關於 measure area on map ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

ทางเทรนเนอร์ฟิตเนสนี้ส่งมาให้ดู เขาปรับตัวให้เข้า new normal ให้คนมาออกกำลังกายที่ฟิตเนสโดยป้องกันความเสี่ยง covid-19 ดังนี้ ใครสนใจลองดูกันคนับ

ARE YOU READY ??

FitFriendZone Private Fitness Studio
สตูดิโอสอนออกกำลังกายแบบส่วนตัว

ราคาสำหรับโปรแกรมเทรนรายครั้ง (ไม่จำกัดระยะเวลาหมดอายุการเรียน)
12 session 9,600 บาท
24 session 16,800 บาท

**ไม่ต้องเสียค่าเมมเบอร์ยิมเพิ่มครับ**

GOAL ✅ เป้าหมายอะไรบ้าง✅
👉ลดไขมัน
👉สร้างกล้ามเนื้อ
👉กระชับสัดส่วน
👉ปรับพื้นฐาน ในการฝึกเวทเทรนนิ่ง
👉ปรับระบบเผาผลาญ
👉ฯลฯ (เป้าหมายอื่นๆ คุยกันได้ครับ)

ทาง FitFriendZone Private Fitness Studio ได้เปิดให้บริการในวันแรกหลังจากเหตุการณ์โควิท คือวันที่ 18 พฤษภาคม 2563 โดยทางสตูดิโอได้ มีมาตราการต่างๆ เพิ่มขึ้นในการเข้าใช้บริการดังนี้ เพื่อสร้างความมั่นใจให้กับผู้ใช้บริการดังนี้ครับ

"สวมหน้ากากก่อนใช้บริการ"
ปลอดภัยไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรเหมือนเดิมแต่เราทำมากกว่าเดิม

🏋🏻‍♂️แจกหน้ากากอนามัยแบบใช้แล้วทิ้งฟรี สำหรับเมมเบอร์ และผู้ติดตาม
🏋🏻‍♂️รับเฉพาะลูกค้าที่จองคิวเทรนล่วงหน้าเท่านั้น
🏋🏻‍♂️ให้บริการเทรนนิ่งครั้งละ 1 ท่านเท่านั้น
🏋🏻‍♂️จำกัดระยะเวลาการใช้บริการต่อท่านไม่เกินครั้งละ 2 ชั่วโมง / ครั้ง
🏋🏻‍♂️จำกัดผู้ติดตาม และจำนวนคนมานั่งรอในสตูดิโอฟิตเนส
🏋🏻‍♂️ในสตูดิโอจะไม่มีบุคคลภายนอกเข้าในพื้นที่สตูดิโอ เด็ดขาดตลอดการใช้บริการ
🏋🏻‍♂️เทรนเนอร์ใส่หน้ากากอนามัยตลอดระยะเวลาการสอน
🏋🏻‍♂️เทรนเนอร์ยืนรักษาระยะห่าง ตลอดระยะเวลาระหว่างการสอน
🏋🏻‍♂️งดการ Stretching แบบสัมผัสตัวเมมเบอร์ แต่จะสอนการยืดเหยียดด้วยตนเองแทน
🏋🏻‍♂️ทำความสะอาดอุปกรณ์ทุกครั้งด้วยน้ำยาฆ่าเชื้อ ที่ใช้งานเสร็จแล้วทันที
🏋🏻‍♂️ทำความสะอาดราวจับประตู อุปกรณ์ ห้องน้ำ ทุกๆ 3 ชม. ด้วยน้ำยาฆ่าเชื้อ
🏋🏻‍♂️มีเจลล้างมือและสเปรย์ฆ่าเชื้อบริการ ในสตูดิโอตามจุดต่าง ๆ
🏋🏻‍♂️วัดอุณหภูมิผู้ใช้บริการทุกครั้ง หากเกิน 37.5 องศาเซลเซียส ควรขอให้กลับบ้านและปรึกษาแพทย์

ในคอร์สสิ่งที่จะได้

- มีการประเมินสุขภาพเบื้องต้น เพื่อลดความเสี่ยงในการออกกำลังกาย รวมไปถึงสามารถวางโปรแกรมการฝึก ในการออกกำลังกายและปรับ Posture เพื่อเลี่ยงต่ออาการบาดเจ็บของคุณก่อนเริ่มโปรแกรม

- ออกแบบโปรแกรมออกกำลังกายตามหลักวิทยาศาสตร์การกีฬาให้เหมาะสมกับตัวผู้ฝึก ข้อจำกัดในการออกกำลังกายของท่าน และสอดคล้องกับเรื่องความปลอดภัยจากโรคประจำตัว

- มีการยืดเหยียดหลังการออกกำลังกายทุกครั้งเพื่อป้องกัน อาการบาดเจ็บ

- แนะนำเรื่องโภชนาการและการคาร์ดิโอเบื้องต้นฉบับเข้าใจง่าย ให้ตรงตามเป้าหมายของตัวผู้ฝึก

แผนที่ : https://goo.gl/maps/z2F6tHF5MCJg9gAw6
บางใหญ่ซิตี้ (ตรงข้ามเซ็นทรัลเวสเกต) อยู่หัวมุมซอย 16/3
การเดินทาง รฟฟ.สายสีม่วง ลงสถานีตลาดบางใหญ่ นั่งวินมอเตอร์ไซค์ ซอย 16/3 ซ้ายมือ

สิ่งอำนวยความสะดวก
- น้ำแร่ดื่มฟรี
- หน้ากากอนามัย
- Netflix
- Youtube Premium
เครื่องคาร์ดิโอ ลู่วิ่ง , จักรยาน , เครื่องเดินวงรี , เกมส์ Nintendo Ring-Fit , WOD , HIIT , EMOM . CirCuit , Tabata , AMRAP

สนใจติดต่อได้ที่
FanPage : Fit Friend Zone
Line : boybangyai_at
IG : FitFriendZone
Tel : 0886727101

#FitFriendZone #PrivateFitnessStudio #ฟิตเนสบางใหญ่ #ฟิตสู้โควิท
#Guardอย่าตก
ARE YOU READY ??

FitFriendZone Private Fitness Studio
Private workout studio

Price for training program (UNLIMITED EXPIRATION PERIOD)
12 session 9,600 baht
24 session 16,800 baht

** no need to pay for more gym members **

Goal ✅ what goals ✅
Reduce fat
Build Muscle
Tighten the shape
Adjusting the basics of training weights.
👉 adjust metabolism
Etc. (other goals can talk to each other)

Fitfriendzone private fitness studio has opened on the first day after the cowitt event on may 18, 2563, the studio has increased section to access the following services to ensure service users as follows.

"wearing a mask before service"
Be safe first. Nothing is the same but we do more.

🏋🏻 Free Disposable Hygienic Mask for members and followers
🏋🏻 only accept customers who reserve the training queue in advance.
🏋🏻 ONLY 1 person training service
🏋🏻 Limited service period per person, no more than 2 Hours / time.
🏋🏻 ♂️ limited followers and number of people waiting in the fitness studio
🏋🏻 ♂️ there will be no external person in the studio area throughout the service.
🏋🏻 trainers wear hygienic masks throughout the teaching period.
🏋🏻 ♂️ trainers stand to maintain distance throughout the time during teaching.
🏋🏻 ♂️ refrain from stretching in touch members, but I will teach self-stretching instead.
🏋🏻 ♂️ cleaning equipment every time with antibiotics. It's done immediately.
🏋🏻 ♂️ cleaning the door handle, bathroom equipment every 3 hours. With antibiotics
🏋🏻 ♂️ Hand Wash Gel and disinfect spray. Service in studio at various points.
🏋🏻 ♂️ every service user temperature measure. If it's more than 37.5 degrees Celsius, you should ask to go home and consult a doctor.

In course, what to get.

- preliminary health assessment to reduce the risk of exercise, including exercise training program and adjust postture to avoid your injuries before the program.

- design exercise program according to sports science to fit male, practice your exercise restrictions and comply with congenital safety.

- every post-workout stretch to prevent injury

- introducing the original nutrition and cardio. Easy to understand to meet the goals of the trainee.

Map: https://goo.gl/maps/z2F6tHF5MCJg9gAw6
Bang Yai City (opposite central weskating) is around the corner of soi 16/3
The journey of the hospital. Purple line. Going to bang yai market station. Ride on motorcycle soi 16/3 left hand.

Facilities & facilities
- mineral water. Drink for free.
- Hygienic Mask
- Netflix
- Youtube Premium
Cardio Treadmill, bikes, marching machine, Nintendo Ring-fit games, WOD, HIIT, EMOM. Circuit, Tabata, AMRAP

If interested, contact at
FanPage : Fit Friend Zone
Line: boybangyai _ at
IG : FitFriendZone
Tel : 0886727101

#FitFriendZone #PrivateFitnessStudio #ฟิตเนสบางใหญ่ #ฟิตสู้โควิท
#Guardอย่าตกTranslated

What Are Ground Control Points (GCPs) and How Do I Use Them?
A Guide to Using Ground Control Points with Drone Mapping Software
If you work with drone mapping software, you’ve no doubt heard talk of ground control points (GCPs). Used often in the surveying industry, as well as in virtual design and construction, GCPs greatly increase the global accuracy of drone maps. Although they are not necessary in every situation, GCPs are a vital tool for precision mapping. But what exactly are ground control points? And how do you go about using them correctly?

To help crack the code on ground control points, we’ve put together this short guide to using GCPs with drone mapping software.

What Are Ground Control Points?
So what exactly are ground control points? Ground control points are large marked targets on the ground, spaced strategically throughout your area of interest. If you use ground control points with your aerial map, you first need to determine the RTK GPS coordinates at the center of each. (We’ll explain how to do this a little later.) The ground control points and their coordinates are then used to help drone mapping software accurately position your map in relation to the real world around it.

It might be helpful to think of your GCPs as a series of thumbtacks placed on your drone map. Because the drone mapping software knows the exact location of each of these “thumbtacks”, it can reference their locations when it matches up all of the other points on the map.
When and Why Are GCPs Important?
When used correctly, ground control points greatly improve the global accuracy of your drone map. That is to say, they help ensure that the latitude and longitude of any point on your map corresponds accurately with actual GPS coordinates. This is important in situations where precision mapping and true global accuracy are needed. As we mentioned above, surveying companies generally use GCPs, because a high level of global accuracy is important in most of the work that they do. Virtual design and construction is another sector that often requires this level of precision drone mapping.

Landpoint, a surveying company based in Louisiana, uses ground control points when creating drone maps used for topographical surveying. Using GCPs on an 85-acre map, their team conducted an accurate aerial survey, saving over 80 man hours compared to traditional land survey methods.

Each drone mapping project is unique, and not all projects require a high level of global accuracy. Because of this, it is important to assess each project individually before you decide to take the extra step of using GCPs. But generally speaking, projects like geo-referenced overlays, design documents and land title surveys benefit from the use of ground control points. In an upcoming post, we’ll take a deeper look at which types of projects are best suited for using GCPs.

How to Construct a Ground Control Point
There is no one right way to make a ground control point. One important thing to remember is that the GCP must be easily visible in your aerial imagery. This is achieved by using high-contrast colors and by making sure the ground control point is large enough to be seen from your particular flight altitude. We generally recommend flying at 300 feet with a frontlap and sidelap of 70/75 when using ground control points. Keep in mind that this may change dependent upon the area you are mapping. Learn more by reading our recent post about mapping accuracy and reviewing our GCP support documents.

A number of companies do sell pre-made, portable ground control points. However, many drone users simply fashion their own.
This well constructed GCP was spray painted onto the concrete using a stencil. Notice that the marker is large enough to be visible from far away. A center mark helps eliminate any confusion as to where the center point is located.

If you’re unable to mark GCPs with paint, there are a variety of low-cost ways to make markers with items available from any local hardware store. The weather-resistant rubber and vinyl markers seen above end up costing about $5 each and are very durable.

Measuring the Location of Your GCPs
As we mentioned above, it is important to measure the GPS coordinates at the center of each ground control point. To do this, you need either a Real Time Kinematic (RTK) or Post Processing Kinematic (PPK) GPS receiver. Trimble and Leica products are commonly used for high-accuracy GPS measurements. New, lower-cost alternatives have recently come onto the market as well. Hiring a surveyor to measure the location of your ground control points is also an option.

Do not use a phone or tablet to measure the location of your ground control points. The accuracy of these devices is very similar to that of a drone’s onboard GPS system and will not deliver precise results. Instead, use one of the previous methods listed above, such as an RTK or PPK GPS receiver.

Best Practices for Using Ground Control Points with Drone Mapping Software
Of course, if you use ground control points with drone mapping software, it is important to use them correctly. Follow these best practices to help ensure your GCPs serve their intended purpose and improve the accuracy of your map.

Use a minimum of 4 large GCPs: DroneDeploy requires a minimum of 4 ground control points. Each should measure at least four feet. No more than 10 are usually needed for larger maps.

Evenly distribute your GCPs on the ground: For most maps of moderate size, we recommend 5 GCPs, one located near each corner and one located in the center, as pictured above. Also, make sure GCPs are spaced far enough apart, to avoid confusion. As a general rule, if you can see more than one GCP in an image, they are too close together.

Create a buffer zone around your map’s perimeter: We recommend a buffer zone between the edges of your map and any ground control points. This ensures there is enough image coverage to carry out reprocessing. The size of your buffer zone should be somewhere between 50–100 feet, depending on the overlap of your flight. A higher overlap produces more images and generally requires less buffer zone.

Be aware of elevation changes: If the area being mapped has noticeable elevation changes like hills, mines and valleys, make sure to place at least one ground control point on each of the different major elevations.

Make sure your GCPs are unobstructed: Visual obstructions like overhangs, snow, shade or glare make ground control points difficult to identify on your drone map.

Know Your EPSG code: Before processing your map in DroneDeploy, you must enter the EPSG code that relates to your GPS measurements. Choose your EPSG code by modifying the settings of your GPS measurement device. In most cases, we recommend using WGS84 (EPSG: 4326).

蕭叔叔短評被譽為「人生有呢種朋友不枉此生」的黃仁龍那十頁紙求情信

全文：

http://m.mingpao.com/ins/instantnews/web_tc/article/20170220/s00001/1487583133001

（報章轉載錯漏不少，敬請留意）

I have known Mr Donald Tsang since 2005. As Secretary for Justice (SJ), I worked closely with Donald as Chief Executive (CE) between October 2005 and June 2012. In addition to official dealings, I consider Donald to be a good friend and someone I admire for his dedication to public service.

Donald's over 40 years of service and contribution to Hong Kong is a matter of public record. Others will speak to his key role in helping Hong Kong weather through stormy financial crises. Here I would refer to his significant contributions to the public based on my own personal experience particularly in the area of the rule of law in Hong Kong.

During my 7-year tenure as SJ, I had on numerous occasions tendered legal advice to Donald as CE. He would sometimes debate with me and test the basis of the advice; but he has never acted against such legal advice. This in itself is a remarkable attribute as the head of the HKSAR.

Donald always said to me the Governors he previously worked with, however headstrong, would always abide by the legal advice of the Attorney General, and it is important that the CE of the HKSAR should stay that way.

Congo Case

One of the most important tasks, if not the most important task, of the CE of HKSAR is to faithfully and effectively implement the principle of “one country, two systems.” The power of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) to interpret the Basic Law and its exercise have always been considered a major challenge to the post-1997 constitutional order.

During my tenure as SJ, the NPCSC interpreted the Basic Law once in 2011. That was upon the reference by the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) on the question of state immunity. The issue in the case is whether the People’s Republic of China’s doctrine of absolute immunity (under which no foreign state can be sued in the court at all) should be followed in Hong Kong. Prior to 1997, Hong Kong’s common law provided for restrictive immunity, where foreign states could be sued if the dispute arouse out of commercial transactions.

The HKSAR Government lost in the Court of First Instance and in the Court of Appeal. If the Government were to lose again in the CFA, it could stir up serious political and economic repercussions for China particularly vis-à-vis her African friends. National interest of China was at stake. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was understandably very concerned.

Immense political pressure mounted. There were suggestions that Beijing should not take any risk but should consider taking more definitive measures such as an interpretation of the Basic Law before the appeal was heard. If that were to happen, on the eve of the appeal hearing, the damage to judicial independence would not be less than an overriding post-judgment interpretation.

I cannot go into further details for confidentiality reasons. However, I can testify that Donald has been solid and staunch in endorsing my stance against any extra-judicial measure in view of its adverse impact on the rule of law.

Owing in no small part to Donald’s endorsement and resolve, the Central People’s Government (CPG) was content to trust the HKSAR Government and the CFA, and to leave the appeal to be heard by the highest court, despite grave risk and many conflicting views given by others. At the end, the Government won in the CFA by a majority of 3 to 2. The Court further referred the relevant Basic Law provisions to Beijing for interpretation, as required under Article 158 of the Basic Law, before pronouncing the final judgment. A huge constitutional crisis was warded off. The rule of law had prevailed.

Over this difficult episode, I know Donald had been under tremendous pressure. I remember often times he suffered from acute acid reflux before and after major discussions. Yet he stood firm throughout.

As CE, Donald had faithfully discharged the indispensable trust reposed by both the CPG and by Hong Kong. He had the courage to stand by what he believes to be right and the ability to address mutual concerns and to strengthen mutual understanding. He had performed well the crucial bridging role in the two-way process under “one country, two systems” at critical times.

Constitutional Reform

There was another important event in which Donald’s principled stance had been vital in achieving a favourable result for Hong Kong: constitutional reform.

Although no change could be made of the imminent 2017 CE election method due to the set-backs in 2016, during Donald’s tenure as CE, he has been made significant contributions toward moving Hong Kong closer to universal suffrage.

The first landmark was achieved, with tremendous efforts by the core team under Donald’s lead, when the NPCSC delivered its decision in December 2007 setting out “the timetable” and “road map” for universal suffrage in terms of the elections of CE and Legco.

Second, in 2010, the Government managed to secure Legco’s support to pass the 2012 constitutional reform package. Here, Donald had played a pivotal role, one perhaps not many are aware of.

Whether the 2012 reform package could be passed in 2010 was crucial to ensure “gradual and orderly progress” and that the next round (i.e. the intended goals of universal suffrage in electing CE in 2017) could be achieved.

In June 2010, the original government proposal was losing support and hope was vanishing for it to be passed at Legco. Time was running out. Whether to modify the package by incorporating a proposal of the Democratic Party (i.e. the additional 5 District Council Functional Constituency seats to be elected by over 3 million electorate, “the new DCFC election method”) appeared to be the lynchpin.

Without going into details again for confidentiality reasons, I can again testify that the make-or-break moment was when Donald made the timely and difficult decision to revise the package by incorporating the new DCFC election method. It was an agonizing decision for him as he had to override certain internal opposition and to risk personal credibility and trust before the CPG. As an insider, I know that decision was not a political manoeuvre but a selfless act for the sake of the long-term wellbeing of Hong Kong and the smooth transition toward universal suffrage.

Son of Hong Kong

Donald is truly a “son of Hong Kong” (香港仔). His genuine concern for the public good is most vividly demonstrated when Hong Kong was caught in crises of one kind of another.

Hong Kong went through attacks of avian flu and swine flu. Donald tirelessly headed the cross-bureau task forces and chaired long and intensive meetings. I remember more than once Donald being caught in very heated debates with colleagues, pushing them to the limit to mobilize maximum resources and manpower, in order to give the public maximum protection against these outbreaks. He would grill colleagues over thorny issues such as requisitioning hotels as places of quarantine, not satisfied with the usual civil service response of reluctance, as lives of many were at stake.

Over the Manila hostage incident in August 2010, Donald vigorously pressed the President of the Philippines for full investigation, joining the victims’ families and the rest of Hong Kong to cry for justice, although his action raised eyebrows as foreign affairs strictly is a matter of the CPG under Article 13 of the Basic Law.

Donald had a strong concern for young people. During my tenure, exceptionally I was commissioned to chair a Steering Committee to combat drug abuse by youth. The public might not realize this initiative in fact came from Donald. He was deeply concerned and alarmed by the reports reflecting the seriousness of the problem. He was determined to tackle the problem pro-actively. The Steering Committee was unprecedented, involving concerted and strategic efforts of different departments and bureaus. More importantly, Donald was instrumental in putting in substantial and sustainable resources to strengthen the efforts. The figures of reported drug abusers, particularly among young abusers, have seen significant decline in the past few years.

Other contributions on the rule of law

There was no shortage of controversial cases involving judicial reviews and fundamental human rights. Amidst other voices and political pressure, Donald had fully taken on board the legal position that the Government has a positive duty to protect such rights, including taking reasonable and appropriate measures to enable lawful demonstrations to take place peacefully.

Further, Donald also readily took on my advice regarding procedural fairness in handling Government businesses with quasi-judicial element such as administrative appeals.

Donald truly believes in judicial independence. He assured me repeatedly the independent and internationally renowned Judiciary in the HKSAR is our pride and the cornerstone of our success. His personal commitment to this cause is manifested in his positive response in acceding to many recommendations of the Mason Report endorsed by the Standing Committee on Judicial Salaries and Conditions of Service.

Furthermore, his conviction on the importance of the law as Hong Kong’s assets was amply manifested in his exceptional support in the development of Hong Kong’s capacity as an international arbitration centre. Donald was very understanding on the need of expansion on this front and had put in personal efforts to make it happen. He was instrumental in enabling resources are in place to secure additional space for the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, and to procure the arbitration arm of the International Chamber of Commerce and the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission to set up regional offices in Hong Kong.

A fair man who has given much to the public

Before joining the Government, I was an Election Committee member of the Legal Subsector elected on the same ticket as Ms Audrey Eu, Mr Alan Leong and other vocal barristers. In that capacity, in 2005, I first met Donald in an election forum where I questioned him harshly and criticised the Government’s earlier attitude over certain rule of law issues. Instead of bearing any grudge, in the late summer of 2005, Donald invited me to take up the post as SJ, assuring me that he would give me full support in upholding the rule of law in Hong Kong. That quality of fairness in Donald and that personal assurance to me have never slackened in the following 7 years in which I served in his cabinet.

As CE of the HKSAR, Donald had truly poured himself out. I strongly believe his significant contributions to Hong Kong in the past over 4 decades should be properly recognized.

Dated the 20th day of Februray 2017.

Wong Yan Lung SC

- See more at: http://m.mingpao.com/ins/instantnews/web_tc/article/20170220/s00001/1487583133001#sthash.0nwGN3QA.dpuf