Does this sound familiar?
1. Go to school
2. Go $30K-$200K in debt
3. Get a “job” to pay off the debt you just accumulated
4. Get deeper into debt by getting a car to drive to your job that was supposed to pay off your debt
5. Get deeper into debt by getting a house so you can sleep after being exhausted from all your debt-paying activities
6. Get married
7. Have kids
8. Work through retirement until you die to pay off debt doing something you hate
𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙡 “𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙗𝙩 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙥.”
Where you’re so entrenched in debt and so confused about how to escape, you’re in a trap.
Thankfully, debt isn’t always a bad thing.
There’s Good Debt, and Bad Debt.
You may be thinking, “What!? There’s GOOD Debt?”
Crazy, right?
So what’s the difference?
𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐃𝐞𝐛𝐭 𝐈𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲
A mortgage from the bank to invest in investment property.
An online course that could increase your skills so you can deliver more value to the marketplace.
Borrowing money from the bank to hire more employees or buy more equipment to expand your business.
𝐁𝐚𝐝 𝐃𝐞𝐛𝐭 𝐈𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲
Car loans.
Payday loans.
Credit card debt.
Personal debt.
Personal consumption.
Other types of debt that are for personal pleasure that don’t generate money.
So here’s the question that everyone’s wondering right now:
𝙄𝙨 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙂𝙤𝙤𝙙 𝘿𝙚𝙗𝙩 𝙤𝙧 𝘽𝙖𝙙 𝘿𝙚𝙗𝙩?
Well, if you go deep into debt to go to school to “find out what you like” and “find yourself”, is that really a good idea?
And what happens to people who do that?
They get a Bachelor Of Arts degree.
Or they party every weekend for their entire 4+ years of college until they’ve graduated.
And the only thing that’s changed is they now have:
1. Crippling debt
2. Liver damage
It may be fun, but being $100K+ in debt in exchange for liver damage and faded memories of crazy parties is definitely not...
...and I’m sure you don’t need me to tell you that.
However, school can be Good Debt.
Don’t you think it’s a good idea if you go to learn a highly profitable skill?
For example, a surgeon. Doctor. Lawyer. Accountant. etc.
These are all highly paid professions because they take REAL skill.
And the bigger problems you solve with that skill, the more you get paid.
The problem is, people don’t think of it that way.
What do most people do to escape their debt?
They decide to become an “entrepreneur.”
They’ve been sold this fat lie that being an “entrepreneur” is easy.
That they should start their own business.
And that it only takes a few months to get stupidly rich.
They change their Facebook profile and Instagram bio from “unemployed” to:
“CEO at [their name].com” or “entrepreneur” or “digital nomad”.
They have no skills to make the business work!
And worst of all, they invest money they don’t have in a business idea that’s not proven.
Now, you may be thinking, “But Dan! That’s good debt! It’s investing in an asset like a business that could make me money.”
Yes, you’ve got the right idea.
Here’s the problem.
Over 90%+ of businesses fail.
Heck, I started and failed 13 different businesses and went $150K in debt before making a single dime back.
If that’s not BAD Debt, then I don’t know what is.
Now you may be thinking, “But Dan, I thought you were an advocate for being an entrepreneur!”
I’m NOT an advocate for being an entrepreneur.
In fact, if I did it all over again I wouldn’t have started my own business first.
What I would’ve done instead is something that wouldn’t have gotten me into failing 13 different businesses and ending up in 150K debt.
If you want to know exactly what I would’ve done, let me know by typing the code word "𝑬𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑" below.
「entrepreneur instagram bio」的推薦目錄:
entrepreneur instagram bio 在 渾水財經Channel Facebook 的精選貼文
金融講ED: 渾水
新世界鄭志剛想做的是TMT
在很偶然的情況下,我發現原來新世界第三代的接班人鄭志剛在潮流網媒「Hypebeast」做了guest editor。後來我把這「小道發現」告訴給好友千頌C,結果她在友報專欄寫了出來,搶了我頭啖湯,令我很不爽。
衣衫襤褸的我較喜古文、詩詞,跟當代藝術、潮流掛不上邊,不過都會留意一些做得出色的網媒學習學習。有次無聊睇到有位叫Adrian Cheng的editor,覺得寫得有紋有路,概念演繹幾好。只是有點奇怪。因為editor很少用「I」第一人稱,他的寫法偏近blogger。當時心中不疑有鬼,點知睇一睇Bio對比一下,原來真係新世界接班人。他的bio寫得算humble,只提K11和自己係Cultural Entrepreneur,一句新世界系、政經相關的銜頭都無講過。
香港大孖沙近年正處理道統繼承問題,舊人要推新人。地產商要洗底改變形象,上一代難免承接很多媒體輿論負面印象,咁都係為了犧牲自己,讓繼任人留下清白之身,改改新氣象。正如會德豐要推銷肌肉靚仔,走運動風;新世界則推銷溫文儒雅,走藝術風。
新世界除了本業地產之外,過往也常接觸資本市場,也扶植了不少梟雄和股票大製作。第一、二代的step down,亦令依附其共生的ibanker大感頭痛,因為舊一代的線會斷,新一代不喜賺快錢,卻喜搞文創藝術、做創投融資。
由新世界收購baby kingdom,在K11搞電競,想做創投項目搞融資等等,都反映鄭志剛骨子想做的是TMT(Technology,Media,Telecom),藝術只是由興趣發展出來的襯托。正如他文章也這樣寫:
「I have to say, I don’t resist social media apps like Instagram since that’s where I find a lot of news and really creative artists and designers.」
話自己有興趣做媒體的老闆太多,但未必個個肯真正走入社交媒體的世代。他不但自己有IG,也貼地走入第三方潮流網媒Hypebeast寫blog。達官貴人多有架子,架子大起上來可以連傳統媒體都睇唔起,甚至自己棟枝旗出來寫blog自娛,很少「委身」落戶網上媒體。通常寫blog也只是自寫自話多,老屁股只會講自己點叻,一副說教口吻,高官亦慣講政策八股文,講中央愛聽的說話。我當然不會單純到相信鄭志剛沒有文膽幫手,但肯寫生活潮流藝術,已算小清新。
我對新世界的接班人有好感,不過,它們近日推出的首置上車盤,坦言不敢恭維,年輕畢業數年的我實在無興趣入飛,做四十年樓奴。今次看來也是新世界想試水溫,之後有好盤再謀靜後動吧。
https://www.am730.com.hk/column/share/108816