The #MiniLED backlight-equipped 12.9-inch #iPadPro, which has long been rumored in the market, will enter mass production in 1Q21.
This tablet will feature more than 10,000 #LED chips, with over 2,000 local dimming zones, and its imminent release is expected to set a new milestone for the color saturation and contrast performance of #LCD #panels in the tablet market.
However, the current version of 12.9-inch #iPad Pro equipped with edge-lit display, which is cheaper than back-lit display by almost US$80 (this cost discrepancy will be unlikely to drop to $45 in the short run, contrary to what Daijiworld’s article suggests), will continue to be available for sale.
Therefore, #TrendForce believes that it remains a difficult challenge for iPad Pros with Mini LED backlight to account for 30-40% of all iPad shipment for 2021.
「contrary to in contrast to」的推薦目錄:
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 TrendForce Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 堅離地城:沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 喬的英文筆記 Joe's English Learning Notes Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 [分享] By contrast, In contrast, Contrary to, - 看板TOEFL_iBT 的評價
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 IELTS/TOEFL Writing:— in contrast vs. on the contrary 的評價
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 What's the difference between "on the contrary" and "in contrast" 的評價
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 殷凡英文- on the contrary/ in contrast/ on the other... | Facebook 的評價
- 關於contrary to in contrast to 在 contrary to用法的推薦與評價,FACEBOOK和網紅們這樣回答 的評價
contrary to in contrast to 在 堅離地城:沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World Facebook 的最讚貼文
【#TheDiplomat🌍】難得The Diplomat讀者對香港有興趣:
The series of iron-fisted moves last month in Hong Kong may seem sudden to international observers: Hong Kong government’s earlier reinterpretation of the China-Hong Kong relationship, the election of a pro-Beijing legislator to be a Legislative Council chair through a controversial mechanism, and Beijing’s recent decision to impose a national security law on Hong Kong. The desire to bring Hong Kong under the banner of “one country, one system” is not impulsive. Quite the contrary, it’s a calculated campaign to initiate a so-called “second reunification with Hong Kong” — since the first reunification after the handover, using a lenient soft-power approach, has supposedly failed.
What are Beijing’s calculations that motivate this bold campaign now? And more important, will the campaign work?
While I remain highly skeptical of solely applying the realist framework to study Hong Kong, Beijing’s mentality is nonetheless entirely realism-driven. It is therefore essential to use this lens to understand more of their thoughts.
COVID-19: A Golden Opportunity on the International Stage?
To start with, the coronavirus pandemic seems to have created an ideal backdrop for Beijing to push forward its iron-fisted policy toward Hong Kong. The West has been devastated by the pandemic, more so than China, and has been slower to recover economically. Instead of decoupling from China, Beijing thinks the West is desperate for an influx of Chinese capital and markets. This notion encourages Beijing to pursue brinkmanship, in the form of confrontative “wolf warrior diplomacy,” its escalation of sharp power, and, most recently, Hong Kong’s national security law. As long as the international community does not put their condemnation into action, Beijing will keep pushing the envelope.
Beijing is convinced that the chambers of commerce representing other countries in Hong Kong will always place profits above all else as long as the national security law does not threaten them. Business deals struck at the crucial moment can entice foreign businesses to use their lobby teams in their home countries in Beijing’s favor.
Although anti-China sentiment has become more mainstream, Beijing, the major beneficiary of globalization in the past two decades, has tied its destiny with various elites internationally. These “friends of China” can be swayed to safeguard Beijing’s interests, but the up-and-coming leaders in many countries look less friendly. Therefore, the window of opportunity for Beijing to act is closing before the new value-driven generation comes to power.
The Lack of Incentive Behind the U.S. and U.K.’s Escalating Rhetoric
While U.S. politicians from left to right are vocal against China, their ultimate goal, Beijing believes, is to win votes in the November election. They would hence avoid hurting the interest groups they represent and go easy on actions aiming to punish China, such as denying Hong Kong’s status as a separate customs territory, sanctioning Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong, or escalating the trade war.
Even though the Trump administration is ramping up the rhetoric to sanction China, protecting Hong Kong’s autonomy is not one of the United States’ core interests. In contrast, having control over Hong Kong is China’s core interest. Beijing would rather make concessions over other disputes with Washington in exchange for claiming victory in Hong Kong for its internal propaganda.
Britain, the co-signer of the Joint Declaration for Hong Kong’s handover, is arguably most entitled to denounce Beijing’s violation, which would give mandates to the United States to act. But Beijing is convinced that Britain, not as powerful as it used to be, will not make such a move. Beijing’s recent plans to withdraw businesses from the United States and list them in the London stock market is a move to place a wedge between the two powers. U.S. President Donald Trump’s unilateralism and his harsh stance against U.S. allies also strengthens Beijing’s conviction that the West will not follow the United States’ lead.
Beijing’s Divide and Conquer Strategy in Hong Kong
Hong Kong’s parliament, the Legislative Council (LegCo), is a major roadblock to Beijing’s control, as demonstrated twice since the handover — in 2003 when the national security law was first introduced and in 2019 with the anti-extradition legislation that sparked city-wide protests. In both setbacks, Beijing lost control when moderate pro-establishment legislators broke away from the party line in the face of public outcry. As the September LegCo election approaches, the last thing Beijing wants is for the election to become a de facto referendum on the single issue of the national security law, which could result in another landslide win for the democratic parties. The law would be untenable to the international community if it’s opposed by both pro-democracy voters, which according to polls account for 60 percent of the votes, and moderate pro-establishment voters.
The moderates, despite their reluctance to embrace hardline rule in Hong Kong, differ from the more militant faction within the non-establishment camp in that the former rejects the so-called “mutual destruction” option, which risks Hong Kong’s special trade status — its economic lifeline — as a bargaining tactic to force Beijing to back off. Now that Washington is considering withdrawing Hong Kong’s privileges, the possibility of mutual destruction is becoming real. As Beijing has been promoting a narrative that all supporters of the protest movement’s “Five Demands” are bringing about mutual destruction, Beijing hopes the moderates, in fear of losing their financial assets, might turn toward the establishment.
On the other hand, the pro-democracy camp is at risk of breaking apart. Moderate pro-democracy supporters have been going to rallies to keep up with the political momentum. However, marches with more than a million participants would be impossible under the current oppressive environment. For example, the authorities abuse COVID-19 social distancing measures to suppress rallies, permits for peaceful protests are increasingly difficult to obtain, pro-establishment businesses heavily censored the social media activities of employees, and outspoken individuals are often cyberbullied.
Without support from the moderates, some within the pro-democracy camp may radicalize, as Beijing expects. The radicalization would fit Beijing’s tactic of painting protests as separatism and terrorism, justifying the imposition of the national security law. The trajectory would be similar to Beijing’s handling of the 1959 Tibetan “riots,” during which Mao Zedong’s directive was “the more chaotic the scene, the better.”
The Nationalistic Agenda to Divert Domestic Attention
But after all, to Beijing, Hong Kong is not just Hong Kong. In the wake of the pandemic, Beijing urgently needs to uphold nationalism to divert unwanted attention from its economic crisis. That includes a global propaganda campaign to promote its triumph over COVID-19. Upgrading the Hong Kong protests to a national security issue — as a battle against foreign interference to complete the “reunification with Hong Kong” — best suits the nationalist atmosphere. The all-time low sense of belonging with China among the new generation in Hong Kong further justifies a strong-arm approach. The success of the strategy would offer a way to reunite with Taiwan, which would consolidate Xi’s leadership within the Communist Party.
Also, including the Hong Kong issue as part of the national agenda means that the Hong Kong government, which has already lost its will to govern, will dance to Beijing’s tunes.
This comprehensive crackdown on Hong Kong’s civil society is unprecedented. Beijing believes that the heavy-handed approach would pervade Hong Kong with a sense of powerlessness and bring it to its knees. As long as the international response is limited, the execution of the national security law, according to Chairman Mao’s “theory of contradiction,” will follow a script of “a soft hand” and “a firm hand.” That is, after its imposition, the law will initially apply restraint and be used only on individuals to set a stern example, so that the general public would feel as if the law does not impact them at all and property and stock prices would not fall. Gradually and subtly, if the realist formula of Beijing works, the “second reunification” could become a self-proclaimed success story for Beijing’s propaganda.
However, Beijing’s evaluations are not foolproof. Any single miscalculation could lead to a contradictory outcome for the People’s Republic of China. Is it really prepared?
▶️ 國安法:中國的現實主義框架
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjhRbV8qTgo
⏺ 中美夏威夷峰會
https://www.patreon.com/posts/38378214
contrary to in contrast to 在 喬的英文筆記 Joe's English Learning Notes Facebook 的最讚貼文
寫文章或者口說常常要表述兩個不同的立場。就需要使用轉折詞。喬今天整理12個轉折詞,幫助同學表達思緒更清晰。
☛ By contrast = In contrast = In comparison 比較起來
the act of comparing in order to show differences
例:People usually travel in Summer. By contrast (= In contrast), they barely in Winter.
(人們總是在夏天旅行。比較來說,他們幾乎不在冬天(旅行)。)
☛ On the one hand... On the other hand 一方面、另一方面 (比較兩個不同的表述)
used when you are comparing two different facts or two opposite ways of thinking about a situation
例:On the one hand, I’d like a job that pays more; on the other hand, I enjoy my current job at the moment.
(一方面我想要更高薪的工作,但另一方面我又享受現在的工作。)
☛ Yet 然而、儘管
despite that; used to add something that seems surprising because of what you have just said
例:Ray is an indifferent man. Yet somehow he is nice to Joseph.
(瑞是個冷漠的男人。但他不知為何對喬瑟夫很好。)
☛ On the contrary 正好相反、恰恰相反
used to show that you think or feel the opposite of what has just been stated
例:Frank is not as nice as what everybody told me. On the contrary, he is sly and selfish.
(法蘭克並不像每個人跟我說的一樣好。正好相反,他狡猾又自私。)
☛ Although = Though 雖然、僅管
but
例:Although Sophie has been working for only 2 years, she is now handling several key projects.
(儘管蘇菲目前只工作了兩年,她已經負責了許多重要的案子。)
☛ Instead 作為替代
in place of someone or something
例:Jade did not join any top company after graduation. Instead, she created her own business.
(裘德在畢業後並未加入頂尖公司,她創造了自己的事業。)
☛ Despite = In spite of = Notwithstanding 不管、僅管、無論
without taking any notice of or being influenced by; not prevented by
例:Despite the weather, Max still enjoyed the week.
(儘管天氣不好,麥克斯依然享受了這週。)
--
✔ 喬的著作《我的第一本英文文法 國際學村出版》購買連結
博客來: https://bit.ly/38nOl5H
【喬的部落格網誌聊英文談職場/商務英文】
☛ Blogger: http://ohjoseph86.blogspot.com/
【快追蹤IG關注第一手更新與喬生活】
☛ Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/ohjoe86
【若是您願意贊助幫助喬創作更優質的內容,歡迎點擊下方連結贊助】
☛ https://p.ecpay.com.tw/E8145
contrary to in contrast to 在 What's the difference between "on the contrary" and "in contrast" 的推薦與評價
Here's a simple test: if you could possibly substitute “that's wrong” the phrase you want is “on the contrary” or “to the contrary.” If not, ... ... <看更多>
contrary to in contrast to 在 [分享] By contrast, In contrast, Contrary to, - 看板TOEFL_iBT 的推薦與評價
By contrast, In contrast, Contrary to, On the contrary的差別
Smith was industrious. By contrast, his brother was lazy.
They went to Texas. In contrast, we went to California.
By contrast 是做"比較compare"完全相反用的,In contrast 是有"注意notice"
difference差異用的。
Contrary to the common belief, pigs are not stupid.
Contrary to N(the common belief), 是名詞the common belief= pigs are stupid與
後面的敘述相反。
On the contrary
用來反駁對方見解、觀點用的
(與此)相反, 正相反, 恰恰相反
You think you are clever; on the contrary, I assure that you are very foolish.
你自以為很聰明, 相反地, 我確信你很傻。
On the contrary he was the most ruthless person I have ever known.
相反,他是我所見過的最冷酷無情的人.
On the contrary, I took up another resolution, which was more safe, though
more laborious.
相反地, 我作了另外一個決定, 雖然比較費勁, 卻比較安全.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.49.180
... <看更多>