關於 offense棒球 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

看新聞學英文：大谷翔平(Shohei Ohtani)
在美國職棒大聯盟官網上，被稱為：前所未聞的球員（Unheard of)，創下81場球賽，打出30支全壘打，10次盜壘成功的記錄！！

相關單字
MLB: Major League Baseball 美國職棒大聯盟
league (n.) 聯盟
home run (n.) = homer 全壘打
electric (a.) 令人震驚的; 通電的
scorching (a.) 灼熱的
ordinary (n.) 平凡; 尋常
blip (n.) 物體光點
pitcher (n.) 投手
spectacular (a.) 引人注目的；驚人的
manager (n.) 經理
steward (n.) 財產管理人
career (n.) 職業生涯
abbreviated (a.) 縮短的；小型的
interpreter (n.) 口譯人員
score (v.) 得分
consecutive (a.) 連續不斷的
comeback (n.) 復出
stolen base (n.) 盜壘
inning (n.) 局
at-bat (n.) 上壘打擊數
velocity (n.) 迅速; 速度
phenom (n.) 傑出人才
lead (n.) 領先地位
historic (a.) 歷史上有重大地位的
milestone (n.) 里程碑
accomplish (v.) 達成
feat (n.) 功績
shatter (v.) 粉碎

圖3：two-way player，他被稱為是Two-way Player，這個的定義是又會攻(offense)又會守(defense)，在棒球上就是指又會打擊（bat)又會投球(pitch)，超強！

新聞來源：
https://www.mlb.com/news/shohei-ohtani-s-home-runs-make-history-vs-orioles

#尹小俐新聞台
#台大明明讓你又會讀書又會玩
#twowayplayer
#看新聞學英文

我是展元，中職投手先發6局失自責分3分以內
(單場ERA:4.50)，會給予【優質先發QS】紀錄
那8局失自責分4分以內(單場也是ERA:4.50)呢？

我之前問過聯盟紀錄組，答案是也會給QS紀錄！
我早在轉播時說過，這不是我發明的，我求證過！
----------------------------------------------------
昨晚富邦洋投索沙8局失4分，聯盟官網賽後簡報
寫中止優質先發，我去問紀錄組，回答是寫錯了！
今天已經更正，索沙連續優質先發7場持續中~~
----------------------------------------------------
中職紀錄組對於【優質先發】的標準沒有變過！
以前就是8局自責4分以內也有QS，現在也一樣！
----------------------------------------------------
中職連續場次"優質先發"聯盟紀錄：
潘威倫(獅)連12場優質先發2005/9/2~2006/4/18
羅里奇(獅)連12場優質先發2018/3/28~2018/6/8

#中華職棒 #優質先發 #討論棒球是人生一大樂事

紀錄組傳訊息給我，說美國大聯盟也是同樣標準：
Quality Starts
Pros:
The reasons to use quality starts are easier to quantify and easier for me to talk about, since I prefer the category myself. First and foremost, quality starts are entirely dependent on the starting pitcher (and his defense) and have no connection to his team's offense. The pitcher has significant control on whether he gets a quality start or not and it is a good evaluator of a pitcher's performance. More on this later. Like wins and strikeouts, they are a counting stat to balance out the two rate stats of ERA and WHIP. And while the minimum quality start of 6 innings with 3 earned runs is a poor 4.50 ERA, most quality starts actually have a much better ERA than that.

Cons:
That minimum requirement for a quality start is pretty bad. Furthermore, it is rigid and doesn't adjust with innings pitched. A better stat would require something like 5 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 6 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 7 innings with 3 ER or fewer, 8 innings with 3 ER or fewer, and 9 innings with 4 ER or fewer. Currently, a pitcher would not get a quality start for pitching 5 perfect innings and getting pulled, or even pitching nine innings with 4 ER, even though that is better than the 4.5 ERA you get in the basic QS.

Thus, managers with a quick hook become an issue. Tampa Bay last season is a great example, as their club philosophy was to pull starters before seeing the other lineup a third or fourth time, usually in the fifth inning. This was painful as a Nate Karns owner in a deep league with QS. He would pitch well for five innings and then be pulled. Another issue is that relievers can ruin a quality start. I can't count how many times my starter left in the seventh after allowing three or fewer runs and then a reliever comes on and allows inherited runners to score, blowing the quality start.

我是展元，中職投手先發6局失自責分3分以內
(單場ERA:4.50)，會給予【優質先發QS】紀錄
那8局失自責分4分以內(單場也是ERA:4.50)呢？

我之前問過聯盟紀錄組，答案是也會給QS紀錄！
我早在轉播時說過，這不是我發明的，我求證過！
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
昨晚富邦洋投索沙8局失4分，聯盟官網賽後簡報
寫中止優質先發，我去問紀錄組，回答是寫錯了！
今天已經更正，索沙連續優質先發7場持續中~~
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
中職紀錄組對於【優質先發】的標準沒有變過！
以前就是8局自責4分以內也有QS，現在也一樣！
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
中職連續場次"優質先發"聯盟紀錄：
潘威倫(獅)連12場優質先發2005/9/2~2006/4/18
羅里奇(獅)連12場優質先發2018/3/28~2018/6/8

#中華職棒 #優質先發 #討論棒球是人生一大樂事

紀錄組傳訊息給我，說美國大聯盟也是同樣標準：
Quality Starts
Pros:
The reasons to use quality starts are easier to quantify and easier for me to talk about, since I prefer the category myself. First and foremost, quality starts are entirely dependent on the starting pitcher (and his defense) and have no connection to his team's offense. The pitcher has significant control on whether he gets a quality start or not and it is a good evaluator of a pitcher's performance. More on this later. Like wins and strikeouts, they are a counting stat to balance out the two rate stats of ERA and WHIP. And while the minimum quality start of 6 innings with 3 earned runs is a poor 4.50 ERA, most quality starts actually have a much better ERA than that.

Cons:
That minimum requirement for a quality start is pretty bad. Furthermore, it is rigid and doesn't adjust with innings pitched. A better stat would require something like 5 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 6 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 7 innings with 3 ER or fewer, 8 innings with 3 ER or fewer, and 9 innings with 4 ER or fewer. Currently, a pitcher would not get a quality start for pitching 5 perfect innings and getting pulled, or even pitching nine innings with 4 ER, even though that is better than the 4.5 ERA you get in the basic QS.

Thus, managers with a quick hook become an issue. Tampa Bay last season is a great example, as their club philosophy was to pull starters before seeing the other lineup a third or fourth time, usually in the fifth inning. This was painful as a Nate Karns owner in a deep league with QS. He would pitch well for five innings and then be pulled. Another issue is that relievers can ruin a quality start. I can't count how many times my starter left in the seventh after allowing three or fewer runs and then a reliever comes on and allows inherited runners to score, blowing the quality start.