毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
同時也有3部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過71萬的網紅VOGUE Taiwan,也在其Youtube影片中提到,2021七款最強懶人妝前霜 ► https://smarturl.it/v5k6gz 大熱天回到家發現臉跟素顏一樣?挑不到好用的角質調理產品?這次美容編輯推薦六款2021年傳統顆粒型角質調理產品! #美容編輯隨你問 #好家在我在家 #宅保養 00:00 intro 00:25顆粒角質霜正確使用法...
so 德 文 用法 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
[國際學校嘅嘢]感覺呢間嘢都幾唔掂,「仲要海濱花園」,「仲要出埋中文廣告」。一係就出簡體字算啦。「但我懷疑簡體字人未必吼」
1. 即係,我英文都唔係十分好(拎個B仔啫,況且畀高我啦)。所以一般都唔會指正人或乜。況且有時語文嘅嘢,都真係幾多主觀,約定俗成,現代用法同五十年前又唔同,鬼佬日常用同你讀書又唔同,搞搞下就變成語文塔利班或者何文匯,十分煩膠。
2. 不過啦喎,真係久病成良醫,我睇得多英文,自己寫就唔得啦,但大約都識分邊啲好邊啲唔好。呢段東西,唔少位我都覺得怪怪地,「完全好似我寫咁」,等你地專家出嚟指正。
3. 但,30,000 square foot,係feet 下話?
4. 而我相當肯定,個advance是錯的。陳芷菁mode,話晒本人啲Proof Reading都幾高分的。
==============
月頭訂最抵!2021比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費100,已經1800人訂! 畀年費仲有85折,20/40年費VIP 送本人著作一本。
5. 順手自抽,我本新書都唔少錯字。有個讀者全部幫我列晒出嚟整咗個list,都好似有廿幾三十個(未計佢未見到嘅),7萬字,「兩千幾三千字先一個,又好似唔係好多」
6. 但實情,編輯嗰邊已經睇咗第一次(係有捉到不少錯字的),我又都睇咗第二次。都仲係有二三十個,所以我同個讀者講,早知搵你做義工校對。
7. 不過啦喎,「都仲係有啲唔同」,首先我嗰啲好多係打錯字,意義上有啲唔同。二來,我唔係出廣告嘛。三來,我唔係教人Grammer或開國際學校嘛。四來,你出個Post圈我啲錯字,咁都係冇得投訴的,因為真係錯嘛。五來,我篇文仲要講多兩千字幾多嘢嘛!
8. 講開國際學校,本人識條鐵,反正又冇小朋友。不過呢,第一印象當然係「逃學威龍」。第二印象就係大學年代有一期我在浸會(大學,唔係醫院)返暑期工,做打雜,咁放工成日都在又一城,睇下書(Page One)睇下戲(AMC)睇下女(好大個冰場,但我係睇看台上面嗰啲女,唔係踩冰嗰啲)。呢,台上面嗰啲女,就好多係附近國際學校的。
9. 後來到我表妹都讀國際學校,就詳情不方便透露啦,陣間又有人唔高興。不過呢,我就未變態(其實有乜咁戀態?)J我表妹的,我大佢十幾年,「雖然佢啲仔仲老過我」,但我舅父好撚煩的
10. (好似以前都寫過文講我舅父,我對佢嘅感情就複雜啲,外甥多似舅,是真的,我情況絶對係,我唔似任何親戚,但真係講最似,唔係老母唔係老豆唔係叔伯父表哥,而係舅父。都話佢比我十五六年入港大,雖然係雞科,但都係勁,仲要真係窮門,石圍角公屋咋,唔好話自己房,係連碌架床都冇,在廳瞓帆布床咋。而當年我就係睇佢啲讀者文摘呀,地球的奧秘呀,甚麼二十世紀大事回顧呀,咁學埋好多嘢,所以影響我幾大)
11. 之後呢,港大年代,我都周圍幫人補習,托賴高考成績好,港大個招牌又呃得下人,啲家長都唔介意我係大西北窮書生(雖然有啲會擔心我溝咗佢個女,事實亦有啲家長幫個女補習唔會請男仔,咁又事實我第一次上床就係同個補習女學生,可見啲家長嘅擔心合理,雖然擺明條女唔係第一次,應該係我老母去投訴佢個女多啲)。
12. 嗰時都補唔少名校學生,咁又出得起錢呢,況且太雞嘅我都費事補。咁除咗令我見到啲有錢人嘅屋企外,亦都真係發現—屌,有錢人啲女仔都真係靚啲,冇得講。反而仔我覺得分嘢冇咁大,有啲幾有錢讀名校嘅都係七六一條。
13. 咁當然,國際學校嘅女都有補,so happy,係靚啲的,打扮都唔同。有啲仲要講英文添,都有啲吃力,但又令我啲英文冇大幅下降。旨意讀港大就真係含得撚。我一路都話我港大畢業後嘅英文水平,一定低過中七嗰時。當然都好大程度係我自作自受,刁,我年代嘅價值觀呢,大學唔係教埋你英文下話(而家就大學中學化,教埋你普通話,教埋你英文,甚至教埋你見工,教你創業,爭在未教你點扑嘢)
14. 國際學校啲女,係真係唔同的。有個當年隊草添,真係對我嘅三觀造成幾大嘅衝擊。放心,冇甜,不過佢wing 下 wing下,我就錢照數。而我當然係幾年後去到英國先知嗰啲係草味。
15. 回想返,當時我都真係一個補習之霸。雖然我年代其實唔係好多地方洗錢:你見我暑假返浸會大學做打雜咋,嗰時邊撚興咩一年去幾次日本,澳門都冇得你去啦。咁有女,但梗係帶返宿舍或自己屋搞啦。又冇埃瘋,真係冇咁多嘢洗錢的。但冇法,嗰時真係開始接觸到花花世界,瘋狂補習,係多到有錢剩的 — 我仲要交租喎(第二年我在正街住,第三年住西邊街)。
16. 另外都要再提,嗰時有個好過癮嘅補習學生,其實應該相認到,皇仁仔,讀醫,住置富的(你老母不如開埋人地名丫,好似姓劉的)。過癮在,佢會考係9A的,勁過我,但都搵我補。佢老母(真係佢老母!)有玩試鐘(有錢畀返啦,都唔係罕見),個仔同我就一拍即合。高手過招呀,佢都叻,但我就數學叻佢些少咁多,就係可以幫佢突破到再多一層。補足兩年,佢如願讀醫,十分生,老母都好安慰(冇病),臨尾好似醒咗一兩皮嘢酬金畀我,真係十分感動。
17. 而家諗返,雖然補習嘅經歷都唔少(甚至令我有得做愛,雖然就算冇嗰個學生都遲早有愛做),但都係有啲後悔的。亦係我書有講嘅嘢。學生年代,真係唔好去搵錢,因為你根本搵得唔多(你去援交另計,但有其他問題,例如會衝擊你三觀,另文講)。後生細仔吸收力大,你畀我揀多次,我就寧願唔好補咁多習。講真咪多幾千蚊個月,一萬蚊好未?小錢嚟的。但當時應該去裝備自己,睇多啲書又好,學好啲煲冬瓜又好,學好啲德文法文日文韓文又好,睇多啲戲又好,乜都好。就係拎去搵錢,唔化算。因小失大
18. 呢個亦係我搞呢個「馬蘭頭獎學金」嘅原因,雖然十劃未大一撇。順手澄清返,我本書,128蚊本,初版2000,你當賣晒,你估我好多錢落袋咩。根本就算賣晒都係我倒貼啦,定你以為我啲獎學金一千幾百咁仆街?所以唔使小人之心覺得我借呢啲嘢cap 水。我又係嗰句。「我打次方榮記都千幾銀,使唔使寫7萬字呃你錢?」
==============
月頭訂最抵!2021比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費100,已經1800人訂! 畀年費仲有85折,20/40年費VIP 送本人著作一本。
==============
so 德 文 用法 在 DJ 芳翎 Facebook 的最佳解答
【09/18 星期三 絕對音樂】
「我們曾渴望命運的波瀾,到最後才發現,人生最曼妙的風景,竟是內心的淡定與從容;我們曾期盼外界的認可,到最後才知道,世界是自己的,與他人毫無關係;我們曾計較付出的回報,到最後才懂得,一切得到終將失去的,只能空留一抹浮名。」SO~~走好選擇的路,別選擇好走的路,你才能擁有真正的自己。!」
下午4:00-5:00
「絕對音樂」~~ON AIR)))))),
就在KISS RADIO FM99.7
把耳朵借給我,芳翎和你/妳分享~~
網路線上收聽:www.kiss.com.tw點選 南投廣播FM99.7
或下載KISS RADIO專屬APP收聽哦!
*************************
《真正的善良,長有四個堅硬的角…》
善良的意思是:心地純潔,純真溫厚,沒有惡意,和善,心地好。善良,其實是一種美德,是一種修養,是一種提升人性美好的優秀品質。但是,人們往往誤會了善良的意思,人為地把善良和軟弱,無能,低聲下氣融為一體,把善良的褒義詞性錯誤到劃分到貶義詞性之中了。我覺得:做人要懂得包容,善良要留有底線,同時,它還應長有四個堅硬的角,這四個角,抵禦著世俗的錯誤,修正著粗糲的觀點,堅硬著善與良的底線,善良的這四個角,缺一不可,我們必須牢牢把控。
善良的第一個角:做人的底線。做人,要有底線,這是做人的基本原則。一個沒有底線的人,就會胡作非為,在行為上,他們可能超越法律與道德的規範,在語言上,他們會隨意誣陷、打擊他們所不喜歡的對象。所以,跟一個沒有底線的人在一起,非常危險,什麼時候被他們陷害和攻擊都不知道。善良的人,面對這樣的人,一定不要柔軟自己的內心,收縮自己的盔甲,而是應該要拉起自己堅硬的底線,狠狠地把這些人統統阻攔住、壓制住,即使一輩子不見,也要在所不惜。
善良的第二個角:要嫉惡如仇。嫉惡如仇,是為人處世的弱點,但其實,也是一個善良的人的優點。這世間,沒有百分之百完美的事物,而人的性格,更是充滿各自個性的。面對兇惡的事物,面對醜惡的現象,很多人,不敢面對,而是隨之聽之,喜歡隨波逐流,只要自己的利益不受侵害,他們就不想多靠近。因為事不關己高高掛起,身邊幫助他們的人就會越來越少,所以,當自己利益受到侵害的時候,卻往往叫天不應叫地不靈。所以,善良的人,一定要懂得嫉惡如仇,懂得用集體的力量讓醜惡的現像不再發生,懂得用嫉惡如仇的善良銳角,去刺痛那些邪氣和惡意為之的事件,只有這樣,我們才可能受到更多的保護,擁有更多集體的正義的力量。
善良的第三個角:學會拒絕。有些人,心太軟,耳根太綿,對別人的非分要求,不敢拒絕,不會拒絕;對自己無法辦到的事情,卻一味地點頭哈腰地答應;對超出自己能力範圍的事情,也不敢拒絕人家。這樣的人,其實,會讓自己陷入人生的糟糕境地:自己的卑微和底層,別人的嘲笑和攻擊,人生的失敗接二連三。善良的人,一定要懂得,面對別人的非分之求,一定要果斷拒絕;自己無法做到的事情,一定要及時說清。因為這樣,才是保護自己的最佳方式,而這也能讓對方抽身而退,去尋求其它的幫助。所以,學會拒絕,對人對已,大有裨益,所以,學會拒絕,也是善良一種真正體現。
善良的第四個角:學會反擊。動物世界有一個法則:弱肉強食。處於食物鏈頂端的動物,總是喜歡攻擊吞食食物鏈底端的動物。而人類社會,人與人之間,因為法律和道德的約束,人與人之間,存在著一定的平等關係。當有些強勢的人群,去攻擊一些所謂的弱勢群體的時候,他們往往能夠得逞。所以,如何學會反擊,如何懂得運用法律的武器,乃至其它的方式來反擊那些惡意的攻擊,是一個善良的人必須掌握的自我保護和防禦性地攻擊術。當你一而再再而三地反擊對手的時候,對手必然會在你勇敢地反擊中敗下陣來,從而讓我們自己維護了正義。
做人,一定要善良,同時,真正的善良,一定要長著自己角。這些角,不是用來攻擊別人,而是用來保護自己,維護正義。也許,這才是善良的真正意義吧。
(文章來源:網路文章分享)
***************************
so 德 文 用法 在 VOGUE Taiwan Youtube 的最佳解答
2021七款最強懶人妝前霜 ► https://smarturl.it/v5k6gz
大熱天回到家發現臉跟素顏一樣?挑不到好用的角質調理產品?這次美容編輯推薦六款2021年傳統顆粒型角質調理產品!
#美容編輯隨你問 #好家在我在家 #宅保養
00:00 intro
00:25顆粒角質霜正確使用法
01:18 Dior迪奧 精萃再生玫瑰去角質霜
02:35 Sabon 二合一臉部純淨磨砂膏
04:35 Sukin 超級綠臉部角質調理霜
06:04 德國小甘菊 臉部去角質霜
07:52 Aesop 茶樹去角質粉
09:04 rabtree&Evelyn瑰柏翠 野蘋果角質淨化臉部去角質粉
【 其他熱門主題】
讓喜歡的事變生活!Good Job! ► http://smarturl.it/r7si6s
芭蕾舞者們的血淚史 ► http://smarturl.it/uhot5l
唐綺陽12星座深入剖析 ► http://smarturl.it/in8eqp
美容編輯正芳隨你問 ► http://smarturl.it/zf5840
口音、服裝專家拆解經典電影 ► http://smarturl.it/zcbgmf
---------------------------------------------------------------
【追蹤 VOGUE TAIWAN】
★訂閱VOGUE TAIWAN Youtube:http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
★VOGUE TAIWAN 官網:http://www.vogue.com.tw/live/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/VogueTW/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/voguetaiwan/
★VOGUE TAIWAN LINE:https://reurl.cc/V66qNn
★美人會不會 FB社團:http://hyperurl.co/rgfitl
▷ Make sure you subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell, so you don’t miss any of my new videos → http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
--------------------------------------------
※關於時尚,VOGUE說了算!自從1892年第一本VOGUE在美國出版以來,至今已有122年的歷史,始終被時尚專業人士所推崇,因此榮譽為Fashion Bible時尚聖經。
--------------------------------------------
※台灣VOGUE隸屬Condé Nast Interculture Group,相關國外影片皆由國外授權提供給台灣使用,台灣VOGUE秉持服務網友,讓更多中文語系觀眾可以看到國際影片跟中文字幕,所以在此頻道分享給大家,如果喜歡我們的頻道,請訂閱我們,我們將會持續努力帶來更多優質內容。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/CQp9cAx0F6w/hqdefault.jpg)
so 德 文 用法 在 VOGUE Taiwan Youtube 的精選貼文
除了凡士林你還有這些選擇►https://smarturl.it/r9lw60
美容編輯之前曾經寫過一篇皮膚科醫師超推薦凡士林報導,受到很多粉絲熱烈迴響,其實我也很好奇,為什麼皮膚科醫師老愛推這麼便宜的凡士林給肌膚不好的人。我們也在臉書進行了大調查,原來,大家對凡士林還是有一堆黑人問號,今天我就來幫大家解答以下問題。
00:23 凡士林是怎麼來的?是天然產品嗎?
00:48 凡士林應該怎麼選擇?我適合白色還是黃色的凡士林?
1:33 夏天首重輕薄,也可以用凡士林?怎麼用?
2:01 鄧紫棋凡士林救急法
2:48 凡士林好厚,會阻塞毛孔嗎?
3:40 如果我是敏感肌可以用凡士林嗎?怎麼選擇?
4:40 凡士林也可以卸妝?
#美容編輯隨你問 #凡士林 #鄧紫棋凡士林
【 其他熱門主題】
讓喜歡的事變生活!Good Job! ► http://smarturl.it/r7si6s
芭蕾舞者們的血淚史 ► http://smarturl.it/uhot5l
唐綺陽12星座深入剖析 ► http://smarturl.it/in8eqp
美容編輯正芳隨你問 ► http://smarturl.it/zf5840
口音、服裝專家拆解經典電影 ► http://smarturl.it/zcbgmf
---------------------------------------------------------------
【追蹤 VOGUE TAIWAN】
★訂閱VOGUE TAIWAN Youtube:http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
★VOGUE TAIWAN 官網:http://www.vogue.com.tw/live/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/VogueTW/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/voguetaiwan/
★VOGUE TAIWAN LINE:https://reurl.cc/V66qNn
★美人會不會 FB社團:http://hyperurl.co/rgfitl
★訂閱GQ TAIWAN Youtube:http://bit.ly/2fBjdcD
★GQ TAIWAN官網:http://www.gq.com.tw/
★GQ TAIWAN粉絲專頁:http://smarturl.it/r9gauv
★GQ TAIWAN Instagram:https://pse.is/JVNES
★GQ TAIWAN LINE:https://pse.is/FX7T4
▷ Make sure you subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell, so you don’t miss any of my new videos → http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
--------------------------------------------
※關於時尚,VOGUE說了算!自從1892年第一本VOGUE在美國出版以來,至今已有122年的歷史,始終被時尚專業人士所推崇,因此榮譽為Fashion Bible時尚聖經。
--------------------------------------------
※台灣VOGUE隸屬Condé Nast Interculture Group,相關國外影片皆由國外授權提供給台灣使用,台灣VOGUE秉持服務網友,讓更多中文語系觀眾可以看到國際影片跟中文字幕,所以在此頻道分享給大家,如果喜歡我們的頻道,請訂閱我們,我們將會持續努力帶來更多優質內容。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/audigOiPtFg/hqdefault.jpg)
so 德 文 用法 在 Tina Huang Youtube 的最佳貼文
學會用德文問你好之後,怎麼用德文回應也是非常重要,除了影片中提到的幾個用法以外,在形容心情超級好時,還可以使用wunderbar (wonderful)、fantastisch(fantastic),心情超級不好,則可以使用schlecht(bad)。
最近推出【遊德國 學德語-德語A1先修】
一起加入恬恬的行列,開始妳的德文之旅吧~
👉 https://bit.ly/3hl2gzF
所有社群連結在這裡:(臉書、IG、網站、社團)
https://linktr.ee/tinybackpacker
After learning how to greet people in German, it's also very important to learn how to respond in German. Besides the options I mentioned in video, you can also describe your good mood with wunderbar(wonderful) or fantastisch(fantastic), and bad mood with schlecht(bad). If you like this video, pls comment anything or follow this channel. Stay tuned!
大家好,我是恬恬,是個在德國工作與生活的菜鳥人妻,夢想是當個旅遊節目主持人,最近終於開了人生第一個頻道,主要以介紹德國的食衣住行、吃喝玩樂,還有我們旅遊的影片為主,希望大家未來能持續鎖定insi德r頻道喔~
Hi, this is Tina. Currently I'm living with my husband Fabian and working in Germany. This channel "Insider" focuses on everything about Germany and our trips all over the world. So far we've been to several places like Egypt, Tahiti, New York, Mexico, South Africa, Myanmar and will scratch more off countries from our scratch map in the future. Please stay tuned!!!!!
Credit:href="http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/pink-watercolor-texture_940298.htm"
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LR-tRbYDvEo/hqdefault.jpg)