【跨國企業 #總經理 Sean Lin的職場心法:Happy FACE?】#校友來分享 #ChicagoBooth
想要申請 MBA,沒有人不知道 Sean,他當年從 #台大化工所 畢業後,進入 #台積電,3年後離職 #申請MBA,還創辦了 #台灣MBA高峰論壇。
認識 Sean 這麼久,每次見面都會聽他談 #跨國管理 及 #醫美趨勢,最近他更是受到全球知名雜誌 #CEOMagazine 的專訪,成為本月唯一受訪的 #台籍 總經理。
Sean 在文中提到,他的管理概念是 Happy FACE,“Happy, of course, means a happy environment. ‘F’ is for fair, be fair to the team; ‘A’ is for assist, so help them succeed; ‘C’ means change, learning to adapt; and ‘E’ means leading by example.”
#管理 本來就不容易,更不用說 Sean 現在掌管 #Allergan 台灣、香港辦公室,帶領百人團隊,遇到的挑戰會有多大。讀完這篇專訪後,更期待他即將參加我每月舉辦的跨校 #MBALuncheon,分享更多他的職場心法!
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過12萬的網紅Happy Kongner,也在其Youtube影片中提到,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Facebook: https://facebook.com/happyk...
「hong kong science fair」的推薦目錄:
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 Sabina姐分享MBA大小事,登愣 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 國立陽明交通大學電子工程學系及電子研究所 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 元毓 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 Happy Kongner Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 Smart Travel Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於hong kong science fair 在 香港創科展Hong Kong Science Fair - Facebook 的評價
hong kong science fair 在 國立陽明交通大學電子工程學系及電子研究所 Facebook 的精選貼文
交通大學109學年度第一梯次出國交換展
NCTU Exchange Abroad Fair for AY20/21 (1st Intake)
日期: 2019/11/22 (Friday)
時間: 11:00-17:00
地點: 交通大學圖書館 Library B1
※請出示學生證參加 Please show your student ID to participate
本次展覽包含攤位及講座兩部份。本處邀請14間姊妹校代表設置攤位,包含:
There are two parts to this fair.
Part One – Booth:
1. Sweden - Chalmers University of Technology 查默斯理工大學
2. Finland - Hanken School of Economics 漢肯經濟學院
3. Finland - University of Jyvaskyla 約瓦斯其拉大學
4. Singapore - Singapore University of Technology and Design 新加坡科技與設計大學
5. Hong Kong - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 香港科技大學
6. France - École Polytechnique 巴黎綜合理工學院
7. France - University of Technology of Troyes 特魯瓦科技大學
8. France - Ecole Internationale des Sciences du Traitement de l’Information (EISTI) 信息處理科學國際學院
9. France - Sup'Biotech Paris 生物技術高等學院
10. Japan - Waseda University 早稻田大學
11. Israel - Technion - Israel Institute of Technology 以色列理工學院
12. Germany - University of Augsburg 奧格斯堡大學
13. Netherlands - University of Twente 湍特大學
14. Belgium - KU Leuven 天主教荷語魯汶大學
上述知名姊妹校將為本地學生介紹國外學習環境與生活文化等,現場接受學生諮詢,提供最一手之交換資訊。
Above world renowned partner institutions will introduce their study environment, living and culture to our local students. They will also answer questions and provide first-hand information on exchange studies to our students.
Part Two – Information Session:
除各校攤位外,本處也於當天出國交換說明會,向同學解說申請出國交換流程及注意事項等:
Besides having booths, several information sessions have also been arranged:
12:20-13:10 Session 1 109學年度第一梯次出國交換計畫說明
Introduction to AY20/21 Outbound Exchange Program (1st Intake)
<報名連結>
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf1sEVqotxTOQ_ORDiVJqcEO8DDzUjoX8Jfh6kv5oRPAPgnMA/viewform
13:20-14:10 Session 2A Study at Chalmers University
Session 2B JYU Serving the Future since 1863
14:20-15:10 Session 3A Waseda University Information Session
Session 3B What is École Polytechnique's Brand New Bachelor Program? A talk by a first-generation student
15:30-16:20 Session 4A Presentation of the UTT
Session 4B Study in the Netherlands - from an Asian Student’s Perspective
此外,為鼓勵學生踴躍參加,符合以下所有條件者,於申請109學年度第一梯次出國交換校內甄選時,可將「出國交換展參加證明」納入其他有利審查文件中:
1. 諮詢8個(含)以上姐妹校/國際處攤位
2. 參加2個(含)以上講座
To encourage students to participate in this event, if you fulfill below requirement, your certificate of participation can be used as one of the supporting document when you apply to AY20/21 Outbound Exchange Program:
1. Consult with 8 or more booths
2. Attend 2 or more information sessions
本活動網頁公告 Announcement of this event
109學年度第一梯次出國交換計畫公告 Announcement of AY20/21 Outbound Exchange Program (1st Intake)
https://oia.nctu.edu.tw/announcement/student-area/6929/
承辦人 Contact Person:國際事務處 周秋儀 OIA - Ms. Cherrie CHOW
校內分機 Extension:50059
cherrie@nctu.edu.tw
hong kong science fair 在 元毓 Facebook 的最佳貼文
根據計算,100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東;200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。
順道一提香港15~30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看,兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。
另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair,幾天內湧進40萬人次,照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。(http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg)
當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車,幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。
而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。
順道一提,因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現:
https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/
EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)
hong kong science fair 在 Happy Kongner Youtube 的最佳貼文
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facebook: https://facebook.com/happykongner
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/happykongner/
訂閱Happy Kongner 快活角落頭:https://www.youtube.com/c/happykongner
同朋友一齊成為Kongner嘅一份子!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本節目純屬個人意見,與本頻道立場無關。
瘋子愷全程瘋人瘋語,聲音導航帶你睇社會科學
歡迎大家一齊討論,比D意見。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
如果對於呢條片有咩意見,請多多指教。
我哋會竭盡全力做到最好。
如果你哋睇完之後鍾意嘅話,我哋希望你可以同多啲人分享!
我哋嘅圖片大多都係網上搜尋到嘅資源。
如涉及侵權,請聯絡我哋。
All videos on this channel are only used for commentary, criticism, research, scholarship, teaching, comment, and new reporting. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes mentioned above. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
hong kong science fair 在 Smart Travel Youtube 的最佳解答
請用片右下角調HD1080高清睇片。
(文:香港科學館)
展期: 2013年11月8日 (星期五) -- 2014年4月9日 (星期三)
地點: 香港科學館地下展覽廳
票價: $20/$14#/$10*
觀眾如同時參觀常設展覽廳,可以優惠價$40/$28#/$20*元購買套票
香港賽馬會呈獻系列 :「巨龍傳奇」展覽
恐龍於二億年前開始出現,繼而雄霸地球。在地球的漫長歲月中,盤古大陸因地殼板塊運動而分裂,形成具有不同氣候和環境的大陸,恐龍為了適應不同的環境,繁衍出形態各異的品種,並成為史上最強的動物一族。可惜由於氣候和環境的轉變,恐龍最終仍難逃滅絕的命運,在6,500萬年前完全絕跡於地球上。幸好,在古生物學家努力不懈下,已經找尋到不少恐龍及古生物化石,讓我們今天得以重塑牠們的生存點滴。恐龍化石遍佈各大洲,目前全世界已命名的恐龍多達一千多種。近年,中國在發掘和研究恐龍化石方面更取得令人鼓舞的成就,成為世界上出土恐龍化石最多的國家之一。
香港科學館曾多次舉辦恐龍展覽,每次均廣受市民歡迎,即將推出的「巨龍傳奇」展覽更是香港歷來規模最大的恐龍展。這次展覽由香港賽馬會慈善信託基金獨家贊助,展覽將透過嶄新的演譯方法,介紹世界上最大的泰坦巨龍類和有關恐龍的最新科研成果。展覽廳總面積達2,500平方米,分為四大展區,各有不同的主題和特色。
多媒體劇場: 利用大型電腦動畫,帶領觀眾穿越時空返回恐龍時代。
機械動樂園: 透過「為食恐龍」機械恐龍展**,讓觀眾全面認識恐龍的飲食習性。
化石發掘場: 展示恐龍的埋藏狀態,並讓觀眾了解發掘和修復工作的艱辛。
化石展示區: 展出來自十間博物館超過一百件珍貴化石標本和展品,配合運用
新科技設計的互動遊戲,介紹恐龍的最新發現。
要一次過欣賞長達30米、全亞洲最大的恐龍之一炳靈大夏巨龍,栩栩如生的鳥類祖先顧氏小盜龍,奇形怪趣的恐龍蛋,以及小朋友最喜愛的三角龍、暴龍和劍龍嗎?還有最新發現、可能是世界上最大的恐龍 -- 巨型汝陽龍的巨大椎骨化石?那就不要錯過「巨龍傳奇」展覽。參觀時別忘記下載特別為展覽設計的應用程式和携帶你的智能手機或平板電腦,以獲得更多樂趣和資訊。
Throughout the extended history of the Earth, there comes a time when dinosaurs first appeared about 200 million years ago and become the ultimate rulers of the planet for 130 million years. Over long periods of time, the ancient landmass Pangaea split into different continents as a result of plate tectonic movements. Dinosaurs evolved into a whole family of different species in order to adapt to the changing environment, but they ultimately could not escape from extinction and all disappeared about 65 million years ago. Thanks to the efforts of paleontologists, today we can have a glimpse of how dinosaurs survived and reigned from the large number of fossils unearthed. Dinosaur fossils can be found on all continents and more than 1,000 species have been named. Today, China has become one of the countries where most dinosaur species are discovered and many of them are unique.
The Hong Kong Science Museum had organised a number of dinosaur exhibitions and all were well received. The coming "Legends of the Giant Dinosaurs" exhibition would be the largest ever presented in Hong Kong. This exhibition is solely sponsored by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. In this exhibition, new technologies and presentation methods will be used to introduce the largest Titanosaurus and the latest studies on dinosaurs. Occupying an area of 2,500 sq. metres, the exhibition is divided into four areas with different themes:
Multimedia Theatre: The large-scale computer animations in this area will bring visitors back to the age of dinosaurs.
Animatronic Dinosaur Zoo: The robotic dinosaurs and interactive exhibits featured in the "Dino Jaws" Exhibition** will allow visitors to learn about the eating behaviours of dinosaurs.
Fossil Excavation Site: Visitors will be able to appreciate the hard work of excavation and repairing of fossils through a reconstructed dinosaurs burial site.
Fossil Gallery: More than a hundred exotic fossils and exhibits from ten museums will be displayed in this area. Together with the interactive games developed with latest technologies, visitors can learn about the latest discoveries in dinosaurs.
hong kong science fair 在 香港創科展Hong Kong Science Fair - Facebook 的推薦與評價
This year's Hong Kong Science Fair Exhibition & Award Presentation ceremony will be held on 17-18 ... Want to know more about the Hong Kong Science Fair? ... <看更多>