Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought to charge Professor Hwan C. Lin, Professor Ho De-fen, and Dr. Dennis Peng with defamation. It was the first time an acting president brought forth a lawsuit against scholars.
For two years, anyone who doubted Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis, or even questioned it, were ridiculed by the media and legally persecuted. But, aren’t government leaders in a democratic society obligated to have the authenticity of their credentials tested? Why does the opposite prevail in Taiwan? Why can a leader who has their credentials questioned forgo providing proof and can, instead, use the judicial system to suppress those that question them?
The hallmark of a dutiful scholar is how willing they are to uphold academic integrity. A desire to authenticate Tsai’s degree is a basic reaction for anyone who considers themselves part of the academic circle. However, after Tsai sought legal action against the three scholars, the public came to understand that “questioning Tsai’s degree will get you sued.” Such a precedent is an affront to academic integrity, and an insult to intellectuals everywhere.
Can Taiwan deem itself a proud democracy if its head of state is allowed to use privilege to elevate themselves their whole life, and then escape criticism when questioned? Can Taiwan say it’s the proud democracy it claims to be when judicial mechanisms are used to enact acts of academic fraud? Martial law has been abolished for decades, and yet this country still operates like a dictatorship. Today is about transitional justice in the academic realm. Transitional justice begins when we can face our mistakes. Here, justice begins when Tsai faces her own academic fraud.
Today’s press conference is about rallying the public to stand up against authoritarianism. We call on Tsai Ing-wen to do her duty as head of state and divulge the truth about her thesis. If she refuses to do so, then the other purpose of today is to reveal the evidence we have found that uncovers that truth.
It’s time the lies ended. We will hold a press conference at the Legislative Yuan tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. Eat News will broadcast the entire event live: https://www.eatnews.co.uk/video/20210909-1/
#DennisPeng #PengWengjen #HwanCLin #HoDefen #TsaiIngwen #LSEThesisGateScandal
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「hwanclin」的推薦目錄:
- 關於hwanclin 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於hwanclin 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於hwanclin 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於hwanclin 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於hwanclin 在 [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網- 看板Gossiping 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 獨立觀察 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 #hwanclin - YouTube 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 Re: [討論] 判決出爐!LSE向法院坦承無蔡博士資料 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 網路上關於論文門最新-在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試 ... 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 網路上關於論文門最新-在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試 ... 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 網路上關於論文門最新-在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試 ... 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 Re: [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網 - PTT推薦 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 [爆卦] 獨立調查報告:蔡英文博士論文與証書的- 看板Gossiping 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 重磅證據曝光!蔡英文根本就沒有完成倫敦政經學院的博士論文 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網- 看板Gossiping 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 Re: [爆卦] 蔡英文博士論文抄襲他人著作 - PTT八卦政治 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 [爆卦] 獨立調查報告:蔡英文博士論文與証書的 - PTT Uncovered 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 Re: [新聞] 「論文門」爆重大進展!英法庭:LSE提- PTT評價 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 博士論文ptt - WFG 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 [討論] 蔡英文的LSE博士論文疑點(彙整、懶人包) - HatePolitics 的評價
- 關於hwanclin 在 [討論] LSE官方聲明確認蔡英文博士學位- HatePolitics 的評價
hwanclin 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
hwanclin 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
hwanclin 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
hwanclin 在 獨立觀察 的推薦與評價
林環牆(Hwan Lin)的「獨立觀察」臉書頁,主要目的在調查報導蔡英文詐騙博士學位的論文門世紀大醜聞,以伸張「是非、良善、正義」等人類文明的價值。林環牆來自福爾摩 ... ... <看更多>
hwanclin 在 #hwanclin - YouTube 的推薦與評價
You're offline. Check your connection. Retry. ... <看更多>
hwanclin 在 [爆卦] ICO關於LSE的論文門裁定全文公告上網- 看板Gossiping 的推薦與評價