My recent article😎😎😎
https://apps.orangenews.hk/app/common/details_html…
Opinion | Ulterior Motives behind Opposition Camp's refusal to recognize HKSAR political system
HK Current
2020.09.03 11:39
By Athena Kung
In fact, the political system adopted by the HKSAR is executive-led. Under this structure, the executive authorities, legislature and judiciary complement each other, with built-in checks and balances.
In the year of 1840, Hong Kong was occupied by Britain after the Opium War. In accordance with the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed on 19th of December, 1984, the Chinese and British Governments had a hand-over ceremony on 1st of July, 1997, which marked the resumption of sovereignty by China over Hong Kong. Meanwhile, the HKSAR of the PRC was formally established. The Hong Kong Basic Law, which was adopted in April 1990 at the Third Session of the Seventh National People's Congress, formally came into effect. The Basic Law clearly states and defines the specifications as to how the high degree of autonomy as well as the political, economic, cultural and educational systems of the HKSAR to be run.
To comply with the Basic Law, since 1st of July 1997, the Chinese government has been carrying out the basic policies of "One country, Two systems," "administration of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong people" and "a high degree of autonomy" in the HKSAR. Under "One country, Two systems", even though China is a unified country and the mainland practices the socialist system, Hong Kong's previous capitalist system before 1st of July 1997 and way of life has been remaining unchanged for 50 years. To properly implement "administration of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong people", the HKSAR has all along been administering by the Hong Kong people on their own, and the central authorities have never sent officials to the HKSAR to fill any local official posts. To fulfill "a high degree of autonomy", apart from foreign and national defense affairs which should be administered by the central authorities, the HKSAR has fully enjoyed the power to decide all other matters within its autonomous jurisdiction. The central authorities has never interfered in affairs within the scope of autonomy of the HKSAR. All along, the HKSAR government has been making the final decisions on all matters within its autonomous jurisdiction as prescribed in the Basic Law.
Under the political system of the HKSAR, its major organs of power include the Chief Executive, the Government, the Legislative Council and the Court of Final Appeal. The Executive Council assists the Chief Executive in policy-making and advises the Chief Executive on matters relating to the introduction of bills and subsidiary legislation. Being independent agencies, both the Commission Against Corruption and the Audit Commission are directly accountable to the Chief Executive. In accordance with the conditions procedures as prescribed by law, the Chief Executive shall have the power to dismiss the legislative organs whereas the legislative organs shall have the power to impeach the Chief Executive and the administrative organs shall be accountable to the legislative organs. The Chief Executive, administrative and legislative organs shall supervise and cooperate with each other, which is however not the separation of powers as described by the Opposite Camps from time to time.
The Chief Executive of the HKSAR is both the head of the HKSAR and the head of the HKSAR government. His or her dual status enables him or her to have extensive functions and powers. The Chief Executive shall be selected from among residents of the HKSAR by election or through consultations held locally, and be appointed by the Central Government. Thus, the Chief Executive who is appointed by the Chinese Government to manage the HKSAR plays a very superior role in the HKSAR political system.
In short, the Chief Executive is responsible for implementing the Basic Law, signing bills and budgets, promulgating laws, making decisions on government policies and issuing Executive Orders. Article 48 of the Basic Law empowers the Chief Executive a variety of powers and functions:
" Article 48
The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions:
(1) To lead the government of the Region;
(2)To be responsible for the implementation of this Law and other laws which, in accordance with this Law, apply in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region;
(3)To sign bills passed by the Legislative Council and to promulgate laws;
To sign budgets passed by the Legislative Council and report the budgets and final accounts to the Central People's Government for the record;
(4)To decide on government policies and to issue executive orders;
(5)To nominate and to report to the Central People's Government for appointment the following principal officials: Secretaries and Deputy Secretaries of Departments, Directors of Bureaux, Commissioner Against Corruption, Director of Audit, Commissioner of Police, Director of Immigration and Commissioner of Customs and Excise; and to recommend to the Central People's Government the removal of the above-mentioned officials;
(6)To appoint or remove judges of the courts at all levels in accordance with legal procedures;
(7)To appoint or remove holders of public office in accordance with legal procedures;
(8)To implement the directives issued by the Central People's Government in respect of the relevant matters provided for in this Law;
(9)To conduct, on behalf of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, external affairs and other affairs as authorized by the Central Authorities;
(10) To approve the introduction of motions regarding revenues or expenditure to the Legislative Council;
(11)To decide, in the light of security and vital public interests, whether government officials or other personnel in charge of government affairs should testify or give evidence before the Legislative Council or its committees;
(12)To pardon persons convicted of criminal offences or commute their penalties; and
(13)To handle petitions and complaints.
Indeed, the judicial independence plays a vital role to ensure that the acts and policies of the executive and the legislature fully comply with the Basic Law whereas all fundamental rights and freedoms to be enjoyed by all Hong Kong citizens in accordance with the law can be completely safeguarded. However, from the point of view of separation of powers, the relationship between the executive, legislature and judiciary in the HKSAR should be one of mutual-supervision, checks and balances. It is purely a kind of division of work.
The Opposition Camps has been keeping on refusing to recognize the executive leadership role played by the Chief Executive in accordance with the Basic Law. On the other hand, they intentionally and wrongly deny the executive-led political system adopted in the HKSAR so as to weaken the powers, functions and authorities of the Chief Executive. At the same time, they have been trying their best to expand the powers of the Legislative Council. Clearly, the Opposition Camp aims at making a change in the political system of the HKSAR, namely from executive-led to legislative-led in the hope of controlling the whole HKSAR Government once they can obtain more than 35 seats in the Legislative Council Election. Such step is a common strategy adopted in “Colour Revolutions” instigated by the U.S. Government. In reality, the Opposition Camp has been keeping on spreading rumors to provoke the public's hatred towards the Chief Executive so as to crack down the prestige of the executive-led system in the HKSAR and achieve its ultimate goal of Hong Kong Independence.
The author is Barrister-at-law.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.
責任編輯:CK Li
編輯:Whon
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過35萬的網紅屎萊姆的3次元,也在其Youtube影片中提到,如果香港能擁有如果…… 如果警察停止濫暴,克盡厥職維護香港法治; 如果警黑停止勾結,以保障市民安全為首任; 如果警方沒有散播「曱甴」仇殺言論; 如果政府停止白色恐怖,尊重香港的自治和自由; 如果香港有真雙普選,保障「開放參政」和「實質競爭」的權利; 也許歷歷在目的是市民的笑容與歡呼而不是血腥...
hk judiciary 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的最佳貼文
My recent article😎😎😎
我最新的評論文章💪💪💪
Opinion | A misleading slogan by the opposition camp: political prosecution HK
Current2小時前
By Athena Kung
LegCo members Lam Cheuk-ting (hereinafter referred to as "Lam") and Ted Hui Chi-fung (hereinafter referred to as "Hui") were arrested at their residence respectively in the morning on 26th of August 2020. In the afternoon on 27th of August 2020, they were brought before Magistrate Peter Law Esq. sitting in West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts. Both of them faced a count of attempting to perverting the course of justice. Lam was also charged of 1 count of riot. Hui further faced 2 more charges, including criminal damage and access to computer with criminal or dishonest intent. Their bail application was objected by prosecution. After all, the court granted bail to both Lam and Hui. Their cases were adjourned for mention.
Shortly after being released by the court, Lam and Hui strongly criticized the arrest and prosecution and described it as a "public prosecution". All along, whenever any members of the opposition camp have been arrested and prosecuted, then their whole group with the local and foreign media supporting them would together accuse the HKSAR Government of making a political prosecution with an aim to suppress the dissidents. They would also try their best to condemn the HKSAR Government's such act as being a violation of the Sino-British Joint Statement and Hong Kong Basic Law. From time to time, they further attack the Government's such acts as suppressing their freedom of speech.
It appears that whenever the opposition camp alleges the Government conducts a political prosecution, all they mean is that the Government is making use of the political reasons to arrest or prosecute them. Recently, the term "political prosecution" has been the slogan made use of by the opposition camp frequently for the purpose of smearing the Hong Kong Police, Department of Justice, the Judiciary as well as the whole HKSAR Government. The motive behind is to provoke the public's hatred towards the HKSAR Government and even the Central Government, which has been a very important step in the Colour Revolutions instigated by the US Government all over the world.
Everyone is equal before the law. Even the LegCo Members must comply with all the laws in Hong Kong. No doubt, according to the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance, Cap 382, Laws of Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as "the Ordinance"), the privileges and immunities to be enjoyed by the LegCo Members include:
(1) Freedom of speech and debate "in the Council or proceedings before a committee" under Section 3 of the Ordinance.
(2) Immunity from legal proceedings, namely no civil or criminal proceedings shall be instituted against any member for "words spoken before, or written in a report to, the Council or a Committee, or by reason of any matter brought by him therein by petition, Bill, resolution, motion or otherwise" under Section 4 of the Ordinance.
(3) Freedom to arrest under Section 5 of the Ordinance, including:
(a) No member shall be liable to arrest for any civil debt whilst going to, attending at or returning from a sitting of the Council or a committee;
(b) No member shall be liable to arrest for any criminal offence whilst attending at a sitting of the Council or a Committee.
In short, the privilege, immunity and freedom of speech and debate can only been exercised by the LegCo Members when they are performing their duties in making speech and debate in the Council or during the committee proceedings. The charges faced by Lam and Hui occurred in Yuen Long MTR Station on 21st of July 2019 or outside Tuen Mun Police Station on 6th of July 2019 respectively. Clearly, on both days, Lam and Hui were not performing their duties in the Council or before any Committee. On 26th of August, they were arrested at their home, but not during their attending at or returning from the Council or any Committee. Obviously, the LegCo Members from the Opposition Camp often exaggerate their privilege, immunity and freedom of speech to mislead the public.
Outside the Council and Committees, all LegCo Members must obey to all the laws in Hong Kong. Being the lawmakers who play a significant role in discussing and passing the Bills in the Legislative Council, as expected by the society, they have to behave themselves properly and setting up as good models for the public to follow and imitate, particularly for those youngsters who are immature. Their keeping on showing no respect at all towards the law and order is step by step ruining Hong Kong's rule of law, which has been the cornerstone of the success gained by the Pearl of the Oriental.
The Opposition Camp often alleges that the HKSAR Government has violated the Sino-British Joint Statement and the Hong Kong Basic Law. However, never have they pointed out which part of the 2 documents have been breached by the HKSAR Government. Obviously, such condemn is slogan as well without any concrete support at all, aiming at spreading the hatred towards the Government in the society.
So long as the Opposition Camp is of the view that any prosecution has insufficient basis to support the charge, all they should do is to face the trial bravely instead of keeping on criticizing the Government wrongfully from time to time. In court, they may have the right to deny the charges against them. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution whereas the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. Defence discharges of no burden of proof at all. All defendants in criminal cases are presumed to be innocent. Prosecution had the duty to produce evidence to prove all elements of the charges they are facing. They also have the right to have their legal representation, call their own witnesses and decide whether to give evidence during the court process. Even if they are convicted after trial, they still have the right to appeal against the conviction and/or the sentence.
The author is Barrister-at-law.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.
責任編輯:CK Li
編輯:Whon
hk judiciary 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
【NATIONAL SECURITY LAW LEGISLATION】
國安法壓境,香港人嚴陣以待,亦知悉到惡法很可能在七一前通過,但據過去幾天跟國際社會交流意見的觀察,不少幕僚仍以為法例最快在八月方會執行,所以為了提升國際社會的關注,我與團隊特意製作了這個懶人包,拜托各位轉發,謝謝。
The legislation is effectively a done deal and expected to be passed on before June 30, on eve of city’s handover anniversary.
Full draft of the law would not be made public until after passage to reduce the dissenting voices in general public.
3 fatal impacts on Hong Kong the law is implemented
1) tailor-made offences for major activists;
2) Cutting-throat damage to judicial independence
3) Install mainland security institution into Hong Kong;
————————
1) tailor-made offences for major activists
- Core members of Demosisto, engaging in international advocacy in particular, are major targets of the law.
- Penalities of the related offences are unknown at the moment, but from the existing sources close to Beijing, defendants who found guilty can be sentenced up to 10 years.
- Once arrested, suspects would be kept in special detention facilities for detention, interrogation and investigation. Serious offences, according to HK's NPCSC representative, Tam Yiu-chung, would be extradited to China for trial.
- The situation of activists becomes extremely dangerous. I believe Beijing is adopting the tactics against mainland activists like Wang Quanzhang to Hong Kong counterparts, as Wang revealed his detention encounters in an interview earlier.
——————————
2) Cutting-throat damage to judicial independence
- Towards the passage of the legislation, the opinion of the legal sector was never consulted.
- According to limited sources, Chief Executive could also appoint special security judges to oversee the trial for serious offences. While in control of both the law-enforcement and judicial power, the law is fatal to Hong Kong's waning judiciary independence.
- Former Chief Justice Andrew Li broke silence on the legislation and slammed the proposed bill 'detrimental to the independence of the Judiciary. It is by far the strongest criticism made among former public officers.
- Though these limited opposing opinion would not be able to prevent Beijing from doing so.
——————————
3) Install mainland institutions into Hong Kong
- HK Government will set up a commission to safeguard national security chaired by the city’s leader and which will include an adviser appointed by Beijing.
- Full power directed from Beijing. The role of Hong Kong government is limited
hk judiciary 在 屎萊姆的3次元 Youtube 的最佳貼文
如果香港能擁有如果……
如果警察停止濫暴,克盡厥職維護香港法治;
如果警黑停止勾結,以保障市民安全為首任;
如果警方沒有散播「曱甴」仇殺言論;
如果政府停止白色恐怖,尊重香港的自治和自由;
如果香港有真雙普選,保障「開放參政」和「實質競爭」的權利;
也許歷歷在目的是市民的笑容與歡呼而不是血腥與混亂;
也許香港仍能擁有曾經自豪與驕傲的美譽 - 「司法獨立高度自治」與「最安全城市」;
也許為社會注入的是希望與和平而不是絕望與低谷;
也許香港仍然是實踐真正民主的希望燈塔;
也許我們仍能穩守民主社會的基石 – 「人權」與「自由」。
也許……能讓孩子不用承受今天如斯不堪的後果。
如果香港人永不放棄,也許能一同堅守信念創造一個屬於我們最好的結果。
如果你有良知,你願意和我們站在一起嗎?
#五大訴求 #缺一不可 #光復香港 #時代革命 #問誰未發聲 #我願榮光歸香港
What if Hong Kong has a lot of “what if”……
What if police brutality never existed in HK , the Force remained steadfast in their duties to uphold law and order;
What if HK police’s shadowy network of triad gangs collapsed, the Force firmly carried out its mandate to maintain public safety;
What if HK police didn’t slam protestors by labeling “cockroach” and spreading death threats;
What if HongKonger could live without ‘white terror’ but with full respect of autonomy and freedoms;
What if true universal suffrage is committed for Hong Kong, which promotes fair and open competition;
Perhaps scenes of smiles and cheers would be vivid in our minds instead of chaos and bloodshed;
Perhaps Hong Kong could still be proud of its independent judiciary and reputation as one of the safest cities in the world;
Perhaps society would be filled with hopes and peace but not despair and desperation;
Perhaps Hong Kong could still serve as exemplar of freedom and beacon of hope;
Perhaps HongKonger would not be robbed of foundation of democracy - human rights and liberality.
Perhaps…. the young generation would not have to suffer from the unbearable and miserable situation today.
What if HongKonger never give up, perhaps we may unite to fight for our beliefs and strike for best result.
What if you have a conscience, are you willing to stand with us?
#FiveDemands #NotOneLess #LiberateHongKong #RevolutionOfOurTimes #DoYouHearThePeopleSing
#GloryToHongKong
hk judiciary 在 Top Hong Kong Judge Geoffrey Ma Defends Right to Rule on ... 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>