關於 future leaders course ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

來 不要再猜了 這是Twitter 封殺川普的公開全文 請你看完再下評論：

After close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them — specifically how they are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter — we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence.

In the context of horrific events this week, we made it clear on Wednesday that additional violations of the Twitter Rules would potentially result in this very course of action. Our public interest framework <https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/worldleaders2019.html> exists to enable the public to hear from elected officials and world leaders directly. It is built on a principle that the people have a right to hold power to account in the open.

However, we made it clear going back years that these accounts are not above our rules entirely and cannot use Twitter to incite violence, among other things. We will continue to be transparent around our policies and their enforcement.

The below is a comprehensive analysis of our policy enforcement approach in this case.

Overview

On January 8, 2021, President Donald J. Trump Tweeted:

“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

Shortly thereafter, the President Tweeted:

“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, and an uptick in the global conversation in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, these two Tweets must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well as in the context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks. After assessing the language in these Tweets against our Glorification of Violence <https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/glorification-of-violence> policy, we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service.

Assessment

We assessed the two Tweets referenced above under our Glorification of Violence policy <https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/glorification-of-violence>, which aims to prevent the glorification of violence that could inspire others to replicate violent acts and determined that they were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This determination is based on a number of factors, including:

President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1 <https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1347103015493361664>, 2 <https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1347103016311259136>) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an “orderly transition” on January 20th.

The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending.

The use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.

The mention of his supporters having a “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition” and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.

Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.

As such, our determination is that the two Tweets above are likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021, and that there are multiple indicators that they are being received and understood as encouragement to do so.

และแล้วการประมูลการกุศลเพื่อแย่งสิทธิ์ในการสร้าง Skin ของเกม Fall Guys จากบริษัทต่าง ๆ น่าจะเข้ามาสู่ช่วงท้ายแล้ว เพราะตอนนี้ยอดบริจาคสูงสุดของการแข่งขันครั้งนี้เริ่มนิ่งแล้ว และผู้ประมูลสูงสุดก็เป็นเจ้าของสโลแกนที่น่าจดจำอย่าง "เรื่องก้นต้องยกให้เรา" นั่นเอง
.
Twitter ของเกม Fall Guys เริ่มทำการโพสต์ปั่นกันอีกครั้งถึงยอดบริจาคเพื่อการกุศลให้แก่มูลนิธิ SpecialEffect ที่จัดตั้งขึ้นเพื่อเหล่าเกมเมอร์ผู้ด้อยโอกาส โดยตอนนี้พวกเขาได้ยืนยันว่า ณ เวลานี้ TUSHY แบรนด์ด้านสุขภัณฑ์ชั้นนำของอเมริกามียอดเงินบริจาครวมสูงสุดนำแซงแบรนด์อื่นไปไกลที่ 420,069.69 เหรียญสหรัฐฯ หรือประมาณ 13.5 ล้านบาทไทย และตอนนี้พวกเขาก็ครองตำแหน่งนี้มานานเกินหนึ่งวันแล้ว
.
แน่นอนว่าเมื่อเห็นอย่างนี้ Twitter ของ Fall Guys จึงเริ่มปั่นต่อทันทีว่า "ฮ่า ๆ อะไรเนี่ย ผู้นำยังเป็นพวกเขาอยู่งั้นหรือ มีใครให้มากกว่านี้ไหม?" ซึ่งถ้าไม่มีล่ะก็ Skin เสื้อ "เรื่องก้นต้องยกให้เรา" นั้นน่าจะเกิดขึ้นจริงในอนาคตแน่นอน
.
แต่ก็ไม่แน่ว่าเราอาจจะได้เห็นผู้ชนะในตอนท้ายก็เป็นได้ ซึ่งผู้ชนะที่แท้จริงจะเป็นใครนั้น เราก็ต้องมาติดตามดูกันต่อไปครับ
.
ที่มา: https://twitter.com/FallGuysGame/status/1296485153217314820…
#ข่าวเกม #gamingdose #FallGuys
And the charity bidding to steal the skin of Fall Guys game from companies should be in the end. The highest donation of this match is now still and the highest bidder owns a memorable slogan like ′′ Buttons to lift. Let us ′′ that's it.
.
Twitter of Fall Guys has started posting again to charitable donations to the SpecialEffect Foundation. Now they confirm that at this time TUSHY, America's leading sanitary brand has the highest total donation amount of total donation. Overtaking other brands far at $ 420,069.69 or around 13.5 million Thai Baht and now they have been in this position for more than a day.
.
Of course, when seeing this, Fall Guys Twitter immediately started cycling, ′′ Lol what the leaders are still them, or who gives more?" If not, it's Skin's shirt, we need to give it to us. ′′ That should definitely happen in the future.
.
But it's not sure that we will see the winner at the end. The real winner will be. Let's follow.
.
Source: https://twitter.com/FallGuysGame/status/1296485153217314820?s=20
#ข่าวเกม #gamingdose #FallGuysTranslated

The silent revolution (Lee Yee)

Before democrats’ primaries, except for one or two Hong Kong government officials jibber-jabbering sporadically, major bureaucrats from Beijing and Hong Kong had been very reticent about it. But afterward, Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government and Carrie Lam denounced in tandem that the primaries were a breach of the Basic Law, the National Security Law as well as the electoral law, yet without uttering which article of them. Why? Perhaps it was due to another wrongly projected scenario by the Chinese Communist Party. In view of the media being nonchalant about the primaries and Tai Yiuting being unconfident in drawing in one-tenth of the pro-democracy electorate(170 thousand voters), they had thought that citizens were apathetic towards the primaries. If that was what it all amounted to, there was nothing to worry about, and they would surely be glad to see it end in fiasco.

Who would have thought that as many as 610 thousand voters who had kept a low profile would have swarmed the polling stations to take the whole world aback? Though the communist China and Hong Kong hastily took remedial actions right away, it was already too late. The primaries already shocked the world.

A wise young man has called on me lately. He put forward a few questions, the first of which was: Which four among all major events in the past year including 6.9, 6.12, 6.16, 7.1, 7.21, 8.31, siege to the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Hong Kong Polytechnic University do you pick to best encapsulate the entire course of the movement?

My answer was: Being a watcher and critic, I’m far from being able to encapsulate the entire movement, but since the start of the anti-extradition movement, there have been a lot of incidents boggling my mind, or more specifically getting me awakened, while changing my perceptual knowledge thoroughly.

The first event is 6.12. Before that day, I had not believed the extradition amendment bill would be laid aside for the communist China and Hong Kong’s resolve was so decided and the pro-establishment faction, the majority in the Legislative Council, had declared support for it, not to mention the government proclaimed on the night right after the 6.9 one million people demonstration that the Second Reading debate on the bill would be resumed. I was concerned about the safety of the protesters who charged, and deemed the radical behaviors useless. Though I understood why the young people did so, I did not find the valiant attempts in the protests desirable. After 6.12, my conception has altered and the five appeals put forward since have been prevailing.

The second event is 6.28. Nothing happened in Hong Kong that day when leaders of various countries converged for G20 summit in Osaka, Japan. Less than a week before, some young people had advocated crowdfunding 3 million dollars for advertising on front pages of influential newspapers in different languages all around the world. Fundraising aside, based on my half-a-century experience in news publication, it is hardly possible to pull it off. But they did it jaw-droppingly well beyond doubt. Even though the leaders of G20 did not react forthwith, the global attention being drawn to Hong Kong and the Hong Kong’s story being ushered into the international arena by the advertisement are indisputable facts. The thought-provoking courage of the young people reshaped my appraisal of the new generation of Hong Kong.

The third event is 7.21+8.31. This two-in-one incident totally transmuted my impression on Hong Kong police. Citizens come into contact with police officers more than any civil servants. The complexion of the police is the complexion of the city. When police officers become public security officers, Hong Kong becomes a place I am no longer familiar with.

The forth event is siege to the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Polytechnic University plus the District Council election. Before the District Council voting, young people had kept on charging valiantly with support from the public, and some citizens had complained about traffic inconvenience caused by the protests. When the day of election was nearing, the society was surprisingly peaceful. Would ordinary citizens, mostly self-absorbed, support the protest? In the end, the turnout and results of the election were dumb-founding. The misjudgement by communist China and Hong Kong became laughingstock. The Chinese officials in charge of Hong Kong affairs stepped down or got demoted.

Every time my mind was boggled, I came at something in one way or another and was somehow awakened through self-reflection. Looking at the primaries of democrats under the threat of the National Security Law, I realized that Hong Kongers on the whole have completely mutated in the past year. All the events that all citizens can take part have been undergoing fundamental changes. Those who keep a low profile will creep into our view to take us aback.

A silent revolution is ongoing. There is no turning back for Hong Kong. When Hong Kongers reminisce about the current “darkest hour” in future, they will find out that in fact that was the “best time”.

(Lee Yee, a prominent political commentator in Hong Kong who embarked on a career of writing and subediting in 1956, has been contributing unremittingly political commentaries to the local press.)