in the index of competitivity of the World Economic Forum and contribute largely to the world in the domains of democracy, of liberty, healthcare and the integrated circuit industry.
　
However, China has never given up on using force on us. On the military front, China has targeted more than 1000 missiles at Taiwan and has threatened to reunify Taiwan by force. Beijing attacks on multiple dimensions in order to throw Taiwan out of the international arena, by preventing us from participating at the World Health Organization, by getting rid of our diplomatic allies one by one, by putting pressure on the international companies so that they would classify Taiwan as a part of China on their internet sites, by putting pressure on the East Asian Olympics Committee so that they would cancel the Youth Games in East Asia organized by Taiwan. Recently, there have been more frequent attacks at Taiwan through the use of hybrid wars which have led to the suicide of a Taiwanese diplomat. They have also invested largely in media for Chinese propaganda and has tried to promote the notion of one country, two systems.
　
This is why today in Paris, I have proudly waved the flag of the Independence of Taiwan against Xi Jinping, with the slogan, Taiwan will not accept, “one country, two systems”. I hope that in France, where freedom is a symbol of the Republic, I can show the international community our determination to defend our democracy. At the same time, I would also like to protest against China and Xi Jinping : stop the invasion of Taiwan immediately.
　
However, France, which prides itself on liberty, equality, and fraternity, has become an accomplice of the authoritarian government today. It tried to block all opposition voices. Even there is no freedom of expression, just standing by the road and taking out the flag and shouting slogans for a peaceful demonstration. Is this the country that symbolizes liberty? Is this the attitude of the French government in face of protests?
　
When I was detained in a police van, they told me that normally, people can protest freely. However today, instructions from high-level officials had already been given that no demonstrations in any form were allowed during this day.
　
I would thus like to ask: who are these “high officials”? Where do these instructions come from? After having declared being Jupiter, is Macron going towards autocracy just as Xi Jinping does? Freedom has always been one of the fundamental values of France but today she has betrayed it by oppressing one freedom, the one of expression.
　
In addition, France, with its « Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité » at the centre of its values, has become an accomplice of an autocratic government. Thus, I would like to question the French government: why did you block the demonstration against Xi Jinping and the authoritarian system he embodies? Is freedom the spirit that France must embody or is it just a dogma that can be compromised to accommodate dictators? France has violated the freedom of Taiwanese who wanted to demonstrate in the streets for Taiwan independence against authoritarian China.
　
Please ask yourself, is France still a country which symbolizes Liberté ?