[知行合一](六之四)
國安法第一審繼續就「光復香港。時代革命」八個字的意義,繼續進行討論。控方由嶺大學者劉智鵬以歷史學者身份,早前指出「光時」有分裂國家意思;而辯方的港大學者李詠怡 (Eliza)則已作供進入第三天。今天下午,和Eliza一起撰寫專家證人報告的另一位學者,中大新傳學院教授李立峯(Francis)開始作供。
由於辯方兩位專家的姓氏同為「李」,「雙李」容易引起混淆。甫坐下,高個子的李立峯教授說,他想用Eliza稱呼李詠怡教授,獲法庭接納。
李立峯解釋,Eliza專長政治學,故對政治選舉及相關理論熟悉。而Francis自己則是傳播學教授,辯方劉偉聰大狀在庭上先介紹Francis, 指出他畢業於史丹福大學,博士論文研究美國9.11事件中,比較報紙讀者來信和網上論壇的言論,專研範圍為「政治傳播學」。
Francis曾出版學術著作,有講述雨傘運動與傳播關係,將出版另一本書,談及六四紀念活動的集體港人記憶現象,「我對香港近年的大型社會運動,有現代歷史脈絡的理解」。Francis亦曾於2017年成為香港法庭歷史上第一位以「民意研究專家」,為佔中九子案擔任專家證人。以往,香港法庭專家證人多為醫生及物理學家等。
三位法官表示接納Francis的專家證人身份。今天在大狀袍下穿了條子花紋西裝褲的劉偉聰大狀,溫文向法官們道謝:「I am grateful」.
Francis花了頗長時間,解釋社會科學中,量化研究(大型民調)和質化研究(焦點小組)的方法論及兩者作為理解社會現像的用途。
由於過往香港法庭甚少傳召社會科學家作專家證人,三位法官發問了很多問題。唯一男性法官陳嘉信說:「我是laymen(普通人)有這些問題」;女法官杜麗冰亦在休庭前向主問劉偉聰說笑:「對不起我們打斷了你的發問。」
休庭前,三位法官先後向Francis多次問及社科研究法的疑問。Francis越答越興起,語速快了。控方周天行說:「教授請說慢一點。」Francis說笑:「我教書時,學生經常說我說得太快。」此時法庭響起了輕鬆的笑聲。
Francis說,他們進行了的量化研究,就是於2019年從連登討論區上,以電腦程式,抽取討論區上曾提及口號相關的帖子,抽取的口號分別為「光復香港」、「時代革命」、「香港獨立」、「港獨」、「五大訴求」。由於連登上的留言量可以數以百萬計,需要由懂寫電腦程式的學者作技術上協助,他再進行統計學分析。法官們沒有太多發問。
Francis說:「看數字,以數量計,量化研究(quantitative research)就可以處理,但要看人們怎樣建構意義,那要進行質化研究,因為做簡單問卷,是不可以看到意義建構的過程。此時要靠質化研究(qualitative research),我們做了焦點小組(focus group)。」
七個焦點小組,每個有五至八人參加,三組是包含了不同年齡性別職業的市民,四組是參與者背景相近的小組,一組是社工,一組是老師,一組是年輕人。總共有40人參加焦點小組,都是在反修例運動期間,有參與示威或同情反修例運動的人。「因為我們要看示威者在想甚麼。」
三位法官發問頗頻密,其中,陳嘉信問,焦點小組只有四十人那麼少,如何有代表性?Francis解釋,質化研究是找「意義成形的過程」,代表性則由量化研究補充:「所以我們用不同研究方法互補不足。」
法官對社會現象的理解,和社科學者明顯有差別。
陳官問道:「參加焦點小組的人,會不會心裡想一樣,答你說另一樣?好像美國選舉你問選民選誰,可能他因為尷尬告訴你一個答案,但去到票站就投另一個。」陳法官形容,這是一個「危險」(danger).
作為社會科學學者,Francis這樣回應:「我不看成一種『危險』,因為人是複雜的動物,人的腦子裡不只有『單一的真相』,面對不同人,在不同處境,會影響人如何建構意義。從社會學及人類學角度,人們會在不同處境『管理自己的形像』,我會形容為因應處境而作出的『調整』,而不是在直白地說謊」。
Francis繼續解釋,「而建構意義是一個過程,同一個人在不同時候,他的想法也有改變。像我們現在在討論『甚麼是焦點小組』,我們(他和法官們)也在集體參與意義建構的過程。」
此時,Francis引述了焦點小組裡,其中一個焦點小組參與者,對「光時」口號的理解,隨時間而出現改變。
Francis在庭上說,其中一個支持反修例運動的焦點小組參與者說:
「最初我面對『光復香港。時代革命』這口號,我說不出口。為何呢?因為我最初認為這口號與『港獨』有關,好像要推翻政府,這不是我的目的,我不支持港獨的。但隨着反修例運動發展下,我理解這個運動是關於爭取普選,關於愛好自由,公義。漸漸我可以喊出口了。這個口號好像承載了一種精神。當我去到集會現場,我喊『光時』口號時,我會覺得和其他香港人連繫起來。」
Francis解釋:「這是一個好例子,這個人最初覺得,『嘩,光時口號好激進』,但漸漸他覺得意義改變了。即使他不支持港獨,他也會嗌這口號。」
「這例子正正示範了,口號的意義建構過程,可以如此複雜,豐富,充滿餘韻(nuances).」Francis說。
Francis還引述了華盛頓大學政治學教授Lance Bennett對政治口號的見解 “Effective political themes and slogans invite people to bring their own meaning to a situation. Thus, an image is an impression anchored partly in symbolic suggestion and partly in the feelings and assumptions that people have in response to that suggestion.”
(有效的政治口號邀請人們把他們自己的意義加諸其上。所以,一個影象像個錨,作為一個符號提示人們把自己的感受及假設投射到其中。)
Francis亦說,焦點小組中發現,只有部份人認為「光時口號」與港獨有關,所以口號是開放式的。「總的來說,光時口號就是關於一些失去的東西,而人們覺得需要改變。至於失去了甚麼又如何改變,則因人而異。」
法官們亦用法律用語詢問,焦點小組裡會否有「引導性問題」(leading question),即因為主持者主動提起「港獨」而引導被訪者去提及這個答案。這顯然是法庭常關注點。
但Francis說,焦點小組做法是開放讓大家討論,「而進行焦點小組時間正好在2019年9月,那時基本上整個社會都在討論這句口號的意思,是否和港獨有關。所以在焦點小組裡不需要提示,就會自然進行討論。」
法庭場境裡,引導性問題,會是法官關注的事。
這天早上,李詠怡(Eliza)教授,繼續接受控方盤問。Eliza早前曾說過,為甚麼「光時」口號在7月21日於社會流行起來,其中一個原因是因為人們對「元朗襲擊」感到憤怒,需要一個口號去表達其情緒。
然而代表律政司的署理刑事檢控專員周天行, 則挑戰Eliza,周專員多次指,7月21日口號最初出現於白天,當時中聯辦被示威者包圍,國徽被損毁,當時中聯辦外牆上更出現「光時」口號,周專員指,「光時」口號的意義,應該與中聯辦事件有關。
控方的周專員說:「中聯辦外示威中,清楚反映拒絕中華人民共國和政府的意思,你為何不認為這些示威活動的意義,有助我們脈絡性地理解口號的意思?」周專員亦呈上了多張中聯辦被損毁的照片叫Eliza細看。
Eliza指,她和研究伙伴,曾在7.21後,嘗試從數據了解為何當天之後,光時口號的使用明顯更普遍。於是她從兩張報紙裡,點算傳媒提及過的地區,發現「元朗」字眼出現的頻率,要比「西環」、「中聯辦」及「上環」高出很多。
「媒體注意力反映公眾注意力,而焦點小組發現,7.21大家一致是關注警察暴力,而不是關注中聯辦。故此我們認為令到7.21口號普及化,元朗事件比中聯辦事件重要得多。」Eliza說。
Eliza早前指,梁天琦在造勢晚會曾引述過美國黑人民權領袖Malcolm X說「the Ballot or the Bullet」意思,Eliza認為「子彈」只是比喻,並非像控方專家劉教授所說有「武器」的意思。控方更指控梁天琦有意推翻政權。Eliza當時更說,以她所知, Malcolm X不是「分裂國家主張者」(secessionist)。
周專員今日呈上Malcolm X的1964年的演講,讀出部份內容,又追問Eliza知否Malcolm X被指為 “separatist”和知否Malcolm X曾經加入激進伊斯蘭組織。
Eliza語氣有點難以置信地反問:「我們是否要進入複雜的美國種族歷史?美國黑人民族主義(black nationalist)和非洲裔美國人那時的分離主義(separatism), 尤其是於種族隔離(apartheid)的過去有多複雜?要研讀多少歷史脈絡?」
周堅持追問:「那Malcolm X是不是分離主義者?」
Eliza沒好氣答: 「若是說建立一個有主權的國家這個理解下,我認為不是。」
周專員仍在要求Eliza看Malcolm X說話節錄。此時,彭官要求暫停提問,三位法官退後座椅商議一會,然後彭寶琴說,Malcolm X是否分離主義者,與本案案情「拉扯得太遠」(far far removed), 彭官提醒周專員,Eliza一直不反對梁天琦在選舉演說中對港獨持正面看法。
周專員另一處的追問,把梁天琦與Eliza拉得更近,問答更有火花。周專員引述去年夏天來自《眾新聞》的報導,報導中訪問了三位學者,表達學者們對泛民立法會議員在政府表示因疫情把選舉延期一年後,是否應該總辭。
報導中,Eliza認為議員應該留任,訪問中提到議會是重要「抗爭陣地」「在威權政治下,策略上考慮比民主原則更重要……」周專員反問,梁天琦進入議會,會否也像她所說的一樣,「具策略意義,目的是去推翻政權」?
Eliza罕見地光火起來:「你在引述我?你是否在說我和梁天琦是一伙?說我和他是同黨?(You suggest I am part of his cohort?)……好了,現在我被審訊,我要回答吧? (I am the person on trial, I have to answer this……)」辯方劉大狀立即站起來抗議,指Eliza是來做證人的。
此時彭寶琴語氣溫和地望着Eliza說:「不是的,妳是來作供,提供專家意見給法庭。請不要覺得來被審判,這不是原來的意思。」彭官打圓場道:「我想周先生要想問妳,會不會梁天琦進入立法會,覺得策略上可以作出改變,而不是留在結構以外。」
Eliza鬆了一口氣,望着彭官說了幾聲:「感謝妳的澄清,感謝。」然後Eliza詳細解釋,她在泛民總辭上的看法,已經算是「溫和派」,因為當時社會上較激進的想法,是主張泛民議員一起總辭以表示對選舉延期的不滿。而Eliza說,我主張泛民留任,是希望有議員監察政府,希望加強政府問責性。
現在仍身陷囹圄的梁天琦,始終成為庭上反覆被斟酌的客體。
Eliza今日完成作供前,有機會詳細解釋,她作為政治學者,如何理解梁天琦為何要使用「光時」口號。Eliza解釋,2016年梁天琦參加的是新界東補選,和以往立法會選舉不同,選舉制度是「單議席單票制」,並非「比例代表制」。
「比例代表制」之下,勝選者需要的票數不需很多,只拿取選票一成也可以拿到席位。然而補選的規則,則是誰多選票誰便勝出,故要爭取選票數量。
Eliza說,回看2016新東補選中,參選者多達6人,當中梁天琦的對手,有知名度高的政黨領袖,梁天琦當時相比之下,是一個無人認識的小伙子,只有大學宿生會經驗,或參加過一些小型社會運動,但知名度不高。「他需要設計一個非常搶耳的口號,以拿得最多的票數。」
Eliza指,一個知名度不夠的參選者,設計口號會有「不成比例地戲劇化」的情況(dramatizing out of proportion),故此梁天琦即使說「選票就是子彈」是一種誇張的說法而已。
Eliza進一步指出:「很多提倡港獨的政治組織,大部份沒有具體的行動計劃,只是口說『香港獨立』」。法官彭寶琴補充:「妳所說的沒有具體行動計劃,是在公眾知道的情況下沒有而已。」
Eliza再補充:「究竟(這些組織主張的)是和平遊說,還是使用暴力或武裝力量?沒有看到這些(資訊)。」
今次被告唐英傑的電單車上,插着旗幟的版本,除了有「光時」這個八字中文口號,亦有七字英文“Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times”,中英文版本均在法庭反覆被檢驗。辯方學者卻說,原來口號的出現,並非有明確的設計時刻,或單一設計者。
彭官曾詢問,英語口號如何出現, “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times”那裡來?彭官留意到梁天琦2016年造勢晚的佈景板已出現這七個英文字。
但Eliza指出,她曾經從梁天琦遞交給選管會的個人簡介中,找到「光時」的英文版,卻是被譯成「Ignite Revolution to Reclaim Our Age.」對於造勢晚會和選管會的文宣為何有差異,Eliza說她不知道。
而Eliza亦曾找遍不同資料,去嘗試看看梁天琦當初創作「光時」口號的原意,但發現他除了在晚會說過,口號不想專注「世代」差別,除此之外,她沒找到更多解釋。不過Eliza說,原來梁天琦最初創作了另一個八字口號,但她認為,梁天琦最初的口號不搶耳,不令人留下深刻印像。
「選舉口號要搶耳,要令人容易記起這個參選人,而原來梁天琦最初設計的口號很悶蛋,孩子氣得像大學活動口號一樣。」
原來,於社會掀起沸沸揚揚的談論,在2019年反修例運動中被廣泛流傳過,今天被法庭研究是否違反國安法的八個字口號,並不是梁天琦最初的構思。
此時,Eliza翻查文件找到了紀錄,並以廣東話在高等法院朗讀出,梁天琦最初曾經構思,但最後放棄了的意念。這個被埋葬了的口號,原來一樣是八個大字:「知行合一,世代革新」。
如果歷史有如果,假若「光時」沒有出現過,今日香港的光景又會如何?
***
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之一):[Regime & Redeem]
7月2日控方專家劉智鵬作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4210137115741348/
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之二):[Just Do it]
7月9日辯方專家李詠怡作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4229321820489544/
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之三):[過去與未來]
7月12日辯方專家李詠怡作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4237523026336090/
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之四):[知行合一]
7月13日辯方專家李詠怡及李立峯作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4240215429400183/
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之五):[沒有誰比誰高貴]
7月14日辯方專家李立峯作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4243328702422189/
國安法首審專家證人系列(六之六):[選櫻桃的人]
7月15日辯方專家李立峯作供
https://www.facebook.com/wwviviantam/photos/a.1435553239866430/4245860505502342/
(圖為辯方第二位專家證人,中大新傳學院教授李立峯離開高院,明天他會繼續作供)
同時也有6部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過38萬的網紅CH Music Channel,也在其Youtube影片中提到,《DAWN》 DAWN / 總有一刻的拂曉 作詞 / Lyricist:aimerrythm 作曲 / Composer:秋田博之、玉井健二 編曲 / Arranger:玉井健二、釣俊輔 歌 / Singer:Aimer 翻譯:夏德爾 English Translation:Thaerin 背景 ...
「out of the question中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於out of the question中文 在 譚蕙芸 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於out of the question中文 在 英語島雜誌 English Island Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於out of the question中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於out of the question中文 在 CH Music Channel Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於out of the question中文 在 Lukas Engström Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於out of the question中文 在 鍾翔宇 Xiangyu Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於out of the question中文 在 【Out of question 定Out of the... - Wall Street English | Facebook 的評價
out of the question中文 在 英語島雜誌 English Island Facebook 的最佳解答
【老外】說out of the question是什麼意思?
a. 沒得談
b. 沒問題
有沒有 "the" 意思差很多...
out of the question中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳貼文
今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
out of the question中文 在 CH Music Channel Youtube 的最佳解答
《DAWN》
DAWN / 總有一刻的拂曉
作詞 / Lyricist:aimerrythm
作曲 / Composer:秋田博之、玉井健二
編曲 / Arranger:玉井健二、釣俊輔
歌 / Singer:Aimer
翻譯:夏德爾
English Translation:Thaerin
背景 / Background - 静蒼 - とちちま :
https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/80551182
版權聲明:
本頻道不握有任何音樂所有權,亦無任何營利,一切僅為推廣用途。音樂所有權歸原始創作者所有。請支持正版。
Copyright Info:
Be aware this channel is for promotion purposes only without any illegal profit. All music's ownership belongs to the original creators.
Please support the original creator.
すべての権利は正当な所有者/作成者に帰属します。あなたがこの音楽(または画像)の作成者で、この動画に使用されたくない場合はメッセージまたはこのYoutubeチャンネルの概要のメールアドレスにご連絡ください。私はすぐに削除します。
如果你喜歡我的影片,不妨按下喜歡和訂閱,你的支持就是我創作的最大原動力!
If you like my videos, please click like and subscribe! Thx :)
粉絲團隨時獲得最新訊息!
Check my Facebook page for more information!
https://www.facebook.com/chschannel/
中文翻譯 / Chinese Translation :
https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=2976963
英文翻譯 / English Translation :
https://www.lyrical-nonsense.com/lyrics/aimer/dawn/
日文歌詞 / Japanese Lyrics :
果てしなく広がる この空に 奇跡なんてなくてもかまわない
流した涙なら 隠さない もう何があっても
例えば そう 空を横切る白い鳥のように翼があって
自由に今 空を飛べたなら 逃げるように ただ彷徨っていた
地上(ここ)でしか見えないものがあって 地上(ここ)でふたり出会えた
行く宛のない旅路としても もう二度と迷わない 願いは 一つだと誓う
果てしなく広がる この空に 奇跡なんてなくてもかまわない
流した涙なら 隠さない もう何があっても
振り返れば 寄せては返す 白い波が ほら
選んできた足跡だけ消してくれるから 正しさとか もう答えはなくて
漕ぎだした船は帆をはって 凍える風 吹かれた
遠ざかってく渚の隅で 思い出と悲しみが手を振り さよならを謳う
果てしなく広がるこの海に 行き場なんてなくてもかまわない
嵐の夜ですら 怖くない もう何も怯えることもない
勇敢な想いがつまずいた夜も そばにいるよ
何があっても そばにいるよ
消えてゆく月と 星のない夜空
何より暗いのは そう 夜明け前
朝日まで もう少し
明けてゆく 静かなあの空に 奇跡なんてなくてもかまわない
つないだこの手なら離さない もう何も怯えることもない
眠れない想いを抱きしめた夜に 朝は来るよ
手を伸ばせば 朝は来るよ
中文歌詞 / Chinese Lyrics :
在寬廣的無邊無盡的,這片天空底下,就算不存在有奇跡也無所謂
因為我已經決定,不會再隱藏落下的眼淚,無論發生什麼事情
要比喻的話,對了,我的心就像是飛越天空的白鳥一樣有著一對羽翼
若是能自由地在空中飛翔的話,肯定會像是在逃竄一樣,僅是四處徬徨吧
這裡有著只有從地上才能看見的景色,而我們就在相遇在這樣的地方
就算是連目的地也沒有的旅途,也絕對不會再次迷惘。在此發誓,那是我唯一的願望
在寬闊的無窮無盡的這片天空裡,沒有奇跡的存在也無所謂
因為,我已經下定決心不會再隱藏流下的眼淚,無論再發生什麼事情
悄然回首,你看,那來回拍打岸邊的白色潮水
都會帶走我們選擇留下的那些足跡,所以正確與否什麼的,根本,就沒有任何答案可言
開始划動的船張開了船帆,在冷冽的風中前進
在岸潮漸漸遠去的那個角落裡,回憶與悲傷正揮著手,與我們高聲道別
在這無限寬闊的大海中,不在乎是否還有我們的棲身之所
就算是暴風雨的夜晚也無從畏懼,已經什麼都不足以使我們膽怯
就算是這份勇敢的心念遭遇挫折的夜晚,我也會在你的身邊
無論發生什麼事情,我都在你的身邊
月亮漸漸抹去了身影,留下星星們接二連三離去的夜空
最昏暗、最昏暗的,是的,就是拂曉之前
那距離晨曦,還差那麼一點點的時刻——
在寧靜之中慢慢明亮的那片天空,不需要什麼奇跡
不會再放開牽起的手,已經什麼都不能讓我們膽怯
懷抱著難以入眠的心念,在這樣的夜晚裡早晨還是回來訪的
只要伸出手……拂曉,就在這裡
英文歌詞 / English Lyrics :
In this limitlessly expanding sky, I don’t mind if there are no miracles to be found.
I won’t hide the tears that have already flowed, no matter what happens.
If I were to have wings, like those white birds that cross the sky,
And could fly freely… I’d have been merely wandering, as if running away from it all.
There’s something that can only be seen here on the ground; this is where we met.
Even if the path of our journey has no destination, I’ll never lose my way again: I swear we share the same wish!
In this limitlessly expanding sky, I don’t mind if there are no miracles to be found.
I won’t hide the tears that have already flowed, no matter what happens.
When you turn to look, you’ll notice that the white waves coming in and out,
Are only erasing the footprints we managed to choose on our own; there’s no longer any answer to the question of what’s “right”.
The boat we’ve started rowing raises its sail and a chilling wind blows in.
In the corner of the shore we leave behind, our memories and sorrows wave, singing a song of parting.
Upon this limitlessly expanding sea, I don’t mind if we have nowhere to go.
I don’t even fear a stormy night; there’s not a thing for us to be afraid of.
Even on nights our brave thoughts stumble, I’ll be by your side –
No matter what happens, I’ll be by your side.
The moon is vanishing in a starless night sky,
But the darkest time of all is just before dawn…
It’s just a little longer ’til the sun rises…
Within the silent sky that opens up, I don’t mind if there are no miracles to be found.
I won’t let go of our joined hands; there’s really nothing else for me to say.
To the nights we clung to sleepless emotions, morning will come –
If we just reach out our hands, morning will come!
out of the question中文 在 Lukas Engström Youtube 的最讚貼文
謝謝大家訂閱我的頻道!
我超開心得到一萬訂閱!這個不僅我第一個Q&A,也是我第一個全部說中文的影片!你覺得我的中文夠好嗎?
我目前在瑞典。會拍一些瑞典的影片然後回來台灣繼續拍我的Q&A第二部。你們還有其他的問題想問我嗎?
THANK YOU ALL FOR SUBSCRIBING TO MY CHANNEL!
I am still super thrilled that we reached 10K subscribers here! As promised, I said that I would do a Chinese only Q&A and this is it!
At the time of release, I am currently in Sweden. I'll shoot some Swedish video and then head back to Taiwan for Part 2 of this Q&A. If you have any questions for me (Sweden/Taiwan related or anything else), there is still time to leave those questions in the comment section below!
Business inquiries:
中文/English
創作者經紀人/Contact person: - Maggie
Line ID: @rog8149u
Email: lukas@ruredi.co
Want to see photos from our adventures before everyone else and/or suggest what I should check out next?!
Please follow me on:
Facebook: www.facebook.com/LukasTaiwan
Instagram: www.instagram.com/LukasEngstrom
The following is the gear I’m using when making my videos. I’m part of Amazon Services LLC Associates Program which means that I will get a small commission if you purchase anything via my links. Any commission I’ll be getting will go straight back into buying new gear for my future videos, so any sort of support is highly appreciated!
MAIN GEAR:
Camera: Canon EOS R: https://amzn.to/2CAybbh
Lens: Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM: https://amzn.to/34RDy1V
Insta360 One X: https://amzn.to/2KfwBjd
Tripod: JOBY GorillaPod 5K Kit: https://amzn.to/36VxMhy
Microphone: RØDE VideoMic Pro+: https://amzn.to/2Tg9mbx
Drone: DJI Mavic 2 Zoom: https://amzn.to/2Sak4CX
Mavic 2 Fly More Kit: https://amzn.to/2TlpLLT
Gimbal: DJI Ronin-S Handheld 3-Axis Gimbal:https://amzn.to/2NG4L20
2x SanDisk Extreme Pro Memory Card (128GB): https://amzn.to/2Oi0CQX
Bag: Lowepro ProTactic BP 450 AW II:https://amzn.to/2NDbCsN
BACK-UP GEAR:
Camera: Canon M50: https://amzn.to/2Tf998r
Lens: Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM: https://amzn.to/2O0a62Y
Lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM https://amzn.to/2O5DJA0
Lens: Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM: https://amzn.to/2X88oR7
Canon EOS M Mount Adapter: https://amzn.to/2O1jH9I
Canon EF-EOS R Mount Adapter: https://amzn.to/2NDak0V
JOBY Gorillapod 3K: https://amzn.to/2S3GQfR
OTHER GEAR:
ADATA SD600Q SSD (240GB): https://amzn.to/2Wp28Tf
ADATA D8000L LED Power Bank: https://amzn.to/34MrlLY
Transcend ESD240C Portable SSD (480GB): https://amzn.to/2X5L7xW
Transcend ESD350C Portable SSD (480GB): https://amzn.to/32LBzeg
Transcend StoreJet 25MC HDD (1TB): https://amzn.to/2KekmUd
Transcend 128GB microSD: https://amzn.to/2tCkOmw
MacBook Pro 15” - TouchBar: https://amzn.to/2p7rSsy
Asus VP28UQG 28" 4K/UHD monitor: https://amzn.to/2CE5eeI
Special thanks to STC for helping me out with filters:
STC website:https://stcoptics.com/en/
STC Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/STCOptics/
CPL:https://stcoptics.com/en/shvcpl/
VND:https://stcoptics.com/en/vnd/
ICELAVA:https://stcoptics.com/en/icelava/
E-shop:https://shop.stcoptics.com/
out of the question中文 在 鍾翔宇 Xiangyu Youtube 的精選貼文
我們平常接觸的有關朝鮮的訊息是怎麼來的呢?可以看看這紀錄片: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eclCfjP7hLM
關於朝鮮戰爭內幕: https://bit.ly/2I9WzU3
臉書專頁: https://www.facebook.com/ComradeXiangyu
專訪: https://blow.streetvoice.com/41873
編曲: Ransom-Notes https://soundcloud.com/ransom-notes
作詞、混音:鍾翔宇
母帶後期製作工程: Glenn Schick
Follow Xiangyu on Twitter https://instagram.com/notXiangyu
Follow Ransom-Notes on Twitter https://twitter.com/ransom1992
有些人會說:「如果朝鮮不是獨裁國家的話,為什麼不給外國旅客自由行呢?為什麼大部分電腦都沒連上境外的互聯網呢?」我希望那些人從不同的角度來思考這些問題。二戰期間的同盟國會開放自己的國家給德國、意大利和日本觀光客自由行嗎?別忘了,朝鮮戰爭只有停火,沒有停戰。
假如互聯網是在 1930 年代的德國發明的,而非 20 世紀下半葉的美國,而德國情報機構能暗中監督和控制一切連上該網路的任何設備(正如斯諾登透露美國國安局所做的那樣),同盟國會讓一般老百姓連上同個互聯網嗎?還是他們會跟朝鮮一樣建設自己的網路?
朝鮮是個小國家。雖然它從 1953 年一直呼籲正式停戰,但它從 1950 年到現在一直與大部分西方國家處於戰爭狀態。只要戰爭狀態不變,這些政策不是「反自由」的,而是任何理性的政府(無論是資本主義國家還是社會主義國家)會施行的防禦性措施。
誰是朋友?誰是敵人?
Who are our friends? Who are our enemies?
我們能否 追究這個問題而不自欺欺人
Can we look into this question without lying to ourselves?
誰的盟友?誰的利潤?
Whose allies? Whose profits?
是誰激於義憤而爭鬥和犧牲
Whose struggle and sacrifice are stirred by righteous indignation?
1.
饒舌的激進份子 被說是憤世
The radical rapper is said to be cynical.
我只想引人深思 和去偽存實
I just want to get people to think, cast aside falsities, and retain the truths,
因為從小到大有太多虛偽人士
because througout our lives, too many hypocrites
灌輸錯誤認識 使人愚昧無知
have instilled false understandings, causing us to ignorantly
地無視 顯而易見 的壓迫和暴行
disregard the clearly visible oppression and atrocities,
使人固執己見 而失去批判思考力
causing us to stubbornly cling to our own opinions and lose our ability to think critically.
一旦遇到陌生的意見 認知就失調
When we encounter unfamiliar opinions, we experience cognitive dissonance.
變本加厲地延伸原本的錯誤視角
Doubling down on our mistaken views
成為了心理防禦機制 也使我們無意識地
has become a psychological defense mechanism which causes us to unknowingly
成為壓迫自己的體制的棋子
become pawns of the system that oppresses us
即使我們自以為自己是正義的義士
although we think of ourselves as just and morally courageous people,
但其實是我們迷失於斷章取義的歷史
it is actually us who are lost in deliberately misinterpreted history.
而敵視 並歧視 被壓迫的各國人民
We vilify and discriminate against the oppressed peoples of all countries;
自以為仁義 卻把壓迫者 奉若神明
we think we are righteous, yet we deify the oppressors.
不分明侵略和防禦只要求無條件的和平
We don't differentiate between aggression and defense, we simply ask for unprincipled peace,
得到奴隸主的肯定不過不被他們尊敬
gaining the approval of slave masters but not their respect.
2.
監禁率最高的國家被當作自由象徵
The country with the highest incarceration rate is considered to be a symbol of freedom;
最常推翻民選政府的它被當作摯友良朋
we call it our friend as it leads in overthrowing democratically elected governments.
我們只有盲人摸象般稱頌或貶斥
We make praises and criticisms based on conclusions made from bad information,
偏執地不檢視騙子掩飾的現實
stubbornly refusing to investigate the truths hidden by liars.
別人飢餓 我們說是領導人無人性
When others starve, we say their leaders are devoid of humanity
卻不記得制裁的目的 是經過餓死人民
while failing to remember that the goal of sanctions is to sabotage stability
破壞穩定 以迫使 革命群眾 放棄革命
through starvation in order to extort the revolutionary masses into giving up revolution.
如果這不是恐怖主義 那麼你的定義可能有問題
If this isn't terrorism, then your definition might be flawed.
我問你 唯一動用核武器的到底是誰?
I ask you, who is the only one to have used nuclear weapons?
為何朝鮮發展核武就被認為是罪?
Why is it considered a crime when (DPR) Korea develops nukes?
誰的奴性思維被支配得顛倒是非
Whose slave mentality's been been dominated to the point where right and wrong are inverted,
使我們把自衛視為威脅 把威脅視為慈悲?
having us believe defense is threatening and threats are benevolent?
是誰不知不覺地在重複戈培爾所起草
Who unknowingly repeats lies written by Goebbels
的流言蜚語的同時說別人被洗腦
while at the same time calling others brainwashed,
並對用著堅如鐵的毅力英勇地起義
while unreasonably being hostile towards those who use their iron-firm willpower
驅逐侵略者的人民無理地壞有敵意?
to heroically drive out aggressors through rebellion?
#朝鮮 #DPRK #Korea
out of the question中文 在 【Out of question 定Out of the... - Wall Street English | Facebook 的推薦與評價
「Out of question」同「Out of the question」係常見而容易混淆用法既片語,雖然只係差了一個冠詞“the” ,但兩者本身有著完全唔一樣嘅意思,所以用嘅時候必先要謹慎 ... ... <看更多>