敬 自由 / 勇於說母語的你
無論是母親還是父親的舌頭
台灣都希望自己的人民能夠勇敢說出各種語言
台灣是語言的熔爐
不同時代的人們將自己的語言帶上岸
在 #語言平權 這條路上我們歷經努力
希望能夠尊重與確保台灣的多元語言文化
讓大家都能自由的使用自己認同的語言
.
外交部在今年聯合國推案影片《敬 自由》中
我們拍攝了在台灣的印尼語課程
.
『在這裡
所有台灣固有族群使用的自然語言
都是國家語言
不管在家裡說的是哪種母語
在學校都有老師繼續教你
跟阿公阿嬤聊天不用翻譯』
.
若聯合國的重要任務之一是要讓國家尊重人民的權利
台灣的夥伴價值,值得聯合國重視。
.
To Freedom / You and your mother tongue
.
#Taiwan is something of a melting pot in terms of language. We’ve been working hard to reduce the historical stigma attached to some of these languages and to ensure that they are not lost to future generations. New languages are also being carried to our shores by new arrivals, creating a linguistically dynamic young generation of bilingual or multilingual children and young adults. These young people benefit from the ability to engage in intergenerational communication, important in the preservation of cultural identity and for a more cohesive society.
We recently featured an Indonesian teacher in Taiwan--a new arrival--and one of her students--part of this multilingual younger generation--in “To Freedom,” our promotional short to mark the #UNGA76. They tell the story of Taiwan’s respect for all its languages when they say:
“Here, the natural languages of Taiwan’s inherent ethnic groups are official languages. Regardless of what language you speak at home, you’ll continue to be taught it at school. I don’t need a translator to talk with my grandparents.”
If the UN states part of its mission as encouraging countries around the world to respect the rights of their people, Taiwan's vision of global partnership can serve as a valuable reference.
#UNGA76
#HearTaiwan
#WorkingTogether
#FreedomForAll
#UNGlobalGoals
#TaiwanCanHelp
#RespectTheRightsOfPeople
#LanguageEquality
同時也有457部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過117的網紅JENN LEE,也在其Youtube影片中提到,🖤觀秀注意事項🖤 1. 強烈建議您配戴耳機觀賞,享受旅程 2. 若網路順暢,請將畫質調至2160p,以利最佳看秀畫質 🖤PLEASE NOTICE🖤 1. Strongly suggest! Enjoy the trip with your earphones. 2. Please watch t...
「what are rights」的推薦目錄:
- 關於what are rights 在 外交部 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC(Taiwan) Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於what are rights 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於what are rights 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於what are rights 在 JENN LEE Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於what are rights 在 大麻煩翻譯組JackO Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於what are rights 在 chungdha Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於what are rights 在 What are Rights? - YouTube 的評價
what are rights 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
MERDEKA?
I think it's a lot better to say, "Selamat Hari Kebangsaan" rather than "Selamat Hari Merdeka". Merdeka connotes a freedom, and we're not really free, are we? I still think Malaysia is a great country, and I'm very thankful to be a part of it. But I do not delude myself into thinking that any of us living here are truly free.
I think most of us are still very frightened to speak out against the myriad injustices that occur right before our eyes, every day.
To add, there is a culture of divisiveness amongst the races in this country that nobody wants to address. The worst thing about it all, is that the education system we currently have, fosters it.
In 2021, when advanced societies are denouncing notions like 'superior race' and 'the right (religious) way of life', our political parties inch closer to primitive dogma, and those opposing it can't say anything against it, because it's all cloaked under that big untouchable subject called "religion".
What is wrong with us? Where is our voice? We can't simply acquiesce, just because somebody said, "God mandated it." Over history, God has mandated A LOT of reprehensible acts. Once upon a time, that same God even mandated owning slaves. Atrocities like the Holocaust, the Spanish Inquisition and mistreatment and displacement of the Rohingyas were all committed in the name of God.
People should not be afraid to raise their voices and question the authorities, when their rights are being trampled on. More importantly, they should feel compelled to raise their voices against the authorities, when the rights of others are being trespassed on. It is so crucial for us to speak up for them, because these people, these 'others'... they may not have a voice to stand up for themselves.
When we are free to do that, THAT'S when we can say we have attained freedom. That is when we are merdeka.
So until we achieve that, I will wish you Selamat Hari Kebangsaan instead.💜
#BeYou
#BeTrue
#BeProud
#NoFear
#PRIDE
#LGBT
#LoveIsLove
#LoveYourself
#BornThisWay
#PhotoOfTheDay
#InstaGood
#IGers
#PicOfTheDay
#LifeIsGood
#InstaPic
#InstaDaily
#Selfie
#InstaMood
#BestOfTheDay
what are rights 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
what are rights 在 JENN LEE Youtube 的精選貼文
🖤觀秀注意事項🖤
1. 強烈建議您配戴耳機觀賞,享受旅程
2. 若網路順暢,請將畫質調至2160p,以利最佳看秀畫質
🖤PLEASE NOTICE🖤
1. Strongly suggest! Enjoy the trip with your earphones.
2. Please watch the video with 2160p to get the best quality.
—
JENN LEE 22春夏- 家人
「大人不過是長大的小孩」- 華特迪士尼
以實驗性概念延續21秋冬系列耐人尋味的「宇宙恆變」、「活在當下」之理念,以觸動人心的創作帶領觀眾進入充滿『家人之愛』的虛擬世界,探索生命與成長的根源!
一同窺探歷經懷胎十月、初為人母的設計師Jenn在不同身份、心境與情緒轉變下,如何深刻演繹情感的波動與感觸,展示母愛光輝與溫柔無限的蛻變之作!
再次攜手全球最大華語電影獎項─金馬獎特效得主「再現影像」挑戰觀眾的視覺感官,延續JENN LEE 21秋冬的虛擬星球,以第一人稱視角的遊戲感帶領觀眾走進異次元的繽紛叢林,一窺星球上的人們與家人間關於「愛」與「情感」的故事。3D方式呈現2D充滿兒童插畫感的自然世界,再將視覺藝術家JUN YAO ZOIE LIAO設計出的童趣服裝印花3D化,成為虛擬視界裡各種獵奇可愛的生物,鮮豔細緻的畫面營造強烈的視覺效果。
音樂方面與享譽國際獲獎無數的台灣實驗電子音樂創作者Meuko! Meuko!合作,以充滿愛與希望的輕快節奏營造童趣氛圍,特別收錄Marz23狂野嘶吼、白癡公主對女兒阿甜的告白、黃宣神秘低喃以及設計師Jenn與老公Dennis對於愛的詮釋,更能聽見寶寶純真的笑聲,宛如徜徉於恆變宇宙中的呢喃奏樂。
JENN LEE 22 SS- Families
“Adults are only kids grown up”- Walt Disney
This collection is a deeply personal one as it reflects the changes in designer Jenn’s own life as she starts her new life as a mother and what this new journey means to her. This is shown not only through her collection, but also through the bold yet childlike visual motifs through the film.
Award winning production company Renovatio Pictures has returned this season to create a vibrant world filled with color and life as it explores the different forms of love. JENN LEE invited local celebrities, friends and family to take part in this fashion film as it transports the audiences to a world of its own. The unique first person gaming perspective further draws the viewer into this immersive experience as you dive into each unique storyline.
Jenn Lee has worked with talented Taiwanese illustrator JUN YAO ZOIE LIA to create key symbols that reflect the inspiration of this collection. One of the key images that stands out throughout this is the drawing of the umbilical cord, a direct reference to Jenn Lee’s new journey as a mother and a physical representation of the connection between loved ones.These illustrations are animated in the film to help tell the story of the impact that connections and memories have on our lives.
As the global pandemic continues to shape the way we interact with people and we embark on new journeys, Jenn Lee has expressed herself through this collection and hopes to encourage others to not be afraid to express themselves and appreciate the connections we have around us.
Meuko! Meuko! provides the soundtrack to this film and is mixed with different voices from the characters in the film.
--
🖤JENN LEE Team 🖤
李維錚 Wei Chen Lee
劉芸庭 Yun Ting Liu
林昕穎 Xin Ying Lin
吳霈萱 Pei Xuan Wu
毛紫函 Tzu Han Mao
周采丰 Tsai Feng Chou
盧蘊睿 Yun Rui Lu
楊詠茹 Yung Ju Yang
葉重佑 Chung Yu Yeh
何絜霓 Chieh Ni Ho
葉芮妤 Rui Yu Yeh
任宸漢 Chen Han Jen
李俐穎 Li Ying Lee
—
🖤視覺特效製作🖤
再現影像製作股份有限公司
Visual Effects By Renovatio Pictures
視覺特效總監 郭憲聰
Visual Effects Supervisor Tomi Kuo
特效製片 黃棨雋
VFX Producer Peter Huang
CG 數位視覺設計師 吳怡萱
CG Digital Artist Ella Wu
去背遮罩師 陳姵均
Roto Artist Hulk Chen
概念美術設計師 吳怡萱
Concept Design Ella Wu
行政企劃 呂旻穎
Administration Moira Lu
--
🖤Families🖤
黃宣 YELLOW
黃榮勇 Pawan
陳艾美 Amy Chen
阿夜 Marz23
阿娥姐 Monica
白癡公主 87 Princess
阿甜 A Tian
百勒絲 Fairy Pai
雷門 Raven
呀比 Yabi
張維宸 Way Mask
張䕒尹 Mini
李繼堯 Yolanda
王淑緞 Shu Duan Wang
程琪 Kare Chen
樂高 Lego
程舒唯 Edie 艾迪
費俊偉 Dennis Fei
李維錚 Wei Chen Lee
費維 Wei Baby
臭咪 Stinkymimimi
--
🖤Illustration Design and graphic design🖤
廖俊堯 JUN YAO ZOIE LIAO
--
🖤Photographer 🖤
費俊偉 Dennis Fei
--
🖤Sponsors 🖤
文化部
KCC 墾青集團
DENNIS FEI
--
🖤Music 🖤
Meuko! Meuko!
🖤Intro music🖤
庫巧兔 Cloudy Ku - Hermitage Bliss
© all rights reserved
--
JENN LEE Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/official.JENNLEE/
JENN LEE Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jennlee_off...
JENN LEE Website:http://www.jennleestudio.com
PR Contact (Taiwan): ellenliujennlee@gmail.com
PR Contact (UK) :roxannechen@dyelog.co.uk
what are rights 在 大麻煩翻譯組JackO Youtube 的最佳貼文
#Vivziepop #HELLUVABOSS
我並不擁有此影片 影片所有權歸屬於Vivziepop
I do NOT own this video, all rights go to Vivziepop
贊助影片原作者,幫助她製作更多精彩的動畫!
贊助 HAZBIN HOTEL 的 PATREON 網址: https://www.patreon.com/VivienneMedrano
原影片網址(Original Video Link):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXErLiSbxXQ&t=8s
這次的影片由大麻煩翻譯組
& 栗奇 & Sophie 共同製作
還有暖男Baboo最後的最後校正陪同支援
封面是也栗奇大大做的喔!
栗奇的個人頁面:
https://www.facebook.com/ricky.furry.908
好長的一集
而且這次剪輯是我XD 好累
註解區:
3:12
我們之所以用Foxy, Roxie,而不是單純把Moxxie的M改成Foxxie, Roxxie
是因為這裡說的是很多咖啡店都會做的,店員在客人的外帶杯上寫下他們要求的名字
通常是透過用講的去寫,所以難免會遇到聽錯寫錯的狀況
同樣的發音之下Foxy和Roxie是比較常見的名字,所以字幕才會這樣上
4:17
這邊的梗用英文會更完整
What are you? 你是什麼? 這句可以拿來問很多東西
像是職位啊(你是什麼工作)或是究竟何方神聖,還有這邊的星座等等
所以Moxxie前面說的很像是他們怎麼沒問他們究竟是什麼種族,或到底是什麼來頭
等女幹員問What are you?,Moxxie又故意解讀成問星座的去回答星座
4:49
你媽超胖的玩笑在國外也很盛行
而這句本來應該是類似thanking for her fun time或 bed time之類的
就是那種,跟你媽滾床單很爽的玩笑
7:40
從敘述非常明顯在講經典音樂劇「貓」XD
8:31
那個光那個氣氛,那個階梯跟那個唱詞
充滿了音樂劇的味道XD
而且也能從Blitzo的語氣跟外型看出「歌劇魅影」的痕跡
8:38
"It's a bad trip." 並不是在說旅行的事喔
這可以用來指吸毒完很不舒服的狀態或是吸到很爛的毒很不舒服之類的
9:37
加了個Satan撒旦的plain English
說穿了就是我只是平凡的在講話而已,類似中文說強調我在講白話文,在講很平常很簡單的話而已
14:30
感覺作者真的很喜歡「追殺比爾」欸XD
像這個橋段,穿西裝的人成群出來包圍主角,然後又都拿著近戰兵器類的武器
致敬的非常明顯
17:40
真的很鬧XD 即使畫面已經補充了還是想再提一次,我第一次看就注意到的地方
最後一道門鎖是廁所的門XDDD
18:43 ~ 18:48
官方的細節做的很棒
另外被附身,聲音改變,口吐黑色液體等等的橋段也是在致敬1973年的經典恐怖電影「大法師」
---------------------------------------------------------------------
3:20 shot少加s
6:10 them打錯then
18:22 我在戳,我自己最初聽錯,校正字幕沒改到,應該是impish plaything才對
所以應該是「小惡魔玩物」
---------------------------------------------------------------------
希望大家能多多支持我們翻譯組!
訂閱頻道追蹤更多我們的影片!
IG看我們的日常與製作進度: weed99coco1
關於我們翻譯組: https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=4035888
動畫與額外翻譯的網誌:https://weedtrouble.blogspot.com/
我們的Twitter: https://twitter.com/TransWeed
what are rights 在 chungdha Youtube 的最佳貼文
Short Film
導演 Director – Chung Dha Lam
監製 Producers – Alan Leung
執行製作人 Executive Producer – 林俊達
原創故事 Original Story “Paper Girl” – Chung Dha Lam
編劇 Screenwriter – 林俊達 / 問小金
攝影 Cinematographer – Chung Dha Lam
剪接 Editor – Chung Dha Lam
原創音樂 Original Music – Longman Luk
Cast
Kay Krince Mak 麥可怡
John Tai – Wing Yan
Jewelry Shopkeeper – Candice Hui
Friend 2 – Emma
Friend 3 – Yannie Chan
燈光 Gaffer – 林俊達
助理 Runner – 許俊希
化妝 Make up – Kamen Wong / Mim Midori Lai
服裝 Costume – 林俊達 / Alan Leung
道具 Props – Chung Dha Lam
首飾 Jewellery – Paper Diamond
劇照 Stills Photographer – Alan Leung 2
攝製公司 Filming Company – 八十年代有限公司 Ours 80s Ltd
出品 Presents – Chung Dha
嗚謝 Acknowledgement – Paper Diamond, Zaap Zok, D2 Place
特別嗚謝 Special Acknowledgement – Zhiyun Tech 本片故事純屬虛構 如有雷同純屬巧合
The story, all names, characters, and incidents portrayed in this production are fictitious © 2020 Chung Dha All rights reserved
Filmed with Z CAM E2 with Helios 44 55mm f2 & Sigma 18-35mm F1.8
Audio with Rode Wireless Go, Rode Smartlav+ and Tascam DR05
#廣東話 #cantonese #shortfilm
Check out my Adobe Premiere Pro Effects tutorials here:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdjMWVKvc3B2SqrDQB-r5EMxyrn29h6z
Edited with Adobe Premiere Pro - http://goo.gl/k2EagF
If you appreciate what I do, you can support me by donating any amount here on paypal:
http://paypal.me/ChungDha
♪ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@chungdha
? Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/chungdha
? Website: http://www.chungdha.nl
? Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chungdha/
? Twitter: https://twitter.com/chungdha
For any Questions Please Join our Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/chungdhagroup
Business Inquiries, Sponsors & Collaboration email contact@chungdha.com
Chung Dha © 2020 Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong
what are rights 在 What are Rights? - YouTube 的推薦與評價
What is Property in IPR? · SOCIAL RIGHTS IN 2 MINUTES · Growth of Intellectual Property · What Are Rights ? | Political Philosophy with Jason ... ... <看更多>