關於 stereotypes中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【EP35 SÁPMI：在極光與聖誕老人之外，跟著極地導遊認識真正的拉普蘭！ ft. 羅瓦涅米極地導遊 Ralph 】

芬蘭北部第一大城－羅瓦涅米有「官方認證的聖誕老人故鄉」之稱，每年吸引大批遊客從世界各地慕名而來，要和傳說中會在平安夜爬進煙囪、偷偷把禮物塞進聖誕襪的神秘人物見上一面；但你可曾想過，除了聖誕老人之外，還有哪些人居住在這片土地上嗎？

甫自大學畢業的Ralph，意外地來到拉普蘭工作，因而對於這片土地有了不一樣的認識，從近代戰爭帶來的影響、原住民「薩米人」權益進展、各種旅遊項目中的眉眉角角，到對於永續旅遊發展的反思，他都有獨到的見解。在這集紮實的節目裡，Ralph會用以下幾個角度來帶領我們認識拉普蘭——

1️⃣ (07:15) 從芬蘭近代史上的三場戰爭談起——
二次大戰期間芬蘭的冬季戰爭、繼續戰爭與拉普蘭戰爭，改變了羅瓦涅米的面貌，也意外促成聖誕老人村雛形－羅斯福小木屋的出現。想認識芬蘭與羅瓦涅米，不可不了解這三場戰爭！

2️⃣ (21:20) 羅瓦涅米極地導遊的工作秘辛——
擔任極地導遊期間，Ralph累積了不少有趣冷知識——聖誕老人其實不只一個？芬蘭浴怎麼玩才能盡興？極光指數與極光出現的機率不完全相關？張韶涵的《歐若拉》又透漏著什麼資訊？讓Ralph用親身帶團經驗告訴你！

3️⃣ (32:15) 以拉普蘭為家的原住民－薩米人血淚史——
被視為人權典範的北歐，其實也有歧視原住民的黑歷史！不論挪威、瑞典或芬蘭，過去皆有針對薩米人的種族主義政策。曾經被視為次等人種的他們，如何尋回自己的文化與自信，還成為《冰雪奇緣2》的重要元素？作為一位旅人，怎樣的旅行方式才是真正尊重他們？

4️⃣ (46:08) 極地導遊的反思：速食化的觀光模式，對這塊土地真的好嗎？——
疫情之前的羅瓦涅米，似乎已經逼近環境負載力的上限；來自世界各地的遊客，寧可排上2小時的隊，也要看到30秒的聖誕老人！這種旅行方式，對於脆弱的極圈生態系、或仰賴放牧馴鹿的薩米人來說，真的是好的嗎？

🎙️ 來賓簡介：
Ralph 洪瑞甫 ，臺灣大學生命科學系畢業，大學時期即在旅遊新創品牌「大街小嚮 TourMeAway」從事城市步行導覽活動。服完兵役後，因順手多投了一封履歷，展開意料之外的極地導遊體驗。出發時連工作所在城市的名稱都不會唸，到深深被拉普蘭的魅力吸引，樂於分享羅瓦涅米觀光宣傳品鮮少提及的在地故事。現任職於「 Like It Formosa 來去福爾摩沙 」，持續在從事英語導覽教學之新創團隊服務。

Ralph的medium: ralphhong5465.medium.com
Ralph的instagram: instagram.com/ralphhung5465

🔊 收聽資訊：
Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/5rgMJY6rxd08nmZWRwjutv
Apple Podcasts podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/id1518914711?i=1000506584078
Google Podcasts, SoundOn, Firstory, Baabao, KKBox
所有平台收聽連結請點此 ltsoj.com 或者直接搜尋「旅行熱炒店」
Show note ltsoj.com/podcast-ep035
IG: instagram.com/travel.wok

📓 名詞解釋：
35:58 提到的yoik，是一種薩米傳統吟唱方式，隨著薩米文化受到重視，也越來越廣為人知。其中一首知名歌曲《Eatnemen Vuelie》（大地之歌），後來被改編為迪士尼動畫《冰雪奇緣》的開場與結尾配樂。

📚 延伸閱讀：
- Ralph的Medium
https://reurl.cc/5o2l7R
- 北極科學博物館官方宣傳影片，含拉普蘭與羅瓦涅米簡介（Visit Rovaniemi，英文）
https://reurl.cc/9Z5EM8
- 旅居芬蘭的臺灣人系列專欄文章： 水鹿遇到馴鹿
https://reurl.cc/Xel6vM
- 解鎖地球 Unlock the Earth Ep.36 芬蘭跳舞極光怎麼看 | 零下 30 度極圈生活 | 官方認證聖誕老人
https://reurl.cc/GdbVz3
- Geography Now! Finland (Geography Now)
https://reurl.cc/AgRgYd
- In Santa’s home town, booming tourism and Christmas stereotypes anger Sami locals (FRANCE 24 English)
https://reurl.cc/1goxyG

#podcast #travel #播客 #音頻 #自助旅行 #中文podcast #台灣podcast #波羅的海 #北歐 #芬蘭 #羅瓦涅米 #拉普蘭 #聖誕老人 #極光 #芬蘭浴 #薩米 #薩米人 #原住民 #永續發展 #環境負載力 #北極 #極圈

(English) Stereotypes about Germans ｜ 對德國人的刻板印象，德國人愛吃豬腳喝啤酒嗎？德國人很冷淡？（中文字幕）

搬來德國之前，或是認識Fabian之前，我其實對於德國也有一定的刻板印象，以下就把我當初對於德國人的印象，一一地提出來詢問Fabian，以及分享我居住在德國後，對於這些刻板印象的回覆。

所以，你們覺得德國人很冷漠嗎？德國人很守時？還是你也以為德國人都會吃豬腳？還是你有其他的刻板印象，歡迎提出來！

🙇🏻‍♀️如果你們有其他想了解德國的主題，歡迎在底下留言！

👍🏼喜歡影片的人，再幫恬按讚、留言，還有追蹤恬的頻道喔。

👉🏼最近推出旅遊德文、初級會話家教課程，歡迎報名免費體驗課程！
更多資訊：https://youtu.be/_FdAwbXLcsw

***只要影片是我跟Fabian說英文，恬都會加上中文字幕，點cc選字幕即可 :)
________________________________________________

👩🏻‍💻INSTAGRAM: tiny.backpacker
更多生活動態以及更新。
https://www.instagram.com/tiny.backpacker/

請恬喝一杯咖啡，鼓勵我持續創作 ❤
https://bit.ly/2XII55Z

【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】

***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated，將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像：以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文（https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/）翻譯成英文，鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演，在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***

中文精簡版本：https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/

Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.

In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.

The possibility of realizing legislative majority

Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.

The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?

Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.

Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.

Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority

To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.

While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.

Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.

Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.

Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP

What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.

Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.

The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.

Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution

Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.

Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.

The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.

All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.

https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw

Dato' Maw is not your ordinary "Dato". He is one of the proudest Cina I know. Dato' Maw is fearless when it comes to pushing boundaries, breaking stereotypes and saying what needs to be said. His goal is to fill the void between two generations, the old and the new. Make great music that's close to us as Malaysians and prove the whole of Chinese Music Industry here in Malaysia wrong!

Super proud to see how he has found his sound and never backing down from what he truly believes in. I am inspired after listening to his come up and struggles. Hope this inspires you too.

Do subscribe and help us share this out, it will mean the world to us!

Music by : Saucie J

Nigel Sparks
http://instagram.com/nigelsparks

Dato' Maw
http://instagram.com/dato_maw

Negative
http://instagram.com/negativeclothing

Timecodes :
0:00 - Intro
0:44 - Are you a real dato?
2:30 - How we met
7:16 - Was the Chinese rap scene bigger then or now?
8:48 - Did you make a cap?
12:38 - Fired from working in Levi’s
13:06 - I was a tuition teacher
19:14 - You came with a luggage bag
24:28 - Mutual friends on Facebook
34:18 - I met Justin Bieber
38:03 - Hypeman is actually an occupation here in Asia
39:00 - Huat cap sold out
41:46 - Money and face
46:27 - Very hard meh to get a million views?
50:53 - I wanna be a YouTuber
51:22 - Rap of China
54:29 - What is Ban Huat?
1:02:07 - No need think of your future ah?
1:03:11- Eh you wanna be Namewee ah?
1:05:06 - Inside a box until the day they die
1:09:42 - Daughter wants to be on OnlyFans
1:11:05 - Who do you want to prove wrong?
1:12:40 - How many “Journey to the West” do we need?”
1:15:55 - “Wei jibai, I’m Chinese leh”
1:16:28 - You feel like prostitute
1:21:56 - Legacy
1:24:35 - Outro

#theproveemwrongpodcast #datomaw #马来魔

🤗Coucou 我是法國Anna

法國女生不刮毛？
法規女生有天天洗澡嗎？
法國女生都不會胖？

到底哪一些是刻板印象，哪一些是真的？

A plus tard ~ 😘

#法國Anna
#法國女生刻板印象


🆔INSTAGRAM http://instagram.com/anna.sacilotto 法國Anna
🆔FACEBOOK http://www.facebook.com/anna.WTO 法國Anna
———————————-
🔤字幕：中文 / French Subtitles
————————————


工作相關部分麻煩請直接跟我的經紀人聯絡！謝謝喔
For business inquiries, please send an email (listed below) or contact my management team on Line.

創作者經紀人 Maggie
Line ID: @rog8149u
email: anna@ruredi.co

IG: kaiximay
FB: https://www.facebook.com/kaiximay/
工作邀約: kaiximay@gmail.com

在這次的影片中我們要回答我之前在IG請你們回答對我或我們夫妻有什麼猜想，在不認識的情況下覺得我們是怎麼樣的人。很多台灣人對外國人或是異國戀都有一些想像。我們整理了全部的回答，在影片回應給你們。希望你們覺得有趣！

I asked you guys on Instagram what assumptions you have about me, a Canadian in Taiwan, or about us, as an international or AMWF couple living in Taiwan, and we respond to them in this video! Thanks for watching!

Music:

Far Away by Declan DP https://soundcloud.com/declandp
Licensing Agreement 2.0 (READ)
http://www.declandp.info/music-licensing
Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/iTSpmnHMVS4

Steps by Roa https://soundcloud.com/roa_music1031
Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported — CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: https://bit.ly/steps-roa
Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/-DLn9wFw3Ew

Alley by Roa https://soundcloud.com/roa_music1031
Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported — CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: https://bit.ly/roa-alley
Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/cQmntMw_c8I