毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過54萬的網紅野火娛樂,也在其Youtube影片中提到,是不是被韓騰緯撩到不要不要的 男生的加分行為 無法抗拒! 【喝加分水,送你去看NBA】→https://is.gd/0TZIBG #加分 #NBA #霸氣 #籃球 #浪漫 #貼心 #加分水 #這個捨身相救我可以 #可以以身相許嗎 - #感謝穀保家商提供拍攝場地 #劇情與學校無關 - Hope yo...
「這個捨身相救我可以」的推薦目錄:
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 野火娛樂 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 我咬緊牙關命令我發出這句話。』【動態歌詞 ... - YouTube 的評價
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 烟(许佳豪)『要不你还是把我删了吧我咬紧牙关命令我发出这 ... 的評價
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 讓我們可以公布《瀕臨絕種團》小說的石虎篇內文 ... - ننوتل 的評價
- 關於這個捨身相救我可以 在 蔡旻佑這個音樂人- 音樂板 - Dcard 的評價
這個捨身相救我可以 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
【#好文重溫】 只要用心欣賞,沒有孩子是垃圾
直至孩子如安仔般長大,考進大學,離家自立,為人父母如胡迪雖萬般失落與不捨,但也須學習放手……
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
兒子最喜歡哼唱“You‘ve got a friend in me,You've got a friend in me,Some other folks might be a little bit smarter than I am,Bigger and stronger too,Maybe,But none of them,Will ever love you,The way I do,It's me and you, boy……” 這是《反斗奇兵》的主題曲。
《反斗奇兵》在1995年上映,當年我跟丈夫首次約會就是看《反斗奇兵1》,然後拍拖、結婚,一路走來就像動畫中的玩具經歷許多坎坷與重逢,不經不覺來到第4集已橫跨24年了!今次由二人行變成我們仨看《反斗奇兵4》,故事主線仍是透過拯救玩具同伴,講述作為玩具的使命,就是毫無保留的陪伴與愛護小主人,給他們創造開心的回憶,並永存心裡,這讓我回想起第3集片尾安仔跟胡迪警長說的最後一句: “You mean so much for me”,眼淚不禁如雨下!
每個小孩都曾經相信玩具有生命,像我兒每晚都要數齊6隻毛公仔及1張被被,擁著才肯入睡,任我們隨便拿走一隻,他也會午夜夢迴尋找;而每位父母則是動畫中的胡迪,看著孩子如寶妮般第一天戰戰兢兢上學,會擔心非常,希望陪伴左右,甚至願意犧牲一切來換取子女健康快樂成長,直至孩子如安仔般長大,考進大學,離家自立,為人父母如胡迪雖萬般失落與不捨,但也須學習放手。
除了繼續探討陪伴、成長與選擇的問題,今集主題是「心入面嗰把聲」,巴斯每次遇上難題,都會按動身上的按鈕,從錄音中尋找啟示;另一邊廂的胡迪,因為傾聽「心入面嗰把聲」,「我心入面把聲唔會放過我,就係我自己嘅良心!」於是不惜捨身拯救寶妮用垃圾創造的玩具小叉。小叉卻認定自己是垃圾,無時無刻想返回垃圾筒,然而對小朋友來說,只要有幻想,任何事物都可以成為玩具;只要懂珍惜,任何玩具都可以成為朋友,就正如是今集主題曲《I can't let you throw yourself away》 - 只要用心欣賞,沒有孩子是垃圾。
#反斗奇兵4 #鄧明儀 #親子專欄 #親子教育 #親子
這個捨身相救我可以 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
當身旁沒有心靈導師時,需要自我找出口!
相信自己是好人,也要求自己一定不要有負於他人的信任。
做自己能力可以承擔的事,甚至於超出能夠承擔的範圍之下盡可能努力付出。
怕大家沒有方向的為我擔心,大麥町在處理事件當中,還是跟各位留言不要擔心,事情是可以處理的。
只是我自己糾結錯還是對?
錯在哪裡?
為什麼一件美好的事情,會變成一件可以被指責的事。
是思慮不夠成熟?還是太感性做事?
人真的是要冷漠才能做好自己嗎?
———
舉兩個例子;
有一次大麥町從市區回來很沾沾自喜的跟我說,他早上幫助了一位危險中的老人。
當他開車途中遇見一個路旁老人很痛苦的在招手,老人90好幾自己開車出來,忽然覺得不舒服需要幫助,攔下大麥町要求他幫助帶他回家。
於是大麥町當下就帶著老人回去。
這個事情我沒有讚美他,反而罵他愚蠢!
生氣他危機處理方式不對。
當下他應該打救護車將老人送到醫院。
若是老人當下狀況不好,有可能死在車上!
雖然是做好事,但可能給自己帶來後面可大可小的麻煩。
——
第二個故事是我的兒子
一天在百貨公司門口等朋友,忽然一個大男人直接在他面前倒下抽蓄,忽然發生的事情讓兒子驚嚇不知所措,但還是邊救邊打電話給救護車,因為怕倒下的人咬到舌頭還要撐開他的嘴巴,這時候救護車那一頭還一直徐徐不慌的問一些無關緊要的問題!
一手電話一手幫助倒下的人,加上自己在驚慌下情緒緊張。直到救護車來!
這過程旁觀的人一堆,沒有一個伸出援手!
兒子回家打電話給我時還言語混亂情緒不平穩,他說他因為慌亂無助情緒無法平復。
經過我的交談讚美他才慢慢穩定下來,第一時間我跟他說不要碰臉,立即酒精消毒,回家衣服全部換洗。
救人是好事第一時間沒有辦法想太多,救了別人可能自己陷入麻煩!
是說事後至今已經確定沒有被感染。萬幸。
有時候真的我很慶幸我的家人跟我一樣都有好心腸,捨身救人絕對不會閃躲,但是往往在幫助別人的時候而忘記自己,如果能夠被人理解是非常快樂的事,但是被人套上責任時那是非常傷心的事。
有時候外傷可以復原,最多也留下一個傷疤,但是心如果受傷,那是一輩子到死都不會瞑目的。
這個世界真的不是很美好,所以我常常叮嚀我自己要分享正能量。
當我在分享生活時很怕不小心變炫耀,有時要照顧每一位來這兒朋友的情緒,所以有時候我會寫一些抱怨文,讓大家知道生活就是生活沒有100%完美。
但是我努力讓身旁的人感受美好,這就是我會傷心的原因,有些人有些事你就算自覺100%的無償付出,還是不會得到認同。
我要的真的不多。鼓勵就好。
這個捨身相救我可以 在 野火娛樂 Youtube 的精選貼文
是不是被韓騰緯撩到不要不要的
男生的加分行為 無法抗拒!
【喝加分水,送你去看NBA】→https://is.gd/0TZIBG
#加分 #NBA #霸氣 #籃球 #浪漫 #貼心 #加分水
#這個捨身相救我可以
#可以以身相許嗎
-
#感謝穀保家商提供拍攝場地
#劇情與學校無關
-
Hope you enjoyed this video please share and subscribe.
-
精彩推薦
✐長不大的男同學✐https://youtu.be/y-61CPKr7R8
✐中學生的帥學長✐https://youtu.be/ep6vdm_KrMc
✐中學都有的校草✐https://youtu.be/5KoTp8C77QU
✐暗戀女生會有的行為✐https://youtu.be/J1Qk_yY0vCw
✐校園的偶像劇情節✐ https://youtu.be/yZOOMxUKDlk
--
✐影片連結:https://reurl.cc/8EGZM
✐中學 FB:https://goo.gl/pc5RoL
✐中學 IG:https://www.instagram.com/highschool_fun
✐更多中學影片:https://goo.gl/6XLd9Y
-
業務合作✐https://bit.ly/2O0gkyv
這個捨身相救我可以 在 烟(许佳豪)『要不你还是把我删了吧我咬紧牙关命令我发出这 ... 的推薦與評價
删了吧#许佳豪#烟#抖音喜欢的请分享以及订阅本频道,您的订阅与喜欢正是对于吉米的支持❤️If you like, please share and subscribe to this channel ... ... <看更多>
這個捨身相救我可以 在 讓我們可以公布《瀕臨絕種團》小說的石虎篇內文 ... - ننوتل 的推薦與評價
我緊緊抓住棉被,只露出一對眼睛,刻意背對著房門,是怕她們知道我醒著,默默的、安安靜靜的、不吵不鬧的,等待她們準備好,才是成熟女子該有的作為吧? 不過……她們明明 ... ... <看更多>
這個捨身相救我可以 在 我咬緊牙關命令我發出這句話。』【動態歌詞 ... - YouTube 的推薦與評價
煙(許佳豪) - 刪了吧『要不你還是把我刪了吧,我咬緊牙關命令我發出這句話 ... 韋禮安WeiBird《如果可以Red Scarf》MV - 電影「月老」主題曲導演親剪 ... ... <看更多>