關於 pro direct de ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#Twitter戰線【天下制裁方向：科技產品、紅色資本、白手套 —— 請立即Retweet】

我已用英文撰文，公開回應白宮有意切實推動制裁的路透社報導，並提出經濟制裁應從三個方向，包括軍民兩用科技產品、紅色資本和白手套企業入手，呼籲各位幫忙Retweet，香港正與時間競賽，反制北京實在爭分奪秒：https://twitter.com/joshuawongcf/status/1265469996123041797

中文原文：https://www.facebook.com/200976479994868/posts/3025281830897638/

#眾志國際連結 #國際戰線

Reuters and Bloomberg just confimed that the US is likely to sanction China if it approves the hugely controversial bill that damages HK's autonomy. When Beijing insists on ignoring international responses and breaching international norms and rules, it is time for China to face the grave consequences and international backlashes for its irresponsible act of scraping an UN-filed Joint Declaration.

In fact, the world has already expressed concern over the evil and ill-defined national security law that will kill democratic movements in HK and harm global business interest in the city. But China keeps dismissing all doubts from world leaders, business sectors and even bar associations. This law is even eviler than the extradition bill last year. China’s poor human rights records have already proved that it will undeniably use the law to crush HK’s civil society and dissents.

For a long time, Hong Kong has been treated by Beijing as a white glove port for importing sensitive strategic commodities. Once the law is implemented, a secret police agency and a CCP-led China’s court will be imposed upon this global business centre. At that time, HK will fall into Beijing’s direct rule, and de facto becomes another city of China. Hence, all special treatments granted to HK need to be subject to reconsideration.

In fact, countries starts to realize the changing role of Hong Kong in a bigger picture of China’s global strategy. For example, Israel’s security officials just rejected a bid from CK Hutchison Holdings for the potential security risks of Chinese involvement in a plant construction in the disguise of "HK companies”.

To safeguard the city’s freedoms and urge China to stop further misconduct, world leaders, not only the US, should consider sanctions on China as the only effective strategic option to send a warning signal to Beijing. The sanctions should not only be restricted to personal sanctions like travel bans and asset freezes (since China won’t really realize the severity), but also partial sanctions on pro-CCP companies and dual-use technology.

Democratic values and the virtue to respect treaties are the foundation of democracies. If China’s flagrant breach of Joint Declaration, a legally binding international treaty at the United Nations, is tolerated, it will set a bad precedent to all other treaties and agreements alike.

————————

儘管拉人封艇，取締眾志不再是空談，留一口氣，點一盞燈，拜托大家幫忙延續國際戰線血脈：https://bit.ly/DemosistoBackup（是次籌募以美金結算）

戰場直擊
F-16戰機的優勢，再度獲得驗證，土耳其空軍的F-16戰機，今天與敘利亞空軍Su-24戰轟機發生空戰，兩架Su-24戰轟機不敵F-16戰機，皆被擊落墜毀，駕駛員生死不明

ALERT ⚠️ Turkish F-16s shot down two Su-24 “Fencer” fighter-bombers of the Syrian Arab Air Force (#SyAAF) over northwestern #Syria. The Su-24s scrambled to intercept the Turkish F-16s which destroyed three Syrian air defense systems in Idlib. One of the neutralized air defenses downed a Turkish “Anka-S” drone over #Saraqib earlier today. This is the latest escalation in the increasingly direct conflict between Turkey and the pro-government camp Idlib.

🔴Since the attack against Turkish soldiers in Idlib last week #Turkey has destroyed over 100 tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, non-standard tactical vehicles, self-propelled artillery systems, and rocket launchers and killed scores of pro-government fighters (#SAA soldiers and Iranian-backed militiamen). The Turkish defense ministry estimates 2,200 casualties (killed and wounded) on the pro-government camp.

🔴The Turkish offensive is called “#SpringShield” and seeks to establish a “safe-zone” in Idlib (as in Aleppo and Raqqa provinces), de-conflicted through a new and durable cease-fire, to prevent the influx of over one million Syrian refugees into Turkey. But to achieve this, Turkey must first halt the pro-government offensive, which it slowed down through a massive UCAV-strike campaign, and forcefully push the pro-government forces back to the territorial lines agreed in #Sochi in 2018.

🔴As President #Erdogan’s ultimatum to Damascus to withdraw to the Sochi lines expired last night, Turkey is expected to go all-in. Turkey and its allied opposition groups will seek to capture as much land as possible before Erdogan meets with #Russian President Putin to negotiate a new agreement on March 5, 2020.

【 黎安友專文 l 中國如何看待香港危機 】

美國哥倫比亞大學的資深中國通黎安友（Andrew Nathan）教授最近在《外交事務》（Foreign Affairs）雜誌的專文，值得一看。

黎安友是台灣許多中國研究學者的前輩級老師，小英總統去哥大演講時，正是他積極促成。小英在美國的僑宴，黎安友也是座上賓。

這篇文章的標題是：「中國如何看待香港危機：北京自我克制背後的真正原因」。

文章很長，而且用英文寫，需要花點時間閱讀。大家有空可以看看。

Andrew這篇文章的立論基礎，是來自北京核心圈的匿名說法。以他在學術界的地位，我相信他對消息來源已經做了足夠的事實查核或確認。

這篇文章，是在回答一個疑問：中共為何在香港事件如此自制？有人說是怕西方譴責，有人說是怕損害香港的金融地位。

都不是。這篇文章認為，上述兩者都不是中共的真實顧慮。

無論你多痛恨中共，你都必須真實面對你的敵人。

中共是搞經濟階級鬥爭起家的，當年用階級鬥爭打敗國民黨。而現在，中共正用這樣的思維處理香港議題。

文章有一句話：“China’s response has been rooted not in anxiety but in confidence.” 這句話道盡階級鬥爭的精髓。

中共一點都不焦慮。相反地，中共很有自信，香港的菁英階級及既得利益的收編群體，到最後會支持中共。

這個分化的心理基礎，來自經濟上的利益。

文中還提到，鄧小平當年給香港五十年的一國兩制，就是為了「給香港足夠的時間適應中共的政治系統」。

1997年，香港的GDP佔中國的18%。2018年，這個比例降到2.8%。

今日的香港經濟，在中共的評估，是香港需要中國，而不是中國需要香港。

中共正在在意的，是香港的高房價問題。香港的房價，在過去十年內三倍翻漲。

文章是這樣描述：
“Housing prices have tripled over the past decade; today, the median price of a house is more than 20 times the median gross annual household income. The median rent has increased by nearly 25 percent in the past six years. As many as 250,000 people are waiting for public housing. At the same time, income growth for many Hong Kong residents has fallen below the overall increase in cost of living.”

無論你同不同意這些說法，都請你試圖客觀地看看這篇文章。

有趣的是，黎安友在文章中部分論點引述了他的消息來源（但他並沒有加上個人評論），部分是他自己的觀察。

#護台胖犬劉仕傑
Instagram: old_dog_chasing_ball

新書：《 我在外交部工作 》

**

黎安友原文：

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-09-30/how-china-sees-hong-kong-crisis?fbclid=IwAR2PwHns5gWrw0fT0sa5LuO8zgv4PhLmkYfegtBgoOMCD3WJFI3w5NTe0S4

How China Sees the Hong Kong Crisis
The Real Reasons Behind Beijing’s Restraint

By Andrew J. Nathan September 30, 2019

Massive and sometimes violent protests have rocked Hong Kong for over 100 days. Demonstrators have put forward five demands, of which the most radical is a call for free, direct elections of Hong Kong’s chief executive and all members of the territory’s legislature: in other words, a fully democratic system of local rule, one not controlled by Beijing. As this brazen challenge to Chinese sovereignty has played out, Beijing has made a show of amassing paramilitary forces just across the border in Shenzhen. So far, however, China has not deployed force to quell the unrest and top Chinese leaders have refrained from making public threats to do so.

Western observers who remember the violent crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Tiananmen Square 30 years ago have been puzzled by Beijing’s forbearance. Some have attributed Beijing’s restraint to a fear of Western condemnation if China uses force. Others have pointed to Beijing’s concern that a crackdown would damage Hong Kong’s role as a financial center for China.

But according to two Chinese scholars who have connections to regime insiders and who requested anonymity to discuss the thinking of policymakers in Beijing, China’s response has been rooted not in anxiety but in confidence. Beijing is convinced that Hong Kong’s elites and a substantial part of the public do not support the demonstrators and that what truly ails the territory are economic problems rather than political ones—in particular, a combination of stagnant incomes and rising rents. Beijing also believes that, despite the appearance of disorder, its grip on Hong Kong society remains firm. The Chinese Communist Party has long cultivated the territory’s business elites (the so-called tycoons) by offering them favorable economic access to the mainland. The party also maintains a long-standing loyal cadre of underground members in the territory. And China has forged ties with the Hong Kong labor movement and some sections of its criminal underground. Finally, Beijing believes that many ordinary citizens are fearful of change and tired of the disruption caused by the demonstrations.

Beijing therefore thinks that its local allies will stand firm and that the demonstrations will gradually lose public support and eventually die out. As the demonstrations shrink, some frustrated activists will engage in further violence, and that in turn will accelerate the movement’s decline. Meanwhile, Beijing is turning its attention to economic development projects that it believes will address some of the underlying grievances that led many people to take to the streets in the first place.

This view of the situation is held by those at the very top of the regime in Beijing, as evidenced by recent remarks made by Chinese President Xi Jinping, some of which have not been previously reported. In a speech Xi delivered in early September to a new class of rising political stars at the Central Party School in Beijing, he rejected the suggestion of some officials that China should declare a state of emergency in Hong Kong and send in the People’s Liberation Army. “That would be going down a political road of no return,” Xi said. “The central government will exercise the most patience and restraint and allow the [regional government] and the local police force to resolve the crisis.” In separate remarks that Xi made around the same time, he spelled out what he sees as the proper way to proceed: “Economic development is the only golden key to resolving all sorts of problems facing Hong Kong today.”

ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS, MANY QUESTIONS

Chinese decision-makers are hardly surprised that Hong Kong is chafing under their rule. Beijing believes it has treated Hong Kong with a light hand and has supported the territory’s economy in many ways, especially by granting it special access to the mainland’s stocks and currency markets, exempting it from the taxes and fees that other Chinese provinces and municipalities pay the central government, and guaranteeing a reliable supply of water, electricity, gas, and food. Even so, Beijing considers disaffection among Hong Kong’s residents a natural outgrowth of the territory’s colonial British past and also a result of the continuing influence of Western values. Indeed, during the 1984 negotiations between China and the United Kingdom over Hong Kong’s future, the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping suggested following the approach of “one country, two systems” for 50 years precisely to give people in Hong Kong plenty of time to get used to the Chinese political system.

But “one country, two systems” was never intended to result in Hong Kong spinning out of China’s control. Under the Basic Law that China crafted as Hong Kong’s “mini-constitution,” Beijing retained the right to prevent any challenge to what it considered its core security interests. The law empowered Beijing to determine if and when Hong Kongers could directly elect the territory’s leadership, allowed Beijing to veto laws passed by the Hong Kong Legislative Council, and granted China the right to make final interpretations of the Basic Law. And there would be no question about who had a monopoly of force. During the negotiations with the United Kingdom, Deng publicly rebuked a top Chinese defense official—General Geng Biao, who at the time was a patron of a rising young official named Xi Jinping—for suggesting that there might not be any need to put troops in Hong Kong. Deng insisted that a Chinese garrison was necessary to symbolize Chinese sovereignty.

Statements made by U.S. politicians in support of the recent demonstrations only confirm Beijing’s belief that Washington seeks to inflame radical sentiments in Hong Kong.

At first, Hong Kongers seemed to accept their new role as citizens of a rising China. In 1997, in a tracking poll of Hong Kong residents regularly conducted by researchers at the University of Hong Kong, 47 percent of respondents identified themselves as “proud” citizens of China. But things went downhill from there. In 2012, the Hong Kong government tried to introduce “patriotic education” in elementary and middle schools, but the proposed curriculum ran into a storm of local opposition and had to be withdrawn. In 2014, the 79-day Umbrella Movement brought hundreds of thousands of citizens into the streets to protest Beijing’s refusal to allow direct elections for the chief executive. And as authoritarianism has intensified under Xi’s rule, events such as the 2015 kidnapping of five Hong Kong–based publishers to stand trial in the mainland further soured Hong Kong opinion. By this past June, only 27 percent of respondents to the tracking poll described themselves as “proud” to be citizens of China. This year’s demonstrations started as a protest against a proposed law that would have allowed Hong Kongers suspected of criminal wrongdoing to be extradited to the mainland but then developed into a broad-based expression of discontent over the lack of democratic accountability, police brutality, and, most fundamentally, what was perceived as a mainland assault on Hong Kong’s unique identity.

Still, Chinese leaders do not blame themselves for these shifts in public opinion. Rather, they believe that Western powers, especially the United States, have sought to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland. Statements made by U.S. politicians in support of the recent demonstrations only confirm Beijing’s belief that Washington seeks to inflame radical sentiments in Hong Kong. As Xi explained in his speech in September:
As extreme elements in Hong Kong turn more and more violent, Western forces, especially the United States, have been increasingly open in their involvement. Some extreme anti-China forces in the United States are trying to turn Hong Kong into the battleground for U.S.-Chinese rivalry…. They want to turn Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy into de facto independence, with the ultimate objective to contain China's rise and prevent the revival of the great Chinese nation.

Chinese leaders do not fear that a crackdown on Hong Kong would inspire Western antagonism. Rather, they take such antagonism as a preexisting reality—one that goes a long way toward explaining why the disorder in Hong Kong broke out in the first place. In Beijing’s eyes, Western hostility is rooted in the mere fact of China’s rise, and thus there is no use in tailoring China’s Hong Kong strategy to influence how Western powers would respond.

IT’S NOT ABOUT THE BENJAMINS

The view that Xi has not deployed troops because of Hong Kong’s economic importance to the mainland is also misguided, and relies on an outdated view of the balance of economic power. In 1997, Hong Kong’s GDP was equivalent to 18 percent of the mainland’s. Most of China’s foreign trade was conducted through Hong Kong, providing China with badly needed hard currencies. Chinese companies raised most of their capital on the Hong Kong stock exchange. Today, things are vastly different. In 2018, Hong Kong’s GDP was equal to only 2.7 percent of the mainland’s. Shenzhen alone has overtaken Hong Kong in terms of GDP. Less than 12 percent of China’s exports now flow through Hong Kong. The combined market value of China’s domestic stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen far surpasses that of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, and Chinese companies can also list in Frankfurt, London, New York, and elsewhere.

Although Hong Kong remains the largest offshore clearing center for renminbi, that role could easily be filled by London or Singapore, if Chinese leaders so desired.
Investment flowing into and out of China still tends to pass through financial holding vehicles set up in Hong Kong, in order to benefit from the region’s legal protections. But China’s new foreign investment law (which will take effect on January 1, 2020) and other recent policy changes mean that such investment will soon be able to bypass Hong Kong. And although Hong Kong remains the largest offshore clearing center for renminbi, that role could easily be filled by London or Singapore, if Chinese leaders so desired.

Wrecking Hong Kong’s economy by using military force to impose emergency rule would not be a good thing for China. But the negative effect on the mainland’s prosperity would not be strong enough to prevent Beijing from doing whatever it believes is necessary to maintain control over the territory.

CAN’T BUY ME LOVE?

As it waits out the current crisis, Beijing has already started tackling the economic problems that it believes are the source of much of the anger among Hong Kongers. Housing prices have tripled over the past decade; today, the median price of a house is more than 20 times the median gross annual household income. The median rent has increased by nearly 25 percent in the past six years. As many as 250,000 people are waiting for public housing. At the same time, income growth for many Hong Kong residents has fallen below the overall increase in cost of living.

☺ FIND Me ☺

☺ Instagram: heyman_lam

☺ Facebook: Heyman Lam
- https://www.facebook.com/heymanlam100...

☺ E-mail: [email protected]
要找我最好用IG Direct！我最常看到和最快回覆的～

☺ QnA 常見問題 ☺

☺ 皮膚性質Skin type:
春夏天: 全臉中性到乾性膚質 狀態不好鼻子會脫皮 基本不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫

秋冬天：全臉超乾性膚質 長時間鼻子會脫皮 不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫 ＊眼皮和咀唇常敏感

☺ 身高: 160cm

☺ Camera 相機：Canon M50

☺ Lighting 燈光：環型燈

☺ Editing Software 剪片軟件：Final cut Pro
____________________________________________________

Products Mentioned:

1. MTM - custom-blended eye make-up remover*

2. espoir - Pro Tailor Be Powder Cushion

3. LAKA - Soft Lighting Cover Cushion

4. SHU UEMURA - Unlimited Breathable Lasting Fluid Foundation*

5. MUJI - Portable Eyelash Curler Clear

6. ROMAND - BETTER THAN EYES EYESHADOW #01

7. Byredo - TEARS IN RAIN WATERPROOF MASCARA *

8. Clio - Waterproof Liner - Kill Brown

9. 歐可茶葉 - 台灣即沖珍珠奶茶

10. Loewe - 001 Woman Eau De Toilette

11. Gucci - Heart earrings with Gucci trademark

12. Dior - J'ADIOR SLINGBACK PUMP

____________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: Products with (*) = sent by PR
Items with (**)= paid to mention
This video is not sponsored.
All opinions are 100% honest.
*FYI: For sponsored products, I will try at least one month time before confirming the collaboration and feature them in my videos.

☺ FIND Me ☺

☺ Instagram: heyman_lam

☺ Facebook: Heyman Lam
- https://www.facebook.com/heymanlam100...

☺ E-mail: [email protected]
要找我最好用IG Direct！我最常看到和最快回覆的～

☺ QnA 常見問題 ☺

☺ 皮膚性質Skin type:
春夏天: 全臉中性到乾性膚質 狀態不好鼻子會脫皮 基本不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫

秋冬天：全臉超乾性膚質 長時間鼻子會脫皮 不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫 ＊眼皮和咀唇常敏感

☺ 身高: 160cm

☺ Camera 相機：Canon M50

☺ Lighting 燈光：環型燈

☺ Editing Software 剪片軟件：Final cut Pro
____________________________________________________

Products Mentioned:

Bambi Series - Natural 1 Day
Around HKD $200

Olens - Vivi ring One day
Around HKD 150/10pc

Candy Magic 1 Day Aqua
Around HKD HKD178/20pc

Olens - Spanish circle 1 day
Around HKD 230/20pc

CNP Laboratory - ANTI-PORE BLACK HEAD CLEAR KIT
Around HKD 200/10 sets

HADALABO TAMAGOHADA Daily Foaming Wash (AHA)+(BHA)*
Below HKD 100

MTM - custom-blended micro foaming cleanser*
HKD 500

Ariul - Micellar Cleansing Water*
Around HKD 120

Novexper - SMOOTHING TONING MIST*
HKD 195/100ml

MTM - custom-blended moisturizing toner*
HKD 500/170ml

Estee Lauder - 櫻花微精華原生液*
HKD 855/200ml

Estee Lauder -Advanced Night Repair*
Old Version

Estee Lauder - New Advanced Night Repair(第7代)*
HKD 890/50ml

Sabon - 嬌貴茉莉沐浴油
HKD270/500ml

Laundrin - 香水系列芳香噴霧
Around HKD 60

Innisfree - Blueberry Rebalancing 5.5 Cleanser*
HKD42/100ml

Kanebo - Freeplus Mild Soap
HKD 125/100g

Biore - Eye&Lip Makeup Remover
Around HKD 60

Laneige - Perfect Makeup Cleansing Water*
HKD 170/320ml

Avene - Gentle Toning Lotion*
HKD 215/200ml

Avène - Cleansing Mattifying Foam*
Around HKD 200

The Body SHop - Drops of Youth Youth Gentle Foaming Wash*
Around HKD 200

L'occitane - Aromachologie Volume & Strength Shampoo*
HKD 270

Hada Labo - 海洋面膜(提亮）
Around HKD 95

Hada Labo - 海洋面膜(修護）
Around HKD 95

OLAY - 深海巨藻 B3 細緻毛孔保濕面膜*
Around HKD 150

On: The Body - Kakao Friends Moisture Mask*
Around HKD 100

Kanebo - Freeplus 潤透純棉面膜*
HKD 137

For Beloved One - Melasleep Whitening Bio-Cellulose Mask*
Around HKD 150

Kose - Japan Clear Turn Super Premium Fresh Mask*
Around HKD 100

Karuna - Revivify+ Face Mask*
HKD 315

AG - ultimate mask
Around HKD 200

UTENA - Premium Puresa Skin Conditioning Mask (Light)*
Around HKD 80

sMTS - 雙效加強補水面膜
Around HKD 150

SECRET KEY - Starting Treatment Essence
Around HKD 170

SU:M37 - 奇蹟活酵肌密注氧精華*
HKD 520/80ml

Bicelle - 全效維他命B5補濕精華*
HKD 419/60ml

Dermacept - C10強效抗氧化精華液*
Around HKD 500

Dermacept - 活膚化妝水*
HKD 330/150ml

Bifesta - Cleansing Lotion Sensitive*
Around HKD 60

MTM - custom-blended milk cleanser*
HKD 500

Factiv - 2% Polyhydroxy Acid 爽膚水
HKD 165/150ml

Factiv - 3% 透明質酸 + Vitamin B5精華*
HKD 200/30ml

ReVIA - 1 Day BLUE LIGHT BARRIER BASIC BARRIER
Around HKD 140/10pc

Helena Rubinstein - 植物幹細胞再生眼霜*
HKD680/15ml

Dr. Wu - Intensive Hydrating Gel With Hyaluronic Acid Moisturizer*
Arounf HKD 350

CAUDALIE - Vinoperfect Concentrated Brightening Essence*
Around HKD 250

Cle de peau - 鉑鑽淨膚潔面泡沫
HKD 450/110ml

Canvas - Rose Otto Illuminating Souffle Cleansing Mousse*
Around HKD 250

Dr.Hong - Rainbow Toothpaste
Below HKD 100

Innisfree - Apple Seed Lip & Eye Makeup Remover*
HKD 60/100ml

Clarins - 防水眼部卸妝液
HKD220/125ml

LEONOR GREYL - Shampoo Creme Moelle de Bambou - Nourishing Shampoo*
HKD 300

THE HISTORY OF WHOO - GONGJINHYANG SOO VITAL HYDRATING CREAM *
HKD 740/50ml

Hermes - Un Jardin sur la Lagune Eau de toilette
HKD 1075/100ml

TONYMOLY - Back Gel Eyeliner Long Brush
Around HKD 65
____________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: Products with (*) = sent by PR
Items with (**)= paid to mention
This video is not sponsored.
All opinions are 100% honest.
*FYI: For sponsored products, I will try at least one month time before confirming the collaboration and feature them in my videos.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
☺ FIND Me ☺

☺ Instagram: heyman_lam

☺ Facebook: Heyman Lam
- https://www.facebook.com/heymanlam1007/

☺ E-mail: [email protected]
要找我最好用IG Direct！我最常看到和最快回覆的～

☺ QnA 常見問題 ☺

☺ 皮膚性質Skin type:
春夏天: 全臉中性到乾性膚質 狀態不好鼻子會脫皮 基本不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫

秋冬天：全臉超乾性膚質 長時間鼻子會脫皮 不出油不長暗瘡 會長黑頭粉刺 沒眼紋但十分浮腫 ＊眼皮和咀唇常敏感

☺ 身高: 160cm

☺ Camera 相機：Canon M50

☺ Lighting 燈光：環型燈

☺ Editing Software 剪片軟件：Final cut Pro
_________________________________________
Products Mentioned:

1. Bobbi Brown - SHEER FINISH PRESSED POWDER

2. Bobbi Brown - LUXE ILLUMINATING POWDER*

3. Integrate - Crush Jelly Foundation

4. I'M MEME - I’m Genius Foundation*

5. bareMinerals - Complexion Rescue Defense Radiant Protective Veil*

6. LAURA MERCIER - Loose Setting Powder Glow*

7. Armani Beaty - DESIGNER LIFT FOUNDATION*

8. Maybelline - SuperStay Matte Ink *

9. Clé De Peau - 鉑鑽柔膚潔面泡沫

10. D-UP - Orishiki薄膜隱形式雙眼皮膠水

DISCLAIMER: Products with (*) = sent by PR
Items with (**)= paid to mention
This video is not sponsored.
All opinions are 100% honest.
*FYI: For sponsored products, I will try at least one month time before confirming the collaboration and feature them in my videos.