今天早上跟老婆吵架了,當時我真的很生氣,很氣很氣很氣,而且氣到笑出來(是真的笑出來),睡前反省完,說給老婆聽,順便分享給你們聽看看。
大家有沒有玩過七巧板?從小到大,我很習慣的把自己的學業、工作、人生當成一副七巧板,所有的行程和工作,都安排的嚴絲合縫,意思是都排得剛剛好,只要誤差一點點就會放不進去。
這陣子我在臉書發文頻率很低,因為疫情,因為醫師的工作,還有因為搬家。
新家在苓雅區,舊家在鳳山區,女兒們讀書在三民區,灰灰讀書在苓雅區。先說,老婆真的很辛苦,但她真的對時間和空間的規劃都很差。
舉例來說,如果一模一樣的行李,要塞進後車廂,我如果一台休旅車可以裝得完,給太太來裝大概要一台七噸貨車吧。
一樣的出國物品,我只要一個24吋行李箱就可以裝完,太太來整理出國行李的話,會放了兩咖27吋還跟我說行李箱滿了裝不下。
我習慣極度的追求效率,但缺點就是我安排的行程計劃表容錯率很低,而且我的個性某方面來說很糟糕,不管是工作、讀書、或交友,常常都和骨骼肌收縮一樣的全有全無率(All-or-none law)。
什麼意思?要發懶就啥都不做,要工作就追求效率,要交朋友就真心相交,不值得相交的我連虛以尾蛇都懶,所以我朋友不多,但都很好,基本上沒有什麼點頭之交。
舉個經典的例子。國中期末考週前,放學回到家真的很累,我設了鬧鐘打算小睡一小時,再起來熬夜唸書,我媽覺得我睡太少,把我的鬧鐘關掉,讓我睡了兩小時才把我叫起來。但我本來規劃好8~10點要寫數學,10~12點要寫物理,12點後精神比較差,開始複習我最喜歡的國文到睡前。但因為被我媽關掉了鬧鐘,延後了一個小時起床,打亂了整個讀書計畫。我就整個人都不好了,陷在一個強迫症的迴圈裡出不來,後來乾脆不起床,直接睡到天亮,擺爛。
所以吵架的原因是,早上我們兩人行程如下:
✅新家出發送女兒上學(7:30)
✅調頭送灰灰上學(8:00)
✅去舊家搬兩張愛兒館的桌子(9:00)
✅去舊家拿衣服要送洗
✅買灰灰的奶粉和尿布
✅中午十二點家電行要送冰箱到新家
其實灰灰的幼稚園在新家旁邊,但七點送他去學校實在太早了,所以我們都是先送姐姐上學,再調頭送灰灰。
✅我原本的計劃行程:
1.送完灰灰,開車回舊家,要打包愛兒館的書桌椅,開團的開箱文我到現在還沒寫。
2.順便拿了舊家要送洗的衣服,旁邊洗衣店送洗。
3.開車回新家,在新家旁邊的宜兒樂買奶粉尿布。
4.回新家等電器行中午十二點送冰箱來,時間綽綽有餘,搞不好還可以小睡一下回籠覺,或是寫篇衛教文的稿。
✅胎胎弄出來的行程:
1.送完灰灰開車回舊家。
2.路過舊家旁邊的宜兒樂,心血來潮先進去買奶粉尿布,還多逛了「一下下」。
3.舊家打包書桌椅,打包到一半就快十二點了,要開車20min趕回新家,等冰箱送到。
4.冰箱送來了,再開車20min回舊家拿衣服送洗。
是小事嗎?其實真的是。她偷懶嗎?沒有,她超忙的。作為全職媽媽,她整天的時間都花在三個小孩、家務還有我身上了。但明明可以更有效率啊!如果她不是擅改我的行程跑去逛了很久的宜兒樂,放我在路邊空等,就不用一整天在新舊家中折返跑,時間就是這樣才都被吃掉了啊!
我和太太的個性說是互補實在是太客氣了,基本上我們的個性就是相反。我很懶她很勤勞,我做事很精準但她很隨興,我從來不諱言我很懶,懶人就是想要很有效率的完成所有的事情,然後就可以趕快躺著休息了。
麻醫的工作不知道是因還是果,但給麻藥能夠不精準嗎?醫療上的事情不小心就是一條人命,由不得我不精準啊!1毫克和1.1毫克就是有差啊。
胎胎說「性格決定命運」,她希望我除了工作,日常生活中要我學著放過自己,輕鬆隨意一點。
其實我已經被她影響很多,不然像今天這樣被她放在宜兒樂外面等,弄到早上行程大亂,我可能已經想去撞牆。
常常有粉絲私訊我們「你們感情好像很好?好像都不會吵架?」
我想告訴各位的事就是夫妻可以吵架,哪對夫妻敢說自己完全不吵架?但最遲當天睡前一定要溝通解決,千萬不要讓情緒過夜。有時候試著換位思考,試著去理解一下對方吧。
這篇其實不是寫給各位,專門是寫給胎胎看的,但想了想,覺得很有意義,所以我還是發了出來。
為了避免跟流氓中醫師的極道診間一樣沒有老婆,或是跟比爾蓋茲一樣被離婚,吾即便再白目,依舊維持吾日三省吾身。
「none相反」的推薦目錄:
none相反 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最讚貼文
[時事英文] 蘭德智庫 (RAND): 美國的未來之戰
同學來參考一下蘭德智庫對於未來十年軍事發展的Q&A!
需要最新的時事英文講義 (L10 The Future of the USA) 請按個讚和留言「Send me more breaking news, please!」。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
🇺🇸 Let’s start with the big picture. Who are the main U.S. adversaries in 2030?
None of our main competitors—Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and terrorist groups—are going away, and some of them will probably strengthen. China will become a more formidable threat as its economic and military influence increases. We're not going to have the same freedom of movement that we have with China now.
1. a more formidable threat 更為難纏的威脅
2. freedom of movement 行動自由
讓我們著眼大局。時至2030年,誰是美國的主要對手?
我們的主要競爭者——俄羅斯、中國、北韓、伊朗以及恐怖組織——都沒有消失,其中有些國家或組織可能會愈發強大。隨著經濟與軍事影響力的增長,中國將成為更加難纏的威脅。屆時面對中國的我們,將不再擁有今日的行動自由。
★★★★★★★★★★★
🇺🇸 How do you see the global economic picture changing?
The United States and its allies are going to lose some of their share of global economic output. China is growing, and growing at the expense of our allies, particularly the Europeans. If you think about economics as the underlying bedrock that allows you to produce military capabilities, that trend is the opposite of what you want to see.
3. global economic output 全球經濟產出
4. at the expense of 以……為代價
5. the underlying bedrock 潛在的基石
6. military capabilities 軍事能力
如何看待全球經濟情勢的轉變?
美國與盟邦將喪失其於全球經濟產出的部分份額。中國正以犧牲我們盟邦——尤其是歐洲——的方式成長。若你將經濟視為提升軍事能力的基礎,那麼此一趨勢與你所見者恰好相反。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
🇺🇸 How will environmental change play into this?
First, it will have an effect on where we can base. Some of our installations around the world are in places that will be threatened by climate change—they're in low-lying areas or flood plains, for example. But second, it also will have a destabilizing effect. Some of the places that will be hardest hit by droughts or rising sea levels tend to have weaker governments. That could increase domestic instability, and more domestic instability can lead to terrorism and civil war, the kind of sub-state conflict that we've been dealing with for the last decade or so.
7. base (v.) 以某處作為主要地點;將某地設為總部
8. installation (尤指用於軍事目的的)設施
9. low-lying areas 低窪地區
10. flood plains 洪泛平原;泛濫平原;澇原
11. a destabilizing effect 一個不穩定的因素
12. be hard hit by… 受到……的重創
13. increase domestic instability 增加國內動盪
14. lead to 導致
15. sub-state conflict 次國家衝突
環境變遷將如何產生影響?
首先,它將影響我們基地的選址。我們遍布全球的某些設施處於受氣候變遷威脅的地方——位於低窪地區或澇原。但第二,氣候變遷也會造成不穩定的因素。在一些受嚴重乾旱或海平面上升衝擊的地方,其政府通常較為軟弱。這可能會加劇國內動盪,而更多的國內動盪會導致恐怖主義與內戰,此類次國家衝突是我們近十年來一直在處理的問題。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
🇺🇸 What role will domestic politics in the United States play?
We've seen a steady trend over the last several decades toward increasing polarization among the U.S. electorate. That creates some significant constraints. Just to get the defense bill passed requires a bipartisan consensus, and that will face increasing pressure in the years to come. We're also seeing a second major trend, which is a growing push to retrench, to pull the U.S. back from a global posture.
16. a steady trend 一個穩定的趨勢
17. increasing polarization 日益加劇的兩極化
18. the U.S. electorate 美國選民
19. a bipartisan consensus 兩黨的共識
20. retrenchment strategy 緊縮策略
美國的國內政治將扮演什麼角色?
在過去的幾十年裡,我們看到一個穩定的趨勢——美國選民的兩極化日益加劇。這形成了一些重要的約束。為使國防法案通過,便需兩黨的共識,而在未來的幾年中,其所面臨的壓力將愈發龐大。我們還看見了第二個重要趨勢,即緊縮的聲音持續增長,要求美國自全球態勢中抽身。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
🇺🇸 What should the United States be doing to prepare for 2030?
We probably need more longer-range platforms, for example, but there's really no silver bullet. The bigger finding is that the United States is going to increasingly face a grand-strategic choice. It can double down on its role for the last three decades as the world's leading superpower, in which case it needs to spend more on defense and defense capabilities than it has.
21. longer-range platforms 更長程載臺
22. face a grand-strategic choice 面對巨大的戰略選擇
23. double down on sth 加倍努力;決心完成
24. the world's leading superpower 世界領先的超級大國
25. defense capabilities 防衛能力
美國應為2030年做怎樣的準備?
舉例來說,我們可能需要更多更長程的載臺,惟確無萬靈丹。更大的發現是,美國所面臨的巨大戰略選擇將愈發增加。美國可以加倍努力,扮演好自己在過去三十年裡,領導世界的超級大國角色。如此,美國便需要在國防與防衛能力上投入更多的資金。
《RAND》完整內容:https://bit.ly/33Nb7mX
★★★★★★★★★★★★
L1-9 時事英文講義:https://bit.ly/2XmRYXc
時事英文大全:http://bit.ly/2WtAqop
如何使用「時事英文」:https://bit.ly/3a9rr38
★★★★★★★★★★★★
🌎 對新聞英文和批判性思考有興趣的同學也可以參考我的課程:
https://bit.ly/3eTHIvH
none相反 在 趙氏讀書生活 Facebook 的最佳解答
【#重要資訊請廣傳🇮🇹】日前中國官媒、微信、香港藍媒鋪天蓋地宣傳,「武漢肺炎源自意大利」,唯一的source,就是引述意大利醫生Giuseppe Remuzzi接受美國電台訪問的一句話,再斷章取義,昨天我們已經解釋過。
一位手足為了求真,專門發電郵向Dr Remuzzi本人詢問,從這位意大利專家的以下回覆,可明確知道他的原意:不但肯定武漢肺炎源自武漢,而且懷疑早在10月尾,武漢可能已出現武漢肺炎感染,但中國政府沒有公佈,期間可能大量中國人從武漢來到意大利,令意大利出現了一些疑似案例,由於一切來自中國的資訊都不透明,才令疫情失去控制的黃金時機。整個訊息,和中國官媒宣傳的完全相反,fake news之意,莫此為甚。
Dear XXX,
The only thing I said was that some general practitioners candidly told me of having observed a few cases of severe pneumonia already in late November and December, which is not unexpected, since the majority of contagions are coming from asymptomatic people who likely travelled from China before the Chinese authorities communicated that this outbreak had occurred. Attached is my answer to the journalists who have contacted me.
//Quoting the answer:
I repeat, none of these cases have been documented as Covid-19 because there was no evidence yet of the existence of Covid-19.
In any case, we can be certain that the virus emerged in Wuhan first, where it had probably been circulating for some time before it was made public in China, and the genetics confirm this beyond a shadow of a doubt. It arrived in Italy through a German person who had been in contact with a Chinese person, as you can see in the NEJM paper (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001468). The strongest evidence of the fact that the current Covid-19 derives from bats and pangolins is reported in an article in Nature Medicine (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9) recently published, which shows almost identical sequences. Commercial activities using bats and pangolins are very well documented in Wuhan market, which was almost certainly the source of the outbreak. The question now is for how long the virus was circulating in China before health authorities understood the dimension of the problem. Considering the incubation period, I would not be surprised if asymptomatic individuals had been moving around China and travelling abroad in December and maybe even earlier.
In my opinion, there is no doubt that the virus arrived in Italy from China based on genetic studies just reported in Nature Medicine. However, one has to consider the possibility that, rather understandably, the emergence of this unfortunate event in China probably occurred long before health authorities realised it,considering the number of asymptomatic carriers, which isnow extremely well documented in the paper published in Science (DOI:10.1126/science.abb3221).//
By the way, I think you should probably investigate an event that was organised in Wuhan at the end of October (see attached). We know from the paper published in Science that 80% of contagions occur through people who are asymptomatic; you can imagine how many people arrived in Italy from Wuhan in that precise period of time.
Please see also a statement by Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University and the Lancet paper attached.
Best regards,
Giuseppe Remuzzi//
none相反 在 Join - Facebook 的推薦與評價
None of us enjoy waking up to a puffy, swollen face. ... 虽然许多人相信睡前喝大量的水会导致脸部水肿,但事实其实截然相反。 ... <看更多>
none相反 在 [問題] getElementsByName.style.display[已解決] - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
javascript新手發問:
我原本是想用document.getElementById("A").style.display="block";
可以顯示或隱藏每一個同樣的Id
後來發現這樣只會抓第一個此Id的東西 於是請教google大神
說可以用document.getElementByName
可是不管我在哪個標籤加入name="A" 始終不能控制none或block
假設原本的code是以下:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<div id="A" >
<a href="123.html">
<img src="123.jpg" alt="123" />123
</a>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div id="B" >
<a href="456.html">
<img src="456.jpg" alt="456" />456
</a>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
我想用兩張照片
一張照片顯示全部的div A 隱藏全部的div B
另一張 顯示全部的div B 隱藏全部的div A
(div A 和 div B 會有很多個)
於是我寫了
<a href="javascript:showA();"><img src="AAA.jpg" /></a>
<a href="javascript:showB();"><img src="BBB.jpg" /></a>
function showA(){
document.getElementByName("A").style.display="block";
document.getElementByName("B").style.display="none";
}
showB()則是相反
請問前輩們
在上面那個table中
我要如何加入name="A" 以便控制div的顯示或隱藏呢?
謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.220.140
※ 編輯: ABOQQ 來自: 111.249.220.140 (12/26 22:34)
... <看更多>