關於 after the rain事件 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

《極端氣候不只是警告！它已成新常態：Ida風暴襲擊紐約，地鐵街道成河流：紐澤西州南方龍捲風將一排房屋夷為平地》

* 紐約週四凌晨宣布進入緊急狀態。美東北地區因艾達颶風帶來的暴雨，造成嚴重洪災，紐約及紐澤西地方政府，在許多淹水地區包括華人聚居的Queens等地區進行多次水上救援。

* 颶風Ida肆虐美國南部各州後，繼續北上。周三晚上襲擊美國東北部，週四早上紐約市政府宣布紐約為重大危險區。

Ida在中央公園下了傾盆大雨，地鐵被洪水淹沒，整個城市系統幾乎皆癱瘓。直到清晨，洪水才慢慢退去。

*紐約鄰近的紐澤西州紐瓦克市，出現有氣象記錄以來，最大單日降雨紀錄。

* 紐約市從1日入夜開始禁止民眾出門，禁令持續至當地時間2日清晨5時，所有非緊急車輛，不得上路。

全紐約市地鐵，幾乎皆因洪流灌入停擺，只剩7號線與史塔登島線（Staten Island Railway）營運，但班次也延誤。

紐約市長白思豪（Bill de Blasio）推文：「今夜我們遭逢歷史性的極端氣候事件，全市降雨破紀錄，洪流湧入市內，街道狀況危險。」

* 「紐約時報」報導，昨晚紐約中央公園記錄到時雨量3.1英寸（約78.7毫米）的降雨強度，打破上週才締造的1.94英寸（49.2毫米）紀錄。

*美國國家氣象局破天荒地向紐約市、紐約州、紐澤西州發出暴洪緊急警報。

* 紐約地區周四努力克服颶風艾達殘餘帶來的毀滅性和致命暴雨，紐約市長白思豪説或許這個城市得面對及適應極端氣候事件，已成為常態的現實。

這場風暴至少造成 20 人死亡，導致紐約、紐澤西和賓州共150,000 多所房屋斷電。紐澤西州南部甚至出現龍捲風，將一排房屋夷為平地。

截至週四中午，政府宣布的緊急狀態命令在整個地區仍然持續生效，官員試圖處理許多意外損失。

週四上午在洪水重災區皇后區舉行的新聞發布會上，紐約州州長凱西·霍赫爾 (Kathy Hochul) 表示，她接到了拜登總統的電話，在評估艾達 (Ida) 造成的破壞時，拜登總統表示“將提供任何幫助”，她說這場風暴代表了一種紐約的新常態。

“我們需要提前預見這些極端氣候，並做好更多的準備，”她說。

“全球變暖已經到來，”民主黨紐約市長候選人埃里克亞當斯說。

週三的大雨——在短短幾個小時內下降了半英尺多——把街道和地鐵站變成河流。緊急救援人員從汽車和屋頂救出人們，數百人從火車和地鐵中緊急疏散。

這場雨打破了熱帶風暴亨利在 11 天前創下的紀錄。這突顯了氣候科學家一個月前的警告：地球變暖將出現更多極端氣候新常態：而更熱的空氣會集中更多的水份，使風暴更快地聚集雨量，並且變得風越來越大，降雨量愈來愈驚人。

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/09/02/nyregion/nyc-storm#ida-new-york-flood

New York declares a state of emergency as the Northeast is slammed by flooding from Ida's remnants https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/01/weather/ida-flooding-tornado-forecast/index.html

* See dramatic footage from New York subway after Ida https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2021/09/02/flooding-in-new-york-new-jersey-from-ida-aftermath-lc-lon-orig.cnn

* At least 9 killed in US Northeast floods https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news/ida-aftermath-09-02-21/h_6553ab3339b8a7aacf8617b7d08b2dac

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

受源自中國武漢的新冠肺炎疫情影響，全世界大多數地區的電影院都仍處於閉館狀態。美國目前僅部份州郡開放戶外汽車電影院，而義大利政府則宣佈其國內電影院將在 6/15 重新開張。英國則表示最早將會在七月來考慮重開戲院。
　
相比之下，台灣的疫情控制得當，人民也在保持個人衛生和安全社交距離的前提下，得以持續進戲院觀影。除了四月的 #金馬奇幻影展 因故取消，目前六月的 #台北電影節 和七月的 #金馬經典影展，都預計會如期展出，後者更會放映義大利大師費里尼的 24 部經典作品（大部分為 4K 修復版）。
　
大型院線片必須隨著全球發行計畫連動，因此諸如《007》和《玩命關頭》等大片都擇期再映。（影展口碑好片《從未很少有時總是》則直接提供 Amazon 串流租借服務，雖要價不斐（19.99美金）但台灣應該不會上映，有興趣的影迷仍可在線上觀賞）。
　
在這樣的新片空窗期，雖然台灣發行商仍卯起來、每週發行許多獨立小眾電影（每週十幾部新片真的是世界創舉了），但也有不少片商趁此機會以「經典重映」的方式，讓許多經典名片再次進到戲院。同時也讓較為年輕的影迷，可以在大銀幕上觀賞這些作品。最近的感觸是，台灣的影迷是何其幸福的，希望大家一同繼續呵護這得來不易的家園樂土。
　
-
　
以下盤點了今年初至今，台灣大大小小影院已上映（重映）過的「經典老片」：（若有遺漏請不吝告知）
　
《海上鋼琴師》 The Legend of 1900 (1998)
《海上花》 Flowers of Shanghai (1998)
《在黑暗中漫舞》 Dancer in the Dark (2000)
《天氣之子》 Weathering With You (2019)
《亂世佳人》 Gone with the Wind (1939)
《咒怨》 Ju-on: The Grudge (2002)
《咒怨2》 Ju-on: The Grudge 2 (2003)
《亂》 Ran (1985)
《刺激1995》 The Shawshank Redemption (1994)
《第六感生死戀》 Ghost (1990)
《鬼店》 The Shining (1980)
《羊男的迷宮》 Pan's Labyrinth (2006)
《霸王別姬》 Farewell My Concubine (1993)
《阿飛正傳》 Days of Being Wild (1990)
《情書》 Love Letter (1995)
《樂來越愛你》 La La Land (2016)
《一級玩家》 Ready Player One (2018)
《橫山家之味》 Still Walking (2008)
《比海還深》 After the Storm (2016)
《辛德勒的名單》 Schindler's List (1993)
《下女的誘惑》 The Handmaiden (2016)
《月光下的藍色男孩》 Moonlight (2016)
《咫尺天涯》 Faraway, So Close! (1993)
《欲望之翼》 Wings of Desire (1987)
《巴黎德州》 Paris, Texas (1984)
《殺人回憶》 Memories of Murder (2003)
《因為愛你》 Carol (2015)
《相愛相親》 Love Education (2017)
《終極追緝令》 Leon (1994)
《碧海藍天》 The Big Blue (1988)
《星際救援》 Ad Astra (2019)
《大象席地而坐》 An Elephant Sitting Still (2018)
《末代皇帝》 The Last Emperor (1987)
《白髮魔女傳》 The Bride With White Hair (1993)
《愛蜜莉的異想世界》 Amélie (2001)
　
今年即將上映：
　
《藍色情挑》 Three Colours: Blue (1993)
《白色情迷》 Three Colours: White (1994)
《紅色情深》 Three Colours: Red (1994)
《愛情，突如其來》 Over the Fence (2016)
《小偷家族》 Shoplifters (2018)
《現在，很想見你》 Be With You (2004)
《蝙蝠俠：開戰時刻》 Batman Begins (2005)
《黑暗騎士》 The Dark Knight (2008)
《黑暗騎士：黎明昇起》 The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
《烈火情人》 Damage (1992)
《夜半歌聲 The Phantom Lover (1995)
《非常母親》 Mother (2009)
《北非諜影》 Casablanca (1942)
《銀翼殺手》 Blade Runner (1982)
《東邪西毒》 Ashes of Time (1994)
《射雕英雄傳之東成西就》 The Eagle Shooting Heroes (1993)
《大叔》 The Man from Nowhere (2010)
《我要復仇》 Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance (2002)
《原罪犯》 Oldboy (2003)
《親切的金子》 Lady Vengeance (2005)
《海灘的一天》That Day, on the Beach (1983)
《恐怖分子》 The Terrorizers (1986)
《牯嶺街少年殺人事件》A Brighter Summer Day (1991)
《一一》 A One and a Two (2000)
《藍色恐懼》 Perfect Blue (1997)
《綠光》 The Green Ray (1986)
《慾望街車》 A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)
《萬花嬉春》 SIngin' in the Rain (1952)
《中央車站》 Central do Brasil (1998)
《里斯本的故事》 Lisbon Story (1994)
　
-（持續更新）-
　
《燃燒女子的畫像》 Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019)
《新橋戀人》 Lovers on the Bridge (1991)
《沒有煙硝的愛情》 Cold War (2018)
　
-
　
（圖為中國新艺联兄弟為慶祝中國影院復工在即所設計的海報。對照台灣日前才剛重映了《樂來越愛你》，顯得寓意無窮。）

p/s: 為了配合作曲，粉絲留言經過刪減，但沒有改詞。
Fans' comments are not altered, but abridged to fit melody.

【歌曲介绍 】
碰碰2020 第一首單曲《你有什么用？》曲风为中文流行抒情歌曲（Mandopop）。继《不觉丢脸吗》 在网上火红，#碰碰车写歌企划，已进入了第三首企划！碰碰原在2019年，开始了和粉丝们（碰碰车）一起创作的写歌企划。这个写歌计划只用粉丝们的留言为作词，碰碰自己谱曲后，制作成单曲发表在网络上。第一首《不觉得丢脸吗》受到了多家台湾媒体报道，现今更在YouTube频道上获得了116万的点击量。

碰碰深受R&B和流行乐的影响，在这首单曲发挥了平时少见的爵士唱腔，编曲也加入了各种R&B元素。上千个粉丝们的评论当中选出，《你有什么用？》主题围绕在 “放弃”的主题，歌词表达了各种沮丧或心碎人的心声。

“你有什么用？站在黑暗的角落，come on, 没有人和你感同身受。” 副歌一响起，也许歌词会让人心酸。配上疗愈地伴奏，碰碰希望作品可以给予粉丝们疗愈的效果。 借着多人的负面情绪，凌乱的句子通过了音乐的洗礼，却变成了一支有意义的作品。作品想大声地告诉正在面对困难的人们，他们不是一个人。碰碰相信 “雨后有彩虹”。碰碰希望这首《你有什么用？》就像一道光，照亮别人黑暗的世界。

【Song Introduction歌曲介紹】

“你有什么用？” (Useless) is PongPong’s third songwriting project with their fans after “不觉丢脸吗 (Aren’t you embarrassed)” , a collaborative project with fans, which went viral on the Internet. Reported by various Taiwanese media, their previous project has gained 1,160,000 views on their YouTube channel. After the success, PongPong is back with their latest single entitled “你有什么用？” (Useless) , a Mandopop ballad hit.

The track showcases PongPong’s influence of R&B elements like R&B vocals, jazz piano, backing vocals and R&B chords. With the first project themed with hate comments, “你有什么用？” (Useless) surrounds the theme of “giving up”. The lyrics were made solely from fans' comments, which gave a voice for those who felt depressed or heartbroken in life.

The chorus features fans’ lyrics like, “You’re useless.” “Hiding in a dark corner.” “No one would understand your feelings.” it could be overwhelming to listen. However, PongPong believes this piece would be a medium to heal the broken-hearteds by showing them that they are not alone. The song ends with “There’s always a rainbow after the rain” . The sibling duo wanted this track to be a beacon of hope to their fans who are facing hardships and battling everyday.

【歌詞Lyrics】
《你有什么用？》
作词：碰碰車
作曲：碰碰
编曲：碰弟Gaston

尽力了 不能了 太难了
受够了 不行了 白费了
（我努力了）
没希望了 放弃算了 做错了什么？
好累了 不想再继续了 我别无选择

放弃算了 白费力气 不能成功的
也许这个世界 没什么好留恋的
（我努力了）
不知道 自己做什么才是对的
我真的 很累了

你 有什么用?
站在黑暗角落
Come On 没人和你感同身受

有什么用?
心烦 心乱 心痛
活在这世界 有什么用?
有什么用?
没人看到我
没人看到我
不懂坚持什么
我不红

两极的 信念在打架 挣扎
我真的 呆不下 我怎么那么差
不知道啦
想怎样就怎样啦
输就输吧 我想喝奶茶

停下来 想一想 明天还 是一样
石头怎样都不会发光
像没灵 魂一样 只想躺 在床上
陪月亮到天亮

放弃算了 白费力气 不能成功的
也许这个世界 没什么好留恋的
（我努力了）
不知道 自己做什么才是对的
我真的 很累了

你 有什么用 (有什么用)
站在黑暗的角落
Come On 没有人和你感同身受

有什么用 (有什么用)
心烦 心乱 心痛
活在这世界 有什么用 (有什么用)
有什么用
没人看到我 (有什么用)
没人看到我
不懂坚持什么
我不红

努力那麼久
找堅持理由
看着天空
见星星闪烁

家人愛我
同學捧我
Never try never know
雨後有彩虹
雨後有彩虹