關於 standpoint of view ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Q: standpoint of viewHa Phong IELTS - Thầy Hà & Phong 在Facebook 的評價

🔥HOT🔥BÀI MẪU IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CHỦ ĐỀ: 𝗘𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧🌿‼️Bảo vệ môi trường là một vấn đề cực kì nhức nhối vào thời điểm hiện tại, vì vậy các giám khảo cũng khá thường xuyên đưa vấn đề này vào đề thi IELTS. Dưới đây là một bài mẫu trong phần thi Writing task 2 về chủ đề này, các em lưu lại tham khảo nhé😉𝓥𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓻𝔂:Shoulder the responsibility of - Gánh vác trách nhiệmFrom my standpoint = From my point of view - Theo quan điểm cá nhânShare the responsibility - Chia sẻ trách nhiệmPlay a pivotal role - Đóng vai trò chủ chốtIntroduce the legislation - Ban hành luậtMitigate environmental problems - Khắc phục các vấn đề môi trườngPoisonous fumes - Khói độcProminent role - Vai trò chínhEndeavor to V - Nỗ lực làm gìExhaust gases - Khí thảiContaminate - Làm ô nhiễmOnly in rare cases - Chỉ thỉnh thoảng, hiếm khiWaterways - Đường thủyMobilizing all the possible forces - Huy động tối đa mọi nguồn lựcJoint efforts - Nỗ lực chung👉Tham gia Group Thầy Hà & Phong IELTS để giao lưu, học hỏi thêm nhiều kiến thức nhé😉_____________HA PHONG IELTS - Học tiếng Anh thực chất !!👉 Thầy Hà (L9 R9 S9 W8,5) & Thầy Phong (L9 R9 S8 W7)👉 Tuyển sinh các lớp tiếng Anh hàng tháng: www.haphong.edu.vnCác lớp từ Nền tảng đến IELTS 7.0, sĩ số nhỏ (10-15). Giảng viên tận tâm & chuyên môn cao. Học thử miễn phí!

「standpoint of view」的推薦目錄：

關於standpoint of view 在 Ha Phong IELTS - Thầy Hà & Phong Facebook 的最佳貼文
關於standpoint of view 在李怡 Facebook 的最佳貼文
關於standpoint of view 在 Admiral Livestream Facebook 的最佳解答

關於standpoint of view 在コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
關於standpoint of view 在大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
關於standpoint of view 在大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文

關於standpoint of view 在 Point of view Meaning - YouTube 的評價
關於standpoint of view 在 Viewpoint vs. Point of view - English Language & Usage Stack ... 的評價

standpoint of view 在 Ha Phong IELTS - Thầy Hà & Phong Facebook 的最佳貼文

By Ha Phong IELTS - Thầy Hà & Phong

2020-10-15 21:00:03 有 23 人按讚

🔥HOT🔥BÀI MẪU IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CHỦ ĐỀ: 𝗘𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧🌿

‼️Bảo vệ môi trường là một vấn đề cực kì nhức nhối vào thời điểm hiện tại, vì vậy các giám khảo cũng khá thường xuyên đưa vấn đề này vào đề thi IELTS. Dưới đây là một bài mẫu trong phần thi Writing task 2 về chủ đề này, các em lưu lại tham khảo nhé😉

𝓥𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓻𝔂:
Shoulder the responsibility of - Gánh vác trách nhiệm
From my standpoint = From my point of view - Theo quan điểm cá nhân
Share the responsibility - Chia sẻ trách nhiệm
Play a pivotal role - Đóng vai trò chủ chốt
Introduce the legislation - Ban hành luật
Mitigate environmental problems - Khắc phục các vấn đề môi trường
Poisonous fumes - Khói độc
Prominent role - Vai trò chính
Endeavor to V - Nỗ lực làm gì
Exhaust gases - Khí thải
Contaminate - Làm ô nhiễm
Only in rare cases - Chỉ thỉnh thoảng, hiếm khi
Waterways - Đường thủy
Mobilizing all the possible forces - Huy động tối đa mọi nguồn lực
Joint efforts - Nỗ lực chung

👉Tham gia Group Thầy Hà & Phong IELTS để giao lưu, học hỏi thêm nhiều kiến thức nhé😉
_____________
HA PHONG IELTS - Học tiếng Anh thực chất !!
👉 Thầy Hà (L9 R9 S9 W8,5) & Thầy Phong (L9 R9 S8 W7)
👉 Tuyển sinh các lớp tiếng Anh hàng tháng: www.haphong.edu.vn
Các lớp từ Nền tảng đến IELTS 7.0, sĩ số nhỏ (10-15). Giảng viên tận tâm & chuyên môn cao. Học thử miễn phí!

Tags: standpoint of view

Ha Phong IELTS - Thầy Hà & Phong

About author

Ha Phong IELTS: học IELTS cam kết đầu ra với lớp học nhỏ, giáo viên chuyên môn cao và tận tâm, và giáo trình chuẩn quốc tế. Lịch khai giảng hàng tháng: www.haphong.edu.vn Hotline: 0981488698

Các lớp IELTS ở trung tâm Ha Phong. Lịch khai giảng hàng tháng: www.haphong.edu.vn

standpoint of view 在李怡 Facebook 的最佳貼文

By 李怡

2020-09-24 23:11:01 有 254 人按讚

Is a U.S.-China hot war imminent?｜Lee Yee

In July, Pompeo claimed the American policy towards China is harsher than the one towards the Soviet Union in the Cold War era. The approach has been shifted from “listening to its words and watching its deeds” to “ignoring its words and only watching its deeds”. Recent developments show that the U.S. is striding closer and closer to a complete de-linkage with China. The recall of the ambassador from China was just a prelude. What followed was the U.S. official interpretation that “one China policy” is not equivalent to “one China principle”, plus the emphasis that “the U.S. holds no specific standpoint towards the sovereignty of Taiwan”. Furthermore, during the visit of Krach, U.S. Under Secretary of State, Tsai Ing-wen stated that “Taiwan has the determination to take the critical step”. Adding fuel to this, Hsiao Bi Khim, Taiwan’s delegate at the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the U.S., introduced herself as the “Taiwan Ambassador to the U.S.” on Twitter. In view of all these, is the U.S. going to establish diplomatic relation with Taiwan? Will it turn out to be the “October surprise” before the U.S. presidential election? In response, China dispatched fighter jets to violate the airspace of Taiwan, and as “Global Times” put it, “this was not a gesture of warning, but an actual combat exercise of attacking Taiwan”. In return, Taiwan authority urged China “not to underestimate its armed forces' resolve in safeguarding Taiwan”. As tension keeps building up across the Strait, will the U.S. intervene and finally trigger a U.S.-China hot war?

For the last few months, while analyzing the situation, quite a few observers have drawn upon the “Thucydides trap” originated from an ancient Greek historian. According to this theory, when an emerging power threatens to displace an existing great power as an international hegemony, there will be an unavoidable tendency towards war.

To be frank, these observers may have well overestimated the strength of China. Thanks to its huge population, China has become the second largest economic entity in the world. But we are now living in an era that national strength is rather defined by technological advancement. In reality, China is militarily inferior to Russia and technologically lagging far behind major western countries. To put it simply, China is yet to be capable of challenging the American dominance.

Back in the 1980s, in the heyday of its economic development, Japan has significantly outperformed the U.S. in the capital market, and some American scholars have come to the “Japan No.1” conclusion. Despite this, there was never a sign of military confrontation between U.S. and Japan. A decade later, the formation of the European Union posed new challenge to the American supremacy. But again, the two did not come anywhere close to a war. So why has the emergence of China, which in fact lacks the capabilities to overwhelm the U.S., aroused much anticipation of war?

Rudolph Rummel, an American professor of political studies, have made a thorough analysis on the correlation between wars and democracy in human history. After humans surviving a thousand years of darkness, it was not until the independence of the U.S. in 1776 that unveiled a democratic institution with public elections, separation of powers, multi-party system as well as freedom of speech, press, religion and assembly. After more than a hundred years, in 1900 there were only 13 democratic countries in the world. And after another decade, in 2015 the rose to 130, and dictatorial states without meaningful elections have become the minority.

According to Rummel’s statistics, there were 371 wars between 1816 and 2005. Among them, 205 were fought between two dictatorial countries and 166 between democratic and dictatorial ones. Interestingly, there had not been a single war between democratic countries. The conclusion is all too obvious: if there were only democratic states on earth, wars would not happen.

And here lies the fundamental reason why the “Thucydides Trap” has been more valid in the old days when dictatorial systems prevailed, but has failed to apply in contemporary cases between two democratic countries. And it also explains why the competitions between the U.S. and Japan or the EU have not led to any war, while the challenge from China will probably end up differently.

In a democratic system, to wage a war requires a consensus among the government, legislature, media and public opinion. It is rather a matter of the people’s collective will than the ruler’s subjective decision. Whereas within a dictatorial structure, no approval from the legislature is needed, media and public opinion are never respected and judicial challenge simply does not exist. A dictator or oligarch can just go to war at will.

From a dictator’s point of view, whether to enter a war or not is not subject to external circumstance, but the domestic status of his ruling. When a dictator’s position gets shaken by severe economic downturn and widespread public discontent, he will try to divert domestic dissatisfaction by means of foreign maneuvers. The dictator tends to single out those “non-conforming groups”, as so identified by the “little pink” Chinese patriots, and tries bullying them, as what the CCP is doing in India, Hong Kong and Inner Mongolia. The objective is to distract attention with extreme nationalism. More often than not, stirring up external instability has become a tactic to secure domestic stability of the dictator’s rule.

Perhaps a shrewd dictator will weigh up the strength of his counterpart before taking action. Nevertheless, the intrinsically defective system may hinder the dictator from understanding the reality and accessing different views. And personal intellectual and intelligent inadequacies may also breed unrealistic self-inflating belief. The resulted stupidity can make a tragedy more imminent than everyone may expect.

Tags: standpoint of view

李怡

About author

參看維基百科 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%8E%E6%80%A1

standpoint of view 在 Admiral Livestream Facebook 的最佳解答

By Admiral Livestream

2020-08-16 20:24:26 有 1 人按讚

SecretFam:
.
.
A couple things I would like to say regarding recent events, and I hope to give you a better understanding of the team's management by the end of this post.
.
.
Since 2017 when our management team was formed, I take great pride in saying that we have had very few missteps surrounding our management practices -- whether it is regarding our staff, our current players, or even players that have left. We pride ourselves on being firm, but fair, to enable our teams to perform as well as they can, and to enable us to best entertain you, our fans. I hope you can trust our track record on this, and continue to place faith in Team Secret.
.
.
It has always been our policy not to get involved in personal conflicts. Some people like each other, some people don't like each other -- it's not appropriate for an organization to get involved in personal conflict, as long as both remain professional and have the common goal of winning as a team. I have a great relationship with Biu, and with OTG -- I am not going to comment on their personal conflicts, and I ask that you also respect their privacy in this matter.
.
.
What I will comment on is their professional capacity. There's been much speculation over the last few hours, and I want to shed some light on our team's activities, to give you a better sense for how decisions are made. Our management philosophy is simple -- to make the best and fairest decisions for the good of the team as a whole. Sometimes that will lead to one or more people being upset, but try to be as balanced as the situation allows.
.
.
In my experience with him, OTG's management of our PUBG Mobile squad in Malaysia has been exceptional. From taking care of team logistics and bootcamps, to supporting each player's needs, to managing tournament schedules, practices, and casting engagements, he has been nothing short of professional towards myself, and our global management team. When a player forgets their headphones, OTG is the guy that will drive an hour back to a player's home to fetch their headphones. I don't say this from just my own single point of view, but it is also a shared opinion from our players, and our global team.
.
.
Following our win in the Malaysia Country League, the team strengthened our lineup with Jangs and Rex in order to prepare for the World League. This was a team decision, and every player -- including Biu -- believed we would be stronger with these new additions. This however, meant naturally that one player would be an observer during games, which is not uncommon for many teams fielding 5 or even 6 man rosters. Rex, Biu, and even uHigh all came in and out of the active lineup, as the team experimented with different strategies to adapt to the meta and playstyle of the World League.
.
.
The active time of each player during World League was a result of guidance that I gave to OTG and the rest of the team. After experimenting with different lineups and strategies during the weekday group stages, we knew there were only 3 Super Weekend chances to qualify for the Finals. Out of the 3 Super Weekends, the team decided to allocate time for Biu to be in the Week 1 active roster, for Rex to feature in Week 2, and for the lineup with the highest point total to carry the momentum the rest of the way. My guidance was to put personal matters and emotions aside, and make decisions based on what would be best for the team in this moment. Ultimately we have responsibility towards all of our players, and our fans, to give the best performance we believe we can give as a team.
.
.
From a personal standpoint with Biu and OTG, as a friend I will get involved if asked, but any personal matters are for them to work out between themselves, not the Team Secret organization. I sincerely hope as a community we can give them the space to solve their differences.
.
.
From a team management and professional decision standpoint, I would humbly ask you to direct all criticisms to me. We manage with the best of intentions, but that does not mean we don't have room to improve. I hope we can continue to have your trust, and we can count on your support for this upcoming season.
.
.
John