今天, 應該是最炫最酷的一家公司, Robinhood, 上市的一天. 它獲利了嗎? 我想沒有多少投資人會care. 最關心的, 應該是它的營收成長率, 還有股價.
在我們一直追逐科技成長股, 被他們的高營收成長率, 潛在的高報酬昏眩的時候, 會不會忘記他們醜得要命的財務報表?
而在今年, 大家追逐的這些趨勢股表現不佳的時候, 是不是也給了我們一些省思?
其實美股中, 還有很多財務報表漂亮, 但聽起來一點也不有趣(甚至很無聊)的公司, 但他們股價穩定, 長期下來, 也給了投資人很大的回報. 像之前介紹過的POOL, 過去幾年也是平均一年翻一倍的漲幅.
而在IPO中, 也有這類的好公司.
Carrier Global(CARR), 2020年4月上市的IPO, 算是工業類股, 漲了快5倍. 有在獲利. (開利冷氣應該有聽過?就是這家公司)
Academy Sports and Outdoors (ASO), 民生消費股, 也有獲利, 2020年10月上市的IPO, 目前也漲了3倍.
下面這篇文章挺好. 與大家分享. 就像文章作者所提的, 龜兔賽跑, 穩(漲)的烏龜, 不一定會輸.
也祝福大家找到&培養自己的能力圈, 穩穩獲利.
Jim Cramer: The Biggest Thing That Happened Thursday Was the Boring Stuff
No, it wasn't Robinhood or the mega-cap tech companies, it was names we depend on like Carrier Global.
By JIM CRAMER Jul 29, 2021 | 03:38 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: HOOD, FB, PYPL, CARR, RTX, NUE, AGCO, ZM, ALGN, AAPL, EBAY, AMD, XLNX
One of the most glorious things I have seen involving the stock market in ages happened today.
Was it Vlad Tenev ringing the opening bell for his breakthrough, disruptive Robinhood (HOOD) , representing 22 million mostly young new investors? Was it the free-for-all decline in the stock of the "F" in FAANG, Facebook (FB) ? Or the clobbering that Paypal (PYPL) took after what looked to be a good quarter?
Nah. I was bumping into Dave Gitlin, CEO of Carrier Global (CARR) , and his charming daughter, a college student at the University of Wisconsin. They were calmly waiting for me to finish "Squawk on the Street" to say, "Hi," and I couldn't be more thrilled. Because unlike the much ballyhooed Robinhood deal, which seems like a bust, Carrier Global came public back in April 2020 at $12 and today, after tremendous earnings, not sales, but earnings, it made an all-time high at $53, after reporting a terrific number with tremendous HVAC sales, up 31%, and an earnings surprise of 55 cents vs. the 30 cents that Wall Street was expecting.
Carrier, which was spun off when United Technologies merged with Raytheon (RTX) had some tailwinds, like the need to have clean air inside, because of the pandemic and clear air outside because office buildings are responsible for 40% of carbon emissions. But the huge upside surprise and the gigantic buyback belonged to Dave and his team and I that's what I told his daughter. I made sure she knew how proud she should be about how this man made so much money for people. Twelve to 53 in 15 months time is the name of the game.
Look, I am not trying to take away from anything that Robinhood and its co-founder and CEO Vlad Tenev have created. Far from it. They have created billions for themselves and are now letting people participate in their great sales growth. You got a chance to pay a fortune per share and many Robinhoodies did, as tons of stock was allocated to the 22 million people who joined Robinhood, because of a bang up app that every young person seems to know.
I am simply saying that HVAC, yep heating, ventilation and air conditioning is one of the most boring businesses on earth and at times like today, with all of the hoopla of Robinhood it is easy to forget is how lots of money can be made being boring, and I like that. The most exciting thing that happened this year is Carrier helped provide refrigeration for vaccines. That's just fine with me.
Unlike Robinhood, Carrier hasn't brought anyone into the stock market. It's more laser-like focus on air conditioning once spun off from Raytheon means nothing to people. Just Wall Street gibberish. But you have probably walked by a Carrier machine thousands of times and never thought anything of it. Yet, you could have bought it for a song at six times earnings instead of 25 times sales.
The Carriers, with CEOs who pay themselves lavishly but perhaps not excessively, or the Nucor's (NUE) the steel company that's also well managed and sells at six times earnings, represent valuable properties, especially when the U.S. government is about to agree on a trillion dollar infrastructure bill and the country has more than 6% GDP. We don't know why they are re-opening trades or closing trades, delta-variant trades or building and bridge investments. Forgive me, though for comparing the company of Robinhood, with something that may stay special for a while vs. companies that get described as venerable, solid and built to last.
These companies are not rarities. You know people have to eat, right? You know that there would be famine without farming. So why not buy the stock of Agco (AGCO) , No. 2 farm equipment, which went from $40 to $130 in a year and a half without ever being expensive. Combines too boring? Again fine with me. Now that the masks are off -- or at least in some places, although Zoom (ZM) is still crushing it -- I, like many others, including my daughter, didn't like how her teeth looked even as, to me, they were perfect. Dentists tell you to get Align (ALGN) . I wanted them on "Mad Money" but the show was just too darned jammed. The stock's up the most in the S&P 500, with a product that, again, like the Purloined Letter, is right in front of you.
I love tech. Created the term FANG, added the "A" when it was clear that Apple (AAPL) had to take the acronymic stage between another "A" and an "N." I am proud that those who bet against me on Twitter, the legion, are betting against FAANG. I wrote obituaries for a goodly time in my career as a reporter but I never wrote as many as have been penned to talk about the group has already made the ultimate measure on behalf of shareholders.
Oh and it's not like I don't like tech or fin tech. I felt the slings and arrows of Facebook and PayPal today. Facebook's management once again lowered the boom on its future talking about real deceleration in growth. I thought it was too dire. PayPal's Dan Schulman talked about how the separation with its former partner, eBay (EBAY) gets done now and earnings will be hurt. This was one of the least revelatory surprises ever. I think both are practicing UPOD, Underpromising to Overdeliver, and, sure this time might be different, but it's sure been the way they have handled it in the past.
Far better to be in the straight out blow outs like Advance Micro (AMD) which had still one more banner day, this time because the company it is buying, the dowdy Xilinx (XLNX) , a sleepy semiconductor company, had tremendous earnings. The two together could be unassailable and even as AMD is now richly valued it is deservingly so.
I can't wait to hear Vlad Tenev's reflection on Robinhood's debut as a public company and about the novel offering that gave millions of shares to his clients. Vlad's not so much a rags to riches American story. He's a poor Bulgarian to insanely rich American because of his on ingenuity. That's a story with celebrating in itself.
I am simply pointing out that unlike Vlad, whom you would have had invested with when you weren't allowed or able to, Dave Gitlin sure didn't keep you out of the better bet, the stock of HVAC king Carrier.
You did.
u.s. growth stock 在 綠角財經筆記 Facebook 的精選貼文
Vanguard資產管理在2020十二月發表了"A tale of two decades for U.S. and non-U.S.equity: Past is rarely prologue"一文,詳細的解釋為何過去十年美國股市優於國際股市。以及以相同的脈絡進行分析,美國跟國際股市未來十年的預期報酬。
文中將股市報酬拆分成四個組成,分別是:
股票估值的改變(Change in valuations)。
簡單的說,就是每一塊的公司盈餘,市場認為值多少錢。假如每一塊的公司盈餘,原本市場認為值十塊錢,後來變成認為值二十元。這會造成股價上漲。
盈餘成長(Earnings growth)
假如原本公司每股盈餘是一塊錢,後來變成兩塊錢。在股票估值相同的狀況下,也會造成股價上揚。
股息率(Dividend yield)
就是公司盈餘以現金發還給投資人的部分。這也是投資股市的獲利來源之一。
匯率變化(Foreign exchange return)
假如美元相對於國際貨幣貶值,投資國際股市,以美國人的角度來看,會帶來更好的報酬。
但假如國際貨幣對美元貶值,美國人去投資外國股市,會帶來較差的報酬。
第一張圖顯示的是過去十年,美國股市跟國際股市的報酬與報酬差距的成因。
最左邊的紫色長條是美國股市,過去十年年化報酬13%。最右邊的藍色長條是國際股市,年化報酬,5.1%。
中間四個長條就是以上述四個因子分析的報酬率差異。
總結以上四項。國際股市相較於美國股市,總共是5.4+1.5-1.1+2.1=7.9%的落後。
美國股市13%,國際股市5.1%的報酬率,差距就是7.9%。
這是過去十年,那未來十年呢?
Vanguard內部有一個Vanguard Capital Markets Model(VCMM)。根據這個模型計算的成果,未來十年美國股市與國際股市的預期報酬如圖:
文中有很詳細的討論,針對可解釋過去報酬的四個因子,放眼未來,對於報酬率分別會有怎樣的影響。
美國股市預期報酬4.7%,落後國際股市8.1%的預期報酬。
需要留意的是,VCMM針對美國股市跟國際股市做出的預期報酬,不是單一數字,美國就是4.7%,非美國市場就是8.1%。而是一個分布的範圍。
圖中顯示的是預期報酬分布的中位數(Median)。
也就是說,下一個十年,也有可能美國股市再度勝過國際股市。但這個可能性比較低。
Vanguard認為美國股市落後的可能比較高。
這篇文章讓我有些感觸。
近十年美國股市的大多頭,讓很多人認為投資國際股市,就是美股最好。
譬如有人認為買股票ETF就是要買 VTI。
有人說投資ETF,就是只買VGK就好的嗎?只買VPL就好的嗎?只買VWO就好的嗎?
沒有、沒有、沒有。
而且這些人會覺得自己非常對。這個看法有過去十年的經驗支撐。
其自信的強度就跟金融海嘯之前,大多投資人認為全球股市投資就是買新興市場就好的態度,一樣強烈。
現在誰在講新興市場股市?
尤有甚者,由於近年美國股市報酬很大部分是科技類股帶動,有人更倡議只要買QQQ就好。
不需要”無腦”進行全球分散。
或是就是開美國券商帳戶,挑選美國股票來投資。
不是開歐洲券商帳戶買歐洲股票,也不是開日本券商帳戶買日本股票,就是買美股。
事實上,這些只會看過去報酬,只會追尋過去報酬的人,以為過去甚麼好就買甚麼的人,對投資的了解恐怕非常粗淺。
就像在金融海嘯之前,專門買拉美基金,能源基金、世礦基金的人。現在,你會覺得他們很會投資嗎?
當時,他們可都是覺得自己掌握未來趨勢。不買這些,才是笨蛋喔。
有點思考能力,有些經驗的投資人,會知道股票市場常有風水輪流轉的現象。過去好,未來未必好。
有分析能力的專業機構,像Vanguard這篇文章,就可以實際算出來,預期報酬的差別有多少。
一個對投資只有很粗淺看法的人,可以在追逐過去熱門時,理直氣壯地罵其他更深思熟慮、考慮較廣的投資人,”無腦”,真的是投資界一種很有趣的現象。
美國股市未來表現可能落後,所以我們需要投資非美國的國際股市。
美國股市未來也沒有保證落後,所以我們仍需要投資美國股市。
全球股市分散投資,是投資的穩健作法。
完整討論,可見今天文章:
https://greenhornfinancefootnote.blogspot.com/2020/12/2020-vanguardus-stock-market-has-lower.html
u.s. growth stock 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【每日國際選讀】
#文末挑戰多益選擇題📝
5G 尚未普及
Samsung已在研發 6G?
開啟「接收通知」和「搶先看」每天吸收雙語時事新知
來讀華爾街日報獨家
🔥 Samsung Primed for 5G Foray as U.S., China Brawl Over Huawei
美中就華為交鋒之際,三星獲得 5G 市場拓展良機
- foray: 初次嘗試,在此是指三星跨足 5G 之戰取得先機
- brawl over: 為⋯⋯爭吵、打架
🧐 The U.S. and U.K. have barred from their 5G networks China’s Huawei Technologies Co., the industry’s largest player. Other European countries are weighing whether to follow suit. In response, Beijing is considering blocking two European suppliers and the industry’s next largest manufacturers, Nokia Corp. and Ericsson AB, from sending their China-made product elsewhere, The Wall Street Journal reported last week.
中國的華為技術有限公司是 5G 網路產業的最大製造商,不過美英兩國已禁止其生產之設備,目前其它歐洲國家則在考量是否跟進。根據《華爾街日報》上周報導,中國正考慮影響規模僅次於華為的歐洲製造商(諾基亞和愛立信),阻止讓這兩家公司在中國製造的產品運往其它地方。
- bar… from: 阻擋,阻撓…
- follow suit: 跟著做, 照別人的方式去做
✏️ The geopolitical squabbling gives Samsung, the industry’s No. 4 player, a major chance to muscle into a telecom-equipment market it considers a pillar for future growth. Though deep-pocketed, Samsung has been a fringe networks player for decades, mostly servicing its home market. But with stagnating sales from its former cash cows in smartphones and televisions, Samsung has bet billions of dollars that telecom operators will prefer a supplier who sells both the network equipment and all the consumer products that connect to it.
此地緣政治紛爭給了產業第四大競爭者——三星電子開拓 5G 設備領域的大好機會,且三星十分看好 5G 未來的成長趨勢。雖然擁有雄厚資金實力,但數十年來三星以服務韓國本土市場為主,極少投入網路領域的競爭。隨著智慧型手機和電視這兩項以往獲利豐厚業務的銷售停滯不前,三星已投入數十億美元資金,押注電信營運商會青睞其中一家 5G 供應商,該供應商需整合銷售網路設備及其他所有相連的消費者產品。
- geopolitical: 地緣政治的
- squabble: 爭吵、口角
- deep-pocketed: 口袋很深,也就是資金雄厚的意思
- fringe: 邊緣、附加的
- stagnate: 淤塞;腐敗;沉滯;失去活力
📈 Samsung also manufactures its network gear entirely in South Korea, lending it cover from the tit-for-tat restrictions that its main competitors lack.
三星電子的網路設備完全在韓國製造,確保避開他國針鋒相對的限制規定,而這樣的保護正是其競爭對手所缺乏的。
- lend: 提供;給予
- tit-for-tat: 針鋒相對
未完待續...
不只 5G,三星甚至已投入 6G 的研發?
加入文末每日國際選讀計畫,解鎖完整語音導讀版
——
原文連結請看留言
——
❓❓多益模擬題❓:
Because of the ¬¬______ squabble between the United States and China over Beijing’s growing clout on the world stage, the stock market has been _____ for many months.
🙋🏻♀🙋🏼♀
A. geopolitical/ stagmate
B. geopolitical/ stagnating
C. geocentric/ stagnating
-
【每日商業英文計畫,熱烈招生中!】
華爾街日報訂閱超值方案 📰
專屬 #臉書社團,浩爾 #每日語音導讀
「留言+1」,就送你 #優惠碼 及 #導讀試聽!