《#籠罩下的巨大哀愁 》A Dark Cloud of Sorrow Looms Over
A place where millions of people live alone together— the city.
During the busy and constant labor all day and night, we have fewer opportunities to talk to ourselves. The sudden epidemic has opened a door to calm our hearts and let us rethink our relationship with the world.
In the 1970s, urbanism rises in Taiwan, bidding farewell to the landscape of an agricultural society. In addition to skyscrapers, the meaning of the city also produces a certain kind of violent acceleration on our bodies. Before we could face all kinds of unpleasant questions, we quickly escape with the acceleration.
The city seems to be bustling and lively, but in fact it’s a series of stranger encounters unexpectedly. Trying to accompany each other is reduced to their
own mumbling with obscure social distance. They trying to escape from restlessness and distress for a short time; rising the conflict between governance practice and the sense of freedom. The closed, lonely cycle of labor faintly affects the changes of modern cities, and so on.
The people who live here are trying to learn how to coexist with it.
In A Dark Cloud of Sorrow Looms Over, we invite eight artists. The age difference between them is about 20 years old. We are trying to figure out in this big era,how people among different age groups to re-understand and break through the urban conditions of survival and change.
幾百萬人一起孤獨生活的地方-------都市。
沒日沒夜的繁忙,不斷勞動的過程中我們少了與自己對話的機會,突如其來的疫情,像開啟了一扇靜心的大門,反思我們與世界之間的關係。
1970年代台灣興起都市主義,揮別過往的農業景觀,其意義除了建築摩天高樓外,不外乎產生某種劇烈加速度於我們的身體,各種不適的提問還未面對,就隨著加速度快步的逃逸。
城市貌似繁華熱鬧卻只是意外地與一切陌異、他者的肉身遭逢;試圖相伴卻淪為各自的喃喃自語、不成文的特殊社交距離;嘗試短暫逃離不安及困頓的慾望;興起的治理實踐與自由意識的衝突;在封閉與寂寥的循環勞動,隱隱牽動著現代化城市的變遷等......
生存於此的人們,正試圖學習如何與它共存。
「籠罩下的巨大哀愁」一展邀請八位藝術家,之間年紀落差20來歲,我們試圖整出一個大時代下不同年齡層中,面對生存與變動的都市景況是如何重新理解及突破。
_____________________________
《籠罩下的巨大哀愁》展覽資訊
展覽日期|2021/08/07(Sat.) ─ 09/12(Sun.)
展覽地點|台北當代藝術館廣場電視牆 MoCA Plaza LED TV Wall
播映時間| Mon. ─ Sun. 16:00-21:00
嘖嘖募資|https://reurl.cc/bXy09v
#王鼎曄 #吳柏賢 #陳嘉壬 #黃彥超 #黃淑蓮 #蔡傑 #鄭爾褀 #鍾知庭 #林郁晉 #A_Dark_Cloud_of_Sorrow_Looms_OverThe
#Misanthrope_Society_厭世會社
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「governance meaning」的推薦目錄:
- 關於governance meaning 在 林郁晉- Yu Jun LIN Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 李怡 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於governance meaning 在 Governance Meaning - YouTube 的評價
governance meaning 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最佳貼文
#Editorial by AppleDailyHK | "When being asked whether the new electoral system aims to get rid of all pro-democracy camp candidates, she teased, “the way you asked questions sounds like the pro-democracy camp must be unpatriotic. I think this is unfair to them.” Who said pro-democracy camp equates to unpatriotic? Was she blaming the reporters again? So how come has the District Council, led by the pro-democracy camp, been kicked out of the patriotic system? In an era when people calling a deer a horse, the meaning of pro-democracy camp and patriots are all being defined by the CCP. Whether the pro-democracy camp is patriotic or not, or whether the patriots are pro-democracy, depends on what the CCP needs to say at the time. The new Hong Kong people and a new pro-democracy camp have already been created for the era to fit into the new democratic electoral system with CCP Hong Kong characteristics and the new governance thinking of the Lam administration."
Read more: https://bit.ly/3meCe2T
"對輿論質疑新選舉制度是要趕絕民主派,林鄭就揶揄:「有時候我覺得你們這些問題是把民主派等同於『不愛國』,這對民主派非常不公道。」是誰把民主派等同於不愛國?又是記者?那麼,由民主派主導的現屆區議會,為甚麼被踢出愛國者治港的體制?在指鹿為馬的新時代,民主派與愛國者都由中共定義,龍門任搬,民主派愛不愛國、愛黨愛國者是不是民主派,還不都是由中共視乎需要說了算?新香港人、新民主派已經應時而生,不只切合中共香港特色的新民主選舉制度,也切合林鄭政府的管治新思維。"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
governance meaning 在 李怡 Facebook 的最讚貼文
Malignant unrestrained power | Lee Yee
The Hong Kong police issued a statement the night before yesterday quoting the Guangdong Provincial Public Security Department’s response to the arrest of the 12 Hongkongers. The short communication was full of loopholes. If these 12 people are still under investigation, how can the authorities be sure that they will be approved by the procuratorate for arrest later? One of the 12 people was the skipper, is he a member of the smuggling organization? If he is indeed part of a smuggling group, why was he escaping to Taiwan? Why was there no mention of the arrest of the skipper? What happened to the speedboat? Did the 12 people buy the boat hence it was confiscated?
It has been more than a month and they still could not spin a better story. The power has become so domineering to the point where they say what they want without regard for whether it is believable or not anymore.
Chinese state media reported that, at the recent Third Central Symposium on Xinjiang Work held in Beijing, Xi Jinping emphasized the need to “uphold efforts to sinicize religion, sinicize Islam and forge the collective consciousness of a common Chinese identity.” Following Xi’s “sinicization of Tibetan Buddhism,” this is another one of his latest sinicization campaigns with requirements explicitly put forward.
Both Tibetan Buddhism and Xinjiang Islam are religions based on beliefs in God or divine inspirations, while in other parts of China, most religious believers just pray to gods and buddhas for blessings. Very few people truly believe in gods, reincarnation, or life after death. If “One China” means China under the dictatorship of the atheist Communist Party, then the “sinicization of religion” denotes a false and bogus religion. A leader who can come up with the idea of sinicization of religion under atheism is enough to show that there is nothing believable about this regime, including the woven tale for the 12 arrested Hongkongers.
In the era of ancient China’s absolute monarchy, although there was no real religious belief, ancient Chinese emperors at least paid respect to ancestors and held ceremonies to worship heaven. Dictatorship began from as early as the Qin dynasty to the Han Dynasty during which Dong Zhongshu proposed the rule to respect the emperor. However, he also proposed to restrict the emperor and respect heaven; the emperor would be called the son of heaven, meaning the heavenly father was watching over. The occurrence of a catastrophic natural disaster would be the wrath of heaven; the emperor would often issue a rescript for penitence, and reflect and review to improve governance.
The atheistic CCP not only does not believe in gods but also disbelieves in heaven. Mao Zedong claimed to be a “monk holding an umbrella,” meaning that he was above the law and above heaven. He also said, “Battling with heaven is endless joy.” Therefore, under the guidance of the idea of “Humans will triumph over the sky,” the Great Leap Forward brought about a situation of “endless suffering” for the Chinese people.
However, the CCP regime before Mao the second at least would not, on the one hand, claim to believe in Marxism-Leninism, and on the other hand, bludgeon itself with such absurd theories as the “sinicization of religion.” Perhaps Mao 2.0 now possesses absolute power such that no one dares to tell the truth, resulting in comments of all illogical nonsense.
Recently, the Chinese education department was so preposterous that it blatantly falsified the Bible. The story of Jesus and the Adulteress from the New Testament was cited in textbooks but the ending of the story was distorted. In the original passage of the Bible, Jesus said to the adulteress, “I, too, do not condemn you; Go and sin no more!” The Chinese textbook, however, presents the story as: “When the crowd disappeared, Jesus stoned the sinner to death saying, ‘I too am a sinner. But if the law could only be executed by men without blemish, the law would be dead.’” Forcing words to justify the Chinese leaders into the mouth of Jesus.
Of course, anyone who enforces the law in any society will not be a flawless person, but in a normal society, at least the law enforcers know that they are either guilty, or that regardless of religion or even non-religion, they believe that “there is a deity watching over them.” In addition to believing that “a deity is watching,” law enforcers are also restrictive in their power by the separation of powers with mutual checks and balances, as well as the supervision of the Fourth Estate. Nearly 300 years ago, the French Enlightenment thinker Montesquieu said, “Every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go. Power is naturally expansive and has a tendency to turn malignant. As long as there are insufficient restraint and supervision, any power will give rise to corruption. To prevent this abuse, it is necessary from the very nature of things that power should be a check to power.”
The power we face and its extension in Hong Kong may be the most extreme power in human history. It has no restraints nor any checks and balances, and without the constraints of “heaven” from the dark ages of ancient China and the Western Middle Ages. Its “expansion and malignancy” can exceed all human imagination. Therefore, normal people can only completely and absolutely distrust this absolute power.
governance meaning 在 Governance Meaning - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>