Happy Independence Day Malaysia! 🇲🇾✨
Let’s take a look at this case where the central incisors decided to be “independent” of each other….Yeap, we’re talking about Median Diastema [spacing between your front teeth].🤗
Why not Braces? 🤔 Answer’s in the second part of this caption.☺️But first, let’s walk through the treatment. 🦷
To achieve this result:
Composite Restoration removal • Smile Design • In-office Dental Whitening • Mock-Up • 8 unit Composite Veneers
Patient initially came in with old, overhanging composite filling on her centrals (swipe left to see). Note that how the overhanging margins have caused Gingivitis!
We discussed about the treatment option of getting Orthodontics treatment (“braces”) to close the gap after filling removal, but before that, we have to consider 2 things:
🦷 Width of the Central Incisors and the Laterals might not be of the proper proportion after filling removal. IPR may be required on the laterals to balance out the ratio.
🦷Patient still has a Class III occlusion (lower teeth are in a more “frontward” position) despite having Braces done before. We might need lower IPR/premolar extractions/retraction with TADs if we were to close that upper teeth gap.
A few other treatment options were discussed and in the end, she decided to proceed with composite veneers.
It is important to discuss treatment options with the patient and go through the pros and cons with them. I always allow my patients to think about their treatment options for a few weeks prior finalising the treatment plan to better the outcome and expectations.☺️
Have a great holiday and a great week ahead yall!🤗
#SmileMakeover #Whitening #CeramicVeneer #CompositeVeneers #resin #MedianDiastema
#CompositeRestoration #AestheticDentistry #Dentistry #Compositefilling #DirectRestoration #ConservativeDentistry #RestorativeDentistry #Composite #Veneers #Aesthetic #Dentistry #AestheticDentistry #Dental #CeramicVeneers #Veneer #Dentist #DentalPhotography
同時也有301部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過803的網紅樂筆 x 日光實驗室,也在其Youtube影片中提到,歡迎光臨~我是樂筆! 不知道大家對婚姻的想法是什麼?先看年齡與外貌?再來房有車?在一起互相取暖,哪天一言不合隨時可以打包走人? 愛是一種感覺,還是愛可以是一種決定? 其實婚姻是盟約,不是契約:「契約」載明雙方要履行的條件,如果不能做到,就可以終止契約;但「盟約」是份深情的承諾,不論颳風下雨、生...
「consider think about」的推薦目錄:
consider think about 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
consider think about 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
Can you guess the price of this food, and do you think it's worth it? I am soon reviewing Watercolors Boracay 2 sets of pasta, as promised from previous video.
I am excited for my first episode of #BoracayFoodWars. The main goal of this is to help the tourists in Boracay to find the best places to eat through my personal and honest reviews.
When it comes to reviewing foods, or services, or products, the credibility and integrity of the person reviewing those, matter. And this is why, I pay for the food, products, and services I review for.
It is very important to me that my judgement will not be affected by the following factors:
1. How bad is the attitude of the people running the business. It is the service that I consider.
2. I do not allow friendship or relationships to affect how I review these things.
3. When people tell me how bad their foods are, I just do not take their words, I dine in and experience it for myself.
As a super-taster (based on my DNA test results), I can distinguish a lot of tastes compared to non-super tasters.
I meet a few restaurant managers who wanted their foods reviewed, and I politely declined when they decided what to do. I manage and control my craft, no one else.
I also understand that getting enemies is normal when it comes to doing so. But I am hoping, in the Philippines, Boracay specifically, people are to take criticisms well, as I do constructive criticism. In Singapore, when people give honest reviews, they taste their food and change if necessary, not retaliate to people who review it. They became my Gold Standard and I believe we can be better.
So you can trust, when coming to my socials, and you see my reviews, it's genuine and constructive. I am a Videographer by profession now and I receive cancellations because of what I do. But I decided to keep going and do what I love to do. The tourists of Boracay Island deserve to have the best experience. In a long run, it will be the island and its people who will benefit from constantly improving. We already experienced what's it is like to be affected by the unknown. Let us not wait for another pandemic to get better. It is not always about the money, it is the experience we give to ourselves and to others, in our lifetime.
If you are a business owner (restaurant and hotel), and if you wish to get reviewed, simply send me a message here and I will get back to you as soon as I can.
XoXo,
Your Boracay Insider
#BoracayInsider #Boracay #WhenInBoracay
consider think about 在 樂筆 x 日光實驗室 Youtube 的精選貼文
歡迎光臨~我是樂筆!
不知道大家對婚姻的想法是什麼?先看年齡與外貌?再來房有車?在一起互相取暖,哪天一言不合隨時可以打包走人?
愛是一種感覺,還是愛可以是一種決定?
其實婚姻是盟約,不是契約:「契約」載明雙方要履行的條件,如果不能做到,就可以終止契約;但「盟約」是份深情的承諾,不論颳風下雨、生老病死,我們永遠彼此相愛、一起共度難關。
愛是「1+1大於2」不是一定要有你,但有你的人生更好。
愛也是「0.5+0.5=1」我們學習給予、付出,甚至彼此犧牲,所以才完全。
認識Hibbii的過程很妙,在網路上。他是非常熱情主動、貼心又細膩的姐姐,謝謝他來「歡迎光臨」分享身為初戀未婚妻的真實故事!(節目播出時變成已婚人妻了)
或許現在的你不一定有經歷,但永遠要相信!你是被愛的!
祝福大家都成為「對的人」!
Welcome to Sunlight~
What do you think about marriage? Consider age and appearance first? House and cars go second? Being in a relationship when you're in need, and whenever you disagree with each other, you end it?
Is love a kind of feeling or love can be a decision?
In fact, marriage is not a contract but a covenant. Contract states and explains a formal agreement between two different people. If one doesn't perform, the other can terminate.
On the other hand, covenant is an affectionate promise. It means that no matter what happens, we love each other forever and weather the storm together.
Love is "1+1 greater than 2", meaning that I don't need to be with you, but my life will be better because of you.
Love is also "0.5+0.5=1". We learn giving and sacrificing, so that we can fulfill each other.
It's amazing to get acquainted with Hibbii online. She's extremely enthusiastic, positive, thoughtful and attentive.
So grateful she comes and shares her real story as fiancée of her first love! (She has been a wife when the program aired)
You might not know much about that, but you should believe that you're beloved all the time!
Hope you become Mr. or Miss Right!
📁節目收聽方式:
Apple Podcast、KKBOX、Spotify、SoundOn 🔍歡迎光臨
- - -
✒️Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/sunlightpen007/
✒️Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/sunlight007_/
✒️合作邀約:hisunlight007@gmail.com
- - -
主持人兼編輯 Host/Editor/:樂筆
剪接師 Sound Editor:Papa.H
翻譯 Translator:Youli
consider think about 在 samguw Youtube 的最讚貼文
I've had the Canon C70 for about two weeks now and whilst I wished I could have shot a lot more with it, there is a full lockdown in my country due to the pandemic. I still wanted to share some of my first impressions and thoughts using this whilst I learn about this camera. I'm sharing a lot about the physical and my personal experiences using the camera thus far and will be going more in depth and technical in future videos.
I don't think this camera is perfect but it is right for what I do. Let me know if you have any questions!
0:00 Intro
1:08: Image Quality
3:38 Built in ND Filters
4:57 Ergonomics
8:48 The top handle
10:12 Ports and Buttons
12:57 Autofocus
14:40 RF Mount
16:57 Digital IS
17:38 Misc
18:19 Final thoughts, who is this for?
If you like to support my channel, consider a small donation: https://www.paypal.me/samguw
Gear mentioned/used in this video:
Canon C70: https://amzn.to/3wougIn
Canon 1Dx Mark iii: https://amzn.to/3wscl3s
Canon EF-RF 0.71x Adaper: https://amzn.to/3geCJHV
Music I use:
https://artlist.io/Samuel-241034
My 2021 filmmaking/photography kit:
(these are Amazon Affiliate Links and I get a small commission every-time you purchase from these links. These really help the channel out a lot!)
Main photo/video camera: https://amzn.to/2QQ9ChI
Back up body: https://amzn.to/2QRB1zG
Favourite lens: https://amzn.to/2DsOVFy
Second favourite lens: https://amzn.to/2Z2HLPR
Best on-camera shotgun mic: https://amzn.to/3jzhPmO
Cheaper version of ^: https://amzn.to/32WlSD7
Alternative on-board shotgun mic: https://amzn.to/3lKBFx8
Best wireless mic: https://amzn.to/3jHd1Mi
Favourite Backpack: https://amzn.to/3lHETSa
Affordable external SSD I use: https://amzn.to/32NG4a2
Favourite gimbal: https://amzn.to/2Z3k7CJ
Affordable drone: https://amzn.to/2YZEmkK
Favourite action camera: https://amzn.to/2ETfBzV
----
Let's do something together! Ask me anything you'd like!
[email protected]
Follow me on social media:
https://www.facebook.com/samuelguw/
https://www.instagram.com/samguw/
https://www.instagram.com/samguw_bts/
consider think about 在 samguw Youtube 的最佳解答
It's been quite awhile since my last upload and the previous uploads were very gear focused too. Wanted to talk about something I've been thinking a lot for awhile. Creativity often times has been used as crutch to shield ourselves from negative feedback or descriptions of our work that we don't necessarily like. We see it all them in comments and sometimes in our own responses. Awhile back I posted a video about mistakes street photographers are making and some people took it a little too personally and reached out saying how I shouldn't gate keep things and that I didn't know what I was talking about.
I think a lot of these reactions, sometimes including my own, stem from insecurities that we might have towards our work and maybe, in ourselves. Would love to know what you think about this
If you like to support my channel, consider a small donation: https://www.paypal.me/samguw
Gear mentioned/used in this video:
Canon 5D Mark IV: https://amzn.to/36lX8GQ
Music I use:
https://artlist.io/Samuel-241034
My 2021 filmmaking/photography kit:
(these are Amazon Affiliate Links and I get a small commission every-time you purchase from these links. These really help the channel out a lot!)
Main photo/video camera: https://amzn.to/2QQ9ChI
Back up body: https://amzn.to/2QRB1zG
Favourite lens: https://amzn.to/2DsOVFy
Second favourite lens: https://amzn.to/2Z2HLPR
Best on-camera shotgun mic: https://amzn.to/3jzhPmO
Cheaper version of ^: https://amzn.to/32WlSD7
Alternative on-board shotgun mic: https://amzn.to/3lKBFx8
Best wireless mic: https://amzn.to/3jHd1Mi
Favourite Backpack: https://amzn.to/3lHETSa
Affordable external SSD I use: https://amzn.to/32NG4a2
Favourite gimbal: https://amzn.to/2Z3k7CJ
Affordable drone: https://amzn.to/2YZEmkK
Favourite action camera: https://amzn.to/2ETfBzV
----
Let's do something together! Ask me anything you'd like!
[email protected]
Follow me on social media:
https://www.facebook.com/samuelguw/
https://www.instagram.com/samguw/
https://www.instagram.com/samguw_bts/