今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
同時也有16部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過4萬的網紅五哥頻道,也在其Youtube影片中提到,另外蒙面法之後,可能會有每日限住你攞幾多錢,資金限制出境,港元脫鉤等問題。都係嗰句,香港人要未雨綢繆,早啲做好準備好啲。 Marina條片出左啦,大家可以聽返原裝版? https://youtu.be/3aE-UgVwj58?t=3793 English Transcript From The Co...
「video transcript中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於video transcript中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於video transcript中文 在 陳兩儀 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於video transcript中文 在 蘇浩 Anthony So Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於video transcript中文 在 五哥頻道 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於video transcript中文 在 Kouki Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於video transcript中文 在 Kouki Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於video transcript中文 在 Transcribe Cantonese! Turn the Cantonese Video/ Audio to text! 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資源資訊整理 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資源資訊整理 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資源資訊整理 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 YouTube視頻摘要生成器-一鍵複製ChatGPT(中文版) 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 轉錄YouTube 影片- 線上語音轉文字- VEED.IO 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 How to Get Transcript of a YouTube Video: 3 Best Ways 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 By 德周新竹店/PS4/XBox/任天堂- 門市特價活動來囉 - Facebook 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 youtube-transcript-api - PyPI 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 How to get nicely-formatted YouTube video transcripts? 的評價
- 關於video transcript中文 在 Captions | YouTube Data API - Google Developers 的評價
video transcript中文 在 陳兩儀 Facebook 的最佳解答
【前港督彭定康錄影發言 促香港政府撤回修訂逃犯條例】
「我希望即使在這個最後階段,政府仍然可以退讓,撤回方案,不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過,亦不應該通過,香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會,而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。」
發言英文紀錄及中文翻譯:
Former Hong Kong Governor Lord Chris Patten video message Transcript
I know that this week in Hong Kong, thousands of people will be making their views clear, demonstrating against the proposals on extradition, which the government has put forward, extradition to China. It’s a proposal, or a set of proposals, which strike a terrible blow - I think - and so, I think to most people in Hong Kong and so does the international community, against the rule of law, against Hong Kong’s stability and security, against Hong Kong’s position as a great international trading hub. And the surprise is that the government in Hong Kong doesn’t seem to understand that. It does make you wonder sometimes who actually runs Hong Kong these days: is it the Hong Kong government or is it the joint liaison office acting on behalf of the communist regime in Beijing?
Why is this important? Well it’s the latest in a number of things that have happened in recent years which have tightened Beijing’s grip on Hong Kong, and which have profoundly worried people. I think for ten or a dozen years after 1997, things in Hong Kong went pretty well. Of course they could have gone better, I’m sorry that Beijing throttled the development of democracy, much against the promises that have been made earlier. But by and large, I think, Hong Kong remained a very free and successful society.
But ever since the regime in Beijing started to roll back Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and the developments that have taken place under Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji and Hu Jintao, and Wen Jiabao; ever since then, with the Party taking control over everything, cracking down on dissidents, cracking down on human rights, locking people up, incarcerating them in Xinjiang and so on. Ever since then, we know that Beijing has also been tightening its grip, or trying to, in Hong Kong. And I think that the latest proposals on extradition are an example of that.
Now a lot of very spurious arguments are put forward, it said that the present situation is a “loophole” which needs to be filled up - that’s absolute nonsense. People have known exactly why there shouldn’t be an extradition agreement with China for years, and many of the arguments put for the government’s proposals don’t actually pass the laugh-off-your-seat test. The argument that, well, it’s better to have an extradition treaty than to abduct people illegally from Hong Kong - are people really supposed to believe that?
Except for, but of course, Western democracies in Europe have extradition agreements with China, but they’re in a very different position to the position that Hong Kong is in. The reason why international chambers of commerce, why lawyers, why business around the world, why governments have raised their objections is very simple: because what these proposals do is to remove the firewall between Hong Kong’s rule of law and the idea of law - which prevails in Communist China - an idea of law where there aren’t any independent courts, where the courts and the security services and the party’s rules - which are, sometimes, pretty obscure - are rolled altogether. That’s why we’ve seen recently Canadian citizens that are locked up are taken as if it were hostage against things happening in Canada itself under the rule of law there. So it’s not surprising that people are so worried about what is happening.
I know that when people talk about the particular problem in relation to Taiwan, the leaders of the Hong Kong Bar Association over the last few years, I think a dozen of them, have put forward proposals which show how you could deal with that issue building on the existing common law.
So these proposals are bad for Hong Kong, they - I think - raise all sorts of questions which the government hasn’t even thought through, not least about Hong Kong’s economic importance and economic stability. We know very well that Hong Kong needs to be treated separately in economic and commercial matters from the rest of China. When I was governor a long time ago, I used to travel to Washington fairly regularly to argue the case for treating Hong Kong differently from, say, Shenzhen and Shanghai. But if you appear to be regarding Hong Kong from Beijing as though it was just another China city, then sooner or later, economic governments around the world, businesses around the world, when they’re looking even at things like the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re going to regard Hong Kong as just another part of China, and that would be really bad for the standard of living, for the quality of life in Hong Kong!
Above all, of course, if we go ahead, if the government goes ahead with this extradition agreement, it will cause unnecessary worries and anxieties in Hong Kong. That’s a really bad thing. I hope that even at this late stage, the government will back off and leave well alone. It doesn’t have to happen, it shouldn’t happen, and Hong Kong should carry on as a free society, under the rule of law, without having to worry about this extradition.
前港督彭定康錄影講話翻譯
我知道這星期在香港,成千上萬的人將會到街上遊行表達自己的意見,反對政府所提出將會容許引渡到中國的引渡修例建議。這是一項,或者應該說是一系列我及國際社會認為將會對香港的法治、香港的穩定和社會安全造成很大打擊的建議,它將會嚴重傷害香港作為一個國際貿易中心的地位。令人驚訝的是,香港政府似乎並不理解這一點。這確實令人懷疑這些日子究竟是誰在管治香港:是香港政府還是代表北京共產黨政權的中聯辦?
為甚麼這修例是這麼重要?這是近年來發生的一系列容許北京強行控制香港的事件之一,而這一直以來都讓人深感憂慮。我覺得在1997年之後的十年至十幾年,香港的情況進展尚算順利。當然,是本來可以更好,我很遺憾北京扼殺了香港民主的發展,違背了之前所作出的承諾。但總的來說,香港在那個時候仍然是一個非常自由和成功的社會。
但是,自北京政權開始推翻鄧小平的改革以及在江澤民、朱熔基、胡錦濤和溫家寶時期所推行的發展以後,共產黨控制着一切,打擊持不同政見的人,打擊人權,在新疆把人民關押等等。從那時起,我們就知道北京一直在試圖加緊控制香港。我認為最新的引渡建議就是一個例子。
現在香港政府提出了許多非常虛假的論點,它說目前的情況是展現了一個需要填補的「洞」,這絕對是胡說八道。大家多年來都確切地清楚知道不應該與中國達成引渡協議的原因。而政府提出的許多論點實際上也沒有一個不令你拍案大笑。政府認為制定引渡條約比從香港非法綁架人民更好,你認真覺得人們應該相信這個說法嗎?
當然他們又會說歐洲的西方民主國家與中國已經簽訂了引渡協議,但它們與香港根本處於完全不同的地位。國際商會、律師、商人及各國政府之所以提出反對意見的原因非常簡單:因為這些修例將會摧毀香港法治與中國共產黨的法治概念之間的防火牆。中國的法律觀念不包括任何獨立的法院,並把法院、國安部門以及黨的規則 (黨規則亦有時相當模糊)完全混在一起。這就是為甚麼我們最近看到被關起來的加拿大公民被用為人質,反對加拿大本身在她自己國家的法治下所發生的事情。因此,人們如此擔心這修例所帶來的影響並不奇怪。
我知道當人們都正在談到與台灣有關的問題之際,過去幾年的香港大律師公會領導人,應該是有十幾位,都已經提出意見,說明你如何就着香港現行的普通法來處理這個問題。
這些修例對香港不利,我認為這些修例所引發的疑問是甚至政府都沒有仔細考慮過的,尤其是對香港經濟重要性和經濟穩定性的影響。我們非常清楚在經濟和商業方面是需要把香港與中國其他地區分開對待。很久以前,當我還是港督的時候,我經常前往華盛頓游說對方看待香港的時候要跟對待深圳和上海之類的中國城市有所不同。但是如果以北京的角度看香港,將香港當為另一個普通中國城市,那麼世界各地的政府及企業將會視香港為中國的一部分(而不是特區),就算是看待「一帶一路」之類倡議時亦會是如此。這對香港的生活水平和生活質素都是非常不利的!
當然,最重要的是如果香港政府繼續硬推這些引渡修例,這將會在香港引起不必要的憂慮和焦慮。這些都是非常糟糕的事情。我希望即使在這個最後階段,政府仍然可以退讓,撤回方案,不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過,亦不應該通過,香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會,而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。
video transcript中文 在 蘇浩 Anthony So Facebook 的最佳貼文
【前港督彭定康錄影發言 促香港政府撤回修訂逃犯條例】
「我希望即使在這個最後階段,政府仍然可以退讓,撤回方案,不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過,亦不應該通過,香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會,而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。」
發言英文紀錄及中文翻譯:
Former Hong Kong Governor Lord Chris Patten video message Transcript
I know that this week in Hong Kong, thousands of people will be making their views clear, demonstrating against the proposals on extradition, which the government has put forward, extradition to China. It’s a proposal, or a set of proposals, which strike a terrible blow - I think - and so, I think to most people in Hong Kong and so does the international community, against the rule of law, against Hong Kong’s stability and security, against Hong Kong’s position as a great international trading hub. And the surprise is that the government in Hong Kong doesn’t seem to understand that. It does make you wonder sometimes who actually runs Hong Kong these days: is it the Hong Kong government or is it the joint liaison office acting on behalf of the communist regime in Beijing?
Why is this important? Well it’s the latest in a number of things that have happened in recent years which have tightened Beijing’s grip on Hong Kong, and which have profoundly worried people. I think for ten or a dozen years after 1997, things in Hong Kong went pretty well. Of course they could have gone better, I’m sorry that Beijing throttled the development of democracy, much against the promises that have been made earlier. But by and large, I think, Hong Kong remained a very free and successful society.
But ever since the regime in Beijing started to roll back Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and the developments that have taken place under Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji and Hu Jintao, and Wen Jiabao; ever since then, with the Party taking control over everything, cracking down on dissidents, cracking down on human rights, locking people up, incarcerating them in Xinjiang and so on. Ever since then, we know that Beijing has also been tightening its grip, or trying to, in Hong Kong. And I think that the latest proposals on extradition are an example of that.
Now a lot of very spurious arguments are put forward, it said that the present situation is a “loophole” which needs to be filled up - that’s absolute nonsense. People have known exactly why there shouldn’t be an extradition agreement with China for years, and many of the arguments put for the government’s proposals don’t actually pass the laugh-off-your-seat test. The argument that, well, it’s better to have an extradition treaty than to abduct people illegally from Hong Kong - are people really supposed to believe that?
Except for, but of course, Western democracies in Europe have extradition agreements with China, but they’re in a very different position to the position that Hong Kong is in. The reason why international chambers of commerce, why lawyers, why business around the world, why governments have raised their objections is very simple: because what these proposals do is to remove the firewall between Hong Kong’s rule of law and the idea of law - which prevails in Communist China - an idea of law where there aren’t any independent courts, where the courts and the security services and the party’s rules - which are, sometimes, pretty obscure - are rolled altogether. That’s why we’ve seen recently Canadian citizens that are locked up are taken as if it were hostage against things happening in Canada itself under the rule of law there. So it’s not surprising that people are so worried about what is happening.
I know that when people talk about the particular problem in relation to Taiwan, the leaders of the Hong Kong Bar Association over the last few years, I think a dozen of them, have put forward proposals which show how you could deal with that issue building on the existing common law.
So these proposals are bad for Hong Kong, they - I think - raise all sorts of questions which the government hasn’t even thought through, not least about Hong Kong’s economic importance and economic stability. We know very well that Hong Kong needs to be treated separately in economic and commercial matters from the rest of China. When I was governor a long time ago, I used to travel to Washington fairly regularly to argue the case for treating Hong Kong differently from, say, Shenzhen and Shanghai. But if you appear to be regarding Hong Kong from Beijing as though it was just another China city, then sooner or later, economic governments around the world, businesses around the world, when they’re looking even at things like the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re going to regard Hong Kong as just another part of China, and that would be really bad for the standard of living, for the quality of life in Hong Kong!
Above all, of course, if we go ahead, if the government goes ahead with this extradition agreement, it will cause unnecessary worries and anxieties in Hong Kong. That’s a really bad thing. I hope that even at this late stage, the government will back off and leave well alone. It doesn’t have to happen, it shouldn’t happen, and Hong Kong should carry on as a free society, under the rule of law, without having to worry about this extradition.
前港督彭定康錄影講話翻譯
我知道這星期在香港,成千上萬的人將會到街上遊行表達自己的意見,反對政府所提出將會容許引渡到中國的引渡修例建議。這是一項,或者應該說是一系列我及國際社會認為將會對香港的法治、香港的穩定和社會安全造成很大打擊的建議,它將會嚴重傷害香港作為一個國際貿易中心的地位。令人驚訝的是,香港政府似乎並不理解這一點。這確實令人懷疑這些日子究竟是誰在管治香港:是香港政府還是代表北京共產黨政權的中聯辦?
為甚麼這修例是這麼重要?這是近年來發生的一系列容許北京強行控制香港的事件之一,而這一直以來都讓人深感憂慮。我覺得在1997年之後的十年至十幾年,香港的情況進展尚算順利。當然,是本來可以更好,我很遺憾北京扼殺了香港民主的發展,違背了之前所作出的承諾。但總的來說,香港在那個時候仍然是一個非常自由和成功的社會。
但是,自北京政權開始推翻鄧小平的改革以及在江澤民、朱熔基、胡錦濤和溫家寶時期所推行的發展以後,共產黨控制着一切,打擊持不同政見的人,打擊人權,在新疆把人民關押等等。從那時起,我們就知道北京一直在試圖加緊控制香港。我認為最新的引渡建議就是一個例子。
現在香港政府提出了許多非常虛假的論點,它說目前的情況是展現了一個需要填補的「洞」,這絕對是胡說八道。大家多年來都確切地清楚知道不應該與中國達成引渡協議的原因。而政府提出的許多論點實際上也沒有一個不令你拍案大笑。政府認為制定引渡條約比從香港非法綁架人民更好,你認真覺得人們應該相信這個說法嗎?
當然他們又會說歐洲的西方民主國家與中國已經簽訂了引渡協議,但它們與香港根本處於完全不同的地位。國際商會、律師、商人及各國政府之所以提出反對意見的原因非常簡單:因為這些修例將會摧毀香港法治與中國共產黨的法治概念之間的防火牆。中國的法律觀念不包括任何獨立的法院,並把法院、國安部門以及黨的規則 (黨規則亦有時相當模糊)完全混在一起。這就是為甚麼我們最近看到被關起來的加拿大公民被用為人質,反對加拿大本身在她自己國家的法治下所發生的事情。因此,人們如此擔心這修例所帶來的影響並不奇怪。
我知道當人們都正在談到與台灣有關的問題之際,過去幾年的香港大律師公會領導人,應該是有十幾位,都已經提出意見,說明你如何就着香港現行的普通法來處理這個問題。
這些修例對香港不利,我認為這些修例所引發的疑問是甚至政府都沒有仔細考慮過的,尤其是對香港經濟重要性和經濟穩定性的影響。我們非常清楚在經濟和商業方面是需要把香港與中國其他地區分開對待。很久以前,當我還是港督的時候,我經常前往華盛頓游說對方看待香港的時候要跟對待深圳和上海之類的中國城市有所不同。但是如果以北京的角度看香港,將香港當為另一個普通中國城市,那麼世界各地的政府及企業將會視香港為中國的一部分(而不是特區),就算是看待「一帶一路」之類倡議時亦會是如此。這對香港的生活水平和生活質素都是非常不利的!
當然,最重要的是如果香港政府繼續硬推這些引渡修例,這將會在香港引起不必要的憂慮和焦慮。這些都是非常糟糕的事情。我希望即使在這個最後階段,政府仍然可以退讓,撤回方案,不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過,亦不應該通過,香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會,而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。
video transcript中文 在 五哥頻道 Youtube 的精選貼文
另外蒙面法之後,可能會有每日限住你攞幾多錢,資金限制出境,港元脫鉤等問題。都係嗰句,香港人要未雨綢繆,早啲做好準備好啲。
Marina條片出左啦,大家可以聽返原裝版? https://youtu.be/3aE-UgVwj58?t=3793
English Transcript
From The Council through Marina Jacobi.
This is the beginning of Hong Kong, I discussed last time if you guys remember, they (The Councils) just told me right now but this is just the beginning of Hong Kong to fight for its freedom and it’s a lot more to come because the new Generation they said is going to gain its freedom. I’m not given exactly how but it’s more to come of the same right now, it is going to reach peak performance within two years. Basically, it’s going to be back and forth, all these riots.
The best way, they said (The Councils) is to observe and when situation presents itself, be of the “Best of Yourself” in the Name of Humanity, if you keep up with that and hold the vibration of knowingness with no fear, understand that no matter what happens, you are always going to be shown the bridge for your safety. Because basically, the same, like you are going to project it if you don’t get into fear. So you turn around no matter what happens, you’re always going to have food, help, and situation that will end up in a positive outcome for you, no matter what happens. So, go back to Quantum Structure video one, two and three of the Quantum Manifestation Season 1. It’s important in this situation in chaos to understand to learn the structure so you keep up by understanding that you are watching a holographic imprint and you’re the main character, you are in a virtual reality that is a game and you can build and open doors if you need something. If you learn the structure I guarantee you that you’ll be able to manoeuvre in this game, Because the Hong Kong situation, in every country, now has to go through its process, to pop up in front of people’s faces so people can wake up and take their freedom, basically, not take their freedom, but create their freedom (they correct it).
When you find yourself in “a situation”:
This is basically for everybody that finds themselves in a “situation”, keep up those stronger structures, know that it is a hologram, know that it is a process of Ascension. When you have a situation, always be the Best of yourself, of the Best of your abilities, because whatever you do at this moment, that’s what your projection in the quantum field and that’s what you’re shifting the next momentum into, this is a quantum bylaw. If you keep up with this, understand that more and more you do, it becomes more potent, which pops up like a situation of reality that you have everything you need even in the forest fire. Like you are playing a game, literally guys, I am not kidding what I’m saying no matter what you see, you think of hologram, train your consciousness to think that you are in a hologram life structure. I know it sounds crazy but that’s what it is. And if you keep doing that, you know what happens becomes easy and you’re not afraid. You’re actually free and have an understanding, and then’s it’s easy for you to play that structure, because you are not stopping by the fear vibrational sequence that is so potent and it is stronger than the joy, when not experiencing the joy, you are replacing it with the fear, that is going to create the same and then you cannot get out a whole situation for you to escape the forest, you are going to end up in the forest.
Google中文翻譯
從理事會通過Marina Jacobi。
這是香港的起點,我上次討論過,如果你們還記得的話,他們(理事會)現在才告訴我,但這只是香港為爭取自由而奮鬥的起點,而且還有很多事情要做,因為他們說,新一代將獲得自由。我沒有確切的方法,但是現在有更多的相同之處,它將在兩年內達到最佳性能。基本上,所有這些騷動都是來回的。
他們說,(理事會)最好的方法是觀察並在情況出現時以人性的名義成為“自己最好的”,如果您緊跟這一點並毫不恐懼地把握著知識的振動,那就理解無論發生什麼事情,您總是會被帶到安全的橋樑。因為基本上一樣,如果您不害怕的話,就像要投影它一樣。因此,無論發生什麼事情,您都轉過身來,無論發生什麼事情,您總是會得到食物,幫助和情況,這些都會為您帶來積極的結果。因此,請返回第1季的量子結構視頻。第1,第2和第3幅。在這種情況下,很重要的一點是要了解結構,以便您了解自己正在觀看全息圖像,並保持作為主要角色,您處於一個虛擬的遊戲世界中,可以根據需要建造和打開門。如果您了解了結構,我保證您可以在此遊戲中進行操作,因為每個國家的香港局勢現在都必須經過其過程,才能在人們的面前浮現,這樣人們才能醒來建立並獲得他們的自由,基本上,不是獲得他們的自由,而是創造他們的自由(他們糾正了自由)。
當您發現自己處於“情況”中時:
基本上,這適用於每個發現自己處於“狀況”,保持那些更堅固的結構,知道它是全息圖,知道它是提升過程的人。當您遇到某種情況時,始終要表現出自己的......
Marina Jacobi YouTube頻道:http://bit.ly/30LXDEx
?請支持五哥新平台? https://www.patreon.com/5gor
報讀初班+中班可減 $200
http://5minutesmaster.com/ytgmix
報讀初班減 $100
?五哥上左Youtuber GO好後悔?! https://youtu.be/YgVinPvvnTY
⭐️記得比個Like同訂閲我頻道? https://bit.ly/2F6Y2M8
?打賞鼓勵五哥?https://paypal.me/5minutesmaster
?????? 精選系列
陰謀+QAnon+QMap?http://bit.ly/2RW8oVd
WordPress自建網站?http://bit.ly/2TG34Ti
身心靈+吸引力法則?http://bit.ly/33F4LFg
Shopify廣東話教學?http://bit.ly/2zj5myF
建立網站教學?http://bit.ly/2UphcQz
五哥訪問系列?http://bit.ly/2KGNT9z
陰謀系列? http://bit.ly/2RW8oVd
比特幣教學?http://bit.ly/2Zh7oh2
生活小百科?http://bit.ly/31LEB1N
網上賺錢?http://bit.ly/2YLyt98
寫App教學?http://bit.ly/2HMnfwT
QAnon?http://bit.ly/2TIHKfU
旅遊?http://bit.ly/2NeajAN
YouTube秘技?http://bit.ly/2G8qBZr
樓市+時事+財經?http://bit.ly/2z8SlaI
Affiliate Marketing 聯盟行銷 教學?http://bit.ly/2YWhXXH
網址:https://www.5MinutesMaster.com
Medium:https://medium.com/@5minutesmaster
facebook:https://bit.ly/2QYmNyE
#五哥教學 #五維時空 #香港YouTuber
video transcript中文 在 Kouki Youtube 的最佳解答
這次Undertale周末番到這裡完結囉!感謝大家這幾個月的支持❤,這集影片底下留言開放所有討論!
從今天起開始訂閱吧! ➔ http://bit.ly/Kouki
此影片有繁體中文翻譯,需開啟影片中的CC字幕。
Undertale ★ 播放清單 ★ ➔ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtHA2VxfiZuXl1OkPc7IRvjCz0adMdB4P
To The Moon ★ 播放清單 ★ ➔ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUNoivmtx6A&index=1&list=PLtHA2VxfiZuUcqRLfZAaH7hNA6yEve8Xe
留言禁止爆雷,感謝你對留言版的維護。
♫:Undertale
在Facebook上追蹤我 ➔ https://www.facebook.com/KamiKamiMatsu
在Twitter上追蹤我 ➔ https://twitter.com/Ashan_kouki
在粉絲團上追蹤我 ➔ facebook.com/oeurXstudio
Side Pic : the-mischievous-fox on deviantart
Translation : 鬼怒川
Thumbnail : MirU
Modifications : 阿神、鬼怒川
Transcript : 鬼怒川
Subtitles : 路Rusiru
Microphone ➔ Zoom H2N
Keyboard ➔ Ducky 青軸
Mouse ➔ Razer TransFormers 大黃蜂款
直播頻道 ➔ http://bit.ly/koukilive
video transcript中文 在 Kouki Youtube 的最佳貼文
Alphys 歡笑下掩蓋的秘密,下周末 Undertale 周末番邁入完結篇!
從今天起開始訂閱吧! ➔ http://bit.ly/Kouki
此影片有繁體中文翻譯,需開啟影片中的CC字幕。
Undertale ★ 播放清單 ★ ➔ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtHA2VxfiZuXl1OkPc7IRvjCz0adMdB4P
To The Moon ★ 播放清單 ★ ➔ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUNoivmtx6A&index=1&list=PLtHA2VxfiZuUcqRLfZAaH7hNA6yEve8Xe
留言禁止爆雷,感謝你對留言版的維護。
♫:Undertale
在Facebook上追蹤我 ➔ https://www.facebook.com/KamiKamiMatsu
在Twitter上追蹤我 ➔ https://twitter.com/Ashan_kouki
在粉絲團上追蹤我 ➔ facebook.com/oeurXstudio
Ending Animation : Bani-chan
Side Pic : the-mischievous-fox on deviantart
Translation : 鬼怒川
Thumbnail : MirU
Modifications : 阿神、鬼怒川
Transcript : 鬼怒川
Subtitles : 路Rusiru
Microphone ➔ Zoom H2N
Keyboard ➔ Ducky 青軸
Mouse ➔ Razer TransFormers 大黃蜂款
直播頻道 ➔ http://bit.ly/koukilive
video transcript中文 在 在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資源資訊整理 的推薦與評價
2022video transcript中文討論資訊,在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資訊整理,找video transcript中文在Instagram影片與照片(Facebook/Youtube)熱門討論內容就來 ... ... <看更多>
video transcript中文 在 在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資源資訊整理 的推薦與評價
2022video transcript中文討論資訊,在PTT/MOBILE01/Dcard上的升學考試資訊整理,找video transcript中文在Instagram影片與照片(Facebook/Youtube)熱門討論內容就來 ... ... <看更多>
video transcript中文 在 Transcribe Cantonese! Turn the Cantonese Video/ Audio to text! 的推薦與評價
2022 年更新版:[免費、易用AI軟件] 一鍵轉廣東話做文字, 中文 ... 成文字開會/ interview 錄音要轉返做 中文 字,又係中英夾雜,又唔想打 transcript ? ... <看更多>