這種垃圾調查報告竟然還能年年拿聯合國補助?而且還有無腦媒體報導?
我就一直說經濟學界有一堆不學無術靠嘴砲吃飯的經濟學家,還大言不慚地說自己是給政策制定者建言。
看看該報告內容怎麼定義「快樂」?
The measure of happiness that we use is life
satisfaction. The typical question is “Overall how
satisfied are you with your life these days?”
measured on a scale of 0 to 10 (from ‘extremely
dissatisfied’ to ‘extremely satisfied’).
This is a democratic criterion—we do not rely on
researchers or policy-makers to give their own
weights to enjoyment, meaning, anxiety, depression,
and the like. Instead we leave it to individuals
to evaluate their own wellbeing.
統計學上這叫做「垃圾進垃圾出」,經濟學上叫做「學者自己腦袋短缺」。
通篇報告based on 一堆本來就不靠譜的統計調查 -- 失業率、GDP、通貨膨脹率....這些都是總體經濟裡正確性本來就很低的東西。一堆垃圾,報告結果可參考性自然比餿水還不如。
http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/3754373…
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
criterion meaning 在 Criterion Meaning - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>