貝里斯支持將台灣納入聯合國及其專門機構
貝里斯總理布里仙紐在聯合國大會中表示,貝國與台灣的外交關係立基於民主、自由、人權及法治等共享價值,貝里斯支持將台灣納入聯合國及其專門機構,這將進一步加強全球合作與夥伴關係,更能體現聯合國的普世性原則。
台灣的夥伴價值,值得聯合國重視。
#貝里斯辣醬配蛋餅超讚
Thank you to #Belize Prime Minister John Briceño for his call for #Taiwan's inclusion in the UN at the #UNGA General Debate:
"Our multilateral system must also be inclusive, harnessing the capacity of all states to scale up international cooperation where it is most needed.
Belize has benefited greatly from our diplomatic partnership with Taiwan that is based on the shared values of democracy, freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. Taiwan has provided tremendous assistance to Belize in terms of medical supplies and financial support, so Belize is better equipped in combating COVID-19 and conducting post- pandemic recovery.
Belize calls for Taiwan’s inclusion in the United Nations and its specialized agencies, which will not only further enhance global cooperation and partnership, but also manifest the United Nation’s enshrined principle of universality."
Taiwan's vision of global partnership can serve as a valuable reference for the UN.
同時也有4部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2萬的網紅曾鈺成,也在其Youtube影片中提到,在中國的官方文件裏,「堅持」是使用最頻繁的詞語之一;譯成英文,最常見的是uphold,如uphold the principle of "one country, two systems"(堅持「一國兩制」);uphold the rule of law(堅持依法治國);uphold and ......
「rule of law principle」的推薦目錄:
- 關於rule of law principle 在 外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan) Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於rule of law principle 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於rule of law principle 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於rule of law principle 在 曾鈺成 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於rule of law principle 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於rule of law principle 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於rule of law principle 在 What is the Rule of Law? - YouTube 的評價
rule of law principle 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
(轉)
*【就特區政府引用國安法第22條展開大規模拘捕行動的聲明】*
超過50名民主派議員、社運人士及律師,因組織及/或參與已延期的2020年立法會換屆選舉前的初選,而被指控觸犯國家安全法第22條下,有關顛覆罪的罪行。我們 - 即下列堅定相信基本法和法治的聯署人 - 以個人名義,對上述事宜表達深切關注。
在星期三(6日)的記者會上,警務處國家安全處高級警司李桂華證實,警方在是次行動中,在獲得搜查令的情況下搜查了72個處所,當中包括一間律師事務所。國安法第22條訂明,構成罪行的基本元素是「以武力、威脅使用武力或者其他非法手段」。然而當局在記者會上未能完滿地解釋,在該次初選並沒有出現任何暴力或非法行為的情況下,他們是基於甚麼原因引用第22條採取拘捕行動。
任何人不論政見均有權參與公共事務,是《公民與政治權利國際公約》第25條確保的權利,亦受《香港人權法案條例》第21條保護。這項權利,對發展民主管治和法治均發揮關鍵的作用。因此,我們強烈譴責任何打壓和平表達《基本法》賦予市民的基本人權的行為。
《約翰奈斯堡關於國家安全、言論自由和獲取信息自由原則》(U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) 第二條訂明:「一種以國家安全為理由所實行的限制是不合法的,除非其真正的目的和可以 證實的效果是為了保護國家的生存或領土完整免遭武力或武力威脅的侵害, 或者保護其對武力或武力威脅反應的能力,無論這些武力或武力威脅來自外 部,如軍事威脅,還是來自內部,如煽動以暴力推翻政府。」2003年3月,特區政府嘗試按照《基本法》第23條制訂國家安全法時,當時的保安局仍然正面地肯定國家安全立法需符合《約翰奈斯堡原則》。
我們促請特區政府解釋,是否已經放棄《約翰奈斯堡原則》內的適用原則,以及《基本法》訂明保障的基本權利,包括表達和集會的自由。
作為律師,我們同時深切關注搜查律師事務所可能會違反《基本法》第35條訂明法律專業保密的基本權利,即「香港居民有權得到秘密法律諮詢、向法院提起訴訟、選擇律師及時保護自己的合法權益或在法庭上為其代理和獲得司法補救」。我們急切呼籲當局自我約束,確保法律專業保密權得到充份保障,以及全面維護所有香港市民參與政治的權利。
帝理邁
張達明
林洋鋐
蔡頴德
黃耀初
2021年1月7日
【Statement on the Mass Arrest under Article 22 of the National Security Law】
We, the undersigned, as legal practitioners who firmly believe in the Basic Law and the rule of law are deeply concerned that more than 50 pro-democracy lawmakers, activists and lawyers, were arrested yesterday for alleged subversion under Article 22 of The Law of the PRC on Safeguarding National Security in the HKSAR (“NSL”) for organising and/or participating in a primary election for candidates in the 2020 Legislative Council election.
At the press conference on 6 January, Senior Superintendent Steve Li confirmed that the Police had searched 72 premises with a warrant, including a law firm. No satisfactory explanation, however, was given by the authority at the press conference as to why Article 22 of the NSL was invoked in respect of these activities, when that provision expressly requires as an essential element of the offence the use of “force or threat of force or other unlawful means”. The organisation and conduct of the primary election did not involve any violence or other unlawful acts.
The right to participate in public affairs, irrespective of one’s political opinion, is enshrined under Article 25 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights and also protected under article 21 of the Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap.383). It also plays a crucial role in the promotion of democratic governance and is fundamental to the rule of law in Hong Kong. Therefore, we strongly oppose and condemn any attempts to suppress peaceful exercise of the fundamental human rights enshrined in the Basic Law.
We note that back in March 2003, when the NSL was introduced, the Security Bureau still acknowledged the need for the national security legislation to be consistent with the Johannesburg Principles. Principle 2 of the Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) provides that “A restriction sought to be justified on the ground of national security is not legitimate unless its genuine purpose and demonstrable effect is to protect a country's existence or its territorial integrity against the use or threat of force, or its capacity to respond to the use or threat of force, whether from an external source, such as a military threat, or an internal source, such as incitement to violent overthrow of the government.”
We call upon the Government to explain whether it has abandoned any due regard to the Johannesburg Principles and the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Basic Law, including the freedom of expression and assembly.
As lawyers, we are further troubled by the search of a law firm, which could violate the fundamental right of residents to legal advice as set out in Article 35 of the Basic Law. We urgently urge the authorities to exercise restraint, to ensure effective protection to legal professional privilege, and to fully uphold the right to political participation for all Hong Kong residents.
CHEUNG T.M. Eric
DALY Mark
LAM Kenneth
TSOI W.T. Michelle
WONG Davyd
Dated this 7 January 2021
rule of law principle 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
‘An English-speaking Mao Zedong’|Lee Yee
In mid-November, a friend of mine, a youngster, texted me: “He’s really stingy.” I replied: “It’s OK! Even though we have been holding different views for years, he has been putting up with my audacity.”
Since we met because of June 4 at a dinner with other pro-democracy movement figures, we have been acquainted with each other for more than 30 years, during which we had frequent dealings and contact with one another for a number of years. Asked by him about how much money was needed for running a magazine, I, the operator of The 90s, a business with small capital, told him to put in ten times of mine for a weekly publication. In the end, he invested a hundred times of it in running the most influential magazine that cornered the market in town. Later on, he founded a newspaper which also changed the media ecology in Hong Kong, initiating an unprecedented market setting all at once.
Inspired by the democracy movement in Beijing to switch to another line of work, he surely did it for his compassion for China. I used to have it myself, and it stayed strong until June 4, after which I merely hoped for the indigenous values of Hong Kong to be preserved. In light of the Handover being imperative under the circumstances, to get the democratization of Hong Kong moving seemed to be the only way out, though I reckoned the chance of success was slender as well.
In terms of our beliefs in freedom, democracy and the rule of law, there hasn’t been much difference between us. As to our outlooks on the prospect of democracy of China and Hong Kong, I have always been pessimistic while he has always taken the opposite view. It is understandable because pessimism is never an obstacle to my writing while it is to an operation of such a big media business.
In 2005, I was invited by him to become a writer-turned-editor in charge of the opinion page. He promised me back then he would never meddle in my editorial orientation. As I recommended on purpose a commentator who had fallen foul of the paper, he consented without hesitation. It’s a shame that I was finally turned down by that commentator.
From being an editor to being fired nine years later, from writing editorials to writing a column, I have been disagreeing with him on a number of issues over the last decade: localists versus pro-Greater China camp, freedom of discussion about independence, evaluation of the youths and the valiant, support for or criticisms of the pan-democratic alliance, “conspiracy theories” in all previous elections… But as my boss, he has been putting up with me, delivering to me his opposite viewpoints through somebody else. And he never hampered me from publishing articles I showed him in advance that bluntly criticized him.
With his compassion for Greater China, opening up of China was definitely appealing to him. As far as I know, China did try quite a number of times to take him in in its united front work. There was an occasion that one of his good friends met him in Taiwan, saying to him that he was invited by the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) to pay a visit to China, that he was to be allowed to run newspapers there about everything – entertainments, sports and the society, except for politics, and that in view of the growing economy of China, he would earn a big fortune. No sooner had he finished listening to it than he called the security guards to send the guest off. Later, he explained to me why he did it so abruptly instead of euphemizing. He said he was actually afraid of not being able to resist the enticement, and that he would abstain from the principle of distancing himself from the power. Listening to the story about his being aware he would get feeble, I admired him in all sincerity.
At whiles I just think he displeased the CCP not because of his words and deeds, but the fact that he couldn’t tell good from bad. Who couldn’t be bought off? Not least he’s just a businessman. That was just so riling!
When the publication began in Taiwan, I was told that according to the tacit business regulation in Taiwan, kickbacks had to be given to those who were empowered to do ad placements from the clients’ side. Yet the boss disapproved of it, which made things difficult for the staff in the advertising department. I asked him why he couldn’t bend the rule a little. He said as we kept laying bare under-the-table deals among politicians and businessmen, it was hard to justify ourselves if we also engaged in the same dirty deals. He is really somebody who insists on complying with laws, attaches importance to rules and ethics. Whenever I think of such a person being imprisoned, I feel sorrowful about him and the society.
It has been more than a year since last time I got in touch with him that he gave me a call asking me to stop writing my memoir for a few days to talk about the anti-extradition movement in my column in March last year. That was the only time he has ever suggested a writing topic for me. I agreed for I was going to do the same thing.
The youngsters in touch with me have always been discontent with him and his paper because of a lot of events over more than a decade, but I have always told them to take a look at a bigger picture. He is said to be an English-speaking Mao Zedong in the newsroom. Maybe it’s true. Mao’s merits and demerits aside, his manifest stubbornness and insane words and deeds showed he was somebody that would achieve something big. Winston Churchill was also an eccentric and moody person, but he did a marvelous feat against all odds. It seems Trump belongs to the same category, so does he.
rule of law principle 在 曾鈺成 Youtube 的精選貼文
在中國的官方文件裏,「堅持」是使用最頻繁的詞語之一;譯成英文,最常見的是uphold,如uphold the principle of "one country, two systems"(堅持「一國兩制」);uphold the rule of law(堅持依法治國);uphold and ...
rule of law principle 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳解答
電子書 (手稿e-book) (共261頁) (HK$199)
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Fw_6DwAAQBAJ
Calculus 微積分系列︰ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8o2lveHTSM04WAhaGEZE7xB
適合 DSE 無讀 M1, M2,
但上左 U 之後要讀 Calculus 的同學收睇
由最 basic (中三的 level) 教到 pure maths 的 level,
現大致已有以下內容︰
(1) Concept of Differentiation 微分概念
(2) First Principle 基本原理
(3) Rule development 法則證明
(4) Trigonometric skills 三角學技術
(5) Limit 極限
(6) Sandwiches Theorem 迫近定理
(7) Leibniz Theorem 萊布尼茲定理
(8) Logarithmic differentiation 對數求導法
(9) Implicit differentiation 隱函數微分
(10) Differentiation of more than 2 variables 超過2個變數之微分
(11) Differentiation by Calculator 微分計數機功能
(12) Application of Differentiation - curve sketching 微分應用之曲線描繪
(13) Meaning of Integration 積分意義
(14) Rule of Integration 積分法則
(15) Trigonometric rule of Integration 三角積分法則
(16) Exponential, Logarithmic rule of integration 指數、對數積分法則
(17) Integration by Substitution 代換積分法
(18) Integration by Part 分部積分法
(19) Integration Skill : Partial Fraction 積分技術︰部分分式
(20) Integration by Trigonometric Substitution 三角代換積分法
(21) t-formula
(22) Reduction formula 歸約公式
(23) Limit + Summation = Integration 極限 + 連加 = 積分
(24) Application of Integration – Area 積分應用之求面積
(25) Application of Integration – Volume 積分應用之求體積
(26) Application of Integration – Length of curve 積分應用之求曲線長度
(27) Application of Integration – Surface area 積分應用之求表面積
(28) L’ Hospital rule 洛必達定理
(29) Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus 微積分基礎原理
(30) Calculus on Physics 微積分於物理上的應用
(31) Calculus on Economics 微積分於經濟上的應用
(32) Calculus on Archeology 微積分於考古學上的應用
之後不斷 updated,大家密切留意
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Maths 再現系列 Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8os36AdSf64ouFT_iKbQfSZ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please subscribe 請訂閱︰
https://www.youtube.com/hermanyeung?sub_confirmation=1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HKDSE Mathematics 數學天書 訂購表格及方法︰
http://goo.gl/forms/NgqVAfMVB9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blogger︰ https://goo.gl/SBmVOO
Facebook︰ https://www.facebook.com/hy.page
YouTube︰ https://www.youtube.com/HermanYeung
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rule of law principle 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳貼文
電子書 (手稿e-book) (共261頁) (HK$199)
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Fw_6DwAAQBAJ
Calculus 微積分系列︰ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8o2lveHTSM04WAhaGEZE7xB
適合 DSE 無讀 M1, M2,
但上左 U 之後要讀 Calculus 的同學收睇
由最 basic (中三的 level) 教到 pure maths 的 level,
現大致已有以下內容︰
(1) Concept of Differentiation 微分概念
(2) First Principle 基本原理
(3) Rule development 法則證明
(4) Trigonometric skills 三角學技術
(5) Limit 極限
(6) Sandwiches Theorem 迫近定理
(7) Leibniz Theorem 萊布尼茲定理
(8) Logarithmic differentiation 對數求導法
(9) Implicit differentiation 隱函數微分
(10) Differentiation of more than 2 variables 超過2個變數之微分
(11) Differentiation by Calculator 微分計數機功能
(12) Application of Differentiation - curve sketching 微分應用之曲線描繪
(13) Meaning of Integration 積分意義
(14) Rule of Integration 積分法則
(15) Trigonometric rule of Integration 三角積分法則
(16) Exponential, Logarithmic rule of integration 指數、對數積分法則
(17) Integration by Substitution 代換積分法
(18) Integration by Part 分部積分法
(19) Integration Skill : Partial Fraction 積分技術︰部分分式
(20) Integration by Trigonometric Substitution 三角代換積分法
(21) t-formula
(22) Reduction formula 歸約公式
(23) Limit + Summation = Integration 極限 + 連加 = 積分
(24) Application of Integration – Area 積分應用之求面積
(25) Application of Integration – Volume 積分應用之求體積
(26) Application of Integration – Length of curve 積分應用之求曲線長度
(27) Application of Integration – Surface area 積分應用之求表面積
(28) L’ Hospital rule 洛必達定理
(29) Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus 微積分基礎原理
(30) Calculus on Physics 微積分於物理上的應用
(31) Calculus on Economics 微積分於經濟上的應用
(32) Calculus on Archeology 微積分於考古學上的應用
之後不斷 updated,大家密切留意
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Maths 再現系列 Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8os36AdSf64ouFT_iKbQfSZ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please subscribe 請訂閱︰
https://www.youtube.com/hermanyeung?sub_confirmation=1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HKDSE Mathematics 數學天書 訂購表格及方法︰
http://goo.gl/forms/NgqVAfMVB9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blogger︰ https://goo.gl/SBmVOO
Facebook︰ https://www.facebook.com/hy.page
YouTube︰ https://www.youtube.com/HermanYeung
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rule of law principle 在 What is the Rule of Law? - YouTube 的推薦與評價
In this video we look at the Rule of Law and the main principles it is based on. This video is part of the Civics Academy Introduction to ... ... <看更多>