🌻另一個Zoom會議(第二次貼......有補上一些內容)
繼上次的年報導讀會議後, 讓我們再做另一個會議! 這次很榮幸邀請到一位對估值很有見解的股友前輩來帶大家了解估值(恩, 這次我會是主持人, 不是主講人).
主題: 估值(valuation)分享會(Cat: 這不算基礎的估值會議)
主講人: 小揚(from安泰價值投資)
https://www.facebook.com/antaiinvestment (此為小揚的粉絲頁)
參與者: 具基本估值能力. 若打算參加者, 請事先跟我(請私訊)提出一個關於估值的case study, 到時候可在會議中分享(最好是以投影片形式呈現, 這樣到時候好跟大家分享). 若有估值的問題, 也可以提出.
Case study可以是美股, 也可以是台股.
時間: 台灣時間07/10 (周六)晚間9點.
預計一個小時(不會像上次那樣冗長了😅): 前30分鐘由小揚做分享, 後30分鐘大家分享估值案例&提問
進行方式: 以Zoom進行(之後會私訊會議資訊給參與者)
🌻Morgan Stanley Mid-year Investor Outlook: A tricky transition
https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/midyear-2021-global-markets-outlook
🌻在您投資生涯中, 有沒有一些觀念讓您受用很多?
下面這位投資名人的好觀念影響我很深. 他的意思是, 一般投資人, 只要能説出三個買一家公司的理由, 就很夠了. 這也迫使我, 每次在買股票時, 問自己對這家公司的了解有多少. 也會去衡量公司的優點與缺點在哪裡.
"It is vital (重要的) that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks."
全文在此:
Jim Cramer: In Times Like This, Go for the Easy Money
Look at the stocks you own. Can you tell me why you've got them? If you can't answer the following three questions, then have a look at several I like right now.
We've endured the meme stock craziness, with all of its love for heavily shorted stocks. We have watched the collapse of bitcoin to levels viewed as shocking, even if they are still more than double where they were not that long ago. We've dealt with Fed officials making it clear that they are no longer on the side of the bulls or the bears. They are on the side of job growth, but are wary of inflation. We've seen the end of the rush to get vaccines, which means that millions of people are going to get the new COVID variant, because there is no natural immunity to it. We've watched as the hopes for an infrastructure bill have collapsed. We've endured shortages of everything from chips to plastic to imported goods and labor.
And we're still standing, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yep, we are in one of those halcyon moments, where the masks are off -- even if they shouldn't be -- and Americans are back doing what they do best: consume, spend, go out to eat and then consume and spend some more.
There are times in the stock market where the collective mindset is revealed. This is one of those times: Things are cool, it's not a big moment, there's no real news for a bit, it's the historically strong period and we can reach some conclusions about where we are.
When things are like this, it is important to remember that buyers like to revert to tried-and-true companies that thrive no matter what. These are companies that have an edge and are better at what they do than other companies.
You know that I am a great believer in index funds, that the average person doesn't have the time or the inclination to research individual stocks. It's a difficult barrier. I think you need to make time to read the quarterly report and listen to the conference call, to Google articles and, if possible, get some research about the companies you own. It is vital that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks. I am reminded by this, because, once again, without a mask, I can be recognized and if I am not holding "Nvidia the Second," I can carry on a conversation.
I have had many in the last two weeks and when I have asked this litany of questions, I find myself at a loss as to why almost no one knew what they owned. But they thirsted for individual stocks, because they, like me, think things are better post pandemic. No, that's not a facetious comment. Many, many stocks did better with a stay-at-home economy. A huge number.
So what do I do? I revert to what others do when you are stumped about how to stay in touch with stocks, but want to do less homework. That means buying stocks that are accessible, not stocks like Unity (U) or Snowflake (SNOW) or Twilio (TWLO) or Okta (OKTA) .
I revert to normal businesses people know and I suggest they Google some articles, peruse the conference call, but, above all, like the company's products so you can buy more if it goes down.
Here's some that I have been telling people I like:
First is Ford (F) . I think the Ford lineup is amazing. The electric F-150 series will be incredible. I am eager to get a Maverick for my family, because it is a smaller pickup that will get the job done for the myriad little things I need to do with this farm I bought from that crazy bitcoin foray. I like the competitive edge of the CEO, who says he is going to bury Elon Musk when the Lightning comes out. I even think the Bronco is cool as all get out. Most important, though? I think the chip shortage is ending. My semiconductor friends are telling me the foundries are producing more feature-rich chips and that means Ford can pump out the trucks small business people love and need. Plus, the used car prices at last have plateaued, according to their most important pricing index. Halcyon times.
Second, Costco (COST) : The samples are coming back. Tell me you don't love the samples. You need things in bulk. You want low prices. You want to get all of the things that people don't think of with Costco, like insurance, hearing-aids -- hey, they are a fortune -- jewelry, things around the house. You go and you will buy far more than you first came for. My kind of store.
The kids love this American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) , which we just bought for my charitable trust, which you can follow along by joining the Action Alerts PLUS club. Jay Schottenstein, the CEO, came on "Mad Money" recently and it's clear that his Aerie model has real staying power: 26 consecutive quarters of double digit growth. No flash in the pan, that one. Number one brand in jeans for the 15 to 25 year old group. The best in the mall. How did I know this? I see the credit card bills.
I got up this morning to do my physical therapy. I have been doing it ever since I hurt my back in February. I have this really cool pair of sneakers that fit me perfectly and I love them, but I am fortunate enough to have a vacation house and I am always taking those shoes with me.
So I went on Amazon (AMZN) this morning and lo and behold I saw them for half price. I bought two pairs. Then I went over everything I have bought in the last year and got a bunch of those things. Then I bought a pair of binoculars, because mine were stolen. I paid half price.
Yep, Amazon's universal. I was talking to Alexa, while I was ordering, getting some new music on, asking questions. I saw that despite all of the Sturm und Drang of Amazon being late with things, all the delivery dates were within range. I didn't click on any ads, and I didn't need the speed of Web Services, but the whole thing reminded me about how special the darned company is. I don't care if it's ahead or behind plan for the moment. I would just buy some more when it goes down.
Finally, Apple (AAPL) . I think people who don't own Apple should look what they are holding at this very moment. Yes, right now. Or look at what's in your lap or on the table besides your fork. And then think about the bill you paid last night without knowing it. Think about what you bought in the App store yesterday. Think about what would happen if it would break or get stolen or, left in the Uber (UBER) , or heaven forbid, be dropped into the pool or in the, yes, toilet.
There, that's what you buy in halcyon times. Stocks of companies you know that if they go lower, because things get less halcyon, you are fine with it and buy more. If things go up, believe me, you will participate.
So accept the moment. Don't try for the hard money. Go for the easy kind. That's the best kind.
https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer--15692051
Picture: 牡丹(peony)花開. 恨不得院子裡有一塊地是牡丹園.
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過0的網紅CarDebuts,也在其Youtube影片中提到,The BMW Group continues to expand its electro-mobility activities. In conjunction with its partner, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd., the BMW...
「perfectly competitive market」的推薦目錄:
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 貓的成長美股異想世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 TrendForce Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 無神論者的巴別塔 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 CarDebuts Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 9.3 Perfect Competition in the Long Run 的評價
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 Perfect competition | Microeconomics | Khan Academy 的評價
- 關於perfectly competitive market 在 What is the difference between a free market and ... 的評價
perfectly competitive market 在 TrendForce Facebook 的最佳貼文
"Followed by DRAM, it is said that China government is also investigating suppliers' NAND price fixing issue. Although the rumor is yet to be confirmed, we believe it’s none of the issue since NAND industry is more of a perfectly competitive market than an oligopoly like DRAM, not to mention NAND price per se is expected to drop in 1H18."from #DRAMeXchange, a division of #TrendForce.
perfectly competitive market 在 無神論者的巴別塔 Facebook 的最讚貼文
【財委會演義全攻略(中):碧雲邪神的果斷,其實就是出賣同路人】
去到財委會會議一開波,飯民不分激進溫吞,一律好「團結」咁就教育撥款議案進行「拉布」,證明將36億議案拖到最後一刻先表決,從來都係飯民之間嘅共識。點解我咁肯定係拉布,而唔係因應實際情況而進行嘅質詢呢?
1. 整場質詢時間長達七小時,甚至陳健波要不停劃線,由每人發言5分鐘減到1分鐘再設最後一輪發言,就單一議題黎講根本毋須進行咁長時間進行質詢,明顯就係拉布;而當好多溫吞派議員都有持續發問直到最後,證明所有飯民對於拉布直至最後一刻上,是存在默契的;
2. 我想除了議員助理、政府官員和傳媒以外,很少人會好像我真的花時間幾乎把整場36億審議過程由頭看到尾。事實上正如陳健波所言,飯民議員的提問嚴重重覆,其中有關為何教育局不將資助學位津貼擴充至八大3000名學生的提問次數接近50次、有關為何不將3萬元學生津貼擴充至副學士達16次、就連楊岳橋查詢海外特殊教育專家何時來港為特殊教育主任提供培訓,也可以一條問題拆開四條發問,這就是一個議案用七個小時還未完結審議的由來。
3. 就算不看數字,幾位飯民議員提問水準之差亦令人不忍卒睹。以尹兆堅為例,當他提及大專自資學位津貼時,竟胡扯這是一個「不完全的學券制」、「錢不是跟人走」、「佛利民知道都會激到翻生」,老實說,這段發言幾乎每一句子都錯,連一個修讀經濟科的中四學生也不如;更難堪的是,接著梁繼昌竟然也和應,說尹兆堅的「芝加哥學派知識很有見地」、又說甚麼「Oligopoly」、甚麼「Perfectly Competitive Market」、甚至要求局長以市場角度解答這條問題,內容同樣都是不知所謂。那假若不是尹梁二人不是議政水平低劣,就只能以為了拉布所以不能準備好題目而求其亂問作解釋。
所以,包括黃碧雲在內,拉布到最後一刻,然後通過教育撥款議案,不單係全飯民的共識、亦係彼此合作之下的「成果」。
問題就出響去到表決最後一小時,黃碧雲在受到陳健波鼓動之下,竟然因為害怕沒有時間通過教育撥款,提出表決時間由5分鐘縮減至1分鐘。很多泛民教協左膠支持者說多謝黃碧雲決斷才得以確保教育撥款通過,但實際上是所有拖延時間的修正案都是由飯民議員自己提出,究竟教育撥款議案何時表決的主導權,從來都在飯民手上。
假若黃碧雲有點議政常識(水準高低就不要提了),而又擔心議案趕不及通過的話,那她首先應該找張超雄等進步民主派議員商討,要求他們兌現之前的承諾,確保教育撥款能順利通過而撤回修訂案,讓表決能及時通過。而事實上兩位進步泛民議員張超雄、陳志全本身已是身經百戰;就算連他們的議員助理的議政水平亦比黃碧雲高,如何避免建制派反客為主他們早已心裡有數,也用不著你擔心。
可是黃碧雲卻不是這樣想。相比起向隊友查詢、她卻反而選擇相信陳健波佛口蛇心的「溫馨提示」,誤以為當時的局勢已被建制派掌握、泛民主派已墮入黃碧雲自己妄想的「陷阱」,亦因此妄想自己作為飯民最後的拯救者,唯有「義不容辭」的提出縮減表決鐘聲動議,把一切責任揹上身,卻不知道自己已犯下極其愚蠢的錯誤。
任建峰等人力指黃碧雲無錯,但其實以「無心之失」根本已不足以形容她的「七宗罪」:
第一宗罪:對議事規則完全無知,不知道操控表決時間的主導權在誰手上
第二宗罪:妄顧先前溫和民主派與激進派之間的協定,無視團隊合作擅自行動
第三宗罪:寧願找建制派合作,而不如其他飯民隊友商討,吃裡扒外
第四宗罪:被陳健波欺騙,開以飯民身份提出縮短表決時間這個極壞先例
第五宗罪:犯錯後還要拒絕接受一切批評,死不承認錯誤
第六宗罪:還要誤導泛民支持者、把自己包裝成「為通過撥款不惜犧牲」的英雄,反要進步民主派成為「幾乎壞事」的代罪羔羊
第七宗罪:最慘烈的是,黃碧雲在這次財委會會議所犯下的愚蠢錯誤不但還未完結,還只是個開始……
下回預告:黃碧雲在議會很容易陷入一種亢奮狀態,撳錯制如是、其他人進行議會抗爭時自己亂飛帽如是、但這是她身為主角,亢奮狀態卻為財委會帶來一片混亂……
而最多人關心的是,黃碧雲的「罪孽」如此深重,究竟飯民對其會否有所懲罰?
此外我們亦不應只將焦點放在黃碧雲身上,因為為了包庇她而死撐的民主黨、被愚弄欺騙而四處為黃碧雲辯護的白痴們如馮家強、任建峰、沈偉男等,全部都要負上責任
#財委會演義 <
最後,還是那一句,寫這個系列文章吃力不討好,只為歷史留個紀錄,請多加支持
perfectly competitive market 在 CarDebuts Youtube 的最讚貼文
The BMW Group continues to expand its electro-mobility activities. In conjunction with its partner, Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd., the BMW Group opened a new “High-Voltage Battery Centre” in Shenyang, China today. The battery factory will supply the nearby Dadong plant, which is operated by the BMW Brilliance Automotive (BBA) joint venture and will produce the BMW 5 Series Plug-in Hybrid for the local market.
Oliver Zipse, member of the Board of Management of BMW AG, responsible for Production: “The innovative High-Voltage Battery Centre in Shenyang is an important step in the BMW Group’s electro-mobility strategy. It is the first battery factory of any premium automotive manufacturer in China and already the third in our production network, after Germany and the US.”
The BMW Group is integrating its battery factories into the existing international production network. Oliver Zipse: “By 2025, we expect our electrified BMW and MINI models to account for between 15 and 25 per cent of global sales. This adds up to several hundred thousand vehicles per year. It therefore makes sense for us to integrate electro-mobility into the existing production system.” Doing so will enable the BMW Group to respond flexibly to demand for electrified models.
Competitive edge through in-house know-how
Alongside the electric motor, the high-voltage battery is a central element of partially and fully-electrified vehicles. In-house production gives the BMW Group a decisive competitive advantage by securing know-how in new technologies, gaining key systems expertise and leveraging cost benefits. The company already produces electrified vehicles at ten locations worldwide. The high-voltage batteries needed for these models come from the BMW Group plants in Dingolfing, Spartanburg and now also Shenyang. The Dingolfing plant will play a leading role within the network as the centre of competence for electric drive systems.
From cell to high-voltage battery
Production of high-voltage batteries is divided into two production stages. First, in a highly-automated process, supplied lithium-ion cells, which are about the size of a paperback book, are checked and then combined into a larger unit, the so-called battery module.
The battery modules are then mounted together with the connections, control units and cooling units in an aluminium housing. The size and shape of the aluminium housing, as well as the number of battery modules used, depends on the vehicle variant. In this way, a perfectly adapted "battery pack" or high-voltage battery is created.
This combination of standardised battery modules and housings flexibly adapted to the vehicle has several advantages: It ensures uniform properties and quality standards in the production of high-voltage batteries. The modular design of the high-voltage batteries also forms the basis for a wide variety of electric drive variants. Last but not least, this modular concept is a requirement for responding quickly to customer demand and leveraging cost benefits.
perfectly competitive market 在 Perfect competition | Microeconomics | Khan Academy 的推薦與評價
... perfectly-competitive-markets Perfect competition, sometimes called pure competition, is a theoretical market structure in which there are ... ... <看更多>
perfectly competitive market 在 What is the difference between a free market and ... 的推薦與評價
Perfectly competitive market : Numerous participants, so that no single participant has any influence. A perfectly competitive economic model ... ... <看更多>
perfectly competitive market 在 9.3 Perfect Competition in the Long Run 的推薦與評價
Explain why in long-run equilibrium in a perfectly competitive industry firms will earn zero economic profit. Describe the three possible effects on the costs ... ... <看更多>