“That experience of #GeorgeFloyd and #BlackLivesMatter spoke to me very personally. It spoke to our shared history.”
Just wrapped an engrossing conversation on race and indigenous identity in #Australia with acclaimed journalist (& friend) Stan Grant.
Grant, who recently became the first indigenous host in the 59-year history of the ABC Four Corners documentary program, said Americans and Australians share a history of institutionalised and structural racism that limits opportunities in life and places first nation people on the margins of society.
Discussing the recent announcement of US Senator #KamalaHarris as presidential hopeful Joe Biden’s running mate, he said that while there were similarities between America’s struggle with racism and that of his own country, the chances of an Aborigine taking high office were remote.
“It has taken over 100 years for an indigenous person to make a federal government minister. There are now a few more indigenous represented at state and federal level, but we’re a long way from getting to the point where an indigenous politician would get anywhere near becoming prime minister in Australia,” he said, adding: “It’s something I can’t even envisage at the moment.”
#FCCHK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvEGW28jV0Y&t=1121s
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過24萬的網紅暗網仔 2.0,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour Spotify: https://open.spotify.co...
identity v professor 在 Dr. Ray 的急症室迎送生涯 Facebook 的最佳解答
醫者有社會責任去保障公眾健康,我們認為梁卓偉教授和陳家亮教授作為香港兩所醫學院院長責無旁貸。因此,我們呼籲所有醫護人員參與連署,懇請兩位院長履行社會使命發表聲明保障社會大眾的健康和人身安全。
連署連結: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
———————————————————————-
《致香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長的公開信》
梁教授、陳教授道鑒:
有鑑於在六月十二日、七月二日及二十一日,香港警察濫用武力以控制群眾。如此行徑實對公眾健康遺害無窮,我們一眾醫療人員對此極為關切。作為香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長,吾等懇請兩位院長細察香港警察控制群眾之手段,以保障公眾健康。
據多家本地及國際媒體報導,香港警察於六月十二日,發射多輪催淚彈、橡膠子彈及布袋彈,以驅散聚集在金鐘的示威者。報導提及,警方向示威者發射至少一百五十枚催淚彈,二十輪布袋彈以及數枚橡膠子彈,造成至少七十二人受傷。從多家媒體直播可見,橡膠子彈更直射一名教師眼球,創傷嚴重,對其視力之損害非同等閒。另外,警方亦曾以數枚催淚彈包抄示威者,堵塞其退路;而當示威者被逼退守至中信大廈,警方竟朝人群中央投以催淚彈,造成數以百計的市民受傷及呼吸困難,生死攸關,不容小覷。此外,警方向一名手無寸鐵的市民,近距離發射橡膠子彈,以致其下腹嚴重受傷,情況慘不忍睹。
據多份醫學期刊綜述──如《刺針》(Lancet)[1] 及英國醫學期刊(BMJ (Open))[2],橡膠子彈乃可致命武器。同時,橡膠子彈不易操控,準確性低,有引致重傷,乃至死亡之風險。多份期刊不約而同指出,橡膠子彈不適宜用於密集人群之管制。
然而,香港警察漠視上述已知風險,仍於七月二日及七月二十一日繼續使用此類武器。在七月二十一日,警察更於鄰近民居之地,向群眾發射多輪催淚彈及橡膠子彈,當中更殃及記者。此等武器之禍害影響深重,不單有損呼吸系統,更會導致燒傷、嚴重鈍物創傷及爆炸性創傷。據媒體報導,武器造成至少十四人受傷;更有市民懼於警方之搜捕行動,而未敢求醫,致使受傷數字難以估算。
人權醫療組織(Physicians for Human Rights)醫生哈爾(Dr Rohini Haar)在接受紐約時報訪問時指出,警方對市民使用不成比例的武力,實有濫用武力之嫌。早在二零一四年,潘冬平教授[3]亦對香港警察使用催淚氣體情況深表關注,擔心催淚氣體損害市民呼吸系統。可見,催淚彈、橡膠子彈及豆袋彈等武器危害不輕,對香港市民公眾健康的損害不容置疑。
兩大醫學學院一直致力培育杏林菁英,不遺餘力。一眾醫療人員亦謹承《希波克拉底誓詞》之教誨,不論病患身份職要,一直為全人類之福祉著想,嚴守不懈。學院循循善誘,吾等縷心刻骨。誓詞薪火相傳,代代不息;缺少對生命健康之尊重,醫療人員何以自立?故此,我們一眾醫療人員懇請院長,發表聲明,呼籲香港警察:
一、避免濫用催淚彈及任何類型子彈,以免導致人命傷亡及其他不可見之損傷。
二、在使用武力時,必須顧及市民安全,並保持專業克制。
醫療人員一直存仁心,行仁術;保護市民之健康,乃至生命,吾等責無旁貸。院長為學為醫,高風峻節,茍以吾等同心同德,捍衛市民之生命健康,必見杏林春暖。
謹祝
道安
一眾醫療人員謹上
———————————————————————
Dear Professor Leung and Professor Chan,
We are a group of healthcare professionals, some of us being also graduates from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong and the Chinese University of Hong Kong. We are writing to express our gravest concerns over the persistent and serious threats to the health of members of the public posed by weapons deployed in crowd control by the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) on 12 June, 2 July and 21 July. We hereby urge the Deans of the sole Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong to take actions in censuring the HKPF and the Hong Kong Government against the serious health risks in their crowd-control tactics.
On 12 June, as reported by multiple local and international news agencies, the HKPF fired multiple rounds of tear gas, rubber bullets and bean-bag rounds to disperse protesters in Admiralty. Over 150 canisters of tear gas, 20 bean-bag rounds and several rubber bullets have admittedly been directed at protestors which resulted in at least 72 injuries. As evident in the live reports from various media sources, a teacher suffered traumatic ocular injury causing significant vision loss when his eye was hit by a rubber bullet; hundreds of citizens suffered various degrees of injuries and respiratory distress consequential upon the numerous tear gas canisters shot at Citic Tower in Admiralty where protesters were trapped in a life-threatening space filled with tear gas; an unarmed man sustained injury in his lower abdomen when a rubber bullet was directed at him in a short distance.
According to multiple studies and reviews from high impact factor medical journals, in particular the Lancet[1] and BMJ (Open)[2], rubber bullets can be lethal. Their notorious inaccuracy and risk of severe injury and death render them inappropriate and unsafe means of force in crowd control.
However, despite the known risks of these weapons, the HKPF tenaciously deployed them on citizens on 2 July and 21 July. On 21 July, 55 canisters of tear gas, 5 rubber bullet rounds and 24 sponge bullets were admittedly shot, some without immediate warning, at protestors and even at journalists notwithstanding the numerous residential buildings and citizens in the vicinity. The use of these weapons has left members of the public with at the very least, various types of injuries and further, burns, blunt force trauma and explosive injuries. 14 injuries have by far been reported where others did not present themselves to the hospital in fear of the risk of prosecution.
Dr Rohini Haar of Physicians for Human Rights had in a recent interview told the New York Times that the force used by the HKPF was disproportionate and excessive. In Hong Kong, Professor Ronnie Poon had as early as in 2014 expressed openly his earnest concern over both the short term and long term health risks in the use of tear gas in particular to one’s respiratory system when the HKPF first fired tear gas at Hong Kong citizens [3]. It is indisputable that these named weapons put the health of Hong Kong citizens at serious risks.
Doctors have striven to stand by the Hippocratic oath that they remain members of society, the identity of which comes before their profession, with special obligations to all fellow human beings. The two medical schools in Hong Kong have been established accordingly for the nurture of healthcare professionals to serve the public with benevolent hearts and minds. This is the time to honour our oath that human life should deserve the utmost respect and to maintain by all means such noble traditions of the medical profession.
We, as healthcare professionals, therefore implore the Deans of the only Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong, in the service of humanity with conscience and dignity, to take the lead in safeguarding the public’s health and to issue a statement to urge the Hong Kong Police Force to:
(1) refrain from using tear gas and bullets in any form on protestors to prevent further bloodshed and severe non-reversible injuries; and
(2) exercise due restraint over the use of force when handling protests and at all times, put the safety of Hong Kong citizens at the highest priority.
Regards,
A group of healthcare professionals
———————————————————
Healthcare professionals have a social responsibility to safeguard the health of members of the public. We believe that, as Deans of the faculties of medicine in Hong Kong, Professor Leung and Professor Chan bear a paramount obligation in this regard. We appeal to all healthcare professionals to join us in this petition to urge the deans to issue a statement to honour their obligation to defend the public from health risks.
—————————————————————
Petition Link: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
——————————
參考資料/References
[1] Mahajna, A., Aboud, N., Harbaji, I., Agbaria, A., Lankovsky, Z., Michaelson, M., . . . Krausz, M. M. (2002). Blunt and penetrating injuries caused by rubber bullets during the Israeli-Arab conflict in October, 2000: A retrospective study. The Lancet, 359(9320), 1795-1800. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08708-1
[2] Haar, R. J., Iacopino, V., Ranadive, N., Dandu, M., & Weiser, S. D. (2017, December 01). Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd-control settings: A systematic review
[3] Professor Ronnie Poon Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/138599119760/posts/10152753050039761?s=1014598371&sfns=mo
—————————————————————
identity v professor 在 Hứa Vĩ Văn Facebook 的最讚貼文
Gặp Gỡ Mùa Thu 2016
AUTUMN MEETING 2016 ACTIVITIES
#AutumnMeeting #Gapgomuathu2016
Organized by: DNY Productions – In Co-operation with VUS (Vietnam – USA Society English Center)
Organizers: Director Phan Dang Di, Producer Tran Thi Bich Ngoc.
Media Sponsor: Thanh Nien News.
Main Partners: People’s Committee of Da Nang; Kaohsiung Film Archive (Taiwan), Red Ruby entertainment, Hoa Sen University
Main sponsors: CGV, CJ E&M, SIFS, VNG Corporation, Vingroup
Date: from November 8th to November 16th , 2016.
Other related programs by AM 2016 will take place beginning 05/2016.
Main Location: Da Nang City and Hoi An Ancient Town.
Some AM 2016 courses will also take place in Ho Chi Minh City.
Other Media Partners: VNExpress News, Vietnamnet, Tuoi Tre News, The Thao & Van Hoa. Lao Dong News, Dep, Elle, The Thao & Van Hoa Men, Da Nang Newspaper. Culture – Events – People Program by VTV3. Young Cinema by VTV6, Cinema Program by VTV2. VTV4 channel, VTV Da Nang, DRT Da Nang.
PROGRAM SUMMARY:
Autumn Meeting 2016 is organized by DNY Productions in cooperation with local and international organizations. Since the first Autumn Meeting in 11/2013, the program has been on its way to become an annual cinema event in late autumn in Da Nang beach city and Hoi An ancient town.
Autumn Meeting 2016 continues to be the converging spot for the most familiar and successful faces in Vietnamese cinema through its professional exchange activities, Gala screenings, awards, and fundraising programs. Furthermore, since 2014, Autumn Meeting has welcomed important international guests from Korean Academy of Film Arts, Motion Picture Association of America as well as members of Cannes and Venice International Film Festivals. This year, apart from the familiar faces above, AM will for the first time welcome filmmakers from South East and East Asia and other delegates from Berlin International film festival, Hong Kong International Film Festivals, Kaohsiung Film Archive and Kaohsiung International Film Festival, Fukuoka Asian Film Festival…
Retaining the same guiding principle of discovering and providing support for new cinema talents, Autumn Meeting 2016 will select and invite young filmmakers in the country with promising short projects to present and complete their works in workshops guided by established local and international filmmakers. Additionally, since 2015, AM courses have also begun to welcome young filmmakers from South East Asian and East Asian countries. As the workshops conclude, the best projects selected by a jury of leading movie professionals will be awarded valuable prizes to help propel these projects into future films.
Autumn Meeting 2016 will continue to welcome the world acclaimed Vietnamese director Tran Anh Hung as the instructor for the Directing Workshop. Mister Tran Anh Hung will also be the Jury President for the “Short Film of the Future” Award. French editor Julie Beziau will be in charge of the Editing Workshop. French Colorist Yov Moor will be in charge of Color-grading Workshop, Indonesian filmmaker Joko Anwar and Tia Hasibuan will be in charge of Specialized Workshop “Making movies with a super low budget”. The first ever Acting Workshop by AM will be led by Korean professor Lydia Park, with a special appearance by acclaimed actress Moon So-ri.
Well known Vietnamese actors/actresses and directors will take part in various Autumn Meeting 2016 activities as the event’s official guests.
With the mission of unifying and developing Vietnamese cinema as well as stimulating cinematic discourses with other countries in the region (South East Asia and Asia-Pacific), Autumn Meeting 2016 is a non-profit cultural event that aims to assist young cinema talents. The three AMs so far in 2013, 2014, and 2015 have received enormous support from Vietnamese media outlets and adoration from both Vietnamese and international artists. Most importantly, AM is at the receiving end of the immense support from the people and governmental bodies of the cities it resides. As it grows, AM strives to become a significant International Film Festival in the near future.
AUTUMN MEETING 2016 ACTIVITIES
I. Workshops with well-known filmmakers.
AM 2016 filmmaking courses will be divided into 5 workshops.
Directing Workshop will still be under the guidance of director Tran Anh Hung. 12 young Vietnamese and international filmmakers with exciting short film projects will be chosen to attend the 7-day workshop.
English will be the official language in this workshop.
Editing Workshop, 20 young directors and editors will take part in an 8-day course in Ho Chi Minh City taught by veteran French editor Julie Beziau. Besides editing theories, the course will focus on practice. Attendants will be instructed on how to re-edit and renovate their previous projects.
This workshop will take place from May 10 to May 18 in Ho Chi Minh City.
Color-grading Workshop, 20 young directors and colorists will take part in an 8-day course in Ho Chi Minh City taught by veteran French Colorist Yov Moor. Besides color-grading theories, the course will focus on practice. Attendants will be instructed on how to do color-grading and renovate their previous projects.
This workshop will take place from October 5th to October 13th in Ho Chi Minh City
Acting Workshop: AM will orchestrate a 20 student course with Vietnamese young talents. Attendants will learn under renowned acting coach, Ms. Lydia Park. After completion, Acting Workshop attendants will have the chance to perform alongside movie stars in selected short projects that will be screened in AM 2016 Closing Gala. Attendants can also find acting prospects from other film projects participating in AM program. In November 15th, attendants will join the Panel Discussion with the acclaimed actress Moon So-ri (South Korean) on a subject of: “The co-operation between director and actor/actress in filming”.
Specialized Workshop – Making movies with a super low budget. AM has designed this special course for 12 young Vietnamese and International filmmakers who had taken part in AM before along with other filmmakers in the region who are getting ready to make their first feature. Guest lecturers are director Joko Anwar, producer Tia Hasibuan (Indonesia) – who have made successful movies with very low budget (under 50,000 USD) but are still invited to the most prestigious film festivals in the world.
II. Feature Project Market
This is the third year this format is adapted into AM program. During Feature Project Market, commercial and art-house film projects will be presented in search of investors or buyers.
Art-house Film Corner is reserved for art-house film projects. 6 to 8 projects from Vietnam and Asia will be selected for presentation before a panel of judges including respected Vietnamese and international art film directors and curators film prestigious film festivals like Hong Kong, Venice, Berlin. The judges will pick the best project for the Autumn Meeting Grand Prix. Additionally, projects competing at Art-house Film Corner will have the chance to be invited to other film project markets at notable film festivals or receive sponsorship from international movie funds depending on the ingenuity and potential of each project.
In the third year of Art-house Film Corner, AM organizers expect to welcome Mr. Paolo Bertolin, curator for Venice Film Festival in South East Asia, Mr. John Badalu, curator for Berlin Film Festival, director Tran Anh Hung, director Joko Anwar, and a respected Vietnamese producer as the judges for Autumn Meeting Grand Prix.
The counterpart of Art-house Film Corner for commercial projects is Entertainment Film World.
At Entertainment Film World, 8 high quality Vietnamese commercial projects will be presented through pitching sessions and personal interactions with producers from various production companies in the country.
After getting to know the projects, producers will be invited to sit on a judging panel headed by director Victor Vu. The judges will select the best project in Entertainment Film World to give the Producers’ Choice Award.
III. In Focus: Short film collection from Kaohsiung.
“Short film collection from Kaohsiung” is a collaboration between Autumn Meeting and Kaohsiung Film Archive. This program showcases 8 short films made by young Taiwanese filmmakers and funded by Kaohsiung Film Archive. Four representatives from Kaohsiung Film Archive and 4 young Taiwanese film directors will be invited to Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang to present their films. They also join the panel discussion with other young Vietnamese filmmakers in the subject of “Establishing a filmmaker’s identity through short films”. The filmmakers are also invited to join Autumn Meeting’s activities and closing ceremony on November 16 in Da Nang.
IV. “Voices of Vietnamese Filmmakers” forums and convention.
“Voices of Producers” forum gathers well-regarded producers from Vietnam (see list in appendix) to discuss issues relating to their works. The anticipated topic for the forum this year is: “How to produce a high quality film with a low budget”.
“Voices of Directors” forum also welcomes the best Vietnamese directors (see list in appendix) to talk about the most essential aspects of their careers. Expected topic: “Establishing the Directors Guild of Vietnam”.
Convention –“Establishing a Da Nang – Hoi An International Film Festival – from the experience of professional film festival organizers around the world.”
AM and People Committee of Hoi An this year invites representatives, organizers, and managers from reputable Asian film festivals such as: Hong Kong Film Festival, Busan Film Festival, Fukuoka Film Festival as well as representatives of top international film festivals in the world: Cannes Film Festival, Berlin Film Festival, and Venice Film Festival to a convention with Da Nang, Hoi An government committee, travel agencies, and event organizers. This convention will focus on getting idea and creating a model for an international film festival in the area in the near future.
V. Autumn Meeting 2016 Awards.
One of the most important feature of AM is aiding young movie talents through awards. They are:
1. Autumn Meeting Grand Prix Award.
For the best project at Art-house Film Corner. The winner will receive a cash prize of $5,000 and an AM Grand Prix certificate. The winning director will use this money to continue developing their project until it becomes a feature film.
2. Producers’ Choice Award.
For the best project at Entertainment Film World. The winner will receive a cash prize of $3,000 and an AM Producers’ Choice certificate.
3. Short Film of the Future Award.
For the best project at the Directing Workshop. Young filmmakers will pitch the projects they’ve developed after the 6-day course before a judging panel led by director Tran Anh Hung. The winning entry will receive a cash prize, certificate, and an equipment package at AM Gala Screening and closing ceremony.
4. Emerging Star Awards.
For the best attendants in the Acting Workshop. There are:
- Best Actor Award (selected by judges).
- Best Actress Award (selected by judges).
- Best Actor Award (selected by audience).
- Best Actress Award (selected by audience).
Expected value of each award is $1,000.
VI. Gala Screening and Closing Ceremony.
A red carpet event will commence AM 2016 Closing Gala. Movie stars and valuable guests from within and outside of Vietnam will appear before the fans and audience. Here selected short films by previous Autumn Meetings attendants, exclusive works by 2016 Acting Workshop students and guest stars will be screened. The Closing Ceremony will see the awards (Autumn Meeting Grand Prix, Producers’ Choice, Short Film of the Future, Stars’ Choice, and Emerging Star Award) given to the best new faces of cinema. Last but certainly not least, this night will also be devoted in gratitude of the sponsors whose tremendous contribution has built and strengthened Autumn Meeting.
identity v professor 在 暗網仔 2.0 Youtube 的最佳貼文
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/album/2LjUOH9T9j21GiX8jzytu6
訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8vabPSRIBpwSJEMAPCnzVQ?sub_confirmation=1
我最高觀看次數的影片 (我為何不再拍暗網? 只說一次): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbihKaqEEQw&t=127s
首支單曲: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UASHWB6Ai9Y
我的成長故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdhtp6A6YJE
這位才是真正的網絡垃圾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlJYDx1GP-U&t=263s
Billie Eilish出賣靈魂的方法: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfB1S2uy5Po&t=115s
日本最殘酷的直播節目: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E81OKVX7wc
我受夠了, 我的精神困擾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ6uxaQhiS4&t=7s
破解Bob叔為何永遠不會過氣
Bob叔是唯一香港Youtuber
Bob叔香港Youtube界
為何Bob叔完勝暗網仔2.0
Bob叔是香港Youtube界爛口王
這位是香港Youtube爛口直播王
香港Youtube界爛口王Bob叔
破解Youtube界爛口王Bob叔為何會成功?
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔什麼值錢?
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔為什麼值錢?
爛口網紅Bob叔有什麼價值?
爛口網紅Bob叔為何會成功?
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔成功的恐怖真相
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔為何會成功?
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔有什麼價值?
Youtube界爛口王Bob叔為何會紅?
這是一條‘2.0’ 影片. 超過200個不同影像/音hau/圖片的組geen組成. 不是在說我做片有多kun力, 這個只表yin出我自己多麼沒有個人mei力.
每一次打開Youtube見到這個暗紫色房間加kun 鏡skin-head頭也令我情不自禁要按下去. 就算開頭只想聽自己最感興趣的Youtube花生也會不知不覺連續聽多幾條題目. “Bob叔啊媽” “老豆改名” “每個年代都有廢柴” 題目是否10分吸引? 時間戳也是觀眾搞的. Bob叔直播是由頭到尾/一鏡到底, 什麼也不加. 但其實加了的東西是我們看不到的. 甚至連他自己也不知道.
大家好又是我暗網仔一起diu你老母看一看!
-粗口
網上看了一peen “粗口先係香港文化既精髓” 的文. 對比粗口, 流行歌有年ling之分. 作者yun用列子是羅文00後一定不認識. 同時60歳老人家被問有關 ‘無盡’ 這首歌時, 同樣不會知道. 但任何(老/yuw/窮/富)香港人聽到‘d . i .u 你” 也會明白他意思.
Goo ji yeen Bob叔在直播講粗口是han事. 表達到廣東話精髓之yu亦拿到粗口表現的效益: 看似真誠tip地,增加喜劇娛樂性, 顯得破gak傳統. 但我想講: Bob叔跟粗口關連不止在講,
他本身就是=粗口. 聽我解釋:
公眾演講時, 真誠度重要過實質內容. 1個多小時無剪接直播, 對比其他有剪接/音hau/鏡頭Youtube片, 甚至對比Bob叔他自己其他烹飪旅遊內容顯得份外 ‘真.’ “香港網絡大典” ‘粗口’ 簡介第一句 “粗口來自低下階層” 這刻板印象來自於粗口給人感覺是tip地.
對比另外兩大頻道: 蕭若元先生 memehongkong和杜汶澤喱騷, 亦是做類似不剪接長格式節目.
或許蕭先生太有proper ‘妥當’感覺而杜先生習慣講粗口ching do到他説某一句啊媽時是需要fut錢. 成效沒Bob叔將粗口內置笑話punchline來gung gik你笑yuet一樣 “中” 到. 一個好列子是Bob叔評伍公子這段. 用排球去比yu, 他一開波提及伍公仔hey so的鬚是第一步passing. 然後他屌屌屌屌屌好多次是set: 慢慢介紹粗口入這個笑話. 最後説” 我的gau毛還lung mut過他的鬚” 就是strike! 中了! 現場網友即時笑了. 網友即時留言Bob叔馬上跳到他們建議話題除了給人感覺tip地和gu cup觀眾感受外, 還令整個直播多了一條情緒起伏的線. 這就是重點. 吸收娛樂時我們hout望大起大落的hey kek性. 笑完要ham, ham完又要 luw, 最終就Tim mut. 所以電影電視需要不同角色的hey lo oi lok來互撞火花.
作為對住一個鏡頭的Youtuber自己多變情suey挺難做得到的. 另一個自然自語能到達這個ging界只有lau ma che. Youtuber通常只juen joo某一種情緒導出所有point. 蕭生或Chan yee那種monotone是好列子.
哩show 3個主chi互相引發不同情suey, 唯一不同: 格式似電視late show多於Youtube直bo. 應該kuy發於美國Youtube熱門上late night talk show影片的成功. fung chi是多位美國Youtuber會不滿Youtube過於chuey pung這ban ‘電視人’ chum jap YouTube熱門. 令Youtube味不見. 始終市場大小不同, 我反以開心香港Youtube有多樣性節目.
Yi然bob叔那種原始Youtuber感覺令大多數使用電話看他的年ching人感覺像被長輩gauw do, 還有點像FaceTime call直接跟觀眾本人講一樣.
美國Youtuber Boogie2988的感覺與Bob叔最相似. 不是講身型, 而是比一般Youtuber年紀大一點的人物leen ling/tuy ying yuw suy利用事件教出道理.
Bob叔直播看到好開心然後他實在的程度! 突然怒氣law一個人我會難受. 感覺像law我. 除以因為自己bo ley心之外Bob叔在直播中用gwong bo媒體人最怕發生的gey hauw: deadair. Silence. 無聲. 電台, 電視show, youtuber全部剪剪剪, tuw不過氣! 也是為了沒有這份看似gam gaiy的deadair.
看看這個鏡頭, 我初時看的時候那幾秒以為部電腦freeze左. 但他是在law人句與句之間. 認真眼神加deadair觀眾更加focus在他這個fun wuy中.
這些停duen做public speaking時有助juek到演講時sik hup的jit juw. 有助控制自己説話jit juw之餘更重要是用呼吸ling ga觀眾的呼吸jit juw. 是高深演講技巧. 那一下停...然後再開始. 大家就在同步中. 之後所有笑話所有重點要 ‘中’ 的機會luet就大很多. 這種名rhythmic entrainment或同步化在音樂或cho bo中常用. 佳因與身邊的人(aka. 社會) 同體 (collective identity) 是每一位人類需要用來生cheun的. 直播只是人類這部分gey yun (to belong to a tribe)的sook ying. 其他觀眾參與只jo長這原始心理. 相信Bob叔係度bao粗時大家在家也會各自對mon拍手和叫出聲.
説到這裡把煮家男人頻道説成好似洗lo邪教一樣. 我相信Bob叔自己也沒想那麼多. 其實只是個joo sik頻道, 只是我説什麼也喜歡把他過份分析到恐怖.
但所以將Bob叔ching為香港Youtube lan口直播主或將他=粗口只是想講他有yu粗口般的長ching和tip地元素. Juet無been yee.
其他在影片提及過的創作者也希望大人有大量. 我只是給我的yu見而已. 原本我想mo fong Bob叔ju一ju東西. 但看到他材料...那些...自然就沒什麼信心了.
所以我學另一位經典jue sik頻道:
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/A0zDK7l5Spc/hqdefault.jpg)