The business equation is simple.
Turn strangers into friends.
Friends into clients.
And over-deliver for them to turn them into raving fans.
But, simple doesn’t mean it’s easy.
One of the most effective ways I’ve found to turn strangers into friends is through YouTube.
If you can build a channel of even 1000 subscribers, and you’re a good closer...
That’s enough to move the needle in your business.
Of course, as you continue to grow your channel, so too will your revenue.
What’s your favorite way to turn strangers into friends?
Share with me below
同時也有15部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過6萬的網紅Herman Yeung,也在其Youtube影片中提到,購買此 e-book (HK$199.00) 的連結︰ https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Herman_Yeung_Herman_Yeung_F_3_Maths_%E4%B8%AD%E4%B8%89%E6%95%B8%E5%AD%B8_Exerc...
「mean equation」的推薦目錄:
- 關於mean equation 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於mean equation 在 TradingwithRayner Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於mean equation 在 Taipei Ethereum Meetup Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於mean equation 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於mean equation 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於mean equation 在 EHPMusicChannel Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於mean equation 在 Sample Mean and Population Mean - Statistics - YouTube 的評價
- 關於mean equation 在 What does 'sign' mean in an equation? - Mathematics Stack ... 的評價
mean equation 在 TradingwithRayner Facebook 的最佳解答
𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗹)
This is one of the biggest trading myths which have fooled most traders…
“If you have a winning trading strategy, you can use it to make millions of dollars from the markets.”
That’s B.S.
I’ll explain…
Yes, you can have a winning strategy but, it doesn’t mean you can make millions of dollars.
Why?
Because the size of your account matters!
Let me give you an example…
Let’s say you have a trading strategy that makes 20% a year.
On a $1,000 account, that’s $200/year.
On a $10,000 account, that’s $2,000/year.
On a $1m account, that’s $200,000/year.
As you can see, your trading strategy is one part of the equation, the other equally important aspect is the size of your account.
And this is the same reason why hedge funds raise millions, if not billions of dollars—they need money to make money in trading.
mean equation 在 Taipei Ethereum Meetup Facebook 的精選貼文
📜 [專欄新文章] Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth
✍️ 田少谷 Shao
📥 歡迎投稿: https://medium.com/taipei-ethereum-meetup #徵技術分享文 #使用心得 #教學文 #medium
Once again the game-changing DEX 🦄 👑
Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/
Outline
0. Intro1. Uniswap & AMM recap2. Ticks 3. Concentrated liquidity4. Range orders: reversible limit orders5. Impacts of v36. Conclusion
0. Intro
The announcement of Uniswap v3 is no doubt one of the most exciting news in the DeFi place recently 🔥🔥🔥
While most have talked about the impact v3 can potentially bring on the market, seldom explain the delicate implementation techniques to realize all those amazing features, such as concentrated liquidity, limit-order-like range orders, etc.
Since I’ve covered Uniswap v1 & v2 (if you happen to know Mandarin, here are v1 & v2), there’s no reason for me to not cover v3 as well ✅
Thus, this article aims to guide readers through Uniswap v3, based on their official whitepaper and examples made on the announcement page. However, one needs not to be an engineer, as not many codes are involved, nor a math major, as the math involved is definitely taught in your high school, to fully understand the following content 😊😊😊
If you really make it through but still don’t get shxt, feedbacks are welcomed! 🙏
There should be another article focusing on the codebase, so stay tuned and let’s get started with some background noise!
1. Uniswap & AMM recap
Before diving in, we have to first recap the uniqueness of Uniswap and compare it to traditional order book exchanges.
Uniswap v1 & v2 are a kind of AMMs (automated market marker) that follow the constant product equation x * y = k, with x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y in a pool and k as a constant.
Comparing to order book exchanges, AMMs, such as the previous versions of Uniswap, offer quite a distinct user experience:
AMMs have pricing functions that offer the price for the two tokens, which make their users always price takers, while users of order book exchanges can be both makers or takers.
Uniswap as well as most AMMs have infinite liquidity¹, while order book exchanges don’t. The liquidity of Uniswap v1 & v2 is provided throughout the price range [0,∞]².
Uniswap as well as most AMMs have price slippage³ and it’s due to the pricing function, while there isn’t always price slippage on order book exchanges as long as an order is fulfilled within one tick.
In an order book, each price (whether in green or red) is a tick. Image source: https://ftx.com/trade/BTC-PERP
¹ though the price gets worse over time; AMM of constant sum such as mStable does not have infinite liquidity
² the range is in fact [-∞,∞], while a price in most cases won’t be negative
³ AMM of constant sum does not have price slippage
2. Tick
The whole innovation of Uniswap v3 starts from ticks.
For those unfamiliar with what is a tick:
Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tick.asp
By slicing the price range [0,∞] into numerous granular ticks, trading on v3 is highly similar to trading on order book exchanges, with only three differences:
The price range of each tick is predefined by the system instead of being proposed by users.
Trades that happen within a tick still follows the pricing function of the AMM, while the equation has to be updated once the price crosses the tick.
Orders can be executed with any price within the price range, instead of being fulfilled at the same one price on order book exchanges.
With the tick design, Uniswap v3 possesses most of the merits of both AMM and an order book exchange! 💯💯💯
So, how is the price range of a tick decided?
This question is actually somewhat related to the tick explanation above: the minimum tick size for stocks trading above 1$ is one cent.
The underlying meaning of a tick size traditionally being one cent is that one cent (1% of 1$) is the basis point of price changes between ticks, ex: 1.02 — 1.01 = 0.1.
Uniswap v3 employs a similar idea: compared to the previous/next price, the price change should always be 0.01% = 1 basis point.
However, notice the difference is that in the traditional basis point, the price change is defined with subtraction, while here in Uniswap it’s division.
This is how price ranges of ticks are decided⁴:
Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf
With the above equation, the tick/price range can be recorded in the index form [i, i+1], instead of some crazy numbers such as 1.0001¹⁰⁰ = 1.0100496621.
As each price is the multiplication of 1.0001 of the previous price, the price change is always 1.0001 — 1 = 0.0001 = 0.01%.
For example, when i=1, p(1) = 1.0001; when i=2, p(2) = 1.00020001.
p(2) / p(1) = 1.00020001 / 1.0001 = 1.0001
See the connection between the traditional basis point 1 cent (=1% of 1$) and Uniswap v3’s basis point 0.01%?
Image source: https://tenor.com/view/coin-master-cool-gif-19748052
But sir, are prices really granular enough? There are many shitcoins with prices less than 0.000001$. Will such prices be covered as well?
Price range: max & min
To know if an extremely small price is covered or not, we have to figure out the max & min price range of v3 by looking into the spec: there is a int24 tick state variable in UniswapV3Pool.sol.
Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf
The reason for a signed integer int instead of an uint is that negative power represents prices less than 1 but greater than 0.
24 bits can cover the range between 1.0001 ^ (2²³ — 1) and 1.0001 ^ -(2)²³. Even Google cannot calculate such numbers, so allow me to offer smaller values to have a rough idea of the whole price range:
1.0001 ^ (2¹⁸) = 242,214,459,604.341
1.0001 ^ -(2¹⁷) = 0.000002031888943
I think it’s safe to say that with a int24 the range can cover > 99.99% of the prices of all assets in the universe 👌
⁴ For implementation concern, however, a square root is added to both sides of the equation.
How about finding out which tick does a price belong to?
Tick index from price
The answer to this question is rather easy, as we know that p(i) = 1.0001^i, simply takes a log with base 1.0001 on both sides of the equation⁴:
Image source: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
Let’s try this out, say we wanna find out the tick index of 1000000.
Image source: https://ncalculators.com/number-conversion/log-logarithm-calculator.htm
Now, 1.0001¹³⁸¹⁶² = 999,998.678087146. Voila!
⁵ This formula is also slightly modified to fit the real implementation usage.
3. Concentrated liquidity
Now that we know how ticks and price ranges are decided, let’s talk about how orders are executed in a tick, what is concentrated liquidity and how it enables v3 to compete with stablecoin-specialized DEXs (decentralized exchange), such as Curve, by improving the capital efficiency.
Concentrated liquidity means LPs (liquidity providers) can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish, which causes the liquidity to be imbalanced in ticks.
As each tick has a different liquidity depth, the corresponding pricing function x * y = k also won’t be the same!
Each tick has its own liquidity depth. Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/
Mmm… examples are always helpful for abstract descriptions 😂
Say the original pricing function is 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k), with the price of X token 1000 / 100 = 10 and we’re now in the price range [9.08, 11.08].
If the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is the same as [9.08, 11.08], we don’t have to modify the pricing function if the price goes from 10 to 11.08, which is the boundary between two ticks.
The price of X is 1052.63 / 95 = 11.08 when the equation is 1052.63 * 95 = 100000.
However, if the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is two times that of the current range [9.08, 11.08], balances of x and y should be doubled, which makes the equation become 2105.26 * 220 = 400000, which is (1052.63 * 2) * (110 * 2) = (100000 * 2 * 2).
We can observe the following two points from the above example:
Trades always follow the pricing function x * y = k, while once the price crosses the current price range/tick, the liquidity/equation has to be updated.
√(x * y) = √k = L is how we represent the liquidity, as I say the liquidity of x * y = 400000 is two times the liquidity of x * y = 100000, as √(400000 / 100000) = 2.
What’s more, compared to liquidity on v1 & v2 is always spread across [0,∞], liquidity on v3 can be concentrated within certain price ranges and thus results in higher capital efficiency from traders’ swapping fees!
Let’s say if I provide liquidity in the range [1200, 2800], the capital efficiency will then be 4.24x higher than v2 with the range [0,∞] 😮😮😮 There’s a capital efficiency comparison calculator, make sure to try it out!
Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/
It’s worth noticing that the concept of concentrated liquidity was proposed and already implemented by Kyper, prior to Uniswap, which is called Automated Price Reserve in their case.⁵
⁶ Thanks to Yenwen Feng for the information.
4. Range orders: reversible limit orders
As explained in the above section, LPs of v3 can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish. Depending on the current price and the targeted price range, there are three scenarios:
current price < the targeted price range
current price > the targeted price range
current price belongs to the targeted price range
The first two scenarios are called range orders. They have unique characteristics and are essentially fee-earning reversible limit orders, which will be explained later.
The last case is the exact same liquidity providing mechanism as the previous versions: LPs provide liquidity in both tokens of the same value (= amount * price).
There’s also an identical product to the case: grid trading, a very powerful investment tool for a time of consolidation. Dunno what’s grid trading? Check out Binance’s explanation on this, as this topic won’t be covered!
In fact, LPs of Uniswap v1 & v2 are grid trading with a range of [0,∞] and the entry price as the baseline.
Range orders
To understand range orders, we’d have to first revisit how price is discovered on Uniswap with the equation x * y = k, for x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y and k as a constant.
The price of X compared to Y is y / x, which means how many Y one can get for 1 unit of X, and vice versa the price of Y compared to X is x / y.
For the price of X to go up, y has to increase and x decrease.
With this pricing mechanism in mind, it’s example time!
Say an LP plans to place liquidity in the price range [15.625, 17.313], higher than the current price of X 10, when 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k).
The price of X is 1250 / 80 = 15.625 when the equation is 80 * 1250 = 100000.
The price of X is 1315.789 / 76 = 17.313 when the equation is 76 * 1315.789 = 100000.
If now the price of X reaches 15.625, the only way for the price of X to go even higher is to further increase y and decrease x, which means exchanging a certain amount of X for Y.
Thus, to provide liquidity in the range [15.625, 17.313], an LP needs only to prepare 80 — 76 = 4 of X. If the price exceeds 17.313, all 4 X of the LP is swapped into 1315.789 — 1250 = 65.798 Y, and then the LP has nothing more to do with the pool, as his/her liquidity is drained.
What if the price stays in the range? It’s exactly what LPs would love to see, as they can earn swapping fees for all transactions in the range! Also, the balance of X will swing between [76, 80] and the balance of Y between [1250, 1315.789].
This might not be obvious, but the example above shows an interesting insight: if the liquidity of one token is provided, only when the token becomes more valuable will it be exchanged for the less valuable one.
…wut? 🤔
Remember that if 4 X is provided within [15.625, 17.313], only when the price of X goes up from 15.625 to 17.313 is 4 X gradually swapped into Y, the less valuable one!
What if the price of X drops back immediately after reaching 17.313? As X becomes less valuable, others are going to exchange Y for X.
The below image illustrates the scenario of DAI/USDC pair with a price range of [1.001, 1.002] well: the pool is always composed entirely of one token on both sides of the tick, while in the middle 1.001499⁶ is of both tokens.
Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/
Similarly, to provide liquidity in a price range < current price, an LP has to prepare a certain amount of Y for others to exchange Y for X within the range.
To wrap up such an interesting feature, we know that:
Only one token is required for range orders.
Only when the current price is within the range of the range order can LP earn trading fees. This is the main reason why most people believe LPs of v3 have to monitor the price more actively to maximize their income, which also means that LPs of v3 have become arbitrageurs 🤯
I will be discussing more the impacts of v3 in 5. Impacts of v3.
⁷ 1.001499988 = √(1.0001 * 1.0002) is the geometric mean of 1.0001 and 1.0002. The implication is that the geometric mean of two prices is the average execution price within the range of the two prices.
Reversible limit orders
As the example in the last section demonstrates, if there is 4 X in range [15.625, 17.313], the 4 X will be completely converted into 65.798 Y when the price goes over 17.313.
We all know that a price can stay in a wide range such as [10, 11] for quite some time, while it’s unlikely so in a narrow range such as [15.625, 15.626].
Thus, if an LP provides liquidity in [15.625, 15.626], we can expect that once the price of X goes over 15.625 and immediately also 15.626, and does not drop back, all X are then forever converted into Y.
The concept of having a targeted price and the order will be executed after the price is crossed is exactly the concept of limit orders! The only difference is that if the range of a range order is not narrow enough, it’s highly possible that the conversion of tokens will be reverted once the price falls back to the range.
As price ranges follow the equation p(i) = 1.0001 ^ i, the range can be quite narrow and a range order can thus effectively serve as a limit order:
When i = 27490, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹⁰ = 15.6248.⁸
When i = 27491, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹¹ = 15.6264.⁸
A range of 0.0016 is not THAT narrow but can certainly satisfy most limit order use cases!
⁸ As mentioned previously in note #4, there is a square root in the equation of the price and index, thus the numbers here are for explantion only.
5. Impacts of v3
Higher capital efficiency, LPs become arbitrageurs… as v3 has made tons of radical changes, I’d like to summarize my personal takes of the impacts of v3:
Higher capital efficiency makes one of the most frequently considered indices in DeFi: TVL, total value locked, becomes less meaningful, as 1$ on Uniswap v3 might have the same effect as 100$ or even 2000$ on v2.
The ease of spot exchanging between spot exchanges used to be a huge advantage of spot markets over derivative markets. As LPs will take up the role of arbitrageurs and arbitraging is more likely to happen on v3 itself other than between DEXs, this gap is narrowed … to what extent? No idea though.
LP strategies and the aggregation of NFT of Uniswap v3 liquidity token are becoming the blue ocean for new DeFi startups: see Visor and Lixir. In fact, this might be the turning point for both DeFi and NFT: the two main reasons of blockchain going mainstream now come to the alignment of interest: solving the $$ problem 😏😏😏
In the right venue, which means a place where transaction fees are low enough, such as Optimism, we might see Algo trading firms coming in to share the market of designing LP strategies on Uniswap v3, as I believe Algo trading is way stronger than on-chain strategies or DAO voting to add liquidity that sort of thing.
After reading this article by Parsec.finance: The Dex to Rule Them All, I cannot help but wonder: maybe there is going to be centralized crypto exchanges adopting v3’s approach. The reason is that since orders of LPs in the same tick are executed pro-rata, the endless front-running speeding-competition issue in the Algo trading world, to some degree, is… solved? 🤔
Anyway, personal opinions can be biased and seriously wrong 🙈 I’m merely throwing out a sprat to catch a whale. Having a different voice? Leave your comment down below!
6. Conclusion
That was kinda tough, isn’t it? Glad you make it through here 🥂🥂🥂
There are actually many more details and also a huge section of Oracle yet to be covered. However, since this article is more about features and targeting normal DeFi users, I’ll leave those to the next one; hope there is one 😅
If you have any doubt or find any mistake, please feel free to reach out to me and I’d try to reply AFAP!
Stay tuned and in the meantime let’s wait and see how Uniswap v3 is again pioneering the innovation of DeFi 🌟
Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth was originally published in Taipei Ethereum Meetup on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
👏 歡迎轉載分享鼓掌
mean equation 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最讚貼文
購買此 e-book (HK$199.00) 的連結︰
https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Herman_Yeung_Herman_Yeung_F_3_Maths_%E4%B8%AD%E4%B8%89%E6%95%B8%E5%AD%B8_Exercise?id=K6AREAAAQBAJ
部分教學影片︰
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8pOMLw0MItoo8uCoKpeHKMv
Herman Yeung F.3 Maths 中三數學 (Exercise 3C) (500題)
適合中三下學期至中三升中四暑期的同學學習
500 條題目,內容包括:
1. Probability 概率
2. Statistics 統計學
3. Polynomial 多項式
4. Quadratic Equation 二次方程式
5. Logarithmic Function 對數函數
的 "初中版"
mean equation 在 Herman Yeung Youtube 的最佳貼文
購買此 e-book (HK$199.00) 的連結︰
https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Herman_Yeung_Herman_Yeung_F_3_Maths_%E4%B8%AD%E4%B8%89%E6%95%B8%E5%AD%B8_Exercise?id=K6AREAAAQBAJ
部分教學影片︰
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDe9mOi1K8pOMLw0MItoo8uCoKpeHKMv
Herman Yeung F.3 Maths 中三數學 (Exercise 3C) (500題)
適合中三下學期至中三升中四暑期的同學學習
500 條題目,內容包括:
1. Probability 概率
2. Statistics 統計學
3. Polynomial 多項式
4. Quadratic Equation 二次方程式
5. Logarithmic Function 對數函數
的 "初中版"
mean equation 在 EHPMusicChannel Youtube 的最讚貼文
❖訂閱頻道收聽更多好聽的歌:https://www.youtube.com/c/EHPMusicChannelII
❖Facebook臉書專頁:https://www.facebook.com/EHPMC/
❖IG:ehpmusicchannel
** 喜歡的朋友記得要分享出去喔~ 超級需要你們的支持!!! **
❖歌詞在下面❖
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the day is said and done
In the middle of the night
And you're fast asleep, my love
Stay awake looking at your beauty
Telling myself I'm the luckiest man alive
Cause so many times I was certain
You was gonna walk out of my life (life)
Why you take such a hold of me girl
When I'm still trying to get my act right
What is the reason
When you really could have any man you want
I don't see what I have to offer
I should've been a season
Guess you could see I had potential
Do you know you're my miracle? (oh yeah)
I'm like a statue
Stuck staring right at you
Got me frozen in my tracks
So amazed how you take me back
Each and every time our love collapsed
Statue, stuck staring right at you
So when I'm lost for words
Every time I disappoint you
It's just 'cause I can't believe
That you're so beautiful(Stuck like a statue)
Don't wanna lose you, no (Stuck like a statue)
Ask myself why are you even with me
After all the shit I put you through
Why did you make it hard so with me
It's like you're living in an igloo
But baby your love is so warm
It makes my shield melt down (down)
And every time we're both at war
You make me come around (woah)
What is the reason
when you really could have any man you want
I don't see what I have to offer
I should've been a season
Guess you could see I had potential
Do you know you're my miracle? (ohhhhh)
I'm like a statue
Stuck staring right at you
Got me frozen in my tracks
So amazed how you take me back
Each and every time our love collapsed
Statue, stuck staring right at you (yeah yeah)
So when I'm lost for words
Every time I disappoint you
It's just 'cause I can't believe
That you're so beautiful (Stuck like a statue)
Don't wanna lose you, no (Stuck like a statue)
And you're so beautiful (Stuck like a statue)
Don't wanna lose you, never (Stuck like a statue)
ohhhh woahh no
Every single day of my life
I thank my lucky stars
God really had to spend extra time
When He sculpted your heart
'Cause there's no explanation
Can't solve the equation
It's like you love me more than I love myself
I'm like a statue
Stuck staring right at you girl
Got me frozen in my tracks
So amazed how you take me back
Each and every time our love collapsed
Statue, stuck staring right at you
So when I'm lost for words (statue woah)
Every time I disappoint you (baby you're my statue)
It's just cause I can't believe
That you're so beautiful (Girl, you are the reason)
Stuck like a statue (The reason for living)
Don't wanna lose you, no (The reason for breathing)
Stuck like a statue (You're so beautiful)
And you're so beautiful (And I want you to feel it)
Stuck like a statue ('Cause so bad I mean it)
Don't wanna lose you, no
(You're the reason for breathing)
Stuck like a statue
(You're so beautiful wowowowOo wOah yea yea yea yea yeah)
When the day is said and done
And in the middle of the night
You're fast asleep, my love...
I'm the luckiest man alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❖歌手資料 About Singer
➸ Lil Eddie Channel | http://bit.ly/LilEddieSubscribeYT
➸ Facebook | http://bit.ly/LilEddieFacebook
➸ Instagram | http://bit.ly/LilEddieInstagram
➸ Twitter | http://bit.ly/LilEddieTwitter
➸ Website | http://bit.ly/LilEddieWebsite
❖合作查詢 For all bookings, collabs & business inquires
➸ CONTACT MGT | eddsqd@gmail.com
❖歌曲上架平台 Listen/Download on digital platforms
➸ Spotify | http://bit.ly/LilEddieSpotify
➸ Apple Music | http://bit.ly/LilEddieAppleMusic
➸ Google Play | http://bit.ly/LilEddieGooglePlay
➸ Amazon | http://bit.ly/LilEddieAmazon
➸ Deezer | http://bit.ly/LilEddieDeezer
❖影片由 Lil Eddie 授權推廣。The video is licensed by Lil Eddie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❖合作郵箱:ehpmusicchannel@gmail.com
❖歌曲跟影片版權為歌手本人及其音樂公司所有,本頻道只作推廣及宣傳之用,若喜歡他們的音樂請支持正版。如版權方認為影片有侵權一事,請與我們聯絡,我們將徹底刪除影片。
❖Like, Comment, Share & Subscribe❖
❖喜歡的請分享及訂閱本頻道❖
mean equation 在 What does 'sign' mean in an equation? - Mathematics Stack ... 的推薦與評價
The value sign(x) equals −1, 0, or 1 depending upon whether the value x is negative, zero, or positive. Sometimes this is written as sgn(x) as is the case ... ... <看更多>
mean equation 在 Sample Mean and Population Mean - Statistics - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>