呢個係我有史以來準備最耐既題目
翻開中國歷史，不同於商朝有殷墟甲骨卜辭的佐證，夏朝因未有直接證據，一直以來都被視為「傳說」，然而，一項由台大人類學系教授參與的研究，卻可能推翻夏朝是「傳說」的說法，研究成果並刊登在《科學（Science）》期刊。
Now, an international team of scientists drawn from the fields of archaeology, anthropology, seismology, and geology have gathered disparate evidence from ancient texts, sedimentary deposits, earthquake-triggered landslides, and skeletons in collapsed cave dwellings to craft a scenario presented this week in Science that they claim supports the legend of a great flood and hints that the Xia dynasty might be real. If the findings hold up, they could lend credence to early historical texts and help resolve a long-running debate over the origins of China and its people.
證據確鑿？西方學者也不承認夏朝的原因，中國到底有三千年信史還是四千年？20210402
https://www.patreon.com/posts/49534805
early access期刊 在 Clarivate - 科睿唯安自2017 年起與期刊出版商合作 - Facebook 的推薦與評價
科睿唯安自2017 年起與期刊出版商合作，擴大收錄期刊內容，在Web of Science 核心合輯與InCites 之中納入#EarlyAccess 文章。我們預計將在今年的#JCR 導入Early Access ... ... <看更多>