📰 Update: Reported death toll in Taiwan train derailment is 50
🀄 報導更新: 台灣火車出軌造成50人死亡
TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — The death toll in the train derailment near a tunnel in Hualien County was given as 50 after the last passengers trapped inside were rescued, the Taiwan Railways Administration said Friday (April 2) evening.
📌 台灣鐵路局週五 (4月2日) 晚表示,在救出被困在車裡的最後一名乘客後,花蓮縣火車隧道脫軌造成的死亡人數為50人。
On the first day of the Tomb Sweeping Holiday, more than 450 passengers had taken the Taroko Express train from Shulin, New Taipei City, with Taitung as its destination.
📌 清明節假期的第一天,有450多名乘客從新北市樹林出發乘坐太魯閣快車,目的地為台東。
While initial reports suggested a construction vehicle hit the train as it was about to enter the Daqingshui Tunnel in Xiulin, Hualien County, at 9:28 a.m., further investigation revealed a crane truck parked on a slope above the track might have rolled down 20 meters and ended up on the tracks before the train arrived.
📌 最初的報告顯示,一輛工程車輛將在上午9:28進入花蓮縣秀林的大青水隧道時撞上火車,但進一步調查顯示,停在鐵軌上方斜坡上的工程車可能是滾落20米,並在火車到達之前就在鐵軌上了。
The first carriage of the train, Car No. 8, hit the vehicle before coming to a stop inside the tunnel with four other carriages. Only the last three cars were still outside the tunnel.
📌 火車的第一個車廂,第8號車廂,在與其他四節車廂一起在隧道內停下來之前,撞上了工程車。只有最後三輛車廂在隧道外。
The Taiwan Transportation Safety Board (TTSB, 運安會) said that either the truck’s handbrake had not been engaged or it had malfunctioned. A thorough investigation might last three months before it could produce definitive results.
📌 台灣運輸安全委員會(TTSB,運安會) 說,這輛卡車的手剎未接合或發生了故障。可能需要三個月才能進行徹底的調查,然後才能得出確定的結果。
Prosecutors interviewed the driver, who reportedly claimed he had switched on the emergency brake and even put a rock behind the wheels to prevent the vehicle from moving. Under normal circumstances, no outside vehicle should be able to move onto the tracks, the TTSB said, suggesting a fence should have been erected between the track and the construction site above the railway line.
📌 檢察官會見了這位司機,據報導,這位司機聲稱他已經啟動了緊急煞車,甚至在車輪後方放了一塊石頭,以防止車輛行駛。 TTSB說,在正常情況下,任何外部車輛都不能在鐵軌上行駛,這表明在鐵軌和鐵路線以上的建築工地之間應該建立起圍欄。
According to a Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) map, most of the fatalities were found in the two first carriages. A total of 146 people were injured, many of them transferred for treatment to several hospitals in the region or receiving first aid at nearby Chongde Railway Station.
📌 根據台灣鐵道局 (TRA) 的地圖,大多數死亡事件是在兩個頭車廂中發現的。共有146人受傷,其中許多人被轉移到該地區的多家醫院進行治療或在附近的崇德火車站接受急救。
Both the train conductor and his assistant, aged 33 and 32 respectively, died in the crash, while the youngest victim was a six-year-old girl, reports said. One French national was also believed to be among the victims, while the injured included visitors from Japan and Australia, cable station TVBS reported.
📌 報導說,列車長和他的助手分別在33歲和32歲時死於車禍,而最小的受害者是一個6歲的女孩。據有線電視台TVBS報導,據信一名法國公民也是受害者,而受傷人員包括來自日本和澳大利亞的遊客。
Survivors told reporters how power had cut out, and they had to find their way by using the light from their phones. Eye witnesses said many passengers had become trapped under the train seats.
📌 倖存者告訴記者,電源是如何切斷的,他們不得不通過使用手機上的燈找到路。目擊者稱,許多乘客被困在火車座位下。
The government set up a special emergency center, while asking traffic to avoid the highways leading to the scene of the crash in order to allow ambulances quicker access. Friday’s crash was described as the deadliest rail accident in Taiwan for the past 40 years, CNA reported.
📌 政府建立了一個特殊的緊急中心,同時要求交通避開通往撞擊現場的高速公路,以允許救護車更快進入。 CNA報導,週五的撞車事故被描述為過去40年來台灣最致命的鐵路事故。
🙏 Life is full of uncertainty. May the departed souls rest in peace;
May the living be safe. It is time for solidarity as the nation grieves.
資料來源: https://reurl.cc/Gdl76y
同時也有41部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過18萬的網紅Cyber Editing,也在其Youtube影片中提到,#how do I #cyberediting #crash How to ride safely? (Don't make these mistakes.) BGM: https://soundcloud.com/cyberediting/2021-08-02-delta-bounce Th...
「avoid accident」的推薦目錄:
- 關於avoid accident 在 Ken's Portable Classroom Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於avoid accident 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於avoid accident 在 Daphne Charice D調 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於avoid accident 在 How to Avoid Accidents in the Real World - YouTube 的評價
avoid accident 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
avoid accident 在 Daphne Charice D調 Facebook 的最佳解答
I started using retinol since nov2020. Retinoids are strong & “potent” enough to enhance collagen production, improve skin texture & pigmentation.
Some think that retinol is a miracle, some think it’ll do permanent damage to the skin. I have friends who have better skin using retinol, also have friends who have bad breakouts and haven’t recovered after 6months.
I tried reading up on retinol but the science tho... Anyway, I tried it and I’ll share MY experience :
There’s downtime using retinol. Some see it as exfoliation. Purging stage-Your skin might peel, might have serious breakouts. Skin gets extra dry (so I mix it with moisturizer) but some say that moisturizer is useless because it’s gonna be dry anyhow. Many people give up cuz it’s mentally challenging, imagine waking up to flaky skin/full face of acne for a period of time -unknown period of time.
Some friends told me to just use it everyday, take the ‘purge’ once and for all (let it 烂 max) & wait for it to recover. Some friends say I should only use once a week and that 1% retinol is too high a dosage to start with.
Retinol products are pretty expensive and I was worried that it might not work on my skin. So I went for a small 10ml Drunk Elephant A-Passioni. My first choice was Sunday Riley’s A+.
First week :breakout with 2-3pimples here & there
Second week :skin peeled badly -whole face
Third week :skin peeled -forehead
I consider myself lucky, it isn’t that bad for me. I saw result in just weeks but it took months for my skin to only have minor peel once in a while under my eyes (nothing serious). It’s a nuisance cuz it doesn’t give you a warning when it’s gonna peel. It doesn’t peel the next day after using, sometimes it peels few days after using. The most noticeable effect/result is that my skin glows 皮肤很亮很亮 and my skin tone is more even now (with the help of many other skincare products too).
Will I recommend retinol? I personally love it, I took the risk. However, I won’t recommend it cuz it’s too risky. DO NOT go under the sun with retinol on your face, it can burn your skin. They say use a sunscreen on top but to avoid any accident, I only use retinol at night.
avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳貼文
#how do I #cyberediting #crash
How to ride safely? (Don't make these mistakes.)
BGM: https://soundcloud.com/cyberediting/2021-08-02-delta-bounce
This documentary video is designed to inform and educate about safe vs. unsafe riding techniques & practices.
It does not promote dangerous or violent acts.
It educates other riders to avoid similar mistakes.
I will reply to comments in your own language.
我會用你自己的語言回複評論。
Saya akan membalas komentar dalam bahasa Anda sendiri.
FOLLOW ME:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cyberediting/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CyberEditing
email: cyberediting@yahoo.com
avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳貼文
#how do I #cyberediting #crash
How to ride safely? (Don't make these mistakes.)
No ambulance required.
The rider gets up immediately. Minor abrasions only.
BGM: https://soundcloud.com/cyberediting/say
This video is designed to inform and educate about safe vs. unsafe riding techniques & practices.
It does not promote dangerous or violent acts.
It educates other riders to avoid similar mistakes.
I will reply to comments in your own language.
我會用你自己的語言回複評論。
Saya akan membalas komentar dalam bahasa Anda sendiri.
FOLLOW ME:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cyberediting/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CyberEditing
email: cyberediting@yahoo.com
avoid accident 在 Cyber Editing Youtube 的最佳解答
#how do I #cyberediting #crash
How to ride safely? (Don't make these mistakes.)
No visible injuries. No shocking content.
This video is designed to inform and educate about safe vs. unsafe riding techniques & practices.
It educates other riders to avoid similar mistakes.
BGM: https://soundcloud.com/cyberediting/falling-1
No serious injuries, everyone was able to walk & talk after.
Detailed summary & analysis at 3:00
I will reply to comments in your own language.
我會用你自己的語言回複評論。
Saya akan membalas komentar dalam bahasa Anda sendiri.
FOLLOW ME:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cyberediting/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CyberEditing
email: cyberediting@yahoo.com
avoid accident 在 How to Avoid Accidents in the Real World - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>