代表台灣挑戰明年奧斯卡獎最佳動畫短片的《基石》線上看。
基督徒慎入。
A satire animation about Fundamentalism. (English statement below)
去年三月完成的作品《基石》終於決定在今天發布
謝謝指導教授鐘世凱老師的建議與包容,和一起創作配樂的夥伴 林孝親 Szu-yu Lin,讓聲音和影像配合的天衣無縫, WinSound Studio 紋聲音樂 絕對是品質一流的代名詞,還有一路上幫助本片產出的所有朋友們,謝謝你們!
《基石》的用意並不是要批判特定的宗教,而是特別針對冥頑不靈的基本教義派的信徒,幾乎在每個宗教都有這一群人的存在,他們用盡用手段強迫別人接受其價值觀,特別是在孩童和青少年的心靈身上有著非常大的負面影響,尤其是越聽話的小孩傷害越大,因為父母們教什麼他們就會做什麼。小的時候,我還真因為長輩的話,就相信神奇寶貝是邪靈、哈利波特是魔鬼的化身、流行音樂聽久了會墮落、看了部A片就害怕自己會下地獄,長輩們的善意,扭曲成強迫接受他們的信仰,常常遇到無法解釋的教義或價值觀,就會用情緒勒索的方式,讓你就算接受了也充滿著罪惡感,多少也影響童年的社交生活,越投入在宗教社群之中,越覺得外面的人事物充滿邪惡。在本片的製作過程中,我常常是帶著憤怒的情緒工作著,氣以前愚蠢的自己,也氣現在還是有許多人自認為是正義的化身,手握「真理」的權杖,到處迫害別人。
自己也曾陰錯陽差造訪一些其他的宗教團體,撇開教義和儀式不談,其實會發現有許多的相似之處,他們大多用「親身體驗」的見證去說服別人入教,卻永遠無法有個完美的說詞去解釋一些違背基本邏輯和科學的事情(如果感覺有效,誰管你的故事有什麼漏洞),再藉由社群的力量,慢慢地滲透你的生活和社交圈,直到無法脫身,待在這個群體久了,漸漸接受了該團體的價值觀,本來覺得疑惑的地方也無所謂了,習慣了他們特殊的儀式,甚至連講話的辭彙都開始變異了,生活上偶爾發生一些好事,就會覺得是信仰的緣故而更加投入,最後就會自傲的覺得自己的信仰比起其他的宗教有多偉大,常常看到不同宗教甚至是教派互相敵視對方為邪靈或異端就覺得好笑,其實你們真的,都差不多。
跑過各大的影展後,許多正面和負面的回饋都有,但我不怕批評,因為本片所有橋段和元素全部都是真實改寫自本人和朋友親身經歷過的事情,也有不少基督徒朋友看過後跟我說他們非常能感同身受,一個宗教團體之中雖有固執不通的人卻也有許多開明包容的人士,我無意辯駁其教義,也尊重每個人對信仰的理解,只想問大家
你是真的完全相信你的信仰嗎?有多少教義的漏洞你是故意漠視不去思考的?還是因為家人、朋友的人情壓力才選擇繼續待在其中?又或者是害怕離教之後,會在現世、來世或死後會有所懲罰?
請誠實面對自己的信仰,如果是真的相信,那麼請尊重其他和你不同信仰的人的權利!不是所有人都應該照著你的教條走,這是一個自由平等的社會,任何的種族、性別、宗教、性傾向的基本人權都必須公平對待。
但如果你發現你已經做個假信徒很久了,那麼勇敢地離開吧!真實的東西是經得起考驗,離開了象牙塔後,試著用不同角度和更寬廣的眼光去觀察這個世界,相信你會找到尋屬於你自己的人生定義。
---
[English] Translated by Shannon Yeung
“On first glance, “Fundamental” might look like a blanket criticism of Christianity, making it incredibly easy to dismiss as offensive or even as atheistic propaganda. Yet if you look beyond the provocation, I
hope you will realize that it only intends to criticize a very specific component of religion: dogmatic scripture.
Religious upbringing plays a significant role in shaping the values of a child, values that can easily be upheld for life. This is especially detrimental for obedient children who have yet developed the rational capacity and courage to question their parents.
When I was young, I genuinely believed that Pokemon were evil spirits, that Harry Potter was a devil in disguise, that listening to pop music would lead to degradation, that watching pornography would lead to eternal pain in Hell. Whenever I struggled to endorse contradictory teachings, I would be coerced into fearful acceptance rather than reasoned into genuine belief. Not only is such threat-based enforcement of religion unreasonable, but the resultant guilt also became an enormous burden that inevitably affected how I perceived others and how I handled my social interactions. The more I engaged with my religious community, the more I doubted the kindness I received. Teachings of faith, love, and compassion simply could not counteract the bleak, evil picture painted by original sin.
During the production stages of the animation, I could not help but feel furious. I was furious at my young, foolish self and I am still angry at self-claimed justice warriors spreading falsehood in the name of religion.
Over the years, I have engaged with followers of other religions as an effort to understand. Aside from obvious differences in teachings and rituals, I have found that most religious followers use personal experiences to justify their beliefs, but can never offer a compelling argument to explain contradictions in basic logic and science. Surely, if hearsay was all it took to convert someone, no one would care about the contradictions. Perhaps this applies to some, but the way I see it is that peer pressure and investment into faith tends to mellow out any initial suspicions. Once one conforms to the rituals and adopts the religious semantics by habit, even mere luck points to God. When everything becomes a positive reinforcement of God, one might fall into the trap of believing that their religion is exclusively better than the rest, sneer at other religions, and fail to see just how similarly foolish all Fundamentalism is.
This film has screened at many major film festivals and the reception has been both positive and negative as you might imagine. I am not afraid of criticism because the plot was inspired by my own experiences and a sentiment shared among my friends. Since the film aired, a significant number of people from the Christian community have told me that my film resonated very closely with their experience too. Indeed, some religious people are stubborn, obnoxious and unreasonable, but there are also many who are incredibly tolerant, understanding and empathetic. I do respect everyone’s interpretation of religion, but for those who feel offended by this film, ask yourself: Do you wholeheartedly believe in your religion? How many contradictions have you deliberately shied away from? If you do identify as religious, are you choosing by your own will or are you pressured by friends and family? Or are you subscribing to religion solely for salvation?
Please scrutinize your belief with utter honesty. If you are convinced by your religion, please respect other people’s right to believe in other religions too. There is a fine line between respectful proselytization and an aggressive imposition of religion. This should be a free and equal society where all races, sexes, genders, religions, sexual orientations are treated with basic respect.
Or, if you realize that you have been an atheist at heart the entire time, feel free to cut off your ties with religion! Once you leave the ivory tower, try to examine the world from different perspectives, and I can assure you will find your own meaning of life. The truth will stand the test of time.”
想觀看高畫質影片請按這裡~
https://vimeo.com/300120279
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f68vO5jX5_E&t=3s
------
Credit
導演 Director:
邱士杰 (ShihChieh Chiu)
動畫 Animator:
邱士杰 Shih-Chieh Chiu、張明潔 Ming-Chieh Chang
配音 Voice Actor:
林冠宇 Guan-Yu Lin、邱士杰 Shih-Chieh Chiu、廖容萱 Jung-Shan Liao、莊采融 Cai-Rong Zhuang、林鼎傑 Dan Lin、陳變法 Bian-Fa Chen
指導教授 Supervisor:
鐘世凱 Shih-Kai Chung
音樂與音效製作Music & Sound Design Production:
@紋聲音樂 WinSound Studio
音樂與音效Music & Sound Design:
林孝親 Hsiao-Chin Lin、林思妤 Szu-Yu Lin
混音Scoring Mixer & Re-recording Mixer:
林孝親 Hsiao-Chin Lin
#Fundamental基石
#11/24日 公投14、15請投同意,落實真平
#若想知道更多關於宗教迷信與離教的相關資訊,請持續關注本粉絲團
#若你正迷茫著找尋新的心靈寄托,唯一推薦—台灣合法立案宗教團體 台灣人文煮意麵團 Humanistic Pastafarianism in Taiwan
the hope教派 在 V媽教室 Facebook 的最佳解答
【 V媽碎碎唸 】
前幾天幾個媽媽朋友又在瘋分享一則一個月前的新聞,2016.5.9聯合晚報有則新聞:『指出台灣有12%的學生”未具備參與現代社會運作所需的基本學力“,相當於20萬名國中小學生,還沒出社會就在”等待失敗“』; 另一標題為『註定當魯蛇? 20萬中小學生未達基本學力』; 接著一些文章如連環效應般產生『學者提4指標,盼新政府增加教育經費』...我可以理解有一群人看到這些標題會很恐慌自己的孩子的『學力』程度、或許有一群孩子們會被努力送進補救的機構或課程裡、或許也有一群人開始會很認真的討論教育資源的問題、師資流動的問題等等、或許也有一群人很努力的捲起袖子開始進行檢討、改變、進入需要的地方和孩子們開始工作、或許也有一群人質疑『20萬』這數字是可以這樣推估而來的嗎?......等等,但老實說,看到這些報導,撇開如何“因應”這學力測驗的問題,還是忍不住皺起眉頭覺得有點難過,“魯蛇”.....“等待失敗”...這些字詞是怎麼來的啊?參與測驗的孩子們不是才在國中小階段嗎?為什麼要這樣製造失敗人生的恐慌呢?為什麼以數字在詮量人生輸贏的價值觀呢?...到底是誰在假扮上帝之手?!(疾呼)
大家常常很感動的在分享一些文章或影片,像是讓世界看見的偏鄉孩子的歌唱與表演、很多知名選秀節目上也有很多大家瘋傳的勵志影片、“閱讀障礙也無法擋歌王的路”也成為國中教材...還有很多很多振奮人心、告訴大人路不是只有一條的警世故事等等,感動之餘,看到這個報導的標題時是不是就將那麼多的故事累積出來的感動給忘記了呢?孩子的路,真的不是只有一條呀!學力測驗沒有好的呈現,是不是聽不懂呢?是不是眼球的運轉無法順利呢?是不是文字看懂但無法真正讀懂呢?是不是所學的內容無法真正進入內心呢?是不是學過就忘呢?是不是運動量過少呢?無法專注的原因到底是不乖還是有其他因素呢?看到一個孩子乖乖坐在書桌前就代表他有用功讀書了嗎?這所謂20萬名的孩子們,只是得到的數字不夠罷了,那麼他夠善良嗎?他夠體貼嗎?他意志力堅強嗎?他有創意嗎?他藝術性驚人嗎?他口語伶俐嗎?他力氣很大、正義感十足嗎?他很愛音樂表演嗎?....太多太多了,但是就用這『等待失敗』去說這些國中小的孩子們,是為什麼呢?我們不是一直很感動正念力量的傳遞嗎?『愛與接納』難道只是嘴巴說說、無法用行動落實?難道那麼多努力改變的家長團體只限於某小眾的孩子們?而其他更多的孩子仍被『魯蛇』這樣的字眼所束縛了.....這些從小被貼『等待失敗』標籤的孩子們,要用多少力量才能掙脫這個標籤呢?有沒有可能他從此無法掙脫、反而一直在最黑暗的最角落?“考不好”不等於“等待失敗”、“考不好”不等於“等待失敗”、“考不好”不等於“等待失敗”....我們大人啊,是真心說出這些話的嗎?最後,我們為了應付「考試」而拼命逼自己吞下那些學問,只針對考試測得出來的能力不斷加強,忽略那些考試測不出的才能,做考古題變成重要的學習方法....而無法滿足對世界的好奇心、無法激發對世界的熱情與渴求,那這些學問、這些考試、這些分數到底代表了些什麼?
想起這陣子一直繞在腦海裡的約翰藍儂的歌,一首在1971年就已錄製發行的老歌 “ imagine“(想像),這首歌挑戰大家去想像一個沒有宗教派別、沒有民族界限造成的戰火與隔閡的世界,邀請大家去想像生活在更少物質、更少財富束縛的可能性....我其實也很想用這歌詞邀請大家,想一想孩子不被數字捆綁時的笑容,想一想他們真正“活著”時的暢快,想一想他們擁有對學問的熱情、擁有對世界未知的好奇渴望時的眼神,你就會感覺,這『等待失敗』說的或許不是這一群所謂推估下的20萬孩子們!
取自 Imagine歌詞其中一部份(原唱者:John Lennon):
You may say I'm a dreamer (你可能覺得我在作夢)
But I'm not the only one(但是我不是唯一這麼想的人)
I hope someday you'll join us(希望有一天,你也能加入我們)
----------------------
盛暑巡迴講座熱烈報名中:https://goo.gl/1K3BEf
----------------------
感恩蛋殼上裂縫的存在,因為有裂縫,光才能走進來~
歡迎分享、留言互動喔!
----------------------
如果您想每天看到V媽的新Po文,請在我們的專頁右上角
按下 "讚" 並選擇 "接收通知",感謝!