#微冷 都給你簽就好了──一個人簽完的《波茨坦宣言》
1945年7月17日美蘇英三國在德國波茨坦召開波茨坦會議,會議的重大成果之一是在7月26日發表的《波茨坦宣言》。重點在於要求日本無條件投降的《波茨坦宣言》有十多條,其中包含了一些日後對日本的戰後處理。
這份宣言是以美中英三國的身分發表,因為當時蘇聯尚未對日宣戰,所以沒有簽署。在8月8日對日宣戰以後,才再補簽。
雖然說有三個國家共同簽署發表,不過稍微想一下,就會意識到,其實沒有飛到德國參加波次坦會議的中國應該難以簽署。
看原始檔案文件末處的簽名,就能發現三個斜體字簽名有著高度近似的斜率。這是巧合嗎?
最上面的Harry S. Truman是時任美國總統杜魯門的全名。第二個簽名的是英國首相Winston Churchill,有趣的是,下面還多了一行By H.S.T。H.S.T跟Harry S. Truman,是巧合嗎?不,我不這麼認為!保守黨在1945年7月初的英國大選失利,當時邱吉爾趕回國內處理交接,因此無法親自簽名,在邱吉爾的同意下由杜魯門代簽。
至於第三個簽名,President of China連名字都沒有,如果是蔣中正簽的話,理應除了身分以外也會寫下自己的名字。而且,下面的By Wire更是直接昭示,是透過電報簽署,不是親簽。(代簽的杜魯門八成也寫不出蔣中正的名字)
事實上,中國的簽署是在看過三國擬完的草稿以後,由蔣中正透過電報同意。
另外提一件事:有些說法會認為蘇聯很狡猾的在美國在廣島投下第一顆原子彈才對日宣戰,撿現成的便宜,不過,蘇聯其實是因為在雅爾達會議中同意:在擊敗德國以後的三個月內加入對日作戰。蘇聯只是千拖萬拖,拖到最後一刻,才在德國投降三個月將屆滿的最後一刻對日宣戰。
同時也有22部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過29萬的網紅852郵報,也在其Youtube影片中提到,立即贊助《852郵報》: http://www.post852.com/support-us/ 852郵報 http://www.post852.com...
「churchill china」的推薦目錄:
- 關於churchill china 在 每日一冷 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於churchill china 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於churchill china 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於churchill china 在 852郵報 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於churchill china 在 serpentza Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於churchill china 在 serpentza Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於churchill china 在 blue and white china, churchill, tea pots - Pinterest 的評價
- 關於churchill china 在 Churchill Fine China Crockery Best of British - YouTube 的評價
churchill china 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
肥波送高帽焗拜登對抗極權
G7會議第一位到英國嘅元首係拜登,而主埸英國嘅首相Boris Johnson就即時要求一齊簽份參考當年邱吉爾同羅斯福响1941年簽嘅大西洋憲章(“Atlantic charter”),肥波向傳媒宣布嘅時候特別一字不漏抄考邱吉爾當年嘅原文,
“While Churchill and Roosevelt faced the question of how to help the world recover following a devastating war, today we have to reckon with a very different but no less intimidating challenge...Cooperation between the UK and US, the closest of partners and the greatest of allies, will be crucial for the future of the world’s stability and prosperity."
(當年邱吉爾同羅斯福需要面對世界响殘酷戰爭後嘅各種問題,今日我地面對嘅挑戰一啲都唔比當年少...英美呢兩個世上最緊密同偉大嘅盟友,將會係未來世界穩定同繁榮嘅核心。)
抄到一字不漏咁,自己扮邱吉爾都唔夠,仲要送頂咁大嘅帽比拜登做羅斯福,對付邊個大boss呢?無開名,不過有讀過歷史嘅話,仲洗唔洗開名?
Patreon原文:
Boris Johnson主場嘅G7前菜:翻版大西洋憲章講啲乜?
https://bit.ly/3pEPbFd
#地球和平靠晒肥波
#地球保衛隊變身
報導:
《Financial Times》Johnson and Biden set to focus on China in new UK-US accord
https://on.ft.com/355VXu4
***********************************
每日更新乞兒兜Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
MeWe:https://mewe.com/p/goodbyehkhellouk
Twitter:@ByeHKHiUK
IG:@goodbyehkhellouk
最近更新:
Boris Johnson主場嘅G7前菜:翻版大西洋憲章講啲乜?
https://bit.ly/3pEPbFd
戴安娜的「愛驅」Ford Escort背後的故事
https://bit.ly/354UILH
誰掌摑法國總統?根據法國近期嘅政治風氣,齊來做偵探
***********************************
churchill china 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
‘An English-speaking Mao Zedong’|Lee Yee
In mid-November, a friend of mine, a youngster, texted me: “He’s really stingy.” I replied: “It’s OK! Even though we have been holding different views for years, he has been putting up with my audacity.”
Since we met because of June 4 at a dinner with other pro-democracy movement figures, we have been acquainted with each other for more than 30 years, during which we had frequent dealings and contact with one another for a number of years. Asked by him about how much money was needed for running a magazine, I, the operator of The 90s, a business with small capital, told him to put in ten times of mine for a weekly publication. In the end, he invested a hundred times of it in running the most influential magazine that cornered the market in town. Later on, he founded a newspaper which also changed the media ecology in Hong Kong, initiating an unprecedented market setting all at once.
Inspired by the democracy movement in Beijing to switch to another line of work, he surely did it for his compassion for China. I used to have it myself, and it stayed strong until June 4, after which I merely hoped for the indigenous values of Hong Kong to be preserved. In light of the Handover being imperative under the circumstances, to get the democratization of Hong Kong moving seemed to be the only way out, though I reckoned the chance of success was slender as well.
In terms of our beliefs in freedom, democracy and the rule of law, there hasn’t been much difference between us. As to our outlooks on the prospect of democracy of China and Hong Kong, I have always been pessimistic while he has always taken the opposite view. It is understandable because pessimism is never an obstacle to my writing while it is to an operation of such a big media business.
In 2005, I was invited by him to become a writer-turned-editor in charge of the opinion page. He promised me back then he would never meddle in my editorial orientation. As I recommended on purpose a commentator who had fallen foul of the paper, he consented without hesitation. It’s a shame that I was finally turned down by that commentator.
From being an editor to being fired nine years later, from writing editorials to writing a column, I have been disagreeing with him on a number of issues over the last decade: localists versus pro-Greater China camp, freedom of discussion about independence, evaluation of the youths and the valiant, support for or criticisms of the pan-democratic alliance, “conspiracy theories” in all previous elections… But as my boss, he has been putting up with me, delivering to me his opposite viewpoints through somebody else. And he never hampered me from publishing articles I showed him in advance that bluntly criticized him.
With his compassion for Greater China, opening up of China was definitely appealing to him. As far as I know, China did try quite a number of times to take him in in its united front work. There was an occasion that one of his good friends met him in Taiwan, saying to him that he was invited by the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) to pay a visit to China, that he was to be allowed to run newspapers there about everything – entertainments, sports and the society, except for politics, and that in view of the growing economy of China, he would earn a big fortune. No sooner had he finished listening to it than he called the security guards to send the guest off. Later, he explained to me why he did it so abruptly instead of euphemizing. He said he was actually afraid of not being able to resist the enticement, and that he would abstain from the principle of distancing himself from the power. Listening to the story about his being aware he would get feeble, I admired him in all sincerity.
At whiles I just think he displeased the CCP not because of his words and deeds, but the fact that he couldn’t tell good from bad. Who couldn’t be bought off? Not least he’s just a businessman. That was just so riling!
When the publication began in Taiwan, I was told that according to the tacit business regulation in Taiwan, kickbacks had to be given to those who were empowered to do ad placements from the clients’ side. Yet the boss disapproved of it, which made things difficult for the staff in the advertising department. I asked him why he couldn’t bend the rule a little. He said as we kept laying bare under-the-table deals among politicians and businessmen, it was hard to justify ourselves if we also engaged in the same dirty deals. He is really somebody who insists on complying with laws, attaches importance to rules and ethics. Whenever I think of such a person being imprisoned, I feel sorrowful about him and the society.
It has been more than a year since last time I got in touch with him that he gave me a call asking me to stop writing my memoir for a few days to talk about the anti-extradition movement in my column in March last year. That was the only time he has ever suggested a writing topic for me. I agreed for I was going to do the same thing.
The youngsters in touch with me have always been discontent with him and his paper because of a lot of events over more than a decade, but I have always told them to take a look at a bigger picture. He is said to be an English-speaking Mao Zedong in the newsroom. Maybe it’s true. Mao’s merits and demerits aside, his manifest stubbornness and insane words and deeds showed he was somebody that would achieve something big. Winston Churchill was also an eccentric and moody person, but he did a marvelous feat against all odds. It seems Trump belongs to the same category, so does he.
churchill china 在 852郵報 Youtube 的精選貼文
立即贊助《852郵報》:
http://www.post852.com/support-us/
852郵報
http://www.post852.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0479/d0479befed149c1d261b70ae74dd25a89d5a6cd1" alt="post-title"
churchill china 在 serpentza Youtube 的最讚貼文
In life you keep moving forward or you stay still, this video is about China, Drones and Upping your Game!
Support me on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/serpentza
Join me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/winstoninchina
Twitter: @serpentza
Instagram: serpent_za
Music used: Wolf and Raven - On the run
My other channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/churchillcustoms
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04f19/04f19b6cbe74340be3c2151a0046a73d9e9c852b" alt="post-title"
churchill china 在 serpentza Youtube 的最佳貼文
I'm taking a leap of faith, moving to a spousal visa (trying to) and going to attempt to live off of YouTube!
Biltong contacts:
Peter: 13018477017
Nancy: 18666920599
My other channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/churchillcustoms
Support me on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/serpentza
Join me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/winstoninchina
Twitter: @serpentza
Instagram: serpent_za
Music used: FM84 - Arcade Summer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dbdd/7dbdd7fdf6df8bc7d31258307f5dc4130390a81b" alt="post-title"
churchill china 在 blue and white china, churchill, tea pots - Pinterest 的推薦與評價
Feb 13, 2018 - Explore Kim Dux's board "Churchill China", followed by 316 people on Pinterest. See more ideas about blue and white china, churchill, ... ... <看更多>