這是美國聯邦環保署官網上對於「綠能 Green Energy」、「再生能源 Renewable Energy」、「傳統能源 Conventional Energy」能源類別的規類認定。
特別是對於環保生態的有益程度來說,美國聯邦環保署很明確的認定綠能優於其他各種能源類別,是對於環保生態最有益的能源類別,其次為再生能源類別,對於環境生態最不友善的類別是傳统能源。傳統能源包括兩大項目,分別是化石燃料能源(即火力發電類別)以及核能。
美國聯邦環保署解釋,核電在整個生命週期的過程中,在起源的採礦、提煉、製造核燃料的過程中,以及核後端處理的漫長過程中(包括核電廠廢爐除役過程、核廢料短中長期各階段的處理、貯放過程)都無可避免的會對環境生態造成負面影響。
What is Green Power? (這是USEPA 美國聯邦環保署官方網站上對於"綠電(Green Power)的符合資格認定的說明與解釋的完整內容)
The U.S. energy supply is composed of a wide variety of energy resources; however, not all energy resources have the same environmental benefits and costs.
Green power is a subset of renewable energy and represents those renewable energy resources and technologies that provide the highest environmental benefit. The U.S. voluntary market defines green power as electricity produced from solar, wind, geothermal, biogas, eligible biomass, and low-impact small hydroelectric sources. Customers often buy green power for its zero emissions profile and carbon footprint reduction benefits.
Renewable energy includes resources that rely on fuel sources that restore themselves over short periods of time and do not diminish. Such fuel sources include the sun, wind, moving water, organic plant and waste material (eligible biomass), and the earth's heat (geothermal). Although the impacts are small, some renewable energy technologies can have an impact on the environment. For example, large hydroelectric resources can have environmental trade-offs on such issues as fisheries and land use.
Conventional power includes the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil) and the nuclear fission of uranium. Fossil fuels have environmental costs from mining, drilling, or extraction, and emit greenhouse gases and air pollution during combustion. Although nuclear power generation emits no greenhouse gases during power generation, it does require mining, extraction, and long-term radioactive waste storage.
The following graphic depicts how the U.S. Voluntary market defines green power based on its relative environmental benefits.
原始內容請見美國聯邦環保署官網 :
https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/what-green-power
what is uranium 在 媽媽監督核電廠聯盟 Facebook 的最佳貼文
這是美國聯邦環保署官網上對於「綠能 Green Energy」、「再生能源 Renewable Energy」、「傳統能源 Conventional Energy」能源類別的規類認定。
特別是對於環保生態的有益程度來說,美國聯邦環保署很明確的認定綠能優於其他各種能源類別,是對於環保生態最有益的能源類別,其次為再生能源類別,對於環境生態最不友善的類別是傳统能源。傳統能源包括兩大項目,分別是化石燃料能源(即火力發電類別)以及核能。
美國聯邦環保署解釋,核電在整個生命週期的過程中,在起源的採礦、提煉、製造核燃料的過程中,以及核後端處理的漫長過程中(包括核電廠廢爐除役過程、核廢料短中長期各階段的處理、貯放過程)都無可避免的會對環境生態造成負面影響。
What is Green Power? (這是USEPA 美國聯邦環保署官方網站上對於"綠電(Green Power)的符合資格認定的說明與解釋的完整內容)
The U.S. energy supply is composed of a wide variety of energy resources; however, not all energy resources have the same environmental benefits and costs.
Green power is a subset of renewable energy and represents those renewable energy resources and technologies that provide the highest environmental benefit. The U.S. voluntary market defines green power as electricity produced from solar, wind, geothermal, biogas, eligible biomass, and low-impact small hydroelectric sources. Customers often buy green power for its zero emissions profile and carbon footprint reduction benefits.
Renewable energy includes resources that rely on fuel sources that restore themselves over short periods of time and do not diminish. Such fuel sources include the sun, wind, moving water, organic plant and waste material (eligible biomass), and the earth's heat (geothermal). Although the impacts are small, some renewable energy technologies can have an impact on the environment. For example, large hydroelectric resources can have environmental trade-offs on such issues as fisheries and land use.
Conventional power includes the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil) and the nuclear fission of uranium. Fossil fuels have environmental costs from mining, drilling, or extraction, and emit greenhouse gases and air pollution during combustion. Although nuclear power generation emits no greenhouse gases during power generation, it does require mining, extraction, and long-term radioactive waste storage.
The following graphic depicts how the U.S. Voluntary market defines green power based on its relative environmental benefits.
原始內容請見美國聯邦環保署官網 :
https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/what-green-power
what is uranium 在 我是台灣人.台灣是咱的國家 Facebook 的最讚貼文
AC:
1986年車諾比核災,至今烏克蘭、白俄羅斯和俄國仍然有許多患有先天性心臟病,即「車諾比心」Chernobyl Heart的兒童,等待慈善機構的開心手術。
「車諾比心」Chernobyl Heart是因為核電廠釋放出來的輻射銫 Caesium-137沈積在肌肉組織,導致肌肉細胞長期受輻射曝照而造成的病變。
而心臟肌肉是人體最強壯有勁的肌肉,而且也是24X7 不能停止工作的肌肉。
父母受銫曝照,造基因受損,導致生下來的小孩先天性心臟病。
SHARE THIS PLEASE!! EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW EVERYTHING HERE: The results from nuclear disasters go on for many lifetimes. Chernobyl happened in 1986 but the suffering continues even today just like this. Read this sweet little girl's story from October 2013. She is only one of thousands still suffering. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151771440718295&set=a.123480248294.102931.6162933294&type=1&theater Thank you Chernobyl Children International for taking care of these children. Really wish you didn't have to. Wish these children could have lived normal lives. www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ujAG_Ofj4M
That is the suffering caused by the nuclear industry.
Denied by the nuclear industry. Watch Nuclear Controversies here http://nuclear-news.net/…/nuclear-controversies-full-lengt…/
Listen very carefully, is not TEPCO who is causing more suffering in Japan today. It is the nuclear industry's poison the power company TEPCO housed that is causing the global problems today.
From the same industry whose poison was also released in 1986 and is causing pain and suffering even today downwind from Chernobyl. Just like what has happened to this sweet little girl and thousands like her.
It is the same industry who claims their industry is safe and clean but yet has wasted 2.5 years not solving Fukushima. Why is that? Do they not have a solution to help???
YOUR HELP IS NEEDED: We need to join together as caring responsible citizens from around the world to stop the nuclear industry. It is time to stop the abuse of children and families like this through nuclear poison releases. The only way to ensure that is to shut down nuclear reactors. we have over 100 nuclear reactors scattered all over the United States of America. 100 possible chances of this happening to us.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=477784042340499&set=a.157069831078590.31188.150882998363940&type=1&relevant_count=1
One more thing: It is not right to trade global warming for nuclear meltdowns!!! Nuclear has got to go too!! https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=476962815755955&set=a.157069831078590.31188.150882998363940&type=1&relevant_count=1
GET TO KNOW ABOUT THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. It explains a lot.
Nuclear is part of the military industrial complex. The military industrial complex is what has caused the suffering downwind from Chernobyl. The military industrial complex is what will cause the suffering downwind from Fukushima (that's US citizens!!)
The military industrial complex is what is causing suffering in Fallujah because ammunition used there was laced with depleted uranium to pierce through armor. Now it is piercing through lives. https://www.youtube.com/watch… Just like in Chernobyl.
Just like in Fukushima.
Nuclear for wars. Nuclear for power plants. No difference. The end results are the same. Destruction of lives. Crimes against humanity.
The military industrial complex has created Agent Orange and caused similar suffering even to this day in Vietnam. Created by Monsanto. Know that name???
The same company that now refuses to tell US citizens where the Genetically Modified Organisms they created are in the U.S. citizen food supply. Monsanto has invested millions upon millions of dollars to make sure US citizens don't get so much as labeling of these things on their food supply.
In our humble opinion action like this--actions where Monsanto also turns farmer against farmer--(Watch the documentary David vs. Monsanto trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAuOo5qFUXo#t=57 and full length documentary here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dw961tpkkA) requires a BAN on Monsanto produced products
Here's the lasting legacy of Monsanto from Vietnam
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4494347.stm
http://vn-agentorange.org/news.html
GET TO KNOW ABOUT THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. General Eisenhower warned against it back in his farewell speech in 1961. Many of us were not born yet when this happened. But it is important to get to know history otherwise we will continue to allow the mistakes of the past to continue.
From President and Former General Eisenhower's well written farewell speech in 1961 warning about the military industrial complex, "Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals."
Full text here http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html where he even makes reference to Monsanto "A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel...
But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration." (Section 3 Paragraph 3)
Short version of speech here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Analysis of the speech here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
Full speech on video here
https://archive.org/…/DwightD.Eisenhower-FarewellAddressmil…
BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE HAVE WOKEN UP TO WHAT THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS DOING YET, THEY CONTINUE TO BRANCH OUT INTO OTHER DIRECTIONS MORE AND MORE. INCLUDING TO THE TPP-THIS IS NOT RIGHT. Info on the TPP here http://www.democracynow.org/…/obama_backed_trans_pacific_pa…