幫CJ廣告一下,這本書真的不錯,我今天也會去旁聽
CJ at Booking 第二講:Jorden Peterson, 生存的十二條法則
大家好,歡迎來到文學工作坊,第二場的報名表單。
時間:4/18(日)14:00
地點:Booking書店二樓,高雄市鹽埕區瀨南街177號
費用:完全免費
這次我們要讀的是榮格派心理學家,
臨床心理師/哈佛大學與多倫多大學教授,
世界級公共知識份子的搖滾巨星,
煞氣的 Jorden Peterson
的暢銷著作「生存的十二條法則」,或是英文版 “Twelve Rules For Life: An Antidote To Chaos”
在上一堂工作坊的最後,我承諾大家下一堂課要講榮格的精神分析理論。但是自細想想,其實我好像沒有資格講榮格:我不是心理學家,也沒有心理學背景,頂多在研究精神分析理論的時候,用文學的角度來看榮格學門。所以我想這次我就退而求其次,講榮格學派的學者,用一百年前的榮格理論,應對現世處境的建言。
Jorden Peterson 可說是當今最知名的公共知識份子。沒有之一,就是最知名。他「生存」這本書出版,讓他頓時成為學術/網路/常民生活中的知識型搖滾巨星。在YouTube上,他在學校上課與對外演講的內容輕鬆,就突破百萬點閱率。
到底是什麼樣的書讓他聲名大噪?法則?我們還需要更多法則嗎?
在這本書中,Peterson借用他30年的臨床心理諮商經驗,來去告訴大家要如何限縮自己生活中的混亂,並且建立有效的秩序。建立秩序的方法,包含心裡的秩序(Stand up straight with your shoulders back)、處事的秩序(make friends who want the best of you)、說話的秩序(Be precise in your speech)等等。
Peterson的讀者們普遍反應,在讀過他的書並且學習整理好自己的生活後,他們成功的將自己最好的一面,在這個世間表現出來。也許有些人和伴侶合好,有些人和多年不見的父親講話,有些人在工作上得心應手。而這些都來自於整理好自己的生命,從個人的層級改善,再擴大善的範圍到身邊的人。
這本書幫助我走過我個人的憂鬱症,幫助我在混亂的疫情世代中理出自己的方向。我也時常推薦這本書給那些生活混亂的人。
這次,就讓我帶你一起讀,Jorden Peterson’s Twelve Rules For Life.
注意事項:
一、你需要一本書,或者至少在工作坊上課的時候手邊有個可以看的文本,或者找到人一起看一本,中英文都可以。
書可以在這裡買到中文版:https://www.books.com.tw/products/0010820641
英文版:https://www.books.com.tw/products/F014340597?loc=P_br_60nq68yhb_D_2aabdc_B_2
事先預習的影片連結:https://youtu.be/ApC0faRYabI
二、這個工作坊希望大家能夠共同發言參與,所以我希望你讀完至少三個章節,然後準備三個問題,來課堂上與學員共同討論。
三、如果沒有人指定,這場讀書會我會主講 Rule 6: Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world、與 Rule 8: Tell the truth __or, at least, don’t lie.
四、請遵守當時的防疫規則、工作坊結束後桌椅歸位、嚴禁自顧自開打桌球
五、這場工作坊一樣,免費,無料,free for all.
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3,370的網紅網頁設計x廣告行銷,也在其Youtube影片中提到,❤免費訂閱Free subscribe❤ https://pse.is/submytube Adobe Premiere v15.4 新功能 讓你免打字輕鬆上字幕 | 語音轉文字 SRT 字幕檔 speech to text --------- ✪✪✪FYR 補充資料如下✪✪✪ 章節chapt...
「free speech中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於free speech中文 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於free speech中文 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於free speech中文 在 陳冠廷 Kuan-Ting Chen Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於free speech中文 在 網頁設計x廣告行銷 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於free speech中文 在 尼亞斯 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於free speech中文 在 Hate speech policy - YouTube Help - Google Support 的評價
- 關於free speech中文 在 YouTube Explores Ways to Detect Misinformation Early ... 的評價
- 關於free speech中文 在 Freedom of Speech with Chinese Characteristics | 中国特色 ... 的評價
free speech中文 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
《The New York Times》香港唔再講得嘅嘢專輯。
"What You Can No Longer Say in Hong Kong"
//Hong Kong was once a bastion of free speech....But the limits of the security law are vaguely defined.//
#言論自由堡壘
#曾經
原文:
《The New York Times》
What You Can No Longer Say in Hong Kong
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/09/04/world/asia/hong-kong-speech.html
*********************************
支持Patreon係本Page嘅支柱:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
(最新 5/09/2020)
推動BNO變BC嘅"Hong Kong Bill"响國會通過嘅可能性
https://bit.ly/3btETQV
响英國學中文Out咗...
https://bit.ly/2Z1GKrh
英國五大傳媒幫手重溫721
https://bit.ly/31vSjse
復課:英國全國最糾結嘅決定
https://bit.ly/34udfSl
美國大選:民調反映唔到嘅民意,就係最大嘅變數
https://bit.ly/32ix7p0
馬莎裁員反映白領職位危機
https://bit.ly/31gxrW4
白俄羅斯,三十年獨裁的困局
https://bit.ly/3iw4zyB
*******************************
free speech中文 在 陳冠廷 Kuan-Ting Chen Facebook 的最讚貼文
I have recently perused Nicholas Kristof’s NYT piece “China’s Man in Washington, Named Trump”(https://nyti.ms/3h2JXh8). One paragraph in particular caught my attention: “A joke in China suggests that Trump’s Chinese name is Chuan Jianguo, or “Build-the-Country Trump.” That’s because Build-the-Country is a common revolutionary name among Communist patriots, and it’s mockingly suggested that Trump’s misrule of the United States is actually bolstering Xi’s regime.”
Kristoff also avows that since Trump’s ascension to presidency, the American nation became highly polarized. This is reflected in the current administration’s policies on climate change, foreign relations with established U.S. allies, and COVID-19 prevention, all of which are rather ineffective. It also seems like Mr. Trump and his team diverged from the traditional priorities, including promoting free trade, human rights, and other quintessentially American values. As described thoroughly by John Bolton, all these factors contributed to the declining standing of the U.S. in global politics.
What is more, many people fall prey to CCP’s propaganda and its interpretations of Trump’s actions, which only enhances China’s reputation.
But that might not exactly be the case.
The CCP apparently failed to utilize the window of opportunity created by the ineptness of the Trump administration, as China could have grown to the position of a leader by filling in the void left by the U.S.
During the 2016 APEC Ministerial Meeting in Lima, Peru, Xi Jinping and his team actively supported the plans to establish the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and a Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific, or FTAAP. In contrast, the United States withdrew its signature from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in early 2017. Coupled with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB), this move bolstered China’s capacity to influence global investments and trade, high-tech mergers and acquisitions, and, overall, expand its geostrategic influence on the entire globe.
At the same time, various propaganda films about great power competition, military industry, and science and technology surged all at once, and gained remarkable following around the world.
All this provided a window of opportunity for the CCP to slowly change its course. Around the same time, the distrust for POTUS among U.S. allies’ reached its apex. According to polls conducted by the Pew Research Center, the distrust for the U.S. president in the U.K. reached 75%, 72% in Japan, 70% in Australia, and stunning 86% in France.
Had the C.C.P,. begun to open up at that time, or at least resumed the governance style of the Hu-Wen administration, it could have reaped the benefits of promoting liberalism where the U.S. failed to deliver. It was the time for Beijing to gradually enhance freedom of speech domestically, pursue sustainable infrastructural projects, gradually reform unfair barriers to trade, transform its S.O.E.s, strengthen protections for private ownership, and vitalize its start-ups and enterprises.
Moreover, were China to cease the genocide in East Turkestan and refrain from cracking down on Hong Kong's semi-autonomy, it would have greatly enhanced its global international image. Additionally, if paired with slow but steady reforms, Beijing’s respect for sovereignty of its peoples would have attracted a large amount of foreign investment, which in turn would have continued to buttress the country’s growth.
It is China prerogative to remain idle.
It might still be possible for Chinese “Dream” to come true.
Yet, a historic window of opportunity is now closed.
Xi assumed the tools of proscribing and stalling, which are completely antithetical to the aforementioned window of opportunity.
Today, China is more authoritarian, less flexible, and fully deprived of horizontal accountability. Its reliance on wolf warrior diplomacy backfired: for example, the Swedish parliament sought to expel the Chinese ambassador to Stockholm. Also, Prague, the capital of Czechia, terminated its sister-city agreement with Shanghai and instead signed a new one with Taipei. Last but not least, we ought not to forget about the recent fiasco in the relations with the United States who ordered the shutdown of China’s consulate in Houston. All of this took its toll on China’s reputation.
Its international standing and inability to replace the U.S. as the major global power are not the only issues China is currently facing.
As it experiences multiple domestic and international shocks, China struggles to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and tame the disastrous floods of Yangtze River. The swarm of locusts of biblical proportions is also crippling Beijing’s institutional capacity and may soon lead to food shortages. In fact, the precarity of food supply further diminishes the level of trust for Chinese authorities.
In 2019, the Pew Research Center conducted a public opinion survey to examine the international views of China. In the U.S., Argentina, the U.K., Canada, Germany, and Ukraine, only about 30% of respondents claim a favorable view of China.
As the COVID-19 pandemic rages in the U.S., as many as 73% of U.S. respondents view China unfavorably.
Recently, the C.C.P. is losing its focus by continuously shifting targets. In fact, I believe there is no need for the C.C.P.to rely on nationalistic appeals, since in this new century values, business relations, and fair competition are all far more important than greater than delusive blood ties.
China lies only 130 kilometers away from us. Of course, we welcome dialogue and seek to avoid misjudgments. But we also distinguish between the C.C.P. and China. While we do welcome dialogue, but we will not be coerced to talk under unjust preconditions or in fear.
The only fair prerequisites are those of reciprocity, mutual respect as well as fairness and openness with respect for the rule of law.
Source: Pew Research Center
最近看到紐約時報中文版的一篇文章
<美國的川普,中國的「川建國」>,其中一小段是這樣的
「在中國,人們戲稱川普的中文名字是川建國。那是因為建國是共產黨愛國者中一個普遍的革命人名。它在諷刺地暗示川普對美國的治理不當實際上是在鞏固習近平的政權。」
裡面也提到,川普在任的幾年,國家更分裂,對於氣候變遷,傳統美國盟友,乃至於疫情處理等都相當拙劣,對於美國傳統的自由貿易、人權等價值也基本上都沒有太大興趣。這些方針,導致美國在世界的評價降低,波頓的新書也多有描述。
除此之外,許多不幸相信中共宣傳,又或者是中共圈養的小粉紅,特別故意愛宣傳川普增強中國的威望。
但這不是真的。
中共完全沒有掌握美國做得不夠好的地方,去增強其在世界的領導力。
在2016年時,秘魯的亞太峰會舉行期間,習近平政權爭取(RCEP)及亞太自由貿易區(FTAAP)談判;對比2017年初,美國剛宣布退出TPP,加上中國到「一帶一路」和亞洲基礎設施投資銀行,中國當時在世界全面發揮投資貿易、高科技併購還有其地緣戰略的影響力。
也是那個時候,各種的大國崛起、大國軍工、大國科技的宣傳影片此起彼落,似乎正準備要在世界舞台發光發熱。
這曾經是中共慢慢轉向的一個機會之窗。彼時(2017)美國盟友對美國總統的不信任度達到歷史新高,根據皮尤研究中心的資訊,英國對於美國總統的不信任度達到75%、日本72% 澳洲70% 法國更高達86%
如果那時中共開始有限度的改革,對內放寬言論自由,或者至少維持在胡溫當時的水中,對外追求有責任的基礎建設,逐步緩慢減低不公平的貿易壁壘,對於國有企業改革,增強私營企業、新創企業的活力。
停止對新疆迫害,不干預香港自治,不僅國際形象會大幅改善,哪怕是緩慢但是穩健的改革,也會讓大量吸引外資,讓中國的活力持續前進。
哪怕是什麼都不做也好
那或許有這麽一點可能性,中國「夢」是可以前行的
但是歷史機緣的大門已經關上。
習、禁、停、放棄了這個機會之窗,徹底的走向相反的方向。
更專制、更沒有彈性,更沒有任何制衡的力量。各種戰狼外交,讓瑞典議員提案驅逐中國大使,捷克布拉格市長與台北簽訂姊妹是,就解散上海與該市關係、被美國關閉領事館、各種讓中國形象低下的事情,中共都沒有少做。
中共不但完全沒有辦法取代美國,在多重國內外的衝擊之下,又是瘟疫,又是超大水患,緊接著蝗害,還有進來的糧食不足問題,正在面臨巨大的瓶頸。
而糧食的命脈,卻恰恰又在對他最不信任,對中共價值最反對的國家聯盟
根據皮尤研究中心:Pew Research Center2019調查各國對中國的喜好度,美國、阿根廷、英國、加拿大、德國、烏克蘭等,對於中國的喜好度都在30%上下
而2020疫情後美國對於中國的不信任度,更高達73%。
最近中共在演習,又要玩轉移目標的手段,對於中共,其實不必再有民族主義的同情,因為新的世紀,價值、商業模式、公平競爭的制度大於血緣幻想。
中國離我們只有130公里的距離,我們當然歡迎對話,避免誤判。但我們同時也區分中共與中國,歡迎對話,但不在前提、條件、恐懼之下對話。
如果真的要有前提,那就是對等、尊重,還有公平公開法治的方式會晤。
資料來源:皮尤研究中心:Pew Research Center
(美國著名的民調機構和智庫機構,https://www.pewresearch.org/)
free speech中文 在 網頁設計x廣告行銷 Youtube 的最佳貼文
❤免費訂閱Free subscribe❤
https://pse.is/submytube
Adobe Premiere v15.4 新功能 讓你免打字輕鬆上字幕 | 語音轉文字 SRT 字幕檔 speech to text
---------
✪✪✪FYR 補充資料如下✪✪✪
章節chapter
影片00:00 語音轉文字功能簡介
影片00:47 實作示範 語音轉譯文字檔
影片02:57 如何輸出SRT 字幕檔 或 TEXT純文字檔
影片03:21 如何修改自訂影片中subtitle的字幕樣式
影片04:22 補充
free speech中文 在 尼亞斯 Youtube 的最佳解答
以下是其他遇到這問題
有發影片說話的YouTuber
他們同樣都有寄信給官方
官方同樣都是敷衍態度去處理
我並不想起爭議,只想回報bug
並希望頻道恢復正常
但看了這兩部影片之後
我發現不跳過寄信這個步驟
可能這bug永遠都不會修好
還會找上你其他喜歡的YouTuber
因為它是隨機出現的bug!
https://youtu.be/OhHFLFQWAFg
https://youtu.be/CFMAvDjPt40
free speech中文 在 YouTube Explores Ways to Detect Misinformation Early ... 的推薦與評價
These tools working together have been pivotal in keeping views of bad content low, while preserving free expression on our platform. ... <看更多>
free speech中文 在 Hate speech policy - YouTube Help - Google Support 的推薦與評價
Gender Identity and Expression; Nationality; Race; Immigration Status; Religion; Sex/Gender; Sexual Orientation; Victims of a major violent event and their kin ... ... <看更多>