關於 mark six result ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

國際青少年文化藝術盛典

2019 Malaysia《International Youth Culture and Arts Festival》Malaysia & International Grand Finale
2019 马来西亚《国际青少年文化艺术盛典》马来西亚全国甄选圈及国际比赛及文化艺术交流

Malaysia Audition Details 马来西亚甄选圈细则:
Rehearsal Date & Time 彩排日期及时间:
14th August 2019, 8am - 3pm
Audition Date & Time 甄选日期及时间: 15th August 2019, 8am - 3pm
Venue 地点: “Encore Melaka” International Theater Hall “又见马六甲” 国际演播厅

International Finale Details 国际总决赛细则:
Rehearsal Date & Time 彩排日期及时间:
16th August 2019, 8am - 3pm
Finale Date & Time 总决赛日期及时间: 17th August 2019, 8am - 3pm
Venue 地点: “Encore Melaka” International Theater Hall “又见马六甲” 国际演播厅

The Largest Multiracial and The Most International Youth Culture and Arts Event Performances Linked Platform Endorsed & Supported By Ministry of Education Malaysia
由马来西亚教育部认证及支持的最大型多元民族及最多国际青少年文化艺术活动对接平台

A Yearly Summer Gathering with Global Youth ● The Power Of Assembly in Malaysia and China
全球青少年每年冬夏季的青春约定 ● 共聚马来西亚及中国强势震撼登陆

Extra School Co-curriculum Marks ( Malaysia Student Only )
额外获得学校课外活动分数 ( 马来西亚学生而已)

Awarded Recognition Certificate From Malaysia Ministry Of Education
可获马来西亚教育部所办法的表扬参与证书

Malaysia 《International Youth Culture and Arts Festival》 is using "Self-Challenge" Scoring Concept for each categories:
马来西亚《国际性青少年文化艺术盛典》采用 “自我挑战” 评分制度:

Gold Award 金奖 : 8 – 10 Marks 分
Silver Award 银奖 : 6 – 7.9 Marks 分
Bronze Award 铜奖 : 4 – 5.9 Marks 分
Excellent Performance Award 杰出表现奖 : 1 – 3.9 Marks 分

* There is No Awardees Limit for Each Award Category, Any Team Fulfill the Mark of the Category, They will be awarded that Award Category. Organizing Committee Encourage Students Participate in this event actively.
* 各奖项没有任何获奖上限，只要任何团队符合该成绩分数，就获得该分数领域奖项。委员会鼓励各校学生多踊跃报名参加。*

Gold Awardee will Eligible to Represent Own Country to participate in Global Grand Final. Multiple Award to be given in each category.
金奖得奖者将代表该国家参加全球总决赛。同等奖项将有机会有多个组别同时获得。

PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES 活动表演项目: （5 - 18 YEARS OLD )

VISUAL ART CATEGORY ( INDIVIDUAL ) 视觉艺术项目 ( 个人 )
MICROFILM SHOOTING 微影视摄录 ( 10 mins )
MULTIRACIAL CALLIGRAPHY 多元民族书法

PERFORMING ART CATEGORY 表演艺术项目
（ 15 ~ 50 PAX AND ABOVE 或以上）
MUSIC INSTRUMENTS 器乐 ( 5 mins )
THEATRE 故事情景剧 ( 6 mins )
TALENT 才艺 ( 6 mins )
VOCAL 声乐 ( 5 mins )
DANCE 舞蹈 ( 5 mins )

Event Highlight 活动精彩内容：
1. International Cultural and Arts Networking 国际文化艺术交流
( Country Youth Representative From Malaysia, China, Russia, Singapore, Philippine, Korea, Japan, Thailand, USA, Australia, Europe, etc. )
（来自马来西亚、中国、俄罗斯、新加坡、菲律宾、韩国、日本、泰国、美国、澳大利亚、欧洲等国家青少年的代表）

2. Starlight Avenue Award Ceremony 新光大道颁奖盛典

3. The Super Star Involving Performance & Redcarpet Show
璀璨群星表演及明星红毯秀

4. The Superb Judgement Council 超强评委阵容

5. International Culture and Arts Carnival & Exchange Workshop
国际文化艺术嘉年华会及交流工作坊

6. Global Sister School Exchange Official Ceremony
全球姐妹学校交流对接签署仪式

7. Program Video Production from Professional Team 专业团队节目录制

8. Malaysia & China Wellknow Culture And Arts Master Class Exchange & Instruction Sharing 马来西亚及中国著名文化艺术大师班交流及指导

9. Malaysia Edu-Tour and Experience with International Mate
与国际朋友一同畅游及深入体验马来西亚教育之旅

10. Courtesy Visit Media, Government Sector, School or Success Entrepreneur
礼貌拜访媒体、国家政府单位、学校或著名企业家

Congratulation to All Global Grand Finale Awardee!!! 恭喜所有全球总决赛的获奖者！！！
2019 Malaysia《International Youth Culture and Arts Festival》Global Grand Finale Result!!!
2019 马来西亚《国际青少年文化艺术盛典》全球总决赛成绩揭晓！！！

Talent Performance Category 才艺表演项目
1. Sekolah Seni Malaysia Sabah ( La’ Forza ) - Marks: 8.8 ( Gold Award )
2. NKTS ( This Is Me ) - Marks: 6.7 ( Silver Award )
3. NKTS ( 动感Fun乐 ) - Marks: 6.4 ( Silver Award )
4. NKTS ( 交响南洋 ) - Marks: 7.6 ( Silver Award )
5. Wendy Media 文惠传媒 ( 薪传 ) - Marks: 7.7 ( Silver Award )

Music Instrument Category 器乐项目
1. Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Kota Kumuning ( SMK Kota Kemuning 24 Festive Drums ) - Marks: 9.4 ( Gold Award )
2. VR Drumming Academy ( VR Drumming Academy ) - Marks: 9.9 ( Gold Award )

Theatre 故事情景剧
1. Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tun Fatimah Hashim ( Karisma Tufah ) - Marks: 8.5 ( Gold Award )
2. Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seri Perling ( Anak Johor ) - Marks: 8.3 ( Gold Award )

Vocal 声乐项目
1. Institute of Technical Education ( ITE That Acappella Group “T.A.G” ) - Marks: 8.2 ( Gold Award )
2. Sekolah Nasional Karangturi ( Karangturi Choir ) - Marks: 9.3 ( Gold Award )
3. Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina) Kwang Hwa, Butterworth ( Butterworth Kwang Hwa Children’s Choir ) - Marks: 8.8 ( Gold Award )

Dance 舞蹈项目
1. Indian Culture Centre ( NSCBICC ) - Marks: 8.0 ( Gold Award )
2. NKTS ( 别人家的小孩 ) - Marks: 8.4 ( Gold Award )
3. Sekolah Seni Malaysia Sarawak ( Anak Warisan Kenyalang ) - Marks: 9.7 ( Gold Award )
4. NKTS ( 诗经•采薇 ) - Marks: 8.4 ( Gold Award )
5. Sekolah Seni Malaysia Kuala Lumpur ( Sekolah Seni Malaysia KL ) - Marks: 9.5 ( Gold Award )
6. Genius Art Studio ( Six Little Elf ) - Marks: 9.3 ( Gold Award )

Post-scriptum 备注:
The Final Official Result will be based on this Result.
For further information, please contact our IYCAF Secretariat.
以上的成绩最终都以筹委会按此公开的成绩为准，如有任何疑问，欢迎与我们IYCAF秘书处联系

International Collaborate Organizations 国际合作单位：

Endorsed & Supported By 认证及支持单位 :
Ministry of Education Malaysia ( Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia ) 马来西亚教育部（中央）
Visit Melaka 2019 2019 马六甲旅游观光年

Organizer 主办单位 ：
Malaysia Entrepreneur Friendship Association ( MEFA ) 馬來西亞企業家友好會
Acez Global Group 武士國際集團


Co-Organizer 协办单位 ：
Malaysia Arts and Culture Friendship Association ( MACFA ) 馬來西亞藝術文化友好協會
Elemente Entertainment 音樂連線娛樂事業
VR Culture & Creative Association Malaysia 馬來西亞大眾文創協會
HCR Event Solutions 優創策劃
AVG Media Solution 艺星媒體

Strategic Partner 策略伙伴：
Pro Specialist ( International ) Advisory 專誠國際投資投資顧問
Grand Empire Ent Limited 辉腾文化产业

International Collaboration Partner 国际合作伙伴 :
Wisdom Media 文惠传媒
ZhanFang YiCai ( ChongQing ) Culture Media 绽放艺彩 （重庆）文化媒体
US National TV 美国国家电视台
Global Alliance of China Hongkong Macao Taiwan Association 全球中华港澳台侨联谊会
European China Hongkong Macao Taiwan Association of the World's Alliance 欧洲中华港澳台侨联谊会
Henan Chengzhe Culture Media 河南晟澤文化傳媒

Collaboration Partner 合作伙伴：
e-kid Art Corridor e-kids 艺术走廊
e-Youth
VR Drumming Academy 大众鼓艺学院

Official Venue 指定会场：
Encore Melaka 又见马六甲

Official Hotel 指定酒店：
The Pines Melaka ( 4 Star Hotel )
Summer Tree ( 3 Star Hotel )

Official Beverage 指定饮料：
Who’s Tea Malaysia 鬍子茶

支持单位 Supporting Partner :
CCTV《Young China》Program Team 中央电视台《少年中国》栏目组
《"Dream Of Youth" International Youth Culture and Arts Festival》 《“少年梦 ” 国际青少年文化艺术节》
《"NKTS" International Youth Culture and Arts Festival》 《"NKTS" 国际青少年艺能大奖》
《JinTongXiang》Children Film Festival 《金童象》儿童电影节
《China CYC》Youth Culture and Art Festival 《少年盛典》青少年文化艺术节
《VCFF》International Film Festival 《VCFF》国际电影节
《CCTV》Starpark 《中央电视台》星光影视园
《JSBC》Children Spring Gala Night 《江苏电视教育频道》少儿春晚

播出平台 Showing Platform：
HEA！eTV HEA！网络电视台
Youtube
Tencent Video 腾讯视频
LE TV 乐视视频
iQiYi 爱奇艺
TuDou 土豆
YOUKU 优酷

Platinum Sponsors 白金级赞助商：
Natural Points

Gold Sponsors 金级赞助商：
Gintell (M) Sdn Bhd
JVV International Group 久久国际集團
Fugo Ryori Japanese Restaurant 富国料理餐厅

International Organizing Committee Secretariat
国际筹委会事务处

Malaysia《International Youth Culture And Arts Festival》
马来西亚《国际青少年文化艺术盛典》

No.38A, Ground Floor, Jalan Temenggung 19/9, Bandar Mahkota Cheras, 43200 Cheras, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Committee Person in-Charge Contact:
筹委会负责人联系号：
Chris Lim 林娳嫙 +60 13 - 287 5007
Eric Yap 葉耀陽 +60 12 - 620 2867

Official Committee Email 官方筹委会电邮：:
iycaf2019@gmail.com

Official Website 官方网站:
http\://www.IYCAF.com
http\://www.AcezGlobalGroup.com/iycaf

Hashtag Keyword:
#AcezGlobalGroup武士國際集團 #AcezGlobalGroup #武士國際集團 #HCREventSolutions優創策劃 #HCREventSolutions #優創策劃
#AVGMediaSolution艺星媒體 #AVGMediaSolution #艺星媒體 #ElementeEntertainment #音乐连线 #ElementeEntertainment音乐连线
#ekidsArtsCorridor #ekids #ekids艺术走廊 #EYouth

#少年梦 #国际青少年文化艺术盛典 #DreamOfYouth #IYCAF #InternationalYouthCultureAndArtsFestival #同根同梦 #同根同梦少年中国
#少年中国 #国际青少年文化艺术节 #YoungChina #NKTS #2017 #2018 #少年中国 #2018国际青少年文化艺术节#2018InternationalYouthCultureAndArtsFestival
#同根同梦少年中国国际青少年文化艺术节马来西亚甄选赛 #NKTS国际青少年艺能大奖 #NKTSInternationalYouthCultureAndArtsAward #SameRootsAndDreamsYoungChinaInternationalYouthCultureAndArtFestival #《"少年梦"国际青少年文化艺术节》马来西亚甄选活动
#《同根同梦●"少年中国"国际青少年文化艺术节》马来西亚甄选赛 #少年中国国际青少年文化艺术节马来西亚甄选活动

#舞蹈 #声乐 #表演 #器乐 #故事情景剧 #微影视摄录 #多元民族书法 #MultiracialCalligraphy #Calligraphy #Dance #Vocal #Performance #MusicInstrument #Theatre #MicrofilmShooting #个人 #组合 #Individual #Team #Group #Audition #Competition #甄选活动 #甄选 #比赛

#春晚 #中国春晚 #马来西亚春晚 #春节联欢晚会 #公益春节联欢晚会 #马来西亚公益春节联欢晚会 #中国春节联欢晚会 #马来西亚春节联欢晚会 #全球总决赛 #全球青少年文化艺术盛典 #全球青少年文化艺术节 #全球青少年文化艺术交流
#SpringFestivalGalaNight #ChinaSpringFestivalGalaNight #MalaysiaSpringFestivalGalaNight #CharitySpringFestivalGalaNight #MAlaysiaCharitySpringFestivalGalaNight #GlobalGrandFinal #GlobalYouthCultureAndArtsFestival #GlobalYouthCultureAndArtsExchange

#CCTV #中央电视台#中国中央电视台 #HEAeTV #Youtube #南洋商报 #南洋学生 #芒果传媒 #湖南卫视 #HunanTV #NanyangStudents #嘉丽台 #KahLaiToi #HEAeTV网络电视台 #HEAeTV #Youtube #星洲日报 #SinChewDaily #网络电视台#中国教育电视台 #香港卫视 #旅游卫视 #爱奇艺 #土豆网 #乐视视频 #HKS #LeTV #iQiYi #YOUKU #华人频道 #ChinaEducationTelevision #CEC #腾讯视频 #v.QQ.com
#MinistryOfEducation #MOE #KPM #KementerianPendidikanMalaysia #马来西亚教育部 #教育部 #教育部中央总部 #JPN #JambatanPendidikanNegeri #马来西亚州教育局 #州教育局 #教育局#首相署 #PrimeMinisterOffice #SAME #EncoreMelaka #又见马六甲 #EncoreMelaka又见马六甲

#Malaysia #马来西亚 #KualaLumpur #吉隆坡 #中国 #China #北京 #Beijing #Shanghai #Nanjing #上海 #南京 #Korea #韩国 #日本 #Japan #Russia #俄罗斯 #澳洲 #Australia #Singapore #新加坡 #Thailand #泰国 #越南 #Vietnam #印尼 #Indonesia #Philliphine #菲律宾

MPs raise extradition law and Umbrella Movement trial in UK Parliament debate ( Click link for video)

On 10 April 2019, the UK Parliament held a debate on the status of freedoms and the rule of law in Hong Kong. The debate was called by Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat MP for Orkney and Shetland, and 19 MPs from 6 political parties joined a wide-ranging discussion about the proposed amendments to the extradition law, the 9 April 2019 verdict of the trial of Umbrella Movement leaders, the status of the rule of law, and the implementation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

Mr Carmichael opened the debate with a comment on the Umbrella Movement trial, saying:

“The prosecution and now conviction of nine leaders of the Umbrella movement is the latest in a series of egregious human rights abuses by the Government in China. Using the criminal justice system and public order offences in this way is an abuse of fundamental and internationally protected human rights…”

Mark Field MP, the Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office responsible for Asia, refused to directly comment on the case, as sentencing is on 24th April, but referred to the Foreign Secretary’s recent statement that “on civil and political freedoms, Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy is being reduced.” He added that:

“It would be deeply concerning if the [Umbrella Movement trial] ruling discourages legitimate protest in future or discourages Hong Kong citizens from engaging in political activity.”

Mr Carmichael also highlighted wider concerns about Hong Kong’s rights and freedoms, arguing that:

“…these convictions are not an isolated incident. Over the past five years, we have seen the abduction of Hong Kong booksellers who published titles critical of China’s rulers; a political party banned; a senior Financial Times journalist, Victor Mallet, expelled from the city; and, now, proposals to change Hong Kong’s extradition laws to enable suspected criminals to be extradited from Hong Kong to mainland China, which is something that not only political activists but businesspeople fear, as they believe they could be in danger if the change goes ahead.”

Other MPs also highlighted concerns about Hong Kong’s proposed new extradition law. Helen Goodman MP, the Labour Shadow Minister for Asia; Fiona Bruce, the Conservative MP for Congleton; Geraint Davies, the Labour MP for Swansea West; and David Morris, the Conservative MP for Morecombe and Lunesdale, all raised this issue. Fiona Bruce MP, Chair of the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission, asked:

“Does the Minister agree that Hong Kong’s proposed new extradition laws, which may result in political activists and even international business people being in danger of extradition to mainland China, would fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, do irreparable damage to one country, two systems, and destroy business confidence in Hong Kong as a result? Is it not in all our interests, especially business, to defend Hong Kong’s freedom, autonomy and rule of law, which underpin its status as an open, international financial centre?”

In response, Mark Field MP said that:
“We are seriously considering the implications of these changes, including how the proposals might affect UK citizens and, indeed our current extradition arrangement with Hong Kong. Considerably more time should be given for a full and wide consultation with interested parties.

“…it is important that any changes to extradition arrangements from Hong Kong to mainland China must respect Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy and cannot and must not affect the rights and freedoms set out in the joint declaration.”

Labour’s Shadow Asia Minister, Helen Goodman MP issued a strong challenge to the UK government:

“A serious discussion in this House on the situation in Hong Kong is overdue. China’s erosion of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Hong Kong Basic Law has been growing since the pro-democracy Umbrella protests in 2014. The last few years have seen an increasing crackdown on dissent and protest, with political parties banned, pro-democracy candidates blocked and journalists expelled. The conviction of nine leaders of the Hong Kong Umbrella movement yesterday—they could face seven years in prison for organising peaceful protests—is totally disproportionate and clearly politically motivated. The proposals to change Hong Kong’s extradition law means they could serve sentences thousands of miles away in mainland China.

The Sino-British joint declaration is a legally binding treaty registered with the United Nations, and the British Government are a joint guarantor, with China, of the rights of Hong Kong citizens. I have one simple question for the Minister: how will the Government fulfil their legal responsibilities to the citizens of Hong Kong?”

In response to this challenge, Mark Field MP highlighted the ongoing commitment of the UK to Hong Kong, as well as the belief that the ‘one-country, two-systems’ approach is in China’s interests:

“We take one country, two systems very seriously, and we will continue to do so… Our view is that the approach is very much in China’s interests, and China has implicitly recognised the importance of Hong Kong as a financial capital market and business centre. It is therefore equally important that we impress upon China that the uniqueness of Hong Kong will be properly maintained, with Hong Kong reaching its full potential, only if we ensure that “two systems,” as set out in the joint declaration, is every bit as important as “one country.””

Stephen Gethins, the international affairs spokesperson of the Scottish National Party argued that judicial independence was in the best interests of Hong Kong as a commercial hub and was therefore in China’s interest:

“Does the Minister agree that judicial independence is absolutely critical to commercial investment and certainty, and that it is in the interests of China as well? Secondly, what Hong Kong-related discussions have he and his colleagues had with regard to trade talks, and what reassurances have Ministers sought over China’s commitment to Hong Kong’s autonomy and the independence of the legal system?”

The Minister, Mark Field said:
“We have made it very clear that for Hong Kong to fulfil its potential—and, indeed, for China to do so in areas such as the belt and road initiative—the independence of, dare I say it, a common law system such as the British legal system is seen as more reliable for investors than perhaps the more doubtful, or at least less orthodox, systems in Shanghai and elsewhere. Although Pudong in Shanghai is a very important financial centre for China and does a lot of domestic work, Hong Kong still enjoys the confidence of many international capital markets.

On the specifics of free trade agreements in a post-Brexit world, clearly Hong Kong would be towards the top of the list, given the strength of our relationship. We have made it very clear to China that one of the reasons we want one country, two systems to be properly promoted is that it is very much in the interests of China’s plans for its own economic development in the years to come. I thank the hon. Gentleman for his focus on that particular issue, but we should not deny that human rights issues will remain extremely important as far as our own commitment to one country, two systems is concerned.”

Richard Graham MP, the Chair of the China All Party Parliamentary Group, raised the importance of Hong Kong’s rule of law. He said:

“The six-monthly Foreign Office report on Hong Kong, which is circulated by the all-party China group that I have the honour to chair, recognises the close bilateral Hong Kong-UK relations on culture and trade in many sectors, but the Minister is right to highlight the continuing pressures on Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy. Will he confirm that, in relation to the pro-democracy activists found guilty of public nuisance, the appeal process is still very much open and that the higher courts including, if needed, the Court of Final Appeal must take into consideration the freedoms of assembly and speech guaranteed under the joint declaration?”

Mark Field responded by saying:
“I am happy to confirm that. As I said, we have highlighted our hope that a range of recent court rulings do not discourage lawful protest in the future. I stress that Hong Kong citizens are guaranteed the rights to freedom of assembly and demonstration under the joint declaration and the Basic Law.”

For details of the remaining 13 speeches, please read Hansard here https://hansard.parliament.uk/…/HongKongPro-DemocracyActivi…

or watch the Hong Kong Free Press Video link below. Party members of the Conservative Party, Labour Party, Liberal Democrat Party, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party and Plaid Cymru were all represented in the debate.

April 10, 2019

Video link:
https://www.hongkongwatch.org/…/mps-raise-extradition-law-a…

"Beyond the podium places, Colombia’s Frank Carreno took 4th place in 18:25. The next four athletes were separated by only two seconds, with 5th going to Japan’s Roji Watanabe and 6th to the fast improving Wai Ching Soh from Malaysia."

"It is also great to see some relative newcomers to the sport, such as Wai Ching Soh and Muhua Jian, climb up the rankings and perhaps start to challenge the established leaders."

Thanks for a good write up from DH on Towerrunning World Association - Towerrunning Tour Final 2018 at Shanghai Tower, 2nd Tallest Tower in the World with a total steps climb of 3398 steps, 119 floors and 552 meter elevation climb.

Year 2019 Goal - Top 5 in Towerrunning World Ranking!

#MasTowerRunner #Towerrunning #TWA #TWA2018 #ShanghaiTower #TowerrunningSport

Race Report (long)
Towerrunning 200 - Towerrunning Tour 2018 Final
Shanghai Tower – Shanghai – November 25

On November 25, the 2018 Towerrunning Tour Final took place at the Shanghai Tower. This was to be the first race of a three-year deal agreed between the TWA and the Shanghai Tower. As such, the 2018 Towerrunning Tour would finish at the end of November.

Although there were no less than six towerrunning races taking place on the same weekend, 9 of the top ten women would be competing; 9 of the top ten men would also be racing.

The tower itself, completed in 2015, is the second tallest in the world standing at 632m tall and towering over Shanghai’s numerous other skyscrapers. Even the 492m high Shanghai World Financial Center looks a long way down from the top of this tower!

The race would see the athletes ascend more than half a vertical kilometre to 552m over 119 floors up an incredible 3,398 steps. This was undoubtedly a worthy season finale! The aforementioned changes to the Towerrunning Tour meant that year-end TWA rankings would be decided by positions in the November rankings.
Heading into the race, the ladies’ Towerrunning Tour 2018 winner was yet to be decided. The destiny of this year’s trophy would be between World Champion Suzy Walsham (AUS) and Cindy Harris (USA). Although holding the #1 position in the rankings prior to the race, even victory for Suzy would not guarantee her the Towerrunning Tour crown. Due to scores being dropped from the last Towerrunning Tour final held in Changsha back in January, it was potentially going to be incredibly tight on points between these two; a win for Suzy coupled with a second place for Cindy, would see the American take the trophy by just two points…
The race for 3rd place was wide open, with no less than four contenders across three continents in the running – Dominika Wisniewska-Ulfik from Poland, Mexican Maria Elisa Lopez, China’s Muhua Jian and Zuzana Krchova from the Czech Republic.

On the men’s side, the destiny of this year’s crown had already been determined. Regardless of the result in the Shanghai race, Germany’s Christian Riedl would be taking home the coveted trophy ahead of World Champion Piotr Lobodzinski from Poland. Following this year’s World Championships in early May in Taipei, Piotr’s absence from key races later in the month in Shenzhen and Benidorm where Christian was twice victorious have ultimately given the German an unassailable lead in the standings.
Colombia’s Frank Carreno could still take the runners-up spot from Lobodzinski should he finish ahead and Germany’s Goerge Heimann had an outside chance of claiming 3rd place should results fall his way.

Heading into race, Walsham was undeniably the ladies’ pre-race favourite. The Australian had been unbeaten this year since a rare loss in the Tour season opener in Changsha back in January to Krchova and knew that victory was needed to give her the best possible chance of retaining her Tour crown. However, with Harris only needing to repeat her 2nd place from last year’s race to top the year-end standings, the podium placings would certainly influence the final destination of the trophy. Likely contenders for a top-three placing would be Italy’s Valentina Belotti, runner-up in the World Championship, and Muhua Jian from China.

On the men’s side, there was arguably no clear favourite. Lobodzinski led Riedl in the head-to-head during 2018, but with Christian having the upper hand in the more recent races between the pair. Riedl would also no doubt wish to make up for last year’s agonising loss by a mere 0.9 seconds (despite a having a cold) as well as confirming his #1 ranking by ending the season on a high. Never to be discounted, Australia’s Mark Bourne would also be a threat. Incredibly, the Aussie ran a negative split during last year’s race when finishing in third place.
As race day dawned, the assembled athletes who had travelled from far and wide converged on the Shanghai Tower. Once again, a pre-race medical was required consisting of a blood pressure test and a body temperature check. With the formalities over, race warm-ups could begin!

With the clock ticking down to the race start at 0900 hours local time, the ladies assembled in the start area. The usual time-trial format would apply with athletes released 30 seconds apart. Race order would be determined by current ranking position but in reverse, so Suzy would start last.With all the female elites having started, amongst the race favourites it was Italy’s Belotti who crossed the line first having started earlier in the elite wave. She stopped the clock in 21:44, a competitive time but exactly one minute off Walsham’s winning time from 2017. Next to top the leaderboard was local athlete Jian in 20:56. With Jian’s time remaining unbeaten with only a few runners left in the stairwell, we would soon know the identity of this year’s Towerrunning Tour winner. Back on the stairs, Walsham had overtaken Harris having started only one place behind. The question now was whether the American could still get the 2nd place finish she needed to claim the Tour crown, assuming the Australian took the win. However, should Suzy be unable to eclipse Muhua Jian’s time, Cindy would only need 3rd place, assuming Suzy would finish in 2nd place in this scenario.
Minutes later, it was all over. Suzy clocked a superb 20:35 to take the win whilst also knocking 9 seconds off her own course record. Cindy could only manage 4th place, finishing in 22:42. The World Champion therefore added yet another trophy to her no doubt bursting trophy cabinet! Cindy ends the year as #2 in the year-end rankings and the impressive Muhua Jian jumps to 3rd place following her excellent 2nd place in the Tour final.
Outside of the top four, local athlete Linming Chen finished just four seconds behind Cindy to take 5th place and Aussie Alice McNamara took 6th in 23:22 a fraction ahead of China’s Huiji Zhang.

With the women’s race done and dusted, it was the turn of the men. Reverse order meant that Lobodzinski would be the penultimate starter with Riedl starting last. Bourne was the first runner to dip below 18 minutes in a superb time of 17:41, a massive 28 second PB on his showing from last year. This time would have won last year’s race comfortably, but would it be enough this year? Back on the stairs, Christian had overtaken Piotr! Had the German gone off too fast only to suffer in the latter stages or was he flying? As they approached the finish line, Riedl was still ahead of Lobodzinski…could he beat Bourne’s leading time though? The World #1 crossed the line stopping the clock in an incredible 17:26 taking a huge 30 seconds off Piotr’s course record. The Pole failed to break the 18-minute barrier, clocking 18:07, and would have to settle for 3rd this time around behind Mark. To put the winning time into perspective, Christian averaged a fraction under 195 steps per minute and this was most definitely not a sprint race!
Beyond the podium places, Colombia’s Frank Carreno took 4th place in 18:25. The next four athletes were separated by only two seconds, with 5th going to Japan’s Roji Watanabe and 6th to the fast improving Wai Ching Soh from Malaysia.
So, Christian cemented his #1 standing with race victory and would take home the Towerrunning Tour trophy to Germany. World Champion Piotr finishes the Tour season as runner-up, narrowly ahead of Colombia’s Frank Carreno.

The year end rankings show that collectively, the male and female top tens can count athletes in their twenties, thirties, forties and fifties! It is also great to see some relative newcomers to the sport, such as Wai Ching Soh and Muhua Jian, climb up the rankings and perhaps start to challenge the established leaders.
For now though, big congratulations to both Suzy Walsham and Christian Riedl for winning the 2018 Towerrunning Tour, not to mention winning the Towerrunning Tour Final and not be satisfied with just that, setting a course record too!
DH
-

國際冠軍魔術師甄澤權(Louis Yan), 繼2010年表演全球首個恆指預言魔，今年再下一城, 向高難度挑戰, 於端午節六合彩金多寶開彩前預測攪珠結果（7個號碼）, 「特別號碼」更於攪珠結果公布時同步於apm揭曉， 與六合彩攪珠同步進行，將成為魔術界創舉。
Hong Kong Magician Louis Yan successfully predicted the Mark Six result (HK Lottery Game) on 21 June 2012 at apm,the shopping mall in HK. The "Special Number" was predicted and announced before the result announced.

Louis Yan Offical Fan Page: http://www.facebook.com/louisyanmagic

お見送りです、
楽しんできてね、
私・・・お店でお留守番・・・爆

日本初のダチョウ料理専門店、
ライダーズカフェMACHⅢ
大阪府堺市美原区北余部４６９－６
ＴＥＬ＆ＦＡＸ０７２－３６１ー３１７１
http://www.h4.dion.ne.jp/~maltuha/index.html
HONDA and CBX (Shebeeccs) are motorcycles from which Honda Motor Co., Ltd. announces in 1978, and the export to foreign countries is begun from next year. Several kinds of motorcycles that are giving the name of CBX exist as other series models, and this model is indicated when only written, "HONDA and CBX".
Outline

Not only the performance but also the image and the mechanism defeated Z1000 of Kawasaki to boast of a popular hight in an export market at that time including it, and it was done as much as possible as the strongest flagship and was developed. The valve engine of six air cooling series cylinders DOHC24 of displacement 1047cc that becomes the maximum feature is the imitations of former GP racer "RC166". It takes off, it equips with 28φCV carburetor by six reams, and 105ps that becomes over hundred ps is achieved. It was popular because of the engine feeling, the jet plane like the motor, and the criticized peculiar exhaust sound.

It was not able originally to be said that it would make it big from rigidity shortage etc. of a big body, weight, and the adopted diamond frame as a sports model though it was a vehicle developed as super-sports of the works racer image. However, the forge made of the duralumin parts etc. adopted in the generator and each part of the back type adopted to bring six cylinder engine together as compactly as possible were succeeded by the following machine development.
Kawasaki, Z1-R (〈 Zi 〉one of Zet are), and Z1R-II (Zettowan'arluts) are motorcycles of total displacement 1000cc class that Kawasaki Heavy Industries manufactured and was selling.
Z1-R

The type with the cafe racer image that had become popular as an additional model at that time was developed because it met various needs though Z1000 that was the succession of Z1/Z900 existed in one-liter class of Kawasaki. Having been sent as a model in 1978 is this Z1-R (Z1000-D1) as a result.

The style that multiused a past curve was assumed the setting only of one blue metallic color that coloring had darned also to emphasize a metallic feeling by the one to image the Japanese sword with a beautiful figure slight though it changed completely, and it was based on the straight line. Two characters of "Z1" were revived to the car name, and it treated to the black that engine Nuiro is the same as initial Z1.

The cost was multiplied by the equipment goods as the aluminum Cast wheel of the first Kawasaki and "4 in 1" set tube were installed, the fuel gauge and the ammeter besides rotation speed/total were prepared for among bikini Cowling et al., and the auto cancellation mechanism was added to winkers.

It output it according to the adoption of the large caliber carburetor with the acceleration pump though a basic block of the engine was the same as that of Z1000 (Z1000-A2) of the model in 1978 90 Ps (Z1000 was 83 ps) was demonstrated, and the differentiation as a special model was aimed at.

It became a sharp appreciation of the yen at this time, and after it had been done, the price hike simultaneously was pricing higher than original Z1000-A2 of the base model, and was not able to leave the result for this age necessarily well by the performance comparison with one-liter class of rival each company put on the market each company. Furthermore, it came to sell 15,000 or more all over the world though a lot of negative factors like the recall commotion etc. that coiled round the front wheel of 18 inches were held.

The expression that made Z1-R such as "It was faster than Z1-R" and "The novelty of the styling is inferior to that of Z1-R" an object of comparison overflowed in the test article with media, and it became a bench mark in all respects next year of this Z1-R sale though rival each company in Japan turned on the new model to one-liter class one after another.

For those who were there at McDonough Gymnasium on August 4, 1994, few will forget the arrival of a 6-0 freshman guard who needed no introduction. The rumors of Allen Iverson's arrival to the Kenner Summer League were true, and by game's end, Iverson had scored 40 points. By the Sunday afternoon final, before an overflow crowd inside the gym and a crowd of those outside who could not get in, Iverson finished a combined 99 point effort in three days against some of the best collegiate talent in the city. This, of course, from a player that had not played organized basketball in over a year.

The Allen Iverson years had begun.

A brief profile can't do justice to tell the story of one of the greatest pure athletes ever to attend Georgetown, a man without peer in his talent over two years at the collegiate level. Just a year before his Kenner debut, few would have imagined Allen Iverson ever playing college basketball.

Iverson was not only a 31 point a game guard for Bethel HS, but a football player of tremendous skill. As a quarterback and defensive back his sophomore season, he produced nearly 1,600 yards offense and 13 INT's. By his junior year, he accounted for 2,204 yards, 21 touchdowns by rush or interception, and 14 touchdown passes. In a region which has produced NFL quarterbacks such as Michael Vick and Aaron Brooks, there are those who will still say "Bubbachuck" Iverson was better than both of them. Schools such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Duke, and three dozen other top programs across two sports were vying for perhaps the greatest two-sport star the Tidewater had ever produced.

When he led Bethel to the state title, someone asked what it was like to win the title. "I'm going to get one in basketball now," which he did. In late February, 1993, en route to the state title he had promised, Iverson was one of a large group of Bethel teammates at a Hampton bowling alley when a fight broke out between students from rival schools trading racial insults. Three people were hurt in the aftermath. Despite conflicting testimony from eyewitnesses and no clear evidence linking him to the crime, Iverson was one of four black students arrested.

Racial tensions were heightened when the prosecutors passed on a misdemeanor assault charge and charged Iverson with three counts of felony "maiming by mob", which carried a 20 year prison sentence. Despite video evidence which did not place Iverson in the crowd at the time of the fight, he was convicted in a racially charged case.

The 20 year sentence was later reduced to five, and Iverson was granted clemency by Gov. Douglas Wilder three months later, sending Iverson to a detention program at an alternative high school. (The original charges were thrown out by the Virginia court of appeals in 1995.)

In the spring of 1994, with Iverson still in detention, his mother approached John Thompson with a plea to help her son get to college and start a new chapter of his life. Though Thompson had passed on a number of troubled players in the past, he offered Iverson a scholarship in April of that season, contingent upon his completion of high school and his legal release, which was granted 48 hours before his Kenner debut.

By his debut in a Georgetown uniform in November 1994, Iverson had been the subject of intense national media attention. In the Hoyas' annual exhibition with Fort Hood, Iverson scored 36 points, five assists, and three steals in 23 minutes. Local columnists were in awe.

"Hang his number up in the rafters," wrote Tom Knott of the Washington Times. "He's better than most of the point guards in the NBA right now."

"I saw Lew Alcindor, Austin Carr, Moses Malone, Alonzo Mourning, Albert King, Ralph Sampson and Patrick Ewing play in high school," said the Post's Thomas Boswell. "Now, I have two memories on my first impression top shelf. The man who became Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and Allen Iverson."

Iverson opened the 1994-95 season in Memphis, TN in a 97-79 loss to defending NCAA champion Arkansas, scoring 19 points. Six days later, he scored 31 in a nationally televised game with DePaul, followed by 30 four days later against Providence, leading the team in scoring 22 times that season. His only game under double figures for the season (and his career) was a game where he played only ten minutes in a loss at Villanova, a game Georgetown coach John Thompson threatened to forfeit when a group of Villanova students paraded through the Spectrum in black and white-striped prison garb, with a sign comparing Iverson to O.J. Simpson.

"You accept certain ribbing, but there is a line," Thompson said after the game. "I can condone any Christian university sitting and watching that happen...If that happens [again], I going to walk. It that simple." Such fan behavior was not seen thereafter.

Later in the season, with President Bill Clinton in attendance, Iverson scored 26 as the Hoyas routed Villanova, 77-52. He followed it up with 21 to beat Syracuse, 28 versus St. John's, 31 in a Big East tournament opener with Miami (a game that saw Iverson outscore the entire Hurricane team at the end of the first half), and 27 versus Connecticut in the semis. In the NCAA regional, he scored 24 in the loss, but held Jeff McInnis to 1 for 8 shooting. By season's end, Allen Iverson had been named Big East Player of the Week nine times, Rookie of the Year, a second team all-conference selection, and honorable mention All-America recipient. Having led the Hoyas in points and steals en route to the school's first NCAA regional appearance since 1989, Iverson was already a star. By 1996, he would become nothing less than a sensation.

The leaser of a talented team that featured four future NBA stars, Allen Iverson dominated the 1995-96 season as no Hoya has done before or since. Adept at the crossover dribble that became his NBA trademark, lightning quick to the basket, and able to score on opponents at will, Iverson was largely unstoppable. Even more impressive was an effort to improve his shooting touch, for despite averaging 20.4 points as a freshman in 1994-95 (2nd all time for a Georgetown rookie), Iverson only shot 39 percent from the field, 23 percent from three, and 19 percent from three in Big East play. For his sophomore season, his field shooting increased to 48 percent, his three point mark to 36 percent. The results were striking.

In the pre-season NIT versus Temple, Iverson shot 50 percent for 24 points and a career high 10 rebounds. After a 23 point effort against Georgia Tech, he scored a career high 40 against Arizona, one of two 40+ point games that season. In Big East play, Iverson could ring up points with ease, such as the game where he scored 21 points in only 20 minutes against Rutgers.

In the final three months of the season, Iverson led the team in 21 of the team's 25 games: 40 against Seton Hall, 39 against St. John's, 34 against Providence. He scored 30 in a wild win over Memphis, and followed it up two nights later with 26 in an upset of #3 Connecticut. For the game, Iverson totalled 26 points, 8 steals, and 6 assists, including a soaring dunk past Ray Allen and the Huskies. It was the highest ranked team any Georgetown team had defeated since 1988. His best performance of the season might have been a 37 point, 8 rebound, and three steal effort against #6 ranked Villanova, playing only 27 minutes. The 106-68 win represents the sixth largest margin of victory and the largest margin ever by a Georgetown team against a top 10 opponent.

Iverson was capable of an off game; unfortunately, two came at particularly inopportune times for the Hoyas' hopes for a national title. Entering the 1996 Big East Final with a #1 seed on the line, Iverson shot 4 for 15 and the Hoyas lost by one, 76-75. As a result of the loss, Georgetown was seeded #2 behind top ranked UMass, and in the regional final between the two teams Iverson struggled with a 6 for 21 effort in the loss. For the season, though, his statistics were astonishing: his 926 points broke the then-record by 124 points. He set new single season marks in field goals, field goal attempts, three pointers, three point attempts, steals, minutes, and scoring average (25.0), the latter of which ranked 7th in the nation that season. The Big East's defensive player of the year, he was named a consensus All-American amidst numerous other awards.

If he could somehow have stayed four years, Iverson undoubtedly would have shredded the Georgetown record books. But whatever hopes existed for Iverson to resist the lure of the NBA were short lived, particularly with the news that one of his sisters had fallen ill. Seeing the opportunity to take care of his family's medical needs, Iverson announced for the NBA draft soon after the end of his sophomore season, becoming the first Georgetown player in the Thompson era to do so. The compact that had bound so many great Hoya players to a four year commitment--from Ewing to Williams, Mourning to Mutombo--had now been broken.

The first pick in the 1996 NBA draft, Iverson signed a $3.9 million contract with the Philadelphia 76ers and a ten year, $50 million deal with Reebok. His effort on the court is well known and respected, but for all the media portrayals of Iverson as the anti-hero, an icon of a "Hip Hop Nation" that ran counter to the NBA's carefully constructed marketing image, or as a symbol of all that is allegedly wrong in professional basketball, he remains remarkably well-grounded.

Married for six years and the father of two, Iverson is fiercely loyal to his teammates and to his childhood friends. He considered it an honor to play for the U.S. Olympic team in 2004 when other NBA stars passed on the offer, and maintains a number of charity events to benefit his local community. In comparison to his NBA career, his years at Georgetown were largely free of the intense media and personal scrutiny, providing at least two years where he could grow as a person as well as a basketball player.

His arrival and exit at Georgetown is still a source of debate in some circles, but his performance on the court is not. Allen Iverson found a home, even briefly, at the Hilltop, and remains one of its brightest stars. "In my heart, I know I'm a basketball player," Iverson said following his 2006 NBA trade, "being that I know I can play with the best of them."

From that first Kenner League game on 1994, no one has doubted it since.