【龔成問答信箱】(Q18261-Q18280)
Q18261:
龔成你好。一年前有朋友介紹我follow你,我follow左但一直冇太認真留意。
直到暑假時,我屋企人俾公司裁員,突然之間有種背負住屋企人既責任,我都覺得係時候要增值下自己財富。所以我決定再返去你個page睇下,現在已經開始睇你既書。
今年21歲,仲係讀緊書嘅大學生,很少投資知識和經驗。現時剛剛開始做10個月實習,一個月人工應該有$10000左右。
同屋企人商議好俾$2500家用,我紀錄過每月支出都係維持大約1000元,預計每月可儲到$6500左右。
我原本打算月供$4000買股票,但實習完左之後嘅一年我唔會有收入,因為我要讀埋最後一年大學先畢業。手頭上現金有大約5萬左右,所以中間果一年我未必可能有足夠資金投入股票。
我想問三個問題:
1) 我知道愈早投資愈好,請問我應唔應該下年邊返part time邊返學,還是問家人借住少少加自己錢月供,定係唔好投資繼續儲多d資本將來先再月供?
2) 如果開始月供,應該用邊間銀行或證券行開戶最好?我個人可以比較進取和承受少少既風險,除左盈富之外,仲可以加咩股做組合?如何分佈?
3) 我會開始睇關於投資既書,除左你d書同埋富爸爸窮爸爸之外,有咩書適合我呢種新手睇?
龔成老師︰
1) 你可以做一些PARTTIME去維持一定收入,就算唔能夠跟今年月供金額一樣,也盡力去接近,咁樣會較理想。借貸投資始終有風險,同時只適合高階投資者,加上要在明顯平的市況才會動用。
2) 你可以睇翻佢地收費,基本上用銀行或證券行都無問題。
以你年紀計,"平穏增長股" + "潛力股"都適合。
平穏增長股,如盈富(2800)、金沙(1928)、恆基(0012)、中銀(2388)、港鐵(0066)、煤氣(0003)、港交所(0388)、粵海(0270)、領展(0823)、希慎(0014)、太古地產(1972)
潛力股︰比亞迪(1211),中生(1177)或福壽園(1448)。
由於你現時無乜選股經驗,你可以先用盈富基金(2800)作為你投資目標,佢係包括50間質素不錯上市公司股票的組合,有助你平衡組合中的風險。每月可先月供$3000在盈富基金,餘下的資金就先儲起。
現時大市只是合理區較底位置,你現有5萬資金可以先投入一半,分2注,去入盈富。餘下一半和每月儲到的錢就等大市出現一定程度的下跌,才掃貨。
其間要努力增加投資知識,在看書、新聞、報目關課程。到你有一定能力和經驗,就開始買其他我建議的股票。
3) 以下是我認為適合初學者睇的書:
《我十一歲,就很有錢》
《經濟蕭條中,七年賺$1500萬》
《思考致富聖經》
《秘密》
《財富金鑰匙》
《有錢人想的和你不一樣》
《世界上最偉大的成功寶典》
《洛克菲勒寫給兒子的38封信》
《解讀巴菲特》
《巴菲特傳-永恆的價值》
《勝券在握》
《智慧型股票投資人》
《非常潛力股》
《彼得林區的選股戰略》
《誰搬走了我的乳酪?》
《人性的弱點》
------------------------------------------------
Q18262:
你好,想請教一下您
本人今年27歲,月入28k,下年應該可以有55萬左右既首期,亦應該會準備生育。
有睇過您出的《5年買樓4部曲》,你認為250尺既細物業係值得投資,咁170至200尺既物業你有咩睇法,因為我而家不斷出去睇樓
滿意又合乎首期既物業多係半新樓,而太子XX(380萬179尺,銀行估價為360)及大埔XX(350萬192尺,銀行估價為354萬)都係其中之一,請問你覺得值得投資嗎?
真是麻煩你了,謝謝你
若購買單位後,打算出租之用
龔成老師:
250呎是最少的投資,如果少過250呎,就開始勉強,物業的價值唔算高。
半新樓都可留意下,新樓就唔建議。你最重要是計下租金回報率及呎價,比較下同區同類的單位,比較下你想買入的單位,是否有吸引力。
由於少過250呎,因此,要「吸引」,即是比其他物業價錢較好先考慮,否則唔投資。
這些少過250呎的物業,過往一年回落左唔少,價錢上有機會找到較合理的,但你都要明白,佢在質素上始終會較一般。
------------------------------------------------
Q18263:
龔sir, 碧柱園服務同雅生活已經有明顯既盈利預測,所以股價一直高企,看似回落機會不大
發展急速,現價碧桂園服務可以買進嗎?你會用邊類估值方法來幫物管股估值?
龔成老師︰
碧桂園服務(6098)有質素,這企業的生意不錯,本身有規模,盈利正不斷增加,加上高股本回報率,而且行業處增長狀態,而佢的規模及品牌,相信能助佢持續取得生意。
但有兩個問題,第一是佢上市年期不算久,這刻根本未見到企業的真實情況,因此仍要觀察。第二是估值,現時市盈率去到近80倍,少少貴的水平。
而雅生活服務(3319)無論在業務本質、規模、品牌、財務數據、前景,都是理想的,反映這企業有一定的質素。加上這企業的背景因素,以及行業的發展,相信這企業的前景不差,有長線投資的價值。
這企業的發展快速,可說是有危有機,雖然可帶動業務快速增長,同時會令企業造成風險,你要明白這點。
質素及增長力來計,碧桂園服務(6098)較高,但太貴,此刻唔會考慮。
從整體質素與投資值博率去考慮,雅生活服務(3319)會較好。現價在合理區上部,可以投資,但只能小注,並要分注慢慢入。
------------------------------------------------
Q18264:
請教一下隻新創建,佢剛賣左巴士業務,看來清除左瘀血,但又好似想收購不良資產業務,呢隻值得長線投資嗎?雖然息率吸引
龔成老師︰
新創建集團(0659)於8 月21 日宣布,以32億出售旗下新巴及城巴業務,買家為 Templewater Bravo Holdings Limited、漢思能源及 Ascendal Group Limited 合組的財團。
由於巴士並非其核心業務,佔盈利比重唔算高,對集團長線影響唔會太大。
整體而言,集團質素算是不差,但又未到最高級別,業務分散於多個範疇,部分與公共事業有關,過往的生意雖然穩定上升,但盈利卻停滯不前。
企業本身不是沒有優勢,長遠仍有增長能力,但由於賺錢能力略有下降,加上企業本身已很龐大,增長期望不會太多,過往過價大致穩定,你宜集中在股息多於股價回報。
------------------------------------------------
Q18265:
龔sir你好! 有選股的問題想請教。24歲,收入15k。
現時持有港鐵225股,
越秀房地產569股,
長江基建234股,
中生製藥336股,
比亞迪82股,
中國平安53股,
盈富基金325股,
香港電訊86股。
每月供港鐵$1000
長江基建$1000
中國平安$500
盈富基金$1500.
現時每月手上有鬆動的$3000,想問我應該選擇哪一股?還是在原本的組合內加碼?謝謝
龔成老師:
你持有的,基本上都是有質素的股票,但以一隻24歲的人來說,增長力不算強,你可以減翻D收息類股或增長力不算強的股,如長建(1038)、香港電訊(6823)、越秀(0405)。(你不用全部減,可以慢慢調整或減部分)。
如果你之後有資金增加,可月供增長力高少少的股,可考慮:南方恒生科技ETF(3033)、阿里(9988)、騰訊(0700)、港交所(0388)、舜宇光學(2382)、小米(1810)、比亞迪(1211)、中生製藥(1177),但就要明白波動性比上述會高左,同時風險大左,你要自己平衡。
現時大市處合理區,可以一邊投資一邊留現金,而餘下現金的運用,就是等大跌市時出手,如果你能在這段時間學好選股等技巧,到大跌市時就能把握機會,財富增值會更明顯。
------------------------------------------------
Q18266:
hello hello.岩岩做左幾年野,最近先開始玩股票,想請教下你。
想問下月供同自己買碎股最大既分別係咩?如果我每個月將自己草到既錢自己去買碎股,唔係flexible d咩?又或者草幾個月一手一手咁買入,係咪都可以?
暫時打算買入盈富,香港電訊,港燈。呢個組合會唔會太保守?thanks
龔成老師:
月供同入碎股類似的,但月供就是「固定金額」。
而比起一手手入,月供會較有平均價格的效果。
簡單來說,月供股票就是你每月將現金,買入某一隻或多隻股票,慢慢咁樣儲貨。坊間不少銀行都有提供月供股票服務,你先開證券戶口,然後登記做月供股票。
形式就是每月投入相同的金額,買入同一隻或多隻股票,並持續進行。
例如,每月以相同金額$10,000 買入盈富基金(2800),假設第一個月股價為$25,就能買入400股;第二個月升至$35,就能買入286 股;第三個月跌回$30,就能買入333股。
總結這三個月,投入了的資金為$30,000,累積股票為1019股,平均買入價為$29.4。
由於月供股票每月投入的金額相同,因此當股價上升時,買入的股數自然減少,而當股價下跌時,就自然會買入較多股數,如同自行調節一樣。
要注意的是,由於每月持續投入資金,因此一定要選優質股,長線投資,同時要以儲股票的概念進行,最少持續供3 年以上,之後持有5年以上。
至於你的組合,的確較保守,不太適合年輕人。
------------------------------------------------
Q18267:
老師今年年中先認識你,睇左你幾本書,股票勝經,致富藍圖同50潛力股係入面挑選左823呢隻股 好好彩贏左6千
但我知呢啲係新手弊病!所以我將果小小錢再加啲錢黎報讀你既股票基礎班,希望增值下自己
另外較早前買入1810十手購入價係15.10 升到而加20 真係好興奮
因為有之前既經驗今次點都唔放!希望體驗到陪升既感覺
由乜都唔識跟人買數字股輸左幾萬之後,到而加識小小又贏到啲個感覺真係好開心,已報你班,期待跟你學多啲知識!
龔成老師:
相信你已基本明白投資原理,投資並不是坊間的炒炒賣賣,而是持有優質股,長線。同時建立一個組合。
領展(0823)、小米(1810)都有長線持有的價值,你可以長線,唔好比中短期股價影響。同時,可以加入其他股票,建立一個更平衡的組合。
具體建議你上完堂,先慢慢配置自己的組合。股票班見!
------------------------------------------------
Q18268:
老師你好,想請問有咩長線潛力股可以推介,例如比亞迪同美團,本人唔介意承受風險,
同時想請問老師,領展股價可否從上90高位
謝謝老師。身體健康
龔成老師:
可考慮:南方恒生科技ETF(3033)、阿里(9988)、騰訊(0700)、港交所(0388)、舜宇光學(2382)、小米(1810)、比亞迪(1211)、中生製藥(1177),但就要明白波動性高,同時風險大左,你要自己平衡。
同時不少都唔平,你要控親注碼。
領展(0823)慢慢會向上,$90有機的。
------------------------------------------------
Q18269:
龔老師,本人32歲,已婚有兩個小朋友,收入唔多,扣除生活成本,每個月只有$1000多可存。
想問零存整付 和 月供股票 哪一個較適合我存錢/投資/抗通脹? (或者其他)謝謝
龔成老師:
以你的年齡,月供股票較好,但你要先留一定的備用現金,之後先進行月供。
盈富(2800)$1000較適合你。
但你要留意手續費,如果手續費太高,就唔值得做。
------------------------------------------------
Q18270:
你好龔老師,本人今年30歲,剛新婚,正職月入25000。
無做投資,依家有20萬左右saving。欲2年內育1子,長遠希望可達至財務自由。
1. 打算與家人購入土瓜灣近地鐵站40年左右2房單位(430萬,會做高成數按揭)
a) 請問現時是買樓時機嗎?
2. 請問如果新手投資,該如何步處? (每月可儲10000左右)
3. 若現時做線上小生意,是好時機嗎?
多謝龔老師細閱。
龔成老師:
1)地點不差。但要留意樓齡的維修相關問題。
香港樓中短期有可能波動,但長遠仍是向上,就算跌期跌都唔會多,如果你睇中,都可考慮,最重要是「供得起」。
2)你要做三樣野,第一,增加知識,你要學理財及投資的知識,記住,投資並不是坊間的炒炒賣賣,你要從書本或課堂上認真學習。《股票勝經》適合初階者的。
第二,了解銀行及證券行,去開一個證券戶口,並準備做月供股票。
其實兩者都可以,銀行就較方便,但手續費就較貴,證券行收費就較平。你可以先了解下不同的收費。
第三,將每月的部分資金,去做月供股票,供盈富(2800)。對初階投資者來說,月供股票是一個很好的累積財富方法,因為可避免你一次過在高位買入的風險。
原理如同儲錢,不過就不是儲現金,而是儲股票。計劃要長期進行。
另外,盈富是一個組合,適合絕大部分人投資,風險不高,長期儲貨可助你財富平穩增值,記住要長線持有。
當你在做上述三件事的同時,開始學下股票,了解下那些股票適合你自己。上述只同你簡單供盈富,當你過半年,有知識及少少經驗後,就可以利用你手上的資金,其中一部分,去投資股票。
3)是時機。其實這些生意,愈早開始愈好,太多人得個「想」字,先行者能賺最多錢的。
------------------------------------------------
Q18271:
龔老師: 跪求指點迷津!
本人33歲月入3萬公務員,
同父母同住,每月一萬家用、一萬投資 ($9000月供股票) 、一萬其他消費(交通、飲食、娛樂等,通常每月用5千左右,其他儲起)
手上現有現金約80萬
股票共約22萬:
月供組合: 煤氣$1500、比亞迪$1500、港鐵$3000、盈富$3000
尚有小量建設銀行、阿里巴巴、小米、中生製藥、金沙
目標:
財務自由!財務自由!財務自由!
移居泰國,努力尋找副業發展中!
投資組合上,請問有沒有可加速的方案達到目標?
亦有機會準備同男朋友同居,消費上又一筆…. 唉
龔成老師:
你上述月供的,都是有質素的股票,你可以進行長期月供,至於持股,無問題,同樣是有質素的,長期持有就得。
如果你要加速,有兩個方向,第一,加大投資潛力股比例,當然,要求你的投資實力都會多左,你唔單止要月供,同時要自行選股,把握買入時機,創造較高的回報。
如果想增長力高少少,可考慮:南方恒生科技ETF(3033)、阿里(9988)、騰訊(0700)、港交所(0388)、舜宇光學(2382)、小米(1810)、比亞迪(1211)、中生製藥(1177),但就要明白波動性比上述會高左,同時風險大左,你要自己平衡。最好當然等回落先考慮。
你現時有$80萬,可以想想怎樣平衡風險與回報。
但要留意,現時大市未平,要一邊投資一邊留現金,而餘下現金的運用,就是等大跌市時出手,如果你能在這段時間學好選股等技巧,到大跌市時就能把握機會,財富增值會更明顯。
第二,如果你打算移居泰國,又想發展副業,最好是發展一些與香港及泰國有關的業務,你要把握一些你的優勢,你要尋找這個市場。
你的消費將會進一步增加,因此要尋找更高的收入。
------------------------------------------------
Q18272:
你好,呢排睇過2007碧桂園同883中國海洋石油,呢兩隻股票現價算唔算合理價?
同埋有冇發展潛力?
龔成老師:
碧桂園(2007)的質素都不差,但碧桂園服務(6098)更好。2007拆出6098後,質素略略減。
2007要不斷發展物業去賣,這樣才不斷有生意,但6098的模式就不用,物業管理是持續性的,擁有一個項目後,就會有持續的現金流,加上2007負債較多,所以從質素上,6098更好。
但要留意6098現價略貴,投資要控制注碼。
至於中國海洋石油(0883)雖然質素都算有,但不是最高質類別,佢對油價較為敏感。
雖然佢都有一定的規模,但卻不是最高質素的企業,這是由於佢地的產品自主力較弱。
石油是商品,當中沒有差異性,佢地要將石油賣出,只能跟國際油價,這令佢地處於被動狀態。沒有價格自主的能力,這令佢地的獨特性有限。這類商品企業,都可投資,但就要明白不是最高質的企業。
由於質素中等,唔建議大注投資,但相信油價上翻佢會上升的。
------------------------------------------------
Q18273:
hello sir 想請教以下問題:
本人28歲月入$18000,明白收入偏低而且支出不少,希望能盡力每月賺取固定的額外收入,現擁有現金4萬及以下股票:
1. 0788 - 8000股
2. 1928 - 800股
3. 3347 - 200股
4. 9988 - 100股
5. 9999- 100股
問題一: 因為現金不多又希望作備用現金,請問是否建議沽出上述股票?
問題二: 接觸股票不久,明白買得太散,但因為要等出糧先有錢買,但見到覺得潛力股就想買,請問是否建議沾出上述某幾隻股票?
再將資金購入2013/799/3033 其中一隻?請問sir 推薦邊隻?
問題三:是否建議沽出9999或9988及3347,走一轉再主力購入9988?
謝謝老師解答!
龔成老師:
1)現時你的$4萬,可以作為備用現金,不要動用。而現時你的持有,基本上都是有質素的,你可以長線持有,唔好心急賣出。
2)其實,你最重要是建立一個長期的組合,唔好轉來轉去,你可以想清楚,自己的投資策略如何,那些股票值得你長線。
南方恒生科技(3033)可長線的。
3)唔好做「走一轉」的投資,無意義的。
------------------------------------------------
Q18274:
龔sir,你好
最近開始想學習股票投資
係Facebook youtube 都留意左好幾個吾同既老師
佢地好多都係做短期炒買
例如day trade ,swing trade
我想請教下佢地做這類既買賣係咪主要用統計過往股市走勢?
或者估股民心理?
*我個人都係比較覺得龔sir既理論適合自己
另外想問一下,龔sir既書籍有冇教企業估值?有的話是那一本?
龔成老師:
我20年前,都是短炒者,技術分析者,用左幾年,輸足幾年,之後長線投資,就開始不斷賺錢。
我好後悔當時浪費左幾年去學這些分析技術,我當時不斷睇書、上堂學短炒,但最後都是輸,好後悔,只怪我當時無知。
之後做銀行同證券行,見大部分輸錢的客,就是短炒的一群!這是我10年見到的情況,這是行內的秘密,根本大家都知短炒者一定輸,但業界一定唔會講!
另外,如果你分析全球真正賺錢的投資者、經金經理,佢地都無人短炒,都是長線投資的,巴菲特更講明反對短炒,反對技術分析。
只要我地用少少腦去想,都會明短短炒根本賺唔到錢。長線先至係王道。
坦白講,要計企業的價值,過程比較複雜,好難三言兩語就講到,就算在我的股票班,都要講5小時,裡面會講3種估值方法,有難有易,但同學都用到的。
簡單來說,要考慮企業的生意、盈利、現金流等財務數據,同時要比較行業,考慮這企業的經營情況,之後的環境又會如何。這都是計算的基礎。
但如果要深入計算,基本上要好仔細的研究企業,要分析好多財務數據用比率,先至有較完整的答案。
------------------------------------------------
Q18275:
老師,想問月供盈富 好唔好?
現在應唔應該入里亞巴巴呀?
龔成老師:
月供盈富(2800),可以進行,盈富現價合理。
至於阿里(9988)這股有質素,有增長力,不過現價唔算平,所以你如果入,只能小小注,或等回落先,又或以月供模式進行。
------------------------------------------------
Q18276:
龔成老師,你好!自從follow 你嘅page 同埋睇左你D書之後,都已經慢慢開始投資股票。非常感激!
目前擁有嘅股票如下:0066 - 1500股,0823 - 100 股,2800 - 2408股。一直都係月供盈富。其他嘅都係趁3月份嘅時候,一手手買嘅。
之前龔老師都有講過,澳門銀行月供嘅手續費相對比較貴,所以我都諗住係每個月繼續供5000蚊,不過係輪住月供,一個月供2800,一個月供0066,一個月供823咁。
等如果有好時機,再一手手買。請問咁嘅安排好嗎?
月入都只係大概15000蚊,我一個月用5000蚊月供,跟住另外5000蚊儲嚟供馬來西亞嘅債券同埋基金(需要供5年)
現金儲蓄大概有20萬。我想再加一個潛力股,比較有興趣嘅係小米1810。請問龔老師,我咁樣配置嘅話都恰當嗎?
或者我應該點樣做會比較好?
非常感謝龔老師嘅時間,會耐心等候回覆!
同龔老師再補充返小小資料先,我係喺澳門返工嘅馬來西亞人,所以想係澳門嘅呢幾年儘量儲多D錢。謝謝龔老師。
龔成老師:
你上述所月供的,都是有質素的,你可以長線持有及月供。
你可以每月供$5000,轉住供上述的3股,這3股都值得長線,由於盈富(2800)是組合,比起單一股票有較大的風險平衡作用,因此,盈富的比例可多少少,你可以盈富供2個月,然後另外2股各供1個月。
至於基合與債券,最重要是選一些有質素,風險唔高的,債券要有「A」評級的。
至於小米(1810),長遠有發展力,現價在合理區中上部,你可以投資。
你唔好用盡現金,慢慢運用$20萬資金,任何時候都盡量留有一定的現金。
------------------------------------------------
Q18277:
龔sir你好!我有個疑惑,我有時抵受唔到其他好股票升嘅好消息誘惑,都想分杯羹,再加上可以分散風險,所以就買左20隻,每隻小注,當然我明咁樣管理起身會麻煩
通常話持倉股票隻數唔好咁多,10隻左右,哩兩種諗法點平衡?我宜家又需唔需要,點管理減少持股數量呢?多謝指教!
龔成老師:
根據一些學術的研究,如果你持股的數日超過15隻,的確能減少集中風險,能將非系統性的風險減少,不過,由於太多股票管理困難,所以我會建議在當中加入ETF,例如盈富(2800),已經能有效減少風險。
另一方面,持有太多股你管理會好難,因為當你買入股票後,你應該要持續檢討,久不久要睇佢地的業務情況,業績、財務數據。
所以,我會建議你在買入前,要自己寫一份報告,對企業有一定的了解,同時有充份的理由,才買入,這就安全更多。我自己都是這樣。
------------------------------------------------
Q18278:
龔成老師你好,本人最近開始同兩個朋友一齊開舖搞生意,真正落手落腳做先發現原來大家好多意見分歧,而有一個朋友更加係成日唔覆機,唔做野
但臨落決定先諸多意見同阻撓,覺得好氣餒,想你俾少少意見。其實做生意係咪最好唔同人合資?
龔成老師:
同別人合作做生意,經常都有不同的煩野,我自己都試過,我試過有其中一盤生意,我付出多佢付出少,大家分成一樣,所以最後決定拆伙。
後來又試過有另一盤生意,佢出左一D古惑野,大家最後無左信任,所以最後決定拆伙。
合作做生意真的好煩,你要睇下點樣處理,你想一些長遠的方法,如果認為無得搞,就拆伙。
我自己而家D生意,都是自己搞的,我現時會用「請人」「外判工作」的方法,總之,我是老版,我比錢去買別人的時間同服務,我要有控制權。
------------------------------------------------
Q18279:
老師你好 我近2-3個月先開始意識到投資為未來的重要性。所以而家好心急 想請教你方法
我已婚 36歲 沒有小朋友
一直都沒有儲蓄習慣
現時每月收入17000
$2000供保險
每月儲3000去做月供股票
盈富$1500
比亞迪$1500
兩手恒生入手價$139
有30萬現金,但想用黎投資餐飲業,(搵左成年都未搵到入市時機) 所以一直唔敢用呢舊現金去股票市場做投資
另有20萬人民幣係屋企人比我的本意用黎開額外需要的後備資金(未有用處)
財務自由好似離我好遠 ,我想未來可以去泰國移民
我想問
1)我恒生唔望到近年儲會升上去 好唔好做止蝕 ,用呢舊錢去買其他增長速度快啲既股票?
2)如果真係買,建唔建議去買美股Tesla ? (長揸)
3) 老師對農夫山泉未來發展睇法如何呢 (長揸)
4)之前睇過你寫既經歷 月入$8000但儲蓄$10000到底可以點做到 ?
5)因為心急, 但又細膽,我拎左$20000去試玩股票牛熊 , 每次都係入4-5千 ,有$500-1000收益,明白唔係長遠方法,但唔個仲有咩方式可以
老師會否對我情況有任何意見?可以令我快啲上返軌道
謝謝老師
龔成老師:
1)恆生(0011)你預佢主力收息,股價增長力不強,不過要上翻你的買入價,都有機會,以你的年齡,轉其他轉適合,只是你想現價轉還是等佢上翻去先轉。
2)Tesla是潛力股,可投資,現要留意股價會較波動,自己要控制注碼。
3)業務有質素,但唔平,因此小注好了。
4)你可以睇《80後2百萬富翁》,我是利用狂做兼職去增加收入,去完成目標的。
5)唔好再玩牛熊證,長遠計你一定輸的。
你現時保持月供,方向已正確,同時睇下生意方面如何。備用現金唔好急用。可以在這段時,多留意生意的資訊,以及不同類別,小本的生意。
同時,多學習投資知識,對你長遠有好大作用。
------------------------------------------------
Q18280:
龔sir你好 我2014年做過債務舒緩計劃每月還$9615.97足足還左70期 今年6月已經清還晒
2018年喺恒生做咗個儲蓄三年計劃每月儲5000元
另在2019喺AIA又係做咗個儲蓄三年計劃每月儲3000元
我係做旅遊業 因工作量不大如前 但自己又想置業
呢刻如果問銀行借十萬元出嚟
分60期還 用嚟一次過投資股票 會唔會太冒險 咁應該投資哪類型好
謝謝老師回覆
龔成老師:
理財不能太進取,要平衡風險去爭取合理回報。
你現時的儲蓄計劃可以進行,不過當中的回報可能較低,你應該同時投資其他有增長力的項目,建立「財富組合」。
至於借$10萬買股票,是高風險,無人知最後能否賺錢,當你以為自己一定賺時,就是最危險的時候!
建議你想方法增加收入,加大儲蓄。同時投資穩健類別的股票,去累積財富。
----------------------------------------------
若你有問題想向本人發問,可在龔成的fb專頁中(www.facebook.com/80shing)inbox龔成,但要注意如無特別聲明,有可能將問答放上網,當然,會將發問者的身份,以及有關個人資料的部分刪去。
另外,我所給予的各種意見,只是供大家參考,當中無任何銷售及推介,不涉及任何利益,其實大家應該要有獨立分析的能力,我只是給予一些方向及純參考模式。
由於提問人數眾多,見諒無法即日回覆,如果是普通的提問,預起碼要7天以上才能回覆,若然是較複雜的提問,起碼要10天才能回覆,希望各位能諒解。
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過80萬的網紅果籽,也在其Youtube影片中提到,出租漫畫店曾經是大人細路最愛流連的地方,幾蚊租一本漫畫,回家慢慢嘆。不知從何時開始,人們看漫畫的習慣,由實體書轉移到網上漫畫,漫畫店慢慢消失,出租漫畫幾成絕響。蔡子雄一家可說是漫畫世家,他與父親、母親、哥哥都經營漫畫店生意,九十年代高峯時一家人共有五間分店,主要出售二手漫畫和出租漫畫。後來實體漫畫熱...
土瓜灣地舖出售 在 Auman Facebook 的精選貼文
Just a quick update for those who might not have heard of our election result as of yesterday.
We've had the highest voting rate since 2004, with a turnout rate of 58% - reflecting how important it is given that it is the first one since the Umbrella Movement in 2014.
Pro-democracy camp has maintained its veto power in LegCo (at least in relation to members bills and constitutional reforms), winning 19 seats out of 35 in the Geographical Constituency, and 11 out of 35 in the Functional Constituency.
There are some new faces in the LegCo, with new generations now entering the council. Six candidates have set to advocate for Hong Kong's "self-determination" in the LegCo. Although localist parties did not do as well as I'd hope, overall the results still remain positive.
In case you've missed it, here's the video which is a continuation of my previous video explaining how Hong Kong is not China. This video will give you a better idea into Hong Kong's flawed institutional structure. It is to be seen whether call for Hong Kong's self-determination can really be brought up in the LegCo.
Lastly, for the next period of time, I will be returning to my usual Cantonese videos (travelling, vlogging etc). I know that many of you perhaps don't understand Cantonese so I will be putting on English subtitles in my future videos.
Thanks,
Auman
Hong Kong Independence?
…all you need to know about recent Hong Kong in 15 minutes
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
↓↓Transcript (as requested)↓↓
我們之前提及香港與中國有截然不同的制度
So previously we talked about Hong Kong and China having vastly a different system
香港是一個仿民主社會,而中國即由中國共產黨統治
Hong Kong is a quasi-democratic society while China is dominated by the Chinese Communist Party
所以我們不希望人們混淆兩者
…so we don’t want people to get confused between the two
但故事還未講完
But the story doesn’t end here
明年是2017年,香港主權移交給中國的20週年
Next year 2017, it would be 20 years since Hong Kong’s turnover to China
你大概會以為這段時間香港和中國會越走越近
You would’ve thought that during this time, Hong Kong and China would’ve grown closer to one another
但事實卻非如此
But it has not been so.
香港人和中國人反而變得越來越有隔膜
If anything, we’ve grown to be more and more apart.
-\-\-
沒錯 在過去20年
Yes it is true that during the last two decades
中國從一個發展中國家 發展成現時最大經濟體系之一
China has gone from being a developing country to what is now one of the largest, if not the largest economy in the world
人民收入增加 生活質素提升 有些中國人也躋身全球富豪榜
…which means rising income for Chinese citizens, better quality of life and China has some of the richest people in the world
香港人應該為中國人身份感到自豪吧
If anything, Hong Kong people should be a proud China man!
我還記得2008北京奧運 那個開幕典禮實在是精妙絕倫
I still remember seeing the Beijing Olympics in 2008; that opening ceremony was outrageously amazing
花了很多心機 很好看
…it was beautifully done and such a joy to watch
那是香港人少有地為國家感到自豪的一刻
It was one of those rare moments where Hong Kong people share the same sense of pride as the rest of China
不過 現實歸現實
But the Olympics is one thing, and reality is another
-\-\-
事實上,自主權移交以來,香港和中國一直有許多矛盾和衝突
The truth is there have been a lot of conflicts between Hong Kong and China since the handover
香港向中國打開了大門,每天都有大量中國遊客到訪
Hong Kong has largely opened up to China where we get a huge number of Chinese tourists every day
旅客本身不應該是個問題,但我們目睹過不少中國旅客的不文明行為
並不是問題。重點在於中國遊客所製造出來的問題。
While tourism shouldn’t be a problem in itself, we have witnessed a lot of issues with these Chinese tourists
例如不懂得在迪士尼樂園排隊 和隨地小便
There had been reports of uncivilized behavior such as not knowing how to queue in Disneyland and… pissing on the street.
我必須強調 不是所有中國遊客都會這樣做 只有一部份會這樣做
And I can’t emphasize enough, not every Chinese tourists do it, it’s just some that does it
但由於香港每天都有大量的中國遊客 這成為了一個逼切的問題
…but because Hong Kong gets so many of them, that becomes a daily problem for people living in Hong Kong.
除此之外,我們可以看到名牌店和藥房的數量激增,以滿足中國遊客的需求
And it’s not just that, we see the rise in luxury shops and pharmacies in Hong Kong to tailor the need of Chinese tourists
如果你去上水(很接近中國邊境的地方)的街頭
If you go to a street in Sheung Shui, which is a place very close to the mainland border
我以前常常去的──你會看見到處都是藥房
I used to go there a lot - you see streets full of pharmacies
其實我完全不明白為何這些店舖會叫做藥房
…and I don’t even know why they are called pharmacies
因為他們主要不是售賣藥物,而是奶粉和尿片
…because mainly they don’t sell medicine, they sell baby milk formula and diapers.
事實上 大陸人不相信中國製的貨品
The thing is, mainland Chinese don’t trust their own stuff
因為在中國任何東西都有可能是假的 那裡沒有質量管制或食物安全
…because you can get fake everything in China; there’s no quality control or food safety
所以很多中國人都會來香港買日用品 如奶粉
So many Chinese come to Hong Kong to buy daily stuff and one product that has always been in high demand is baby milk formulas
香港部份地區甚至出現奶粉短缺的問題
It has got to a point where the supply became so tight that there is a shortage of milk formulas in some areas of Hong Kong
如果你住在歐洲或美國,這情況可能難以置信
If you are living in the Europe or the US, this might sound really hard to believe
嬰兒配方奶粉和尿片!但這是真的,這切切實實在香港發生
Milk formula and diapers, but it’s true, it is what’s happening in Hong Kong.
還有其他問題,例如中國孕婦來港產子等
I can go on about other stuff as well such as the number of Mainland pregnant women who come to Hong Kong
事實上,在2010年,37%新生嬰兒的父母均不是香港永久居民
In fact, in 2010, as much as 37% of all babies born in Hong Kong have neither parents being a permanent Hong Kong resident
-\-\-
基於這些中港矛盾的問題 香港出現越來越嚴重的反中情緒
Basically because of all these things, this has led to an increasingly serious anti-Chinese hype in Hong Kong
很多香港人都不歡迎中國人 只想他們離開
Many local people are furious and just want them to go away
但對我來說 問題永遠出於制度
But to me, the real problem always lies in the system
我不想將整件事歸疚於中國人身上
Conceptually, I hate to put my frustration upon the Chinese people
因為要來港購物以保障自身安全並不是他們的錯
Because it’s not their fault that they have to buy things from Hong Kong to ensure that they are safe
但制度上出了甚麼問題?
But what about the system?
關於這個制度我簡述如下
There’s a lot I can say about this system, but for now I will just simplify it as follows
在制度頂端有中國共產黨,之後有香港政府和立法會中的建制派
At the top of the system we have the Chinese Communist Party, then we have the Hong Kong government and the pro-establishment camp in our Legislative council
簡單來說,這個制度一直想將香港變成中國的一個普通城市
In short, this system has been trying to turn Hong Kong into just another city of China
並且破壞一國兩制的原則
…and damaging the core principle of “One Country, Two Systems”
-\-\-
很長時間以來,香港人一直在爭取民主
For a long time, Hong Kong people have been advocating for full democracy
即是普選,可以提名和投票給我們自己的領袖(行政長官)
That means universal suffrage with the right to nominate and elect our own leader, which in Hong Kong is called the Chief Executive
根據基本法,我們有普選的權利
According to the Basic Law, we have a legal right to universal suffrage.
在過去20年,中國政府曾多次承諾香港人會有普選
In the past 20 years, the Chinese government has assured Hong Kong several times that we are going to get universal suffrage
但他們一直拖延實施普選的日期
But they have been pushing back the date for it
又推托說香港人未準備好,所以2007年和2012年都沒有普選。
…and kept saying Hong Kong wasn’t ready, so we didn’t get it in 2007 and 2012
但北京承諾香港2017年可普選特首
But the Chinese has set a timeline for it, and they said Hong Kong would eventually get universal suffrage by 2017
結果,2014年8月31日,北京說
And guess what, on 31st August 2014, the Chinese said
好,你可以有你想要的普選,但我們需要增加幾個條件
Alright you are going to get your universal suffrage, but we are going to have to impose some conditions
首先,行政長官必需愛國
First the Chief Executive must be someone who is patriotic to China
第二,候選人需要先得到現有的行政長官選舉委員會的提名 (絕大部分都是親中代表)
Secondly candidates are going to be nominated by the current Election Committee, which consists (mostly) of 1200 pro-Beijing representatives
最後,無論誰勝出選舉,都要得到中國政府委任才可成為行政長官
Lastly, whoever wins the popular election must be appointed by the Chinese government
所以他們就是說,好,你們可以普選,但我們保留剔除任何人的權利
So basically they are saying, alright you can get your vote but we reserve the right to screen out anyone that we dislike
-\-\-
北京公布831決定後,香港人當然很憤怒
After this was announced by the Chinese officials, we were bloody furious
所以我們展開了一連串抗議行動,要求真普選
So we began a series of protests demanding for “true universal suffrage”
我們一直以來都覺得普選就是
For years we have always thought universal suffrage means just that
一個民主及公開的選舉
The right to vote in a democratic and open election
但是中共卻憑空製造了完全相反的東西
But the CCP managed to create something that is completely contrary to that
結果,大學生開始罷課
As a result, university students like myself began boycotting classes
並參與在金鐘香港政府總部外舉行的集會
…and attended gathering outside the Hong Kong government headquarters in Admiralty to protest
這演變成持續79天的佔領金鐘、銅鑼灣和旺角的運動
This has then turned into a 79-days long widespread occupy movement in streets of Admiralty, Causeway Bay and Mongkok
期間警察使用催淚彈和胡椒噴霧來驅散我們,我們即用雨傘作盾
During this time, police has used tear gas and pepper spray to try to get rid of us and we used umbrellas as shield
解釋了為什麼這叫雨傘運動或雨傘革命
That’s why this is called the Umbrella Movement or Umbrella Revolution
我個人不喜歡稱之為革命,因為革命通常與激進的改變有關
Personally I don’t like to call it a revolution, because revolution is often associated with some sort of radical change
但對於我們來說,79天佔領街頭後,仍毫無成果
But for us, after 79-days of occupying the streets, nothing has changed.
到今天為止,一切維持原狀──沒有行政長官普選
So to this day, the status quo remains – there is no universal suffrage for our Chief Executive election
-\-\-
但是為何我們這麼想要普選?
But why do we want universal suffrage so much?
你要明白,我們的制度一直都有缺陷
Well you have to understand that our governmental system has always been institutionally flawed
一般當我們提到三權分立時,有行政、立法和司法三個機關
Usually when we talk about the Separation of Powers, we have the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary
這三個機關本應互相制衡,沒有人能夠掌控一切的權力
They are meant to act as checks and balances of each other so no one gets too much power
因為正如英國的阿克頓男爵所言:
…because as Lord Acton famously said,
「權力導致腐敗,絕對權力導致絕對腐敗。」
“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
我們不但行政長官是經由1200人的小圈子挑選 當中大部份為親中人士
Not only is our leader of the executive selected by a small-group of 1,200 voters – the majority of whom are pro-Beijing
我們連立法會也不能全部直選
We also don’t get to vote entirely for our Legislative Council
事實上,我們只能直選立法會的一半議員
In fact, only half of our legislators get directly elected by us
另外一半是由所謂的功能組別選出
The other half are elected through the so-called Functional Constituencies
香港一共有28個功能組別
There are 28 different functional constituencies, representing different seats in our Legislative council
原意是為了讓香港不同的界別和工種都能對政府政策有話語權
Originally this meant to provide different professions across Hong Kong to have a say in government politics
-\-\-
但這個制度本質上存在缺陷
But there’s a huge problem – this system is fundamentally flawed
最為人爭議的是,這制度容許公司和專業團體登記為選民
Most controversially, it allows companies and professional bodies to register as voters
製造了一個漏洞讓大公司同時間可持有多張選票
So this creates a loophole where big business can hold multiple votes at the same time
以飲食業為例,大公司可以登記每間分店為一個選民
Consider the catering constituency, big restaurant companies can register each of their outlets as voters
像大家樂這種大型的連鎖餐廳
So big food chain like Café De Carol
不,這不是一間法國菜餐廳,這是港式快餐店
Nope, it is not a French restaurant – it’s a fast food Chinese restaurant
這些大公司可以登記上一百張選票
Something like that can register up to a hundred votes if they like
另外,不同功能組別之間也有很大差異
Also there is a huge discrepancy between different functional constituencies
例如,在衛生服務界,有37,000個登記選民,但在保險界卻只有130個
For example, in the Health Services sector, there are 37,000 registered voters, whereas in Insurance, there are only 130 registered voters
這個差異根本不合邏輯 為甚麼有些行業會得到更廣泛的代表?
There is really no logical explanation for it – why are some industry represented more fairly while others are not
事實上,近半功能組別都是自動當選的,大部份的席位都由建制派瓜分
In fact, almost half of the functional constituencies are uncontested and most of the seats are dominated by the pro-establishment camp.
-\-\-
這有甚麼實際意義?
But what is the actual significance?
當立法會議員自行提出草案和議案時,我們有所謂的分組點票
You see, when individual legislators propose bills and motions, we have a split-voting system
意思是,在草案通過之前,
…meaning that to be able to pass the bill
需要得到地區直選和功能組別兩方面均過半數支持
It requires a majority vote in both the geographical constituency – those directly elected by us – and the functional constituency
所以就算一個草案得到總共過半數的支持
So we can have a bill that is supported by the majority of the legislators
但仍會因為在功能組別方面未過半數而流產
But fails nonetheless because it did not pass the functional constituency
理論上,只要控制了功能組別的半數就可以否決任何議員草案或議案
So in effect, you only need half of the votes within the Functional Constituency to reject all bills and motions put forward by individual legislators.
但政府提出的卻不一樣,
But the same does not apply to government bills
只需要取得過半數的支持就可以了
For government bills, you only need to get a majority from all the legislators as a whole
所以有時候會有一些政府議案原本被大部分直選議員反對
So sometimes we have bills that are opposed by the majority of those legislators directly elected by us
但基於功能界別大部份贊成而通過
…but nonetheless get through because of the functional constituency
這個制度的問題在於政府和大商家會有勾結的誘因
The major problem of this is that it creates an incentive for the Government and big business players to side with each other
一方面,有功能組別的支持,政府可以否決所有由議員提出的議案
On one hand with the help of functional constituency, the Government has an effective veto over all motions in the Legislative council
另一方面,商界自己也可以否決不符合他們商業利益的議案,如最低工資和標準工時
…while on the other hand businesses can reject motions that are contrary to their interests such as minimum wage and standard working hours
-\-\-
因此,行政機關在立法方面有很大的控制權
Because of this, the executive has a lot of control over our Legislative Council
他們很多時候也會做很多與市民意願相反的決定
And they often make decisions that are contrary to public opinions
由於選舉制度上的缺陷,我們也不能有效地向行政機關問責
And because of the fundamental flaws in our electoral systems, there is no way we could hold our executive accountable in any shape or form
你也必須明白 香港政府和和中國政府之間的關係
Conceptually you also have to understand the relationship between our executive and the Chinese government
你也許會認為,在一國兩制原則下,香港政府和中國政府是分開的
It’s easy to say, well the Hong Kong government is separate from the Chinese government because of the principle of one country two systems
我們可以實行自己的政策,這不是中國政府的問題,而是香港政府本身的問題
And we can implement our own policies so it’s not the fault of the Chinese government but of our own government
也許是吧,但我們的選舉制度確保香港行政長官是忠於北京的
That is partly true, but remember we have a system as such where our Chief Executive is guaranteed to be pro-Beijing
因此香港政府和中國政府密不可分
That’s why it has an incentive to side with the Chinese government
-\-\-
以現任行政長官梁振英為例 他自上任以來都在替北京擦鞋
For example, our current Chief Executive, CY Leung, he has been keen to please Beijing wherever possible
他重視中國的利益多於香港的利益
There are lots of policies where he appeared to have put Mainland’s interest above Hong Kong’s interest
如2012年,政府打算推行強制國民教育
For example, in 2012, the government tried to introduce mandatory National Education classes
想加強學生的國家認同感
…so that students can strengthen their national identity about China
但這被大眾反對,因為很多人都擔心這是偏向共產黨的洗腦教育
This was met with huge public protests as many fear that it would simply be a brainwashing curriculum biased towards the Chinese Communist Party
其他情況還包括否決香港電視的牌照申請,梁振英的5,000萬元賄款醜聞等等
There are also other instances such as the rejection of HKTV, CY Leung’s $50 million corrupt scandal – etc
我們極不滿意現在的政府
Basically, we are extremely unsatisfied with our current Government
制度本身容許我們的政府恣意妄為
The system itself allows for our government to potentially be arbitrary and self-serving
而我們沒有有效的方法向政府問責
And there’s no way we could hold our government accountable in any shape or forms
這就是我們想要普選的原因:我們想選擇自己的領袖
That’s why we want universal suffrage so much – so that we can choose our own leader
當然,這不會在一夕間解決所有問題,但會是一個通往更民主和平的制度的開端。
Yes it won’t solve everything but it will be a start to a more democratic and fair system
-\-\-
雨傘運動是前所未有的
The Umbrella Movement was a first of its kind
雨傘運動一開始十分和平
It started off extremely peacefully
強調非暴力、理性、愛與和平等等
With an emphasis on being non-violent, rational, love and peace and all that
但隨着時間經過,梁振英政府拒絕回應
But as it went on, the CY Leung’s government managed to remain unresponsive
過了兩個月,人們都不知道要怎麼辦
Two months into occupying the streets, people simply didn’t know what to do
而示威者和警察之間的關係則每況愈下
And the relationship between the protesters and the police got worse by days
有警察使用暴力對待示威者
There was alleged police violence
其中有七個警察將一個示威者拖到暗角施暴
Seven police officers took a protester to a dark corner and beat him up
無可避免地,雨傘運動最終演變成示威者和警察之間暴力的衝突──市民被打、被捕
Inevitably the movement turned into something more violent with protesters clashing with the police – people were beaten up and arrested.
-\-\-
自雨傘運動以來,社會處於嚴重撕裂的狀態
Since the Umbrella Movement, the society has been hugely divided
市民對警察的信任度跌至新低
Police confidence has gone to an all-time low
一方面,我們發現和平的示威遊行再沒有用
On one hand, we realize peaceful protest no longer does a damn thing,
另一方面,人們正在尋找抗衡警力的方法──亦即採取更激進的行動
…while on the other hand, people are finding ways to counter police force – essentially resorting to more radical actions
這也引致部份市民在意識形態上與傳統泛民主派分道揚鑣
It also led to an ideological separation within the pro-democracy camp
香港的傳統泛民主派視建設民主中國為己任
Traditionally pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong felt it was their duty to build a democratic China
他們其實比任何人都更愛中國
If anything they are more patriotic to China than anyone
他們是對六四天安門事件最大感觸的人
They are the people who felt most strongly about stuff like Tiananmen Square
但在過去20年,香港民主沒有寸進,也看不到中國民主化的希望
But for the last 20 years, democracy has not been advanced for Hong Kong nor does it look likely for China
所以有人開始說
That’s why new advocates are saying,
建設民主中國是不切實際的
Well there’s no real possibility of so-called building a democratic China
我們要先自救
We need to start rescuing ourselves first
因此本土和香港獨立的概念開始萌芽,因為人們對一國兩制開始失去信心
So, there emerges the idea of localism and Hong Kong independence because people are simply losing faith in the so-called One Country Two Systems.
-\-\-
這些社會不穩和躁動最終導致今年初在旺角發生的事件
All this social unrest has led to what happened earlier this year in Mongkok
那是農曆正月初一
It was the first day into Chinese Lunar New Year;
街上有小販在賣熟食
There were some street hawkers selling street food
這些小販雖是無牌經營,但他們一向都在農曆新年頭幾天擺賣,賺幾個快錢
They are unlicensed but that’s what they have always done in the first few days of Chinese New Year, just trying to make a few extra bucks
這就像香港的小傳統
It’s like a little local tradition in Hong Kong.
但今年警察突然執法,引發示威者與警察之間的衝突
But somehow this time the police decided to confront them – which has led to protesters confronting the police
突然間,小販擺賣演變成騷動,或暴亂,視乎你怎麼看
Suddenly it has turned into a huge unrest, or riot, depending which side you are on
街上有雜物起火,市民撿起磚和樽扔向警察
There were fire on the street, people picking up bricks and bottles throwing at the police
警察向天開了兩槍以鎮壓人群
Two shots were fired in the air for crowd control
這是香港二十年來都未見過的暴力
It was violence on a scale that has never been seen in Hong Kong for the last 20 years
的確 暴力的程度與本身的小販問題根本完全不相稱
In no way was the violence proportional to the whole street food and street hawker issue
但你必須明白背後的原因
But you have to be able to understand it in the light of the whole circumstances
那種自雨傘運動以來積累的憤怒和不滿
The sort of anger that has been accumulated since the Umbrella Movement
社會民怨達臨界點
Social unrest is now at its highest point
-\-\-
雨傘運動後,各種事情由壞變更壞,北京加重了對香港的控制
Things have gotten from bad to worse for Hong Kong since the Umbrella Movement. Beijing has tighten up control of Hong Kong
我們曾經享有的自由受到嚴峻挑戰
Our once enjoyed freedom has been put to some serious doubt
去年,五個在香港出售中國敏感話題的書籍的書商消失了
Five Hong Kong booksellers who sell sensitive stuff about the Chinese Communist Party went missing last year
他們沒有任何出境記錄,憑空消失了
There were no record of them going out of Hong Kong, and they just disappeared
有好一段時間,沒有人知道他們到哪裡去了,然後……
For a while no-one really knows where they went, and then…
好像魔法一樣,他們出現在中國的電視台,承認他們所謂的罪行
Like magic, there they are in Mainland China appearing on TV, confessing their guilt
其他事情還包括廉政公署(香港引以為傲的反貪污機構)大地震
Other stuff such as the ICAC, an anti-corruption body that we have always been proud of, has also been involved in some major shake-ups
更近期的有立法會選舉有六位候選人被取消資格
More recently, six candidates have been disqualified from running the Legislative Council election
他們被取消資格的原因是因為他們提倡香港獨立
They have been disqualified because they advocate for Hong Kong Independence
沒有法例授權行政機關以政治原因篩選候選人
There is nothing in the law that allows the administrative to screen out candidates running for the legislative council for political reason
這根本違反言論自由
That’s just simply grossly against freedom of speech
-\-\-
還記得四年前,港獨根本無人提及
And remember, four years ago, Hong Kong independence was not even an idea to start with
現在卻成長為一個熱議的社會話題,越來越多人支持香港獨立
Now it has turned into a whole serious social movement – more and more people are turning to Hong Kong independence
背後的原因?
And the reason behind that?
不久之前有一個網上比賽,讓人用六個字寫悲慘故事。有人寫:
A while back there was a post asking people to write sad stories in six words, and someone wrote this:
「一國,兩制,笑話。」
“One Country, Two Systems, Just kidding.”
這就是香港的現況
And that pretty much sums it up for Hong Kong.
主權移交時,曾經有人承諾我們會有
When Hong Kong got handed back over to China, we were guaranteed of all these things:
言論自由、新聞自由和法治
...the freedom of speech, the freedom of press and the rule of law
但這些都一直被破壞
But these things have been undermined hugely
北京的訊息很清晰:
The message from China is clear:
你想要高度自治嗎?
You want your high degree of autonomy and you want to feel special right?
可是你只能在我容許的限度裡享有自由
But you are only as free as we allow you to be
這些自由是我給你們的,我現在要取回你也不能作聲
We gave you that stuff so shut up if we want to take them back. Period.
但事實上中國沒有給予我們自由
But the truth is China didn’t give us freedom of speech\\
我們的人權都不是中國給予的
You didn’t give us any of our fundamental rights. Period.
-\-\-
我的理解?
The way I understand it?
香港獨立是被動而不是主動的
Well Hong Kong independence is reactive rather than proactive
這是對中國收緊香港的控制所走的一步
It’s a response to the Chinese government for increasingly tightening up control of Hong Kong
我們已經對一國兩制完全失去信心
We’ve completely lost faith in One Country Two systems
所以我們要求更多自主
As a counteractive response we are demanding for more autonomy
我們想要把握自己的命運
We want to be able to grasp hold of our own fate
所以這就是香港的現狀
So this is where things are right now in Hong Kong
這是一個死結
It’s in a complete deadlock
我們只能二擇其一:接受一國一制或更激進地抗爭
We either accept for one country one system or we have to fight in a more radical manner
-\-\-
星期日是下屆立法會的選舉投票日,是雨傘運動以來的第一次選舉
On Sunday, it will be our next Legislative Council election – the first since the Umbrella Movement
天知道會發生甚麼事
God knows what’s going to happen
我希望你能去投票,好好考慮要投給誰
But I do urge you to vote, and to think about your vote
Because in a perfect world
你試想,在完美的世界裡
當立法會可以處理大多數事情的話,市民便不需要走上街頭暴力抗爭
…if things can get done in the Legislative Council, then people wouldn’t need to take to the street and to resort to any kind of violence
我們極需立法會抗衡行政機關的權力,而你的一票有莫大的幫助
We desperately need a balance of power right now – and your vote can contribute to that
我們需要議會內有更大的聲音──我們需要更多人去尋找不同的可能
We need more voice in our Legislative council – we need people to look for different possibility
呼。就是這樣。
Phew, so that’s it.
無論你來自香港或香港以外的地方
Whether you are from Hong Kong, or from outside of Hong Kong,
這段和上一段影片都對我以及很多香港人來說很重要。
This video and the last video is important to me, and to a lot of people in Hong Kong
霎時之間這可能難以消化
This is probably a lot to take in if you’re new to this, but don’t just take my words for it
但請繼續留意新聞,和其他人一起討論,做更多的資料搜集,這些東西都可在網上找到
Keep reading the news; keep talking to people about it; go research about this, it’s all over the internet
最後,謝謝收看
And lastly, thanks for watching.
天祐香港
土瓜灣地舖出售 在 Auman Facebook 的最佳貼文
Hong Kong Independence?
…all you need to know about recent Hong Kong in 15 minutes
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
↓↓Transcript (as requested)↓↓
我們之前提及香港與中國有截然不同的制度
So previously we talked about Hong Kong and China having vastly a different system
香港是一個仿民主社會,而中國即由中國共產黨統治
Hong Kong is a quasi-democratic society while China is dominated by the Chinese Communist Party
所以我們不希望人們混淆兩者
…so we don’t want people to get confused between the two
但故事還未講完
But the story doesn’t end here
明年是2017年,香港主權移交給中國的20週年
Next year 2017, it would be 20 years since Hong Kong’s turnover to China
你大概會以為這段時間香港和中國會越走越近
You would’ve thought that during this time, Hong Kong and China would’ve grown closer to one another
但事實卻非如此
But it has not been so.
香港人和中國人反而變得越來越有隔膜
If anything, we’ve grown to be more and more apart.
---
沒錯 在過去20年
Yes it is true that during the last two decades
中國從一個發展中國家 發展成現時最大經濟體系之一
China has gone from being a developing country to what is now one of the largest, if not the largest economy in the world
人民收入增加 生活質素提升 有些中國人也躋身全球富豪榜
…which means rising income for Chinese citizens, better quality of life and China has some of the richest people in the world
香港人應該為中國人身份感到自豪吧
If anything, Hong Kong people should be a proud China man!
我還記得2008北京奧運 那個開幕典禮實在是精妙絕倫
I still remember seeing the Beijing Olympics in 2008; that opening ceremony was outrageously amazing
花了很多心機 很好看
…it was beautifully done and such a joy to watch
那是香港人少有地為國家感到自豪的一刻
It was one of those rare moments where Hong Kong people share the same sense of pride as the rest of China
不過 現實歸現實
But the Olympics is one thing, and reality is another
---
事實上,自主權移交以來,香港和中國一直有許多矛盾和衝突
The truth is there have been a lot of conflicts between Hong Kong and China since the handover
香港向中國打開了大門,每天都有大量中國遊客到訪
Hong Kong has largely opened up to China where we get a huge number of Chinese tourists every day
旅客本身不應該是個問題,但我們目睹過不少中國旅客的不文明行為
並不是問題。重點在於中國遊客所製造出來的問題。
While tourism shouldn’t be a problem in itself, we have witnessed a lot of issues with these Chinese tourists
例如不懂得在迪士尼樂園排隊 和隨地小便
There had been reports of uncivilized behavior such as not knowing how to queue in Disneyland and… pissing on the street.
我必須強調 不是所有中國遊客都會這樣做 只有一部份會這樣做
And I can’t emphasize enough, not every Chinese tourists do it, it’s just some that does it
但由於香港每天都有大量的中國遊客 這成為了一個逼切的問題
…but because Hong Kong gets so many of them, that becomes a daily problem for people living in Hong Kong.
除此之外,我們可以看到名牌店和藥房的數量激增,以滿足中國遊客的需求
And it’s not just that, we see the rise in luxury shops and pharmacies in Hong Kong to tailor the need of Chinese tourists
如果你去上水(很接近中國邊境的地方)的街頭
If you go to a street in Sheung Shui, which is a place very close to the mainland border
我以前常常去的──你會看見到處都是藥房
I used to go there a lot - you see streets full of pharmacies
其實我完全不明白為何這些店舖會叫做藥房
…and I don’t even know why they are called pharmacies
因為他們主要不是售賣藥物,而是奶粉和尿片
…because mainly they don’t sell medicine, they sell baby milk formula and diapers.
事實上 大陸人不相信中國製的貨品
The thing is, mainland Chinese don’t trust their own stuff
因為在中國任何東西都有可能是假的 那裡沒有質量管制或食物安全
…because you can get fake everything in China; there’s no quality control or food safety
所以很多中國人都會來香港買日用品 如奶粉
So many Chinese come to Hong Kong to buy daily stuff and one product that has always been in high demand is baby milk formulas
香港部份地區甚至出現奶粉短缺的問題
It has got to a point where the supply became so tight that there is a shortage of milk formulas in some areas of Hong Kong
如果你住在歐洲或美國,這情況可能難以置信
If you are living in the Europe or the US, this might sound really hard to believe
嬰兒配方奶粉和尿片!但這是真的,這切切實實在香港發生
Milk formula and diapers, but it’s true, it is what’s happening in Hong Kong.
還有其他問題,例如中國孕婦來港產子等
I can go on about other stuff as well such as the number of Mainland pregnant women who come to Hong Kong
事實上,在2010年,37%新生嬰兒的父母均不是香港永久居民
In fact, in 2010, as much as 37% of all babies born in Hong Kong have neither parents being a permanent Hong Kong resident
---
基於這些中港矛盾的問題 香港出現越來越嚴重的反中情緒
Basically because of all these things, this has led to an increasingly serious anti-Chinese hype in Hong Kong
很多香港人都不歡迎中國人 只想他們離開
Many local people are furious and just want them to go away
但對我來說 問題永遠出於制度
But to me, the real problem always lies in the system
我不想將整件事歸疚於中國人身上
Conceptually, I hate to put my frustration upon the Chinese people
因為要來港購物以保障自身安全並不是他們的錯
Because it’s not their fault that they have to buy things from Hong Kong to ensure that they are safe
但制度上出了甚麼問題?
But what about the system?
關於這個制度我簡述如下
There’s a lot I can say about this system, but for now I will just simplify it as follows
在制度頂端有中國共產黨,之後有香港政府和立法會中的建制派
At the top of the system we have the Chinese Communist Party, then we have the Hong Kong government and the pro-establishment camp in our Legislative council
簡單來說,這個制度一直想將香港變成中國的一個普通城市
In short, this system has been trying to turn Hong Kong into just another city of China
並且破壞一國兩制的原則
…and damaging the core principle of “One Country, Two Systems”
---
很長時間以來,香港人一直在爭取民主
For a long time, Hong Kong people have been advocating for full democracy
即是普選,可以提名和投票給我們自己的領袖(行政長官)
That means universal suffrage with the right to nominate and elect our own leader, which in Hong Kong is called the Chief Executive
根據基本法,我們有普選的權利
According to the Basic Law, we have a legal right to universal suffrage.
在過去20年,中國政府曾多次承諾香港人會有普選
In the past 20 years, the Chinese government has assured Hong Kong several times that we are going to get universal suffrage
但他們一直拖延實施普選的日期
But they have been pushing back the date for it
又推托說香港人未準備好,所以2007年和2012年都沒有普選。
…and kept saying Hong Kong wasn’t ready, so we didn’t get it in 2007 and 2012
但北京承諾香港2017年可普選特首
But the Chinese has set a timeline for it, and they said Hong Kong would eventually get universal suffrage by 2017
結果,2014年8月31日,北京說
And guess what, on 31st August 2014, the Chinese said
好,你可以有你想要的普選,但我們需要增加幾個條件
Alright you are going to get your universal suffrage, but we are going to have to impose some conditions
首先,行政長官必需愛國
First the Chief Executive must be someone who is patriotic to China
第二,候選人需要先得到現有的行政長官選舉委員會的提名 (絕大部分都是親中代表)
Secondly candidates are going to be nominated by the current Election Committee, which consists (mostly) of 1200 pro-Beijing representatives
最後,無論誰勝出選舉,都要得到中國政府委任才可成為行政長官
Lastly, whoever wins the popular election must be appointed by the Chinese government
所以他們就是說,好,你們可以普選,但我們保留剔除任何人的權利
So basically they are saying, alright you can get your vote but we reserve the right to screen out anyone that we dislike
---
北京公布831決定後,香港人當然很憤怒
After this was announced by the Chinese officials, we were bloody furious
所以我們展開了一連串抗議行動,要求真普選
So we began a series of protests demanding for “true universal suffrage”
我們一直以來都覺得普選就是
For years we have always thought universal suffrage means just that
一個民主及公開的選舉
The right to vote in a democratic and open election
但是中共卻憑空製造了完全相反的東西
But the CCP managed to create something that is completely contrary to that
結果,大學生開始罷課
As a result, university students like myself began boycotting classes
並參與在金鐘香港政府總部外舉行的集會
…and attended gathering outside the Hong Kong government headquarters in Admiralty to protest
這演變成持續79天的佔領金鐘、銅鑼灣和旺角的運動
This has then turned into a 79-days long widespread occupy movement in streets of Admiralty, Causeway Bay and Mongkok
期間警察使用催淚彈和胡椒噴霧來驅散我們,我們即用雨傘作盾
During this time, police has used tear gas and pepper spray to try to get rid of us and we used umbrellas as shield
解釋了為什麼這叫雨傘運動或雨傘革命
That’s why this is called the Umbrella Movement or Umbrella Revolution
我個人不喜歡稱之為革命,因為革命通常與激進的改變有關
Personally I don’t like to call it a revolution, because revolution is often associated with some sort of radical change
但對於我們來說,79天佔領街頭後,仍毫無成果
But for us, after 79-days of occupying the streets, nothing has changed.
到今天為止,一切維持原狀──沒有行政長官普選
So to this day, the status quo remains – there is no universal suffrage for our Chief Executive election
---
但是為何我們這麼想要普選?
But why do we want universal suffrage so much?
你要明白,我們的制度一直都有缺陷
Well you have to understand that our governmental system has always been institutionally flawed
一般當我們提到三權分立時,有行政、立法和司法三個機關
Usually when we talk about the Separation of Powers, we have the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary
這三個機關本應互相制衡,沒有人能夠掌控一切的權力
They are meant to act as checks and balances of each other so no one gets too much power
因為正如英國的阿克頓男爵所言:
…because as Lord Acton famously said,
「權力導致腐敗,絕對權力導致絕對腐敗。」
“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
我們不但行政長官是經由1200人的小圈子挑選 當中大部份為親中人士
Not only is our leader of the executive selected by a small-group of 1,200 voters – the majority of whom are pro-Beijing
我們連立法會也不能全部直選
We also don’t get to vote entirely for our Legislative Council
事實上,我們只能直選立法會的一半議員
In fact, only half of our legislators get directly elected by us
另外一半是由所謂的功能組別選出
The other half are elected through the so-called Functional Constituencies
香港一共有28個功能組別
There are 28 different functional constituencies, representing different seats in our Legislative council
原意是為了讓香港不同的界別和工種都能對政府政策有話語權
Originally this meant to provide different professions across Hong Kong to have a say in government politics
---
但這個制度本質上存在缺陷
But there’s a huge problem – this system is fundamentally flawed
最為人爭議的是,這制度容許公司和專業團體登記為選民
Most controversially, it allows companies and professional bodies to register as voters
製造了一個漏洞讓大公司同時間可持有多張選票
So this creates a loophole where big business can hold multiple votes at the same time
以飲食業為例,大公司可以登記每間分店為一個選民
Consider the catering constituency, big restaurant companies can register each of their outlets as voters
像大家樂這種大型的連鎖餐廳
So big food chain like Café De Carol
不,這不是一間法國菜餐廳,這是港式快餐店
Nope, it is not a French restaurant – it’s a fast food Chinese restaurant
這些大公司可以登記上一百張選票
Something like that can register up to a hundred votes if they like
另外,不同功能組別之間也有很大差異
Also there is a huge discrepancy between different functional constituencies
例如,在衛生服務界,有37,000個登記選民,但在保險界卻只有130個
For example, in the Health Services sector, there are 37,000 registered voters, whereas in Insurance, there are only 130 registered voters
這個差異根本不合邏輯 為甚麼有些行業會得到更廣泛的代表?
There is really no logical explanation for it – why are some industry represented more fairly while others are not
事實上,近半功能組別都是自動當選的,大部份的席位都由建制派瓜分
In fact, almost half of the functional constituencies are uncontested and most of the seats are dominated by the pro-establishment camp.
---
這有甚麼實際意義?
But what is the actual significance?
當立法會議員自行提出草案和議案時,我們有所謂的分組點票
You see, when individual legislators propose bills and motions, we have a split-voting system
意思是,在草案通過之前,
…meaning that to be able to pass the bill
需要得到地區直選和功能組別兩方面均過半數支持
It requires a majority vote in both the geographical constituency – those directly elected by us – and the functional constituency
所以就算一個草案得到總共過半數的支持
So we can have a bill that is supported by the majority of the legislators
但仍會因為在功能組別方面未過半數而流產
But fails nonetheless because it did not pass the functional constituency
理論上,只要控制了功能組別的半數就可以否決任何議員草案或議案
So in effect, you only need half of the votes within the Functional Constituency to reject all bills and motions put forward by individual legislators.
但政府提出的卻不一樣,
But the same does not apply to government bills
只需要取得過半數的支持就可以了
For government bills, you only need to get a majority from all the legislators as a whole
所以有時候會有一些政府議案原本被大部分直選議員反對
So sometimes we have bills that are opposed by the majority of those legislators directly elected by us
但基於功能界別大部份贊成而通過
…but nonetheless get through because of the functional constituency
這個制度的問題在於政府和大商家會有勾結的誘因
The major problem of this is that it creates an incentive for the Government and big business players to side with each other
一方面,有功能組別的支持,政府可以否決所有由議員提出的議案
On one hand with the help of functional constituency, the Government has an effective veto over all motions in the Legislative council
另一方面,商界自己也可以否決不符合他們商業利益的議案,如最低工資和標準工時
…while on the other hand businesses can reject motions that are contrary to their interests such as minimum wage and standard working hours
---
因此,行政機關在立法方面有很大的控制權
Because of this, the executive has a lot of control over our Legislative Council
他們很多時候也會做很多與市民意願相反的決定
And they often make decisions that are contrary to public opinions
由於選舉制度上的缺陷,我們也不能有效地向行政機關問責
And because of the fundamental flaws in our electoral systems, there is no way we could hold our executive accountable in any shape or form
你也必須明白 香港政府和和中國政府之間的關係
Conceptually you also have to understand the relationship between our executive and the Chinese government
你也許會認為,在一國兩制原則下,香港政府和中國政府是分開的
It’s easy to say, well the Hong Kong government is separate from the Chinese government because of the principle of one country two systems
我們可以實行自己的政策,這不是中國政府的問題,而是香港政府本身的問題
And we can implement our own policies so it’s not the fault of the Chinese government but of our own government
也許是吧,但我們的選舉制度確保香港行政長官是忠於北京的
That is partly true, but remember we have a system as such where our Chief Executive is guaranteed to be pro-Beijing
因此香港政府和中國政府密不可分
That’s why it has an incentive to side with the Chinese government
---
以現任行政長官梁振英為例 他自上任以來都在替北京擦鞋
For example, our current Chief Executive, CY Leung, he has been keen to please Beijing wherever possible
他重視中國的利益多於香港的利益
There are lots of policies where he appeared to have put Mainland’s interest above Hong Kong’s interest
如2012年,政府打算推行強制國民教育
For example, in 2012, the government tried to introduce mandatory National Education classes
想加強學生的國家認同感
…so that students can strengthen their national identity about China
但這被大眾反對,因為很多人都擔心這是偏向共產黨的洗腦教育
This was met with huge public protests as many fear that it would simply be a brainwashing curriculum biased towards the Chinese Communist Party
其他情況還包括否決香港電視的牌照申請,梁振英的5,000萬元賄款醜聞等等
There are also other instances such as the rejection of HKTV, CY Leung’s $50 million corrupt scandal – etc
我們極不滿意現在的政府
Basically, we are extremely unsatisfied with our current Government
制度本身容許我們的政府恣意妄為
The system itself allows for our government to potentially be arbitrary and self-serving
而我們沒有有效的方法向政府問責
And there’s no way we could hold our government accountable in any shape or forms
這就是我們想要普選的原因:我們想選擇自己的領袖
That’s why we want universal suffrage so much – so that we can choose our own leader
當然,這不會在一夕間解決所有問題,但會是一個通往更民主和平的制度的開端。
Yes it won’t solve everything but it will be a start to a more democratic and fair system
---
雨傘運動是前所未有的
The Umbrella Movement was a first of its kind
雨傘運動一開始十分和平
It started off extremely peacefully
強調非暴力、理性、愛與和平等等
With an emphasis on being non-violent, rational, love and peace and all that
但隨着時間經過,梁振英政府拒絕回應
But as it went on, the CY Leung’s government managed to remain unresponsive
過了兩個月,人們都不知道要怎麼辦
Two months into occupying the streets, people simply didn’t know what to do
而示威者和警察之間的關係則每況愈下
And the relationship between the protesters and the police got worse by days
有警察使用暴力對待示威者
There was alleged police violence
其中有七個警察將一個示威者拖到暗角施暴
Seven police officers took a protester to a dark corner and beat him up
無可避免地,雨傘運動最終演變成示威者和警察之間暴力的衝突──市民被打、被捕
Inevitably the movement turned into something more violent with protesters clashing with the police – people were beaten up and arrested.
---
自雨傘運動以來,社會處於嚴重撕裂的狀態
Since the Umbrella Movement, the society has been hugely divided
市民對警察的信任度跌至新低
Police confidence has gone to an all-time low
一方面,我們發現和平的示威遊行再沒有用
On one hand, we realize peaceful protest no longer does a damn thing,
另一方面,人們正在尋找抗衡警力的方法──亦即採取更激進的行動
…while on the other hand, people are finding ways to counter police force – essentially resorting to more radical actions
這也引致部份市民在意識形態上與傳統泛民主派分道揚鑣
It also led to an ideological separation within the pro-democracy camp
香港的傳統泛民主派視建設民主中國為己任
Traditionally pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong felt it was their duty to build a democratic China
他們其實比任何人都更愛中國
If anything they are more patriotic to China than anyone
他們是對六四天安門事件最大感觸的人
They are the people who felt most strongly about stuff like Tiananmen Square
但在過去20年,香港民主沒有寸進,也看不到中國民主化的希望
But for the last 20 years, democracy has not been advanced for Hong Kong nor does it look likely for China
所以有人開始說
That’s why new advocates are saying,
建設民主中國是不切實際的
Well there’s no real possibility of so-called building a democratic China
我們要先自救
We need to start rescuing ourselves first
因此本土和香港獨立的概念開始萌芽,因為人們對一國兩制開始失去信心
So, there emerges the idea of localism and Hong Kong independence because people are simply losing faith in the so-called One Country Two Systems.
---
這些社會不穩和躁動最終導致今年初在旺角發生的事件
All this social unrest has led to what happened earlier this year in Mongkok
那是農曆正月初一
It was the first day into Chinese Lunar New Year;
街上有小販在賣熟食
There were some street hawkers selling street food
這些小販雖是無牌經營,但他們一向都在農曆新年頭幾天擺賣,賺幾個快錢
They are unlicensed but that’s what they have always done in the first few days of Chinese New Year, just trying to make a few extra bucks
這就像香港的小傳統
It’s like a little local tradition in Hong Kong.
但今年警察突然執法,引發示威者與警察之間的衝突
But somehow this time the police decided to confront them – which has led to protesters confronting the police
突然間,小販擺賣演變成騷動,或暴亂,視乎你怎麼看
Suddenly it has turned into a huge unrest, or riot, depending which side you are on
街上有雜物起火,市民撿起磚和樽扔向警察
There were fire on the street, people picking up bricks and bottles throwing at the police
警察向天開了兩槍以鎮壓人群
Two shots were fired in the air for crowd control
這是香港二十年來都未見過的暴力
It was violence on a scale that has never been seen in Hong Kong for the last 20 years
的確 暴力的程度與本身的小販問題根本完全不相稱
In no way was the violence proportional to the whole street food and street hawker issue
但你必須明白背後的原因
But you have to be able to understand it in the light of the whole circumstances
那種自雨傘運動以來積累的憤怒和不滿
The sort of anger that has been accumulated since the Umbrella Movement
社會民怨達臨界點
Social unrest is now at its highest point
---
雨傘運動後,各種事情由壞變更壞,北京加重了對香港的控制
Things have gotten from bad to worse for Hong Kong since the Umbrella Movement. Beijing has tighten up control of Hong Kong
我們曾經享有的自由受到嚴峻挑戰
Our once enjoyed freedom has been put to some serious doubt
去年,五個在香港出售中國敏感話題的書籍的書商消失了
Five Hong Kong booksellers who sell sensitive stuff about the Chinese Communist Party went missing last year
他們沒有任何出境記錄,憑空消失了
There were no record of them going out of Hong Kong, and they just disappeared
有好一段時間,沒有人知道他們到哪裡去了,然後……
For a while no-one really knows where they went, and then…
好像魔法一樣,他們出現在中國的電視台,承認他們所謂的罪行
Like magic, there they are in Mainland China appearing on TV, confessing their guilt
其他事情還包括廉政公署(香港引以為傲的反貪污機構)大地震
Other stuff such as the ICAC, an anti-corruption body that we have always been proud of, has also been involved in some major shake-ups
更近期的有立法會選舉有六位候選人被取消資格
More recently, six candidates have been disqualified from running the Legislative Council election
他們被取消資格的原因是因為他們提倡香港獨立
They have been disqualified because they advocate for Hong Kong Independence
沒有法例授權行政機關以政治原因篩選候選人
There is nothing in the law that allows the administrative to screen out candidates running for the legislative council for political reason
這根本違反言論自由
That’s just simply grossly against freedom of speech
---
還記得四年前,港獨根本無人提及
And remember, four years ago, Hong Kong independence was not even an idea to start with
現在卻成長為一個熱議的社會話題,越來越多人支持香港獨立
Now it has turned into a whole serious social movement – more and more people are turning to Hong Kong independence
背後的原因?
And the reason behind that?
不久之前有一個網上比賽,讓人用六個字寫悲慘故事。有人寫:
A while back there was a post asking people to write sad stories in six words, and someone wrote this:
「一國,兩制,笑話。」
“One Country, Two Systems, Just kidding.”
這就是香港的現況
And that pretty much sums it up for Hong Kong.
主權移交時,曾經有人承諾我們會有
When Hong Kong got handed back over to China, we were guaranteed of all these things:
言論自由、新聞自由和法治
...the freedom of speech, the freedom of press and the rule of law
但這些都一直被破壞
But these things have been undermined hugely
北京的訊息很清晰:
The message from China is clear:
你想要高度自治嗎?
You want your high degree of autonomy and you want to feel special right?
可是你只能在我容許的限度裡享有自由
But you are only as free as we allow you to be
這些自由是我給你們的,我現在要取回你也不能作聲
We gave you that stuff so shut up if we want to take them back. Period.
但事實上中國沒有給予我們自由
But the truth is China didn’t give us freedom of speech\
我們的人權都不是中國給予的
You didn’t give us any of our fundamental rights. Period.
---
我的理解?
The way I understand it?
香港獨立是被動而不是主動的
Well Hong Kong independence is reactive rather than proactive
這是對中國收緊香港的控制所走的一步
It’s a response to the Chinese government for increasingly tightening up control of Hong Kong
我們已經對一國兩制完全失去信心
We’ve completely lost faith in One Country Two systems
所以我們要求更多自主
As a counteractive response we are demanding for more autonomy
我們想要把握自己的命運
We want to be able to grasp hold of our own fate
所以這就是香港的現狀
So this is where things are right now in Hong Kong
這是一個死結
It’s in a complete deadlock
我們只能二擇其一:接受一國一制或更激進地抗爭
We either accept for one country one system or we have to fight in a more radical manner
---
星期日是下屆立法會的選舉投票日,是雨傘運動以來的第一次選舉
On Sunday, it will be our next Legislative Council election – the first since the Umbrella Movement
天知道會發生甚麼事
God knows what’s going to happen
我希望你能去投票,好好考慮要投給誰
But I do urge you to vote, and to think about your vote
Because in a perfect world
你試想,在完美的世界裡
當立法會可以處理大多數事情的話,市民便不需要走上街頭暴力抗爭
…if things can get done in the Legislative Council, then people wouldn’t need to take to the street and to resort to any kind of violence
我們極需立法會抗衡行政機關的權力,而你的一票有莫大的幫助
We desperately need a balance of power right now – and your vote can contribute to that
我們需要議會內有更大的聲音──我們需要更多人去尋找不同的可能
We need more voice in our Legislative council – we need people to look for different possibility
呼。就是這樣。
Phew, so that’s it.
無論你來自香港或香港以外的地方
Whether you are from Hong Kong, or from outside of Hong Kong,
這段和上一段影片都對我以及很多香港人來說很重要。
This video and the last video is important to me, and to a lot of people in Hong Kong
霎時之間這可能難以消化
This is probably a lot to take in if you’re new to this, but don’t just take my words for it
但請繼續留意新聞,和其他人一起討論,做更多的資料搜集,這些東西都可在網上找到
Keep reading the news; keep talking to people about it; go research about this, it’s all over the internet
最後,謝謝收看
And lastly, thanks for watching.
天祐香港
土瓜灣地舖出售 在 果籽 Youtube 的最讚貼文
出租漫畫店曾經是大人細路最愛流連的地方,幾蚊租一本漫畫,回家慢慢嘆。不知從何時開始,人們看漫畫的習慣,由實體書轉移到網上漫畫,漫畫店慢慢消失,出租漫畫幾成絕響。蔡子雄一家可說是漫畫世家,他與父親、母親、哥哥都經營漫畫店生意,九十年代高峯時一家人共有五間分店,主要出售二手漫畫和出租漫畫。後來實體漫畫熱潮減退,父母退休,哥哥移民,只剩下他一人打理兩間舖。
蔡子雄的父親喜歡看武俠小說,1978年在土瓜灣開了武俠小說書店,門口位置擺放二手漫畫,吸引人們前來打書釘。「當時很多人沒有錢買新書,買二手書對他們來說更省錢,加上二手書收購價低,利潤比賣新書高。」當時8歲,還是小學生的他,一放學便會跑到父親的書店裏看漫畫,更會把漫畫帶回學校與同學分享,大家免費一起輪流看。蔡子雄憶起,當時最受歡迎的漫畫是黃玉郎的作品《小流氓》,「他的功夫很厲害,有時我會學上幾招,大家一起模仿角色的動作。」《如來神掌》、《醉拳》、《中華英雄》等都是他的童年回憶。
https://hk.appledaily.com/lifestyle/20210430/ANTS57I6CBD2LBBFHH6T4DNIRI/
影片:
【我是南丫島人】23歲仔獲cafe免費借位擺一人咖啡檔 $6,000租住350呎村屋:愛這裏互助關係 (果籽 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/XSugNPyaXFQ)
【香港蠔 足本版】流浮山白蠔收成要等三年半 天然生曬肥美金蠔日產僅50斤 即撈即食中環名人坊蜜餞金蠔 西貢六福酥炸生蠔 (果籽 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/Fw653R1aQ6s)
【這夜給惡人基一封信】大佬茅躉華日夜思念 回憶從8歲開始:兄弟有今生沒來世 (壹週刊 Next) (https://youtu.be/t06qjQbRIpY)
【太子餃子店】新移民唔怕蝕底自薦包餃子 粗重功夫一腳踢 老闆刮目相看邀開店:呢個女人唔係女人(飲食男女 Apple Daily) https://youtu.be/7CUTg7LXQ4M)
【娛樂人物】情願市民留家唔好出街聚餐 鄧一君兩麵舖執笠蝕200萬 (蘋果日報 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/e3agbTOdfoY)
果籽 :http://as.appledaily.com
籽想旅行:http://travelseed.hk
健康蘋台: http://applehealth.com.hk
動物蘋台: http://applepetform.com
#漫畫 #收買佬 #港漫 #小流氓 #老店
#果籽 #StayHome #WithMe #跟我一樣 #宅在家
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MO5R8HEgVd4/hqdefault.jpg)
土瓜灣地舖出售 在 李根興 Edwin商舖創業及投資分享 Youtube 的最佳解答
今日新聞: 第2462成交(註冊), 成交1350萬。 梁朝偉蝕讓土瓜灣新柳街2a號地舖 ,2013年買入舖1500萬。梁朝偉的2A鋪(利富行工具舖)是大單邊(新柳街及高山道),舖闊15呎 x 27呎,建築約500呎。 大單邊。 簽約日期2021年4月9日。
《經濟日報》【名人賣舖】梁朝偉沽土瓜灣舖位 7年蝕逾150萬
股樓投資19:57 2021/04/28
影帝梁朝偉於2013年底以1,500萬元購入土瓜灣新柳街地下舖位,近日該舖位以1,350萬元沽出,帳面蝕150萬元。
據土地註冊處資料,梁朝偉所持有的舖位為土瓜灣新柳街2A號地下舖位,舖位面積約500平方呎,現以1,350萬易手,帳面已蝕150萬元,連稅項及其他支出計,實蝕金額或逾200萬元。
至於新買家則為去年申請強拍的新朗發展(實業)有限公司,翻查紀錄,上述舖位所位處的新柳街2A號一幢樓齡約62年的舊樓物業,去年5月份獲申請強制拍賣,當時該舖位估值僅839萬元,梁朝偉亦有提出反對通知書阻止強拍。時至今日,在本港經濟未整體復甦的情況下,梁最終仍是以蝕讓價將舖位轉手予上述公司。
據了解,梁朝偉與妻子劉嘉玲早於九十年代起投資住宅及舖位,且獲利甚繁。夫婦二人於土瓜灣、西半山等地區作長綫投資,對市場運作及物業發展前景頗有經驗,惟最近不敵經濟環境衰落而無奈蝕讓一舖位。
。。。。。。
《30/11/2020 錄影內容》
今日新聞 - 第2073成交(堅 - 收購) 成交1600萬,收購唔畀分了。 馬頭圍高山道26號,車行,建築800呎,地舖成交1600萬。闊24呎,深30呎。
。。。。。。。。。。
馬頭圍梁朝偉間舖最新 update as of 9:28pm Monday:
發展商直接搵我,同我講 (100%堅):
(1) 發展商沒有同梁朝偉成交過1500萬,流料,無成交! 市傳是流料。
(2) 佢哋本身都唔太搵到梁朝偉, 839萬只是測量師估的價錢。 他們沒有開這口價給梁朝偉。 至於他們出幾多價,就唔方便講啦。
(3) 發展商仲諗緊方法同梁朝偉溝通,negotiation in progress. 影帝太忙拍戲 ?
我幫他們澄清 - 無成交過! 李根興 Edwin
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
梁朝偉的2A鋪(利富行工具舖)是大單邊(新柳街及高山道),舖闊15呎 x 27呎,建築約500呎。 大單邊,道理上是較值錢, 較單面向街的舖一般值多8成至1.5倍,按人流決定。
如果高山道26號舖成交了1600萬,2B舖(補習社)成交1250萬,這間舖感覺應值約1500至1600萬,即接近梁朝偉當年的買入價。(2013年底他以1500萬買入)。839萬又真係低得滯,I'm sorry 發展商?
【信報】梁朝偉高山道鄰舖賣1600萬,今年5月被財團向土地審裁處申請強拍的紅磡高山道26號、新柳街2A至2B號舊樓再有新進展,高山道26號地下剛以1600萬元沽出,較估值高出46%,現時項目只餘下影帝梁朝偉持有的一個地舖尚未被收購。
高山道26號地下,建築面積約800方呎,由新朗發展(實業)有限公司以1600萬元購入,呎價2萬元。據強拍文件顯示,測量師今年3月對該地下的估值為1096萬元,收購價較估值高出504萬元或46%。
「鷄記」麻雀館家族賺409倍
資料顯示,上址原由香港首間麻雀館「鷄記」創立人林坤的家族成員林瑞琼以個人名義於1961年以3.9萬元購入,近年由林氏家族另一成員林子英成為遺產執行人。以最新成交價計算,相較59年前的購入價大幅高出1596.1萬元或409倍。
新朗發展(實業)有限公司原持有高山道26號、新柳街2A至2B號約83.33%業權,故在今年5月申請強拍以統一業權。原本餘下3個地舖未能成功收購,今年8月以高估值25.3%的1250萬元購入新柳街2B號地下,現加碼購入高山道26號地下,故尚餘新柳街2A號地下未能收購。
新柳街2A號地下由梁朝偉於2013年底透過公司斥1500萬元買入,惟物業估值僅為839萬元,較購入價低661萬元或44.1%,因此一直拒絕出售,並在7月透過律師向土地審裁處提出反對強拍。
。。。。。。
業主有舖放售,記住聯絡我。馬上出價買入你間舖? whatsapp 我 9036 1143 或致電 2830 1111 李根興
www.bwfund.com
www.edwinlee.com.hk
想收到最即時的商舖「八八卦卦」資訊,可 whatsapp 我 90361143, 好多事唔方便公開講。
購買李根興的【李根興的生意哲學】(最新2020年6月出版 - 定價$198),或【買舖 要買得 PRO】(定價$198),連親筆簽名,可 whatsapp Suki (+852) 5566 1335。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gLabWQQKlog/hqdefault.jpg)
土瓜灣地舖出售 在 紅磡土瓜灣區 衛安中心【出租】地舖... - 紅聯地產 - Facebook 的推薦與評價
紅磡土瓜灣區 衛安中心【出租】地舖建築面積: 2600呎(未核實) 樓層: 地下價錢: 租$85000全包特色: 車房裝修門面闊有閣樓寫字樓獨立洗手間 物業編號: ... ... <看更多>