關於 is confirmed 中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

今晚直播目錄出爐囉～

3:44 Part One 被修過的運安會畫面
-蝦米？最初的臆測果真是正確的，運安會到處PS畫面
-說是不願造成民眾困擾？！花蓮地檢署辦案太慢，到底誰是調查主體啊？
-說背後沒有陰謀，nothing is confirmed til is officially denied
-說完整畫面有「阿好」在旁揮手，我怎知附近沒更多人、更多器具、更多等等...
-我一直懷疑為何工程車能夠精準式降落在鐵軌上
-認為李義祥、阿好會被關到死的，最後就說，喔！有未公布畫面證實只是誤會一場
-像不像整個案件都事先規劃好？
-前幾周公布畫面就是為帶風向、公司化，洗掉4000億負債、9成人事成本，黑喔～～

因貼切主題，先進入第一個你斗內、我回答：
18:31 感謝斗內大德A君問：請教大師直接投資美股的這股流行是從甚麼時候開始的？（最近有許多教如何美股開戶直接投資美股的），跟過去鼓吹買美元保單的是否同一批人？美元吸到連這些小散戶的退休金、投資金都要目的為何？
-大概在川普上任後，當時也流行ETF；我YT每天出現etoro廣告
-我猜不會差太多
-當時川普正在解放「陶德法蘭克法案」（Dodd-Frank Act），就是正在台灣的那個陶德，會不會很巧
-有興趣可參閱濕兒當時東森新聞雲專欄 https://accrcw75.pixnet.net/blog/post/65026309
-目的就，哈哈哈.....

26:00 Part Two 笑死人中美博弈
-陶德（Chris Dodd）訪台、凱瑞訪上海，你跟我說太平洋兩岸有武統？
-根據上面斗內、陶德專門負責金融政策，最近又鼓勵鬆綁美資產，這些錢是否來自台灣軍購，我的臆測
-典型老共左手、老美右手晃動台X子搖錢樹套路
-舔中的旺報還幫忙報「美情報總監示警、兩岸摩擦將加劇」，稱職的左手
33:51 中國第一季出口年增39%、進口年增19%、順差擴大近七倍
-台灣對大陸出口成長逾40%；然後一直沒斷ECFA、三通；武統假議題
-拜登將宣布9/11前撤軍阿富汗 終結美國史上最長戰爭
-川建國同志的legacy，目前由拜振華承接，都是要美軍從一帶一路上滾出，符合我預測！
-石油美元出的去，SDR一籃子貨幣進得來？中美合作？

39:20 Part Three 國際財經
-葉倫嘴說愛強勢美元，美元指數卻跌至一月新低
-陳沖爆料：IMF將於6月推6500億美元QE，也就是SDR
-喔，對，台灣原暫定的電子ID發行日期，似乎就是6月，美國7月！有重整？
-人民幣儲備利多，加速國際化
-目前美元全球儲備貨幣佔比為59％（已經在跌）、人民幣為2.25％
-我預估會最終美元會按照SDR佔比修正；目前美元41.73％、歐元30.93％、人民幣10.92％、日圓8.33%、英鎊8.09％
-黃金大漲中！為何
49:39 美財政部將公布匯率報告，倘若遭貼標籤，兌新台幣也會走貶
-事實上，都在刻劃一個持續弱勢美元（除非大崩盤來到）

再度進入第二part你斗內、我回答：
58:39 感謝斗內大德小道姊問：大師預告節目時已有5個贊了！請問封面是麥克道格拉斯哪部電影？請回顧去年大選前邱毅教授在寒國人引述大師，大師補充CIA需人民大數據資料，資金分配給相關自然人與對沖基金投入臉書。邱教授濃縮重點能力也很棒。
-the game，中文翻譯「致命遊戲」
-In-Q-tel
-一個好問題是，為何邱毅在選前卻不追了？！國民黨也都噤聲？

PArt Four 其它國內外議題
1:10:01 福島核廢水應該先給小夫喝，再給日本人民平均喝
-啊，不是說沒問題嗎，有氚沒事啦
-福島災難台灣捐70億，全球南撥萬；小日本無以回報，就送些核食、鮭魚，外加廢水囉，啾咪～
-聽說混了輻射的鮭魚遶個一週就游到台灣了，快拿身份證去壽太郎換喔
1:16:42 馬多夫獄中去世？！你信嗎？淫魔仲介Epstein也是喔
1:20:51 奇怪，台灣缺晶片時，就會缺水、火災，台積電旁施工挖到電線？！

1:25:36 感謝斗內大德Rocky You問：大師對「致富的特權」這本書有何看法，值得買嗎？
1:30:30那本書是故意在鬧矛盾 其實是要跟死老百姓說 未來要進入低價美元嗎

感謝斗內大德Doorman 1996說：先抖內 明天有空再補看

直播網址：
https://youtu.be/qNLicAJcNQo
優質內容，需要您們的贊助！
贊助連結: https://p.ecpay.com.tw/B7CB5 （留言不可空格、分段）

今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓，題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿：

It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:

//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.

Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…

In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.

Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.

Thank you very much!//

Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!

Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity

#到底我地係咪行緊雨傘條舊路【#AntiELAB Movement vs #UmbrellaMovement: are #HKers walking on the old path?】

5/ Global reach for visiting Taiwan. Heiko Maas criticized with an open letter.t 11 pm on 30 June 2020:

1/ HK's protests have indeed reduced due to the COVID19 and the National Security Law. Hong Kong Government mass arrests protestors, and crackdown on the education, mass media, medical and judicial industries. But, NO, we're not walking the old path of division between different sides in the pro-democracy bloc. In fact, we're winning. Here's why:

2/ In 2014,
- 70% of polls call for the occupation to stop
- Division within Pro-democracy bloc
- Average results in the District Council Election
- Pro-Beijing bloc gained 57% seats in Legislative Council
- CCP's economic diplomacy is doing well
- Few countries support HK

3/ From 2019 till now,
- Pro-democracy bloc swept 85% of the seats in the District Council Election
- it's likely for the pro-democracy bloc to gain more than half of the seats in the Legislative Council Election, which forced the #CCP to cancel the election

Polls did by 香港民意研究計劃 HKPOP request by Reuters showed that
- 70% support an independent investigation committee
- 63% support universal suffrage of the Legislative Council and Chief Executive
- 58% support Carrie Lam to step down
- 56% oppose the riot characterization of the antiELAB Movement
- 49% support the release of the arrested people
- 60% oppose the NationalSecurityLaw
- 31% support the NationalSecurityLaw
- 57% vote for pro-democracy candidates
- 25% vote for pro-government candidates

4/ Normally, public opinion of social movements will reverse after a while, like the #UmbrellaMovement, #BlackLivesMatter and the #YellowVests. But after a year, the majority of public opinion is still on the protestors' side ...

5/ Global reac for visiting Taiwan. Heiko Maas criticized with an open letter.t 11 pm on 30 June 2020:
- Jul 1: over 100k people took to the streets
- Jul 11-12: over 610k people vote in the democratic preliminary election
- Aug 12: 530k copies of 香港蘋果日報 Apple Daily were sold & 282 tocks are sold after Jimmy Lai was arrested
- Aug 27: all HKers dressed in black to say no to the Police rewriting what happened on 21 Jul 2019
- Aug 31: hundreds mourned for the #831PrinceEdwardAttack

6/ Gobal reactions
🇺🇸: Sanctioning HK and CCP officials and change "made in HK" to "made in China"
🇬🇧: Banned the buying of Huawei and offering HKers "lifeboats"
🇦🇺: US-Japan South China Sea military exercise took place in Australia. CCP intimidated journalists in Beijing
🇪🇺: Stop exporting sensitive tech and treat HK the same way as China
🇩🇪: Wang Yi intimidated Czech Senate speaker
Miloš Vystrčil for visiting Taiwan. Heiko Maas criticized with an open letter.
🇫🇷: Forced telcos to ditch @Huawei and announced of won't treat China naively
🇨🇦: Showed no sign of thawing with China. Hostage diplomacy continues to deadlock.
🇯🇵: partnered closely with the Five Eyes and acted tougher after 周庭 Agnes Chow Ting was arrested
🇮🇳: border clashes continued and ditched Chinese mobile apps like WeChat, Alipay and Tik Tok.
🇹🇼: international reputation continued to rise after having the least COVID19 confirmed cases in the world with its anti-pandemic policy
🇭🇰: US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, France and Germany ended extradition agreements

7/ #HongKongers have achieved remarkable results fighting against the second-largest, evilest country in the world in just one year. The idea of phoenixism is that we know the chance of winning is low, so we try to increase the costs beard by the #CCP to achieve what we demand.

8/ Everyday we are guided by our thirst for freedom and a sense of duty to bring democracy to our children and grandchildren. So long as we follow that path, we will always be on the right side of history. The island of HK may be small the resolve of its people is anything but.

中文：https://www.facebook.com/200976479994868/posts/3332039616888523/
原文：https://twitter.com/samuelharrendel/status/1306608431139155969

．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．
💪支持我向世界展現香港人頑強抵抗的意志：https://bit.ly/joshuawonghk
╭───────────────────╮
╞#存亡號召 #絕處逢生
╞🌐https://twitter.com/joshuawongcf
╞📷https://www.instagram.com/joshua1013
╞📧joshua@joshuawongcf.com
╰───────────────────╯

《新型冠狀病毒》WHO Can Help？台灣如何成為武漢肺炎的成功典範 台灣抗疫成功故事(中文翻譯)
How Taiwan has become a COVID-19 success story
喜歡請按讚分享訂閱唷
https://www.pbs.org/video/a-different...
As the coronavirus pandemic spreads around the world, Taiwan seems to have it under control. The island is only 80 miles off the coast of mainland China and very near to where the virus originated; plus there were many daily flights to it from Wuhan. But Taiwan has only 329 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and only five people have died from it. Nick Schifrin reports on this COVID-19 success story.
Aired: 04/01/20

■English Title : Eye cutlet Stars game center Corde confirmed that a uniform Happy Meal 2016 original limited card hot star Kohde all
■中文標題 : Aikatsu！偶像活動！2016麥當勞快樂兒童餐附贈限量遊戲卡
■한국어 제목 : 아이 카츠 스타즈 해피 밀 2016 오리지널 한정 카드 핫 스타 코데 모두 갖춘 오락실 코데 확인
■中文标题 : Aikatsu！偶像活动！2016麦当劳快乐儿童餐附赠限量游戏卡

■チャンネル登録はこちら / Channel subscript → https://goo.gl/in9442

■動画内容説明・概要
ハッピーセット次回2016年5月～6月はアイカツスターズマクドナルドのハッピーセット、次回2016年5月13日（金）からはドラゴンボール超とアイカツスターズが登場。 2週間もしくは1ヶ月の販売期間になると思うので5月下旬もしくは6月までの販売と推測されます。 共に6種類のカードが登場

■Video Description / Overview
Happy Meal next 2016 May to June eye cutlet Stars McDonald's Happy Meal, Dragon Ball than the eye cutlet Stars appeared from next May 13, 2016 (Friday). I think to be a sales period of two weeks or one month it is assumed to be sold until late May or June. Both six types of card appeared

해피 밀 다음 2016 년 5 월 ~ 6 월은 아이 카츠 스타즈 맥도날드 해피 밀 다음 2016 년 5 월 13 일 (금)부터 드래곤 볼 초와 아이 카츠 스타가 등장. 2 주 또는 1 개월의 판매 기간이된다고 생각하기 때문에 5 월 하순이나 6 월까지의 판매 추측됩니다. 모두 6 종류의 카드가 등장

麥當勞快樂兒童餐2016年五月至六月眼睛炸肉排星級麥當勞開心樂園餐，龍珠比眼睛炸肉排星從明年2016年5月13日（星期五）出現了。我覺得是一個銷售為期兩週或一個月假定被出售，直到五月底或六月的。這兩種六種類型的卡出現

■↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓次のおすすめ動画/Next Recommend Video/下一個推薦視訊/下一个推荐视频/다음의 추천 동영상↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓■

Hane&Mari'sWorld | 魔法使いプリキュア おもちゃ | Maho Girls PreCure TOYS | 魔法使 光之美少女 玩具 | 마법사 프리큐어 장난감
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuLW2KPIF_i6w2qmZ_sb4oL

Hane&Mari'sWorld | アンパンマン おもちゃ 紹介動画 | 日本麵包超人玩具介紹 | Japan Anpanman Toys | 일본 호빵맨 장난감
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuF1-qE2UZ_hKcFr3JHFjvR

Hane&Mari'sWolrd | マクドナルド ハッピーセット おもちゃ | McDonald Toys | 麥當勞歡樂兒童套餐玩具
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsErHhmhB8V-w_uo8pOWNoH

Hane&Mari'sWorld | かみさまみならい ヒミツのここたま おもちゃ | Himitsu no Kokotama Toys
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BtCrjrdL3rQ7LV6EMuehJyG

Hane&Mari'sWorld | 食玩おもちゃ開封紹介動画 | Candy Toy Chocolat Eggs Review Videos | 日本食品玩具開箱介紹視訊 | 日本零食附赠玩具开箱视频
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsE7XPT_X8rDqiLQ8dSG6GG

Hane&Mari'sWorld | めばえ 小学館の学習絵本 | JAPAN KIDS MAGAZINE Mebae | 日本益智幼兒雜誌 | 日本益智幼儿杂志 | 일본 유아 교육 잡지
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuALZB4fobNF1rHuHPw6aPl

Hane&Mari'sWorld | カードゲーム データカードダス | Japan Card Game DATA CARDDASS
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BvpIWj5DaRlZyaeGAYb4IeH

Hane&Mari'sWorld | こども知育玩具おもちゃ | Kids Educational toys | 小孩子智力开发玩具 | 兒童益智玩具
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsZLR1WhbtebEniScSe8cJ8

Hane&Mari'sWorld | プリパラ | Pripara | 뿌리빠라
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BubVuMQ6weTZaJ863klnEys


■撮影機材/Photographic Equipment → キャノン Canon EOS 80D + EF-S18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM