美東大亂鬥還沒有結束!
7連勝藍鳥 vs 5連敗洋基
美聯外卡爭奪逐漸白熱化
還記得八月底,洋基那一波無人能擋的13連勝嗎?自此之後,條紋軍接連吞下難堪的4連敗、5連敗。分區勁旅紛紛逮住機會,紅襪趁機超前登上美聯外卡1,而九月初落後洋基6.5場勝差的藍鳥,也追近至1.5場的狩獵範圍!
化身「九月狂鳥」的藍鳥隊,近11場比賽僅輸了1場!打線核心 #V葛二世 帶隊衝擊美聯外卡的同時,全壘打支數(41)也步步進逼領先者 #大谷翔平 (43)。另一位有望締造歷史的是本季以1年約加盟藍鳥的明星二壘手Semien,目前38支HR相當有機會打破大聯盟單季二壘手開轟紀錄(43)。至於洋基低迷到不行的打線...就看前一場打破22支0窘境的法官大人Judge能不能以身作則、帶動全隊攻勢了!
MLB 美國職棒大聯盟
9/10 (五) ▸ 07:00
藍鳥 vs 洋基
鎖定MOD CH200
愛爾達體育1台
#MLBonELTA
同時也有9部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過14萬的網紅AMU Game Channel,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【訂閱本頻道】 喜歡這影片嗎? 訂閱本頻道給予支持與鼓勵!!! 【贊助本頻道】 如何贊助本頻道? 1.點選訂閱旁的"加入"連結即可利用信用卡刷卡 每月花費75元贊助本頻道(可隨時退出) 2.點選在本頻首頁封面上的"贊助本頻道"連結 或點選此連結: https://payment.allpay.com...
judge 亂 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
judge 亂 在 JAIME CTW Facebook 的最佳解答
-
沈澱左好耐 初初諗住講吓個故仔
但我覺得每人都會體會到
擁有自己嘅一個版本
所以我都係講下感受
我打呢啲嘢冇其他女仔打得咁叻
我只係想講
好感激遇到你地所有人
雖然我係第一代嘅女聲
但係畢業之後加入翻澳門Recry個場
我感覺好似一個轉學生咁
雖然有熟悉嘅面孔,但係比我嘅感覺非常陌生
(連啲音都好陌生因為我由soprano調咗去alto😂)
之後一直我都淨係想唱好啲歌
講嘢都怕怕醜醜咁
所以好多時候練完歌就即刻返屋企
今次表演 人來人往 因為疫情拖延過幾次
本來都以為佢可能會取消
但係有一日收到陳生message
「THIS IS ONE IN A LIFETIME at 紅館!!!!!! , 而我們就是紅館裏面的主角 ! 😉」
我冇諗過會可以同呢一班女仔由荃灣大會堂行到去紅館
之後落嚟幾個月rehearsal練歌練舞背歌行台位錄節目錄音拍野,我都放開啲 感受同呢班女仔既每一刻
之後先發現那一直judge緊自己嘅係自己
當初以為踏足紅館會超級超級緊張
但係其實6月25日晚上 又冇我想像中咁害怕
我盡量成場都忍住唔喊直到《飲酒思源》
手拖手面對面 真係忍唔住
因為所有野真係好似一場夢咁
而呢場夢好快就到左尾聲
多謝觀眾們係《亂世情侶》整既星海
多謝咁多位女仔既陪伴
唱《最後的歌》你哋每個人我都望左幾望
感激生命遇上你地
多謝 @ch_ivanhoe @weiweimeimei 令我係演繹動作之中
感受到故仔同搵到自己
多謝 @sanders.lau crazy 既音樂造詣
快歌冇得睇住你跳著舞咁指揮真係可惜
多謝 @hobing_goomusic @joyce_cheung_pno @kajengwong 彈出靈魂
多謝 @frankiehung_fkh 令到我哋每次演出都咁好聲
多謝台前幕後令我哋安安全全
多謝化妝同埋set 頭 @healthypro_hk 令到所有女仔都靚靚
多謝 @mopiko 我兩套衫都好鍾意(雖然冇得攞返屋企)
多謝陳生比呢個機會我哋❣️
@cfyxgirlschoir
係咪多謝黎睇我地嘅屋企人同朋友
我知我潛咗水好耐,但係見到你哋嚟我真係好感動🥺
#陳輝陽x女聲合唱團
judge 亂 在 AMU Game Channel Youtube 的最讚貼文
【訂閱本頻道】
喜歡這影片嗎? 訂閱本頻道給予支持與鼓勵!!!
【贊助本頻道】
如何贊助本頻道?
1.點選訂閱旁的"加入"連結即可利用信用卡刷卡
每月花費75元贊助本頻道(可隨時退出)
2.點選在本頻首頁封面上的"贊助本頻道"連結
或點選此連結: https://payment.allpay.com.tw/Broadcaster/Donate/09CB69B1A9483A8DDFB54F1AF864167E
即可利用信用卡刷卡贊助。
【關於本頻道影片】
本頻道的影片只有在此Youtube頻道(AMU Game Channel)及第二頻道(Amu的電玩頻道)公開分享
若各位在其它平台(頻道)上觀看到本頻道的影片一律皆未經本頻道同意"盜用"影片
若真的喜歡本頻道的影片想分享給更多人知道的話
請利用Youtube的內建分享功能,可在各大社群網站上分享。
【第二頻道】
Amu的攻略頻道
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1sU0cjkE-tvjLo0iRVp__A
judge 亂 在 莎皮塞維爾 Youtube 的最佳貼文
Hi,大家好我是莎皮塞維爾
【✨加入莎皮的專屬會員✨】https://reurl.cc/Nr3Gan
【✨莎皮的IG】https://www.instagram.com/xaviershapy/
【✨莎皮的FB】https://www.facebook.com/Shapyxavier/
【✨莎皮公開群Discord】https://discord.gg/TPVQJMM
歡迎訂閱+小鈴鐺,關注我的遊戲頻道!@v@/
#莎皮塞維爾 #審判之眼死神的遺言 #戰雙帕彌什
==============================================
【聊天室注意事項】
1.遊戲在體驗階段,所以有需求,台主發問後再給予回答,不要亂暴雷
2.此台為技術性娛樂台,歡迎交流。
3.惡意騷擾洗頻等行為,禁止!
4.請不要當個聲控達人
5.禁止亂帶聊天室風向,請專注與台主互動或當下的遊戲內容。
6.禁止在聊天室裡未經同意直接宣傳或是"影射他人"頻道or各類廣告。
7.在直播時如台主未要求,直接宣傳其他台主之動作,視同不尊重,直接封鎖
以上規則,感謝配合,聊天品質人人有責
==============================================
0:00 審判之眼:死神的遺言
2:50:50 戰雙帕彌什體驗
==============================================
遊戲加入莎皮好友:
UGS蘿亞帝國遊戲DC公開群:https://discord.gg/TPVQJMM
莎皮discord:Xavier#3623
莎皮 Switch Code :7067-8236-7509
莎皮 PSN ID:shapiyaya
Steam id:YT莎皮塞維爾[目前好友單炸裂中]
==============================================
【贊助莎皮】
訂閱+點擊鈴鐺與分享就好
or
Google姐朗讀贊助:https://goo.gl/KWxK9s
or
YouTube內建超級留言功能
or
paypal贊助:https://streamlabs.com/shapyx
【聯絡方式/業務諮詢】
shapiyaya@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
使用配備
螢幕:BenQ 護眼螢幕EX3203R(好用)
CPU:I7-8700K
RAM:32G
顯示卡:2070RTX
=============================================
莎皮平時蒐集的音樂清單(需要的人可以拿去聽聽)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnHHN0HxS4BSAzH7wuvZdd92kyzDXFTn8
judge 亂 在 時事英文 Podcast by ssyingwen Youtube 的最讚貼文
8 月 14 日,海地西南部發生 7.2 級毀滅性地震,造成超過兩千人死亡,上萬人受傷。幾天後,熱帶風暴席捲這片已傷痕累累的土地,阻礙了搜救工作。距離地震發生已一週,數百人仍然下落不明。
📝 訂閱講義 & 朗讀稿 (只要 $88 /月):https://bit.ly/ssyingwen_notes
👉 延伸閱讀:https://ssyingwen.com/ssep47
🖼️ IG 單字卡: https://bit.ly/ssyingwenIG
😴 8/29 週日預計休息一集,9/1 週三恢復~
———
本集 timestamps
0:00 Intro
1:28 第一遍英文朗讀
3:49 新聞 & 相關單字解說
15:07 額外單字片語
20:45 第二遍英文朗讀
———
臉書社團 (朗讀文字):https://www.facebook.com/groups/ssyingwen/posts/288129716406608/
朗讀內容參考了
Time: https://time.com/6091767/haiti-earthquake-hurricane-disease/
VOA: https://www.voanews.com/americas/more-1-million-haitians-affected-quake-un-estimates
BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-58284713
DW: https://www.dw.com/en/haiti-earthquake-frustration-grows-over-lack-of-aid-as-death-toll-crosses-2000/a-58901882
NPR: https://www.npr.org/2021/08/19/1028971185/haiti-earthquake-haitian-americans-relief-efforts
———
本集提到的單字片語:
Accent 口音
Haiti 海地
Death toll 死亡人數
Epicenter 震央
Les Cayes 海地第三大城市
Port-au-Prince 海地首都
Deadliest 最致命的
Prime minister 總理
Ariel Henry 海地現任總理
On its knees
Assassinated 被暗殺
Chronic political instability 長期以來的政治不穩定
Massive political protests 大規模抗議
Judge 法官
Floods 洪水
Mudslides 土石流
Tents 帳篷
Tarps 防水帆布
Tropical storm
Hurricane
Typhoon
Witnessed 目睹了
Public health disaster 公共衛生災難
Cholera 霍亂
Field hospital 野外醫院
Refrain 重複的話
Catch / get a break
♥️ 喜歡時事英文 podcast 嗎?♥️
你可以支持我繼續錄製 podcast 👉 https://bit.ly/zeczec_ssyingwen
————
#podcast #海地地震 #學英文 #英文筆記 #英文學習 #英文 #每日英文 #托福 #雅思 #雅思英語 #雅思托福 #多益 #多益單字 #播客 #國際新聞 #英文新聞 #英文聽力 #taiwanpodcast