Search
再講多次，辭職信一定要有email留底，你鍾意print出嚟親手交都冇問題，我明白係一種尊重，但之後一定要補個email。
曾經做過一份工，遞完辭職信之後個上司嬲咗我（同時有send email），半個月冇同我講嘢，仲對住我黑口黑面，之後半個月佢出trip去美國，好似完全ignore咗我resign呢件事，冇同我傾，冇同我交接......
佢出trip之後我同HR確認last day，HR話冇收到我上司pass過嚟嘅辭職信🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️唔緊要，我將當日email畀上司封resignation letter再forward去人事部，電郵有晒日子同record，唔使口同鼻拗。
辭職啫，唔使當員工係仇人嘅～～～
https://hkofficedaily.com/?p=14097
補充多句，辦公室日報網站有辭職信同埋各種職場信件template，將來有需要可以去參考。
《你努力入這間公司是為了將來的離開》
話說我今日收到好朋友resign letter 的bcc email。我第一次收到這類型的bcc email，第一個反應係oh reli？到今日我在client office第二次收到朋友傳來的同類型email，我只是嘆了一口氣，唉，之後reply 了一句，I will really missssss u，按下send 前停了一會，想了一會，再關閉了email 視窗，繼續我的工作。
在這個劣幣驅逐良幣的公司，其實new join 同resign 每天都上演，我們只要聽到朋友resign 就一定會恭喜他終於脫離苦海。當然今次我也有恭喜我朋友，但當發覺做了數年，朋友開始離開，真人愈來愈少，留得下去的都是將會走的人。
其實有點唏噓，因為你努力入這間公司是為了將來的離開⋯⋯
P.S. 其實對要走的人，我想不到除了 “Congrats”, “I will miss u” and “Wish you success in everything you do”這三句，我第四句話應該要說什麼⋯⋯
The very fact it's called "Third World" says a lot, and then they publish an article on the "benefit" of colonialism using selective data. I guess that didn't take long...You can't make this stuff up. Occidental hegemony corrected?
19 September 2017
LETTER OF RESIGNATION FROM MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD OF THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY
Dear Shahid Qadir, Taylor & Francis, Colleagues and Interested Public,
We are deeply disappointed by the unacceptable process around the publication of Bruce Gilley’s Viewpoint essay, “The case for colonialism,” which was published in Third World Quarterly without any consultation with the Editorial Board. As International Editorial Board Members, we were told in an email on 15 September from Shahid Qadir that this piece was put through the required double-blind peer review process. We asked for these reviews to be sent to the Editorial Board, and they were not.
We have now been informed by our colleagues who reviewed the piece for a Special Issue that they rejected it as unfit to send to additional peer review, and they stated in an email to us:
“We would question the editorial process that has led to the publication of the piece. It was initially offered to guest editors Dr John Narayan and Dr Leon Sealey-Huggins as an article to consider for inclusion in the aforementioned special issue. The guest editors relayed their unease with the article and rejected considering the piece for peer review. It has subsequently come to light that the article was later reviewed as a standard article and rejected by at least one reviewer and then repackaged as an opinion piece.”—email from Dr John Narayan (Birmingham City University)
Dr Leon Sealey-Huggins (Warwick University)
Dr Kehinde Andrews (Birmingham City University)
Dr Eugene Nulman (Birmingham City University)
Dr Goldie Osuri (University of Warwick)
Dr Lucia Pradella (King’s College London)
Professor Vijay Prashad (Trinity College)
Dr Sahar Rad (SOAS, University of London)
Professor Satnam Virdee (University of Glasgow)
Dr Helen Yaffe (London School of Economics)
We have also been informed through correspondence between Prof Ilan Kapoor and our colleague who was the peer-reviewer, after the piece was rejected by the Special Issue editors, that her review also rejected the Viewpoint. Thus, the fact is established that this did not pass the peer-review when we have documentation that it was rejected by three peer reviewers.
As the Viewpoint did not pass the double-blind peer review as claimed by the editor in the statement he issued in the name of the journal, it must be retracted and a new statement issued.
The Viewpoint fails criterion #1 of the Committee on Publication Ethics COPE guidelines that state: “Journal editors should consider retracting a publication if: they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).” https://publicationethics.org/…/Retractions_COPE_gline_fina…
These COPE guidelines are Taylor & Francis’s reference documents for ethics of retracting a publication the editorial board was told in an email on 18 September by Shahid Qadir.
Thus, Bruce Gilley’s Viewpoint essay, “The case for colonialism” must be retracted, as it fails to provide reliable findings, as demonstrated by its failure in the double-blind peer review process.
We all subscribe to the principle of freedom of speech and the value of provocation in order to generate critical debate. However, this cannot be done by means of a piece that fails to meet academic standards of rigour and balance by ignoring all manner of violence, exploitation and harm perpetrated in the name of colonialism (and imperialism) and that causes offence and hurt and thereby clearly violates that very principle of free speech.
The Editor of TWQ has issued a public statement without any consultation with the Editorial Board that is not truthful about the process of this peer-review, and thus, as we fully disagree with both the academic content of the Viewpoint and the response issued in the name of the journal, we are forced to resign immediately from the Editorial Board of Third World Quarterly.
As scholars, we remain ever-committed to the ideals that this journal has stood for over the past 40 years, and we would consider serving on an Editorial Board under different editorial arrangements.
Sincerely,
Ilan Kapoor (York University, Canada)
Stefano Ponte (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark + Duke University, US)
Lisa Ann Richey(Roskilde University, Denmark + Duke University, US)
Mahmood Mamdani (Makerere Institute of Social Research, Uganda + Columbia University, US)
Asef Bayat (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, US)
Naila Kabeer (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK)
Katie Willis (Royal Holloway University of London, UK)
David Simon (Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Sweden + Royal Holloway Univ. of London, UK)
Walden Bello (State University of New York at Binghamton, US)
Giles Mohan (The Open University, UK)
Ayesha Jalal (Tufts University, US)
Uma Kothari (University of Manchester, UK)
Vijay Prashad (Trinity College, US)
Klaus John Dodds (Royal Holloway University of London, UK)
Richard Falk (Princeton University, US)
send resign letter email 在 HOW TO WRITE A RESIGNATION LETTER or EMAIL! (Job ... 的推薦與評價
HOW TO WRITE A RESIGNATION LETTER ! (Job Resignation Letter Sample + TEMPLATE! by Richard McMunn of: ... ... <看更多>