1 SỐ CỤM TỪ ĐỒNG NGHĨA PHỔ BIẾN TRONG #ieltswriting
💥TASK 1
▪️to show/ give information on/ show key data on … ≈ to compare/ illustrate .../ : so sánh/ thể hiện …
▪️to increase rapidly ≈ to experience a rapid rise: tăng nhanh
▪️to decrease slowly ≈ to see a slow decline: giảm chậm
▪️the 0 to 14 age group ≈ children aged 14 or under ≈ the youngest group: nhóm tuổi từ 0 tới 14
▪️the 30 to 50 age group ≈ people aged 30 to 50 ≈ people between the ages of 30 and 50: nhóm tuổi từ 30 tới 50
▪️the chart ≈ the line graph/ the pie chart/ the bar chart/ the table/ the process/ …: biểu đồ … (tùy đề)
▪️By contrast, … ≈ … illustrate a different pattern: Ngược lại, …/ … thể hiện xu hướng trái ngược
▪️Similarly, … ≈ show a similar pattern: Tương tự vậy, …/ … thể hiện xu hướng tương tự
▪️while … ≈ whilst … ≈ whereas …: trong khi …
▪️in terms of … ≈ regarding … ≈ Looking at …, ...: Khi nói về …
▪️over the given period ≈ during this time frame: trong suốt giai đoạn nào đó
▪️over a 10-year period ≈ over a period of 10 years: trong giai đoạn 10 năm
▪️from 1990 to 2000 ≈ between 1990 and 2000: từ năm 1990 tới 2000
▪️in 1990 and 2000 ≈ in two different years, 1990 and 2000: trong 2 năm, 1990 và 2000
▪️the life cycle of … ≈ the development of …: vòng đời/ sự phát triển của con gì
▪️the percentage of … ≈ the proportion of …: tỷ lệ …
▪️predictions for 2050 ≈ projections for 2050: dự đoán cho 2050
💥TASK 2
▪️benefits ≈ merits ≈ advantages ≈ beneficial effects: lợi ích
▪️drawbacks ≈ disadvantages ≈ negative effects: bất lợi
▪️solution ≈ measure ≈ approach: giải pháp
▪️to be harmful to … ≈ to be detrimental to …: có hại cho …
▪️to have a negative effect on … ≈ to have an adverse impact on …: có ảnh hưởng tiêu cực lên …
▪️the primary cause of … ≈ the principal cause of …: nguyên nhân chính của vấn đề gì
▪️the main reason for … ≈ the primary reason for …: lý do chính cho vấn đề gì
▪️every day ≈ on a daily basis: hàng ngày
▪️every week ≈ on a weekly basis: hàng tuần
▪️every year ≈ on an annual basis: hàng năm
▪️nowadays ≈ these days ≈ today ≈ in modern society = in today’s society: ngày nay
▪️to solve a problem ≈ to tackle an issue: giải quyết 1 vấn đề
▪️in recent times ≈ in recent years: trong những năm gần đây
▪️to lead to … ≈ to result in …: dẫn tới vấn đề gì
▪️some people believe that … ≈ it is believed that …: một số người tin rằng …
▪️others argue that … ≈ other people think that …: một số khác nghĩ rằng …
▪️we do not need to … ≈ it is no longer necessary to …: không cần thiết làm gì
▪️to be important ≈ to play an important role: quan trọng
▪️the best way to … ≈ the most effective method to …: cách tốt nhất để …
▪️the government should … ≈ it is necessary for the government to …: chính phủ cần làm gì
Những cụm từ trên chỉ mang tính tham khảo mọi người nhé, vì việc lựa chọn cụm từ nào còn phụ thuộc vào ngữ cảnh bài viết nữa. Huyền mong rằng những gì Huyền chia sẻ ở trên có phần nào đó hữu ích với bạn nhé.
Chúc page mình học tốt ❤
#ieltsnguyenhuyen
同時也有10部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過6萬的網紅粒方不插電,也在其Youtube影片中提到,遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851 歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us! 我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧! Among...
「contrast effect」的推薦目錄:
- 關於contrast effect 在 IELTS Nguyễn Huyền Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於contrast effect 在 IELTS Fighter - Chiến binh IELTS Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於contrast effect 在 老外看中國、老外看台灣 A Laowai's View of China & Taiwan Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於contrast effect 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於contrast effect 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於contrast effect 在 IELTS Fighter Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於contrast effect 在 The Contrast Effect 對比效應:當我們觀察事物時出現了可供 ... 的評價
- 關於contrast effect 在 我以前曾被#對比效應(Contrast effect)... 的評價
contrast effect 在 IELTS Fighter - Chiến binh IELTS Facebook 的最佳解答
- Luyện Reading, tìm từ vựng hay
MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS AND THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY
A critical ingredient in the success of hotels is developing and maintaining superior performance from their employees. How is that accomplished? What Human Resource Management (HRM) practices should organizations invest in to acquire and retain great employees?
Some hotels aim to provide superior working conditions for their employees. The idea originated from workplaces - usually in the non-service sector - that emphasized fun and enjoyment as part of work-life balance. By contrast, the service sector, and more specifically hotels, has traditionally not extended these practices to address basic employee needs, such as good working conditions.
Pfeffer (1994) emphasizes that in order to succeed in a global business environment, organizations must make investment in Human Resource Management (HRM) to allow them to acquire employees who possess better skills and capabilities than their competitors. This investment will be to their competitive advantage. Despite this recognition of the importance of employee development, the hospitality industry has historically been dominated by underdeveloped HR practices (Lucas, 2002).
Lucas also points out that 'the substance of HRM practices does not appear to be designed to foster constructive relations with employees or to represent a managerial approach that enables developing and drawing out the full potential of people, even though employees may be broadly satisfied with many aspects of their work' (Lucas, 2002). In addition, or maybe as a result, high employee turnover has been a recurring problem throughout the hospitality industry. Among the many cited reasons are low compensation, inadequate benefits, poor working conditions and compromised employee morale and attitudes (Maroudas et al., 2008).
Ng and Sorensen (2008) demonstrated that when managers provide recognition to employees, motivate employees to work together, and remove obstacles preventing effective performance, employees feel more obligated to stay with the company. This was succinctly summarized by Michel et al. (2013): '[P]roviding support to employees gives them the confidence to perform their jobs better and the motivation to stay with the organization.' Hospitality organizations can therefore enhance employee motivation and retention through the development and improvement of their working conditions. These conditions are inherently linked to the working environment.
While it seems likely that employees' reactions to their job characteristics could be affected by a predisposition to view their work environment negatively, no evidence exists to support this hypothesis (Spector et al., 2000). However, given the opportunity, many people will find something to complain about in relation to their workplace (Poulston, 2009). There is a strong link between the perceptions of employees and particular factors of their work environment that are separate from the work itself, including company policies, salary and vacations.
Such conditions are particularly troubling for the luxury hotel market, where high-quality service, requiring a sophisticated approach to HRM, is recognized as a critical source of competitive advantage (Maroudas et al., 2008). In a real sense, the services ofhotel employees represent their industry (Schneider and Bowen, 1993). This representation has commonly been limited to guest experiences. This suggests that there has been a dichotomy between the guest environment provided in luxury hotels and the working conditions of their employees.
It is therefore essential for hotel management to develop HRM practices that enable them to inspire and retain competent employees. This requires an understanding of what motivates employees at different levels of management and different stages of their careers (Enz and Siguaw, 2000). This implies that it is beneficial for hotel managers to understand what practices are most favorable to increase employee satisfaction and retention.
Herzberg (1966) proposes that people have two major types of needs, the first being extrinsic motivation factors relating to the context in which work is performed, rather than the work itself. These include working conditions and job security. When these factors are unfavorable, job dissatisfaction may result. Significantly, though, just fulfilling these needs does not result in satisfaction, but only in the reduction of dissatisfaction (Maroudas et al., 2008).
Employees also have intrinsic motivation needs or motivators, which include such factors as achievement and recognition. Unlike extrinsic factors, motivator factors may ideally result in job satisfaction (Maroudas et al., 2008). Herzberg's (1966) theory discusses the need for a 'balance' of these two types of needs.
The impact of fun as a motivating factor at work has also been explored. For example, Tews, Michel and Stafford (2013) conducted a study focusing on staff from a chain of themed restaurants in the United States. It was found that fun activities had a favorable impact on performance and manager support for fun had a favorable impact in reducing turnover.
Their findings support the view that fun may indeed have a beneficial effect, but the framing of that fun must be carefully aligned with both organizational goals and employee characteristics. 'Managers must learn how to achieve the delicate balance of allowing employees the freedom to enjoy themselves at work while simultaneously maintaining high levels of performance' (Tews et al., 2013).
Deery (2008) has recommended several actions that can be adopted at the organizational level to retain good staff as well as assist in balancing work and family life. Those particularly appropriate to the hospitality industry include allowing adequate breaks during the working day, staff functions that involve families, and providing health and well-being opportunities.
Các từ vựng nổi bật:
critical (adj): then chốt
superior (adj): tốt hơn
accomplish (adj): trọn vẹn
retain (v): giữ lại
by contrast: ngược lại
extend (v): kéo dài
emphasize (v): nhấn mạnh
investment (n): đầu tư
competitive (adj): cạnh tranh
recognition (n): sự công nhận
substance (n): cốt lõi
foster (v): thúc đẩy
constructive (adj): có tính xây dựng
managerial (adj): thuộc quản lý
potential (n): tiềm năng
turnover (n): nghỉ việc
compensation (n): lương
morale (n): tinh thần
obstacle (n): chướng ngại
succinctly (adv): súc tích
retention (n): sự duy trì
predisposition (n): khuynh hướng thiên về
separate (adj): riêng biệt
sophisticated (adj): phức tạp
dichotomy (n): sự lưỡng phân
extrinsic (adj): từ bên ngoài
intrinsic (adj): từ bên trong
align (v): sắp hàng
delicate (adj): tinh tế
simultaneously (adv): đồng thời
adequate (adj): đầy đủ
break (n): giờ giải lao
Các bạn cùng tham khảo nhé!
contrast effect 在 老外看中國、老外看台灣 A Laowai's View of China & Taiwan Facebook 的精選貼文
【香港大學學生會無懼國安法聲明|Statement that the Hong Kong University Students’ Union fears not of the National Security Law】
(Please scroll for English version)
《中華人民共和國香港特別行政區維護國家安全法》(下稱國安法)於六月三十日晚上十一時生效,同日公佈實際條文。七月一日,首次有抗爭者因高舉旗幟被捕。自政權明目張膽地打壓「光復香港,時代革命」、「香港獨立,唯一出路」兩句口號起,言論自由蕩然無存,青山綠水不再依舊,昔日美好的香港不復存在。
香港大學應為香港而立。如今香港禮崩樂壞,我校亦未能倖免。國安法中文版本指名「加強監督和管理學校」,七月五日更於英文版本加插「大學(University)」一字。校方隨即剷除連儂牆上的字句,屈服於強權之下。香港大學百年基業有賴院校自主、學術自由,國安法卻將之毀於一旦。
「世界有陰影,但亮光在對比下顯得更強。」香港人綻放了令人驚心動魄的亮光,這股光芒帶給我們希望,而他將永久照耀這片土地。縱使前路一片漆黑,我們定必團結抵抗邪惡。
我等在此呼籲各位切勿自我審查,屈服於政權的白色恐怖之下。香港大學學生會勢必與香港人同行,守護屬於我們的香港,共同迎來香港的黎明。
香港大學學生會
二零二零年七月八日
“The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region” (National Security Law) took effect at 11:00 p.m. June 30. Actual provisions of the law were published on the same day. The first arrest was made in holding flags on July 1. Ever since the regime blatantly suppressed the slogans of “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Time” and “Hong Kong Independence is the Only Way Out”, freedom of expression has been quashed. Everything has changed. The good old Hong Kong no longer exists.
The University of Hong Kong is to be for Hong Kong. Now that Hong Kong was devastated, our institute is certainly no exception. The Chinese version of the National Security Law specifies strengthening “supervision and regulation of schools”. The word “universities” was even inserted into the English version on July 5. Subsequently, the University demolished words on the Lennon wall, submitting to tyranny. Institutional autonomy and academic freedom had been the foundation of achievements of the University of Hong Kong for more than a century. The National Security Law, however, dealt a blow to such.
There are dark shadows on the earth, but its lights are stronger in the contrast. Hongkongers has shined out bright and brought hope to the city. Such lights shall last forever. Albeit darkness ahead, we shall fight against malignancy.
Do not yield and bow to white terror of the regime by self-censorship. The Hong Kong University Students’ Union shall walk alongside Hongkongers to safeguard our Hong Kong until the dawn comes.
The Hong Kong University Students’ Union
July 8, 2020
contrast effect 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的精選貼文
遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851
歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us!
我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧!
Among Us》是一款多人電子遊戲,由美國]遊戲工作室InnerSloth開發並於2018年6月15日發布。遊戲以太空為主題,玩家將扮演船員(Crewmate)或入侵者(Impostor)之一。船員的目標找出入侵者並完成任務,而入侵者的目標是殺死所有船員而不被發現。雖然遊戲於2018年發布,但鮮有問津,直到2020年因為眾多Twitch實況主和YouTuber遊玩才流行起來。為回應遊戲的熱度,遊戲開發者於2020年8月宣布將開發續作《Among Us 2》,但是一個月後(9月)宣布取消續作的開發,將重點轉移到改進原版遊戲上
The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?
The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.
In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.
At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?
If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.
娛樂百分百
凹鳴狼人殺
contrast effect 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最佳解答
The Menace Among Us太空狼人殺桌遊版 這裡買: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851
講到陣營遊戲 大部分的人想到的應該都是狼人殺、阿瓦隆,但你知道其實有很多比這幾個遊戲更好玩的陣營遊戲嗎? 快來看看吧!
死亡寒冬
CS Files犯罪現場
威脅潛伏 The Menace Among Us (太空狼人殺)
人類懲戒
太空堡壘:卡拉狄加
The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?
The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.
In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.
At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?
If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.
娛樂百分百 狼人殺
contrast effect 在 IELTS Fighter Youtube 的精選貼文
IELTS Speaking part 3 là một phần thi khó nhất trong Speaking. Hôm nay chúng ta sẽ cùng cô Quỳnh chinh phục Part 3 một cách dễ dành nhé!
? Link tải tài liệu: http://bit.ly/2Mw7N5O
? Playlist khóa học online Writing và Speaking: http://bit.ly/2KGmdP5
VIDEO BÀI HỌC BAO GỒM:
? Tổng quan về IELTS Speaking Part 3 với những thông tin về hình thức thi, câu hỏi thường gặp, thời gian thi...
? Chiến lược trả lời Speaking Part 3:
Theo cựu giám khảo IELTS Simon, cách tốt nhất để trả lời cho các câu hỏi trong phần Part 3 là đưa ra các ý như sau:
- Answer – Trả lời
- Reason – Giải thích
- Example – Ví dụ
- Alternative – Ý kiến trái chiều
Ms.Quỳnh sẽ giới thiệu một ví dụ bài nói cho các bạn tham khảo nhé!
? 7 kiểu câu hỏi xuất hiện trong Part 3:
- Opinion– What do you think about ‘this’? Remember to say why you think that way and give examples.
- Evaluate– What do you think about someone else’s opinion?
- Future– What do you think will happen in the future?
- Cause and Effect– What caused ‘this’ and/or what effects has ‘it’ had?
- Hypothetical– Talk about imaginary or unreal situations.
- Compare and Contrast– Talk about the difference and/or similarities between two things.
- Past– How were things different in the past and how have they changed?
Ms.Quỳnh sẽ giới thiệu ví dụ cho các bạn dễ hiểu nha!
Chúc các bạn học tập tốt!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hãy cùng Ms.Quỳnh tìm hiểu về phần thi cuối cùng của IELTS Speaking và cách vượt qua tốt nhất! Nếu có bất kỳ điều gì thắc mắc, các bạn hãy comment dưới đây ngay để được giải đáp nhé! Nguồn bài mẫu chính thống từ ielts-simon.com, ieltsadvantage.com.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe IELTS Fighter nhận thông báo video mới nhất để không bỏ lỡ các video bài học thú vị, ngay tại link này nhé:
?https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5YIs2pY_8ElQWMEnpN5TaQ/featured
? IELTS Speaking in 2 minutes: http://bit.ly/2B96KHE
? Bí kíp Speaking 8.0: http://bit.ly/2KgXkx4
? Bí quyết giúp cho bài IELTS Speaking bớt đáng sợ: http://bit.ly/2BcjHR9
Subscribe IELTS Fighter nhận thông báo video mới nhất để không bỏ lỡ các video bài học thú vị, ngay tại link này nhé:
https://www.youtube.com/IELTSFighter
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IELTS Fighter - The leading IELTS Training Center in Vietnam
Branch 1: 254 Hoang Van Thai, Thanh Xuan, HN; Tel: 0462 956 422
Branch 2: 44 Tran Quoc Hoan, Cau Giay, HN; Tel: 0466 862 804
Branch 3: 410 Xã Đàn, Đống Đa, Hà Nội; Tel: 0466 868 815
Branch 4: 350, 3/2 Street, 10 District, HCM; Tel: 0866 57 57 29
Branch 5: 94 Cộng Hòa, Tân Bình, HCM; Tel: 02866538585
Branch 6: 85 Điện Biên Phủ, Bình Thạnh, HCM; Tel: 028 6660 4006
Branch 7: 233 Nguyễn Văn Linh, Thanh Khê, Đà Nẵng; Tel: 0236 357 2009
Branch 8: L39.6 khu dân cư Cityland - Phan Văn Trị - Q.Gò Vấp - TPHCM. SĐT: 028 22295577
Branch 9: 376 Nguyễn Văn Cừ - Long Biên - Hà Nội. SĐT: 02466619628
Branch 10: 18 LK6C Nguyễn Văn Lộc - Hà Đông - Hà Nội. SĐT 02466619625
Branch 11: A11 Bà Hom, Phường 13, Quận 6, HCM. SĐT: 028 2244 2323
Branch 12: 254 Tôn Đức Thắng, P. Hòa Minh, Q. Liên Chiểu, Đà Nẵng. SĐT: 0236 629 57 57
Branch 13: 44 Nguyễn Hoàng, (gần bx Mỹ Đình), HN. SĐT 02466593161
Cơ sở 14: 66B Hoàng Diệu 2 Thủ Đức. SĐT: 02822 423 344
Cơ sở 15: 48 Trung Hòa, Cầu Giấy - HN - SĐT: 02462910811
Cơ sở 16: 44H1 (343) Nguyễn Ánh Thủ, Quận 12 - HCM . SĐT: 02 822 406 633
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?Website: https://ielts-fighter.com/
?Fanpage:https://www.facebook.com/ielts.fighter
?Group:https://www.facebook.com/groups/ielts...
?Holine: 0963 891 756
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#IELTSSpeakingPart3 #IELTSFighter #HọcIELTSonline
contrast effect 在 我以前曾被#對比效應(Contrast effect)... 的推薦與評價
我以前曾被#對比效應(Contrast effect) 這個偏誤害過好多次。 譬如: 覺得310元的#台積電太貴, 覺得320元的#聯發科太貴, 覺得380元的#鈊象太貴, . ... <看更多>
contrast effect 在 The Contrast Effect 對比效應:當我們觀察事物時出現了可供 ... 的推薦與評價
Sep 11, 2012 - The Contrast Effect 對比效應:當我們觀察事物時出現了可供參照的對象,就會相對的認為目標事物比較美、小、貴,我們對「絕對」的判斷是缺乏能力的, ... ... <看更多>