我來開戰線,你們來掠陣,今次呼召澳洲的香港朋友。
感謝澳洲的手足幫手,招數一早備好,惟暫擱至今有兩個原因:一是避過美國《HKHRDA》聽證會的風頭,以免相沖;二是觀察莫里森訪華盛頓的動向。
澳洲不算太反中,中共滲透的議題近年才漸漸冒起。有錢使得鬼推磨,紅色資本投放巨額的政治獻金,又用微信紅包在地區籠絡選票,制華的議程自然被層層攔阻。
不過,全球抗共乃大勢所趨,莫里森一邊左右蓬源,一邊悄悄地築起防線。澳洲支持南海航行自由,又在太平洋大灑投資,抗衡一帶一路插旗。莫里森亦進一步向美國靠攏,宣布投資NASA的火星計劃,亦公開呼籲中國遵守貿易規則。此外,近日當上議員的香港移民廖嬋娥也捲入通華的調查風波,加上愛國的小粉紅在鬧市示威助攻,可見制華議程已成氣候,只待大家再推一把。
其實,澳洲也曾經審議類似美國《Magnitsky Act》的法案,名叫International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill,可惜在四月胎死腹中。現在正是好時機,促請澳洲的國會議員再度提案,與美國的《HKHRDA》並駕齊驅,將中國和香港的人權犯一網打盡。以下就是請願信的範本,大家可以填上你當區的國會議員和自己的名字,列印出來以郵寄方式寄送他們的辦公室,促請他們納入議程,讓澳洲議會加入捍衛人權的抗共行列。
須知道,無數的中港貪官污吏在澳洲都有大量資產,炒高了當地樓價,令民怨沸騰。法案有震懾力,有民意支持,亦可引蛇出洞——任何衝出來反對立法的政治勢力,必難脫通敵的嫌疑。現在,萬事俱備,只欠大家踴躍推動,希望各位幫香港人分享出去,支持澳洲人維護本地利益及國際道義。
作者
======
Date
Your Name
Your Address
Your Suburb State Postcode
Name of MP
Office Address
Office Suburb State Postcode
Dear Sir/Madam
I am a constituent of your electorate. As an Australian and Hong Konger, I am writing to you as I hold grave concerns over the rapidly deteriorating conditions in Hong Kong.
Since the start of June, millions of Hong Konger have marched on the street and conducted largely peaceful demonstrations on many occasions to voice their opposition to the proposed The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 (known simply as the Extradition Bill) by the Hong Kong Government, which would establish an official extradition mechanism between Hong Kong and China for the first time in history.
The bill has been criticized by the Hong Kong Bar Association as “a step backward” and failing to offer sufficient protections for the accused. The majority of Hong Kong people are in uproar as they harbor deep mistrust towards the Chinese judicial system known for its corruption, disregard for procedural justice, and towing of the official party line.
Oblivious to the depth of animosity, Carrie Lam, the Chief Executive, and the Hong Kong Government ignored the protestors’ demands and ordered the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) to violently crackdown on the protestors. This is what led to the stunning and horrifying footages of police brutality — indiscriminate use of tear gas in crowded residential areas, aiming rubber bullets at the protestors’ face, violently shoving journalists who are just doing their jobs, and arresting seemingly innocent bystanders based on the colour of their clothing or age. To date, over 1200 people have been arrested with many denied the right to be accompanied by their lawyer for unreasonable period of time and subjected to questionable negotiation tactics during their detention.
As the legislative and executive arm of the Hong Kong government show its true allegiance to China and its willingness to sacrifice human rights over economic growth, the people of Hong Kong desperately need assistance from the international community.
What is happening in Hong Kong is of critical importance to Australia. There are currently 100,000 Australian dual citizens currently living in the city. Regardless of their political opinion on the ongoing situation, their safety is at risk due to the disproportionately excessive force and indiscriminate arrests that are being deployed by the HKPF to suppress the protest.
Hong Kong’s instability will negatively impact on Australia’s economy. Hong Kong is one of Australia’s most important trading partner and home to many Australian companies’ regional headquarter in Asia. It also acts as the middleman for many transactions between Chinese and Australian businesses.
The relationship between Hong Kong and Australia are intricate and mutually beneficial. Given the dire situation in Hong Kong, I would like you to consider to following measures to protect the people of Hong Kong, which would ultimately benefit Australia:
1.Introduce the International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill to the parliament. The previous attempt lapsed at the dissolution of parliament at April 11, 2019. The bill is based on precedents from the United States and the United Kingdom and it would give powers to relevant ministers to make Australia a safer place that values universal liberal values.
2.Include human rights protection clauses in the final ratified version of the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and Hong Kong.
3.Consider offering special permanent protection for people from Hong Kong who currently resides or studies in Australia. Many Hong Kongers are highly educated and value western liberal values. This group would be a fine addition to Australia.
4.Vet all visa and immigration applications from Hong Kong and China more thoroughly for the necessity of protecting the integrity of Australia’s national security as some applicants could have active contributed or complicit in the violation of human rights as part of the police force, HKSAR Government, or private companies (for example, Cathay Pacific’s management, which is terminating the contract of staffs whom have expressed sympathy or support towards the protest movement). Recent clashes on university campuses over the Hong Kong protests have also demonstrated that some foreign students neither understand nor value some basic rights we Australians cherish.
I appreciate your time and I look forward to hearing back from you about your position on my proposals.
Yours sincerely,
Your name
======
澳港聯Australia-Hong Kong Link已開了Senate Petition,早在推動Magnitsky-style Sanction,並成功接洽綠黨領袖Di Natale,將於10月將Petition舉上參院,奈何未夠多人簽署,懇請大家幫手推動:
https://www.change.org/p/the-senate-of-australia-impose-sanctions-on-persons-found-to-be-suppressing-human-rights-in-hong-kong-df999fe5-3d9f-434b-8f58-d0840619a046
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「negotiation style」的推薦目錄:
- 關於negotiation style 在 作者 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於negotiation style 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於negotiation style 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於negotiation style 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於negotiation style 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於negotiation style 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於negotiation style 在 Understanding Different Negotiation Styles - YouTube 的評價
negotiation style 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最讚貼文
#完全是在對英語系教授們喊話喔
【台灣未來的英語教育要更好,新興英文老師們要一起做的事】
我常常被外文系或英語系的學生問,如果想要當一個優秀的英文老師,要做什麼準備。當然,屏除掉同理心、愛、耐心這種老師基本要素,我常常跟他們分享的是:不只要學習「教」,更要學習「學習科學」,尤其是第二語言習得科學。
例如,我常常問他們,你們覺得要給學生 feedback 嗎?他們常常點頭說要。但再問下去時,通常就回答不出來了。
• feedback 要怎樣給比較有效呢?
• 你確定你給 feedback 時,學生都有接受到你給的 feedback 嗎?
• 為什麼有些 feedback 比較有效,有些沒效呢?哪些 feedback 比較有效?
• 在口說中,給 feedback 好像會打斷學生,那這樣還要給嗎?
這些問題,如果沒有遇到第二語言習得相關專業的教授的細心引導,大多的台灣外文系 / 英語系出來想要教英文的準老師們,都難以回答(甚至是修完教程)。
用科學、實證研究來回答問題,而非用偏見甚多的「個人經驗」、「個人想法」來回答問題和執行教學,是每個頂尖教師應該對自己的要求 - 至少我在哥倫比亞大學求學時遇到的教授是這樣要求的。
所以不管是英語語用力、英語恆毅力計畫、英語搭配詞、學術寫作、還是全方位口說課,全部都有一個 "theoretical framework",依照著科學已知的內容,再去做教學,學生才不會變成「白老鼠」。
因此我期待未來新興的台灣英文老師們,大家能一起培養科學素養,在期刊論文裡面尋找教學上的答案。
「中文腦有可能剷除嗎?feedback 應該怎麼給好?input 和 output 誰比較重要?口說的自動化如何養成?」
這些問題的答案都在期刊論文裡面呀呀!(在 How languages are learned / Teaching by principles 這種教程生用了20年以上的教科書裡找不到喔)。
✔︎ 以 corrective feedback 要怎麼給為例,頂尖的學者在期刊論文中做了十足的討論。
(以下23篇重要的論文,來自 Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning, TESOL Quarterly, The Modern Language Journal, Language Teaching Research, Applied Linguistics 等重要期刊以及專書。本文純為臉書發文,恕無使用 APA style 呈現。若想知道作者,直接 google 應可查到)
1. How do learners perceive interactional feedback?
2. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
3. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classroom
4. Learner uptake in communicative eel classroom
5. Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom
6. Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition
7. Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching
8. Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons
9. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning
10. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar
11. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output
12. Recasts and second language development
13. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicate classroom across instructional settings
14. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake
15. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness
16. Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition
17. Feedback on corrective feedback — A cast study
18. Corrective feedback in second language acquisition
19. Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classroom
20. Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning
21. Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation
22. Fine-turning corrective feedback
23. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles
negotiation style 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳解答
#完全是在對英語系教授們喊話喔
【台灣未來的英語教育要更好,新興英文老師們要一起做的事】
我常常被外文系或英語系的學生問,如果想要當一個優秀的英文老師,要做什麼準備。當然,屏除掉同理心、愛、耐心這種老師基本要素,我常常跟他們分享的是:不只要學習「教」,更要學習「學習科學」,尤其是第二語言習得科學。
例如,我常常問他們,你們覺得要給學生 feedback 嗎?他們常常點頭說要。但再問下去時,通常就回答不出來了。
• feedback 要怎樣給比較有效呢?
• 你確定你給 feedback 時,學生都有接受到你給的 feedback 嗎?
• 為什麼有些 feedback 比較有效,有些沒效呢?哪些 feedback 比較有效?
• 在口說中,給 feedback 好像會打斷學生,那這樣還要給嗎?
這些問題,如果沒有遇到第二語言習得相關專業的教授的細心引導,大多的台灣外文系 / 英語系出來想要教英文的準老師們,都難以回答(甚至是修完教程)。
用科學、實證研究來回答問題,而非用偏見甚多的「個人經驗」、「個人想法」來回答問題和執行教學,是每個頂尖教師應該對自己的要求 - 至少我在哥倫比亞大學求學時遇到的教授是這樣要求的。
所以不管是英語語用力、英語恆毅力計畫、英語搭配詞、學術寫作、還是全方位口說課,全部都有一個 "theoretical framework",依照著科學已知的內容,再去做教學,學生才不會變成「白老鼠」。
因此我期待未來新興的台灣英文老師們,大家能一起培養科學素養,在期刊論文裡面尋找教學上的答案。
「中文腦有可能剷除嗎?feedback 應該怎麼給好?input 和 output 誰比較重要?口說的自動化如何養成?」
這些問題的答案都在期刊論文裡面呀呀!(在 How languages are learned / Teaching by principles 這種教程生用了20年以上的教科書裡找不到喔)。
✔︎ 以 corrective feedback 要怎麼給為例,頂尖的學者在期刊論文中做了十足的討論。
(以下23篇重要的論文,來自 Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning, TESOL Quarterly, The Modern Language Journal, Language Teaching Research, Applied Linguistics 等重要期刊以及專書。本文純為臉書發文,恕無使用 APA style 呈現。若想知道作者,直接 google 應可查到)
1. How do learners perceive interactional feedback?
2. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
3. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classroom
4. Learner uptake in communicative eel classroom
5. Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom
6. Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition
7. Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching
8. Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons
9. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning
10. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar
11. A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output
12. Recasts and second language development
13. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicate classroom across instructional settings
14. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake
15. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness
16. Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition
17. Feedback on corrective feedback — A cast study
18. Corrective feedback in second language acquisition
19. Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classroom
20. Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning
21. Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation
22. Fine-turning corrective feedback
23. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles
negotiation style 在 Understanding Different Negotiation Styles - YouTube 的推薦與評價
People often use the same negotiation style to resolve conflict instead of adjusting the style to fit the specific situation. ... <看更多>