《水底情深》導演吉勒摩戴托羅 Guillermo del Toro 評《羅馬》,寫得太好了,忍不住大略翻一下跟大家分享:
--
俗話說:「條條大路通『羅馬』」,而艾方索(按:《羅馬》導演艾方索柯朗)所選擇的,則是這之中最成功、最激勵人心的一條路。在《地心引力》評價與票房雙雙告捷之後,艾方索擁有完全的自由可以做他想做的。他大可以簽下鉅額合約、執導任何一部超級英雄電影,或是與大明星演員們合作,拍攝一部繽紛多彩、喧囂轟炸的史詩級電影。
然而,他選擇了拍攝《羅馬》,一部黑白而微小的電影,重現了 1985 年墨西哥大地震後所消逝褪去的城市地景(許多人或許不會注意到,片中許多場景都是為了本片重新搭建而成,包含了好幾個街區的車輛、道路、店面等等。)更甚者,這部片所講述的,是在墨西哥恢宏歷史脈動中,並非特別有趣抑或是擁有多少命運自主權的,一位在中產階級家庭中無名英雄的故事。
他選擇以洪荒之力,講說一個無比細微的私人故事;他刻意捨去了三幕劇的框架,但卻是他至今為止最精準、最令人讚嘆的一次電影作為語言與媒材的展現。
他的選擇是如此睿智,而對我來說,這恰恰確立了他的一貫精神宣言——那自從過去《你他媽的也是》,一直到他未來的作品都將貫徹的作者印記。在現今的亂世中,他始終關懷那些微不足道的隱形人物,以及那些不被人們傳頌的故事,如此他也就賦予了我們絕佳的、我們所迫切需要的一劑解藥——同理心。
All roads lead to “Roma,” as the saying goes. But the most successful, the most heartening of those roads is the one Alfonso took: after the enormous critical and box office triumph of “Gravity,” Alfonso was in a perfect position to do whatever he wanted. He could have commanded life-setting paydays to helm any or all superhero stories, he could have decided to work with the biggest stars or tackle a blank-check epic full of color and bombast.
And he chose “Roma.” A black-and-white, minute re-creation of a Mexico that faded, that disappeared after the massive earthquake in 1985 (unnoticed by most, several blocks of the city were re-created, cars, avenues, stores and all on a backlot set built for the film) and the story of an unsung hero in a middle-class family with no great anecdote or particular agency in the large movements of history in Mexico.
He chose to make an epic effort to tell an intimate story. He made a conscious effort to tell this story devoid of the trappings of Aristotelian three-act structure but he did so with what is, to date, his most precise, his most breathtaking use of cinema as a language and a medium.
He chose wisely. And to me this is the confirmation of his spirit — one that he has demonstrated by going back and doing “Y Tu Mama Tambien” and will do again in the future. In these, our troubled times, he speaks about characters that are invisible and dramas that go unspoken, and thus he provides us with the most urgent of antidotes: empathy.
--
原文出處:
https://variety.com/…/directors-on-directors-black-panthe…/…
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅The Thirsty Sisters,也在其Youtube影片中提到,30 Men to Date Before 30— What does a Musician, Banker, Raffles' Boy and Jujubee have in common? How do you screen for your ideal type? From getting...
what to do after cinema date 在 鄺俊宇 Roy Kwong Facebook 的最佳解答
感激Selina Kinyee Chau翻譯我的散文作品,讓香港及台灣以外的朋友都能看得明白,從中文走向英語,是我作品的大突破,感謝妳一字一句的用心翻譯:)
《WhatsApp and its USD0.99》
by Roy Kwong Translated by Selina Kinyee Chau
The WhatsApp software developer has informed its users to the app to be payable, triggering a fight between iPhone users and android users because iPhone users only pay USD0.99 once to enjoy life-long service but android users need to pay the same price every year.
Android users complain, “Why iPhone users only need to pay once but we need to pay every year?” iPhone users retort, “You didn’t say anything when we were being charged at the beginning. And now you are complaining.” So the two parties are stuck at whether the charge is unfair to Android users.
After the Two Ticks and Last seen on (Please refer to the previous article of the same writer), the WhatsApp started a fight again because of this USD0.99 issue. From between lovers to friends, now it has even extended to the whole user group of the two giant software developers. It should be named the Most Evil App of the Century.
The inconsistency of charging is of course WhatsApp’s fault. However, for those who can afford a smart phone that cost thousands dollars will be able to afford USD0.99 which is only the price of a can of coke, won’t they?
Some student users may complain, “I don’t have a credit card, I’m not able to pay at the App Store, WhatsApp are not considerate of us.” It is reasonable for users under 18 to complain if they don’t have a credit card. But if the charge is a disaster of WhatsApp, isn’t it just time for people to show their kindness? Friends who have a credit card can rescue others at this time, “I have a credit card. Let me pay it for you.”
Friends without a credit card will appreciate what you have done for them, although it is WhatsApp’s fault of the forbiddance of sending messages before the expiry date, reactivating the function for your friends by buying them a can of coke is meaningful, isn’t it? The USD0.99 of WhatsApp has created a chance to show your care to your friends, how nice as a social networking app!
Recall those days when we were still texting, it was actually not financial friendly at all. For the sake of keeping in touch with our friends, we were compelled to use the same service provider as theirs even its service was the worst in the world and we had to survived three times every day from losing connection just because to keep the text messages free of charge.
Still, the Two Ticks and Last seen on functions have created a lot of problem. But the invention of WhatsApp allows us to send messages for free, save us from paying for every text messages. It deserves to be granted a credit. And the simplified process by just clicking a few buttons to send pictures, videos and audios when we could only do so via email in the past. What’s more, WhatsApp had actually stated in the Terms and Conditions that charge may be applied after the first year.
So there have been so many complaints about WhatsApp being unfairness and has been given the name “a broken app” when it announced to charge? No one ever said something like that before the charging. After the charge applied, negative comments has swept over the Internet. Some suggested to use another communication app, Line, which is free of charge, and WhatsApp has become the public enemy. Despite the inconsistent charge, what’s wrong for WhatsApp to charge for using the app?
Have we become too comfortable enjoying free lunch without notice?
I still remember how hard I tried to save to buy a CD home and listened to it again and again when I was a kid. I had never been tired of it because it wasn’t easy. When there was a movie I liked, I saved hard to go to the cinema for it. If I didn’t have enough money, I bought the VCD when it was released. But VCDs were only available for movies not for TV shows. I had to start sitting in front of the TV before the show I liked started so that I wouldn’t miss any parts. And recorders became my good friend too. I really cherished the only-180-minute memory of every tape.
After I grew up, thanks to the advanced technology becomes able to store everything, the TV, computer, CD player, VCD player, game station and recorders, into ONE smart phone, only without the air conditioner. Want to listen to a song? Go to Youtube; want a movie? PPS, internet TV! A TV show? There are also apps you can watch live TV or play back. Want some games? From Angry Bird to Candy Crush, there are thousands of choices waiting for you.
However, The advance of technology has devalue our attitude towards making efforts. Because everything has become easy to get nowadays.
Have you noticed the songs nowadays are not as good as those in the past? That could be the problem of quality itself but more likely, it is because we have too many options. Now we just need to click a few buttons, thousands of search results will come out and we can listen to them right after. We are spoiled to be greedy unconditionally. We didn’t realize how long we hadn’t paid for a CD until the news of HMV’s bankruptcy spread out.
In the past we had to sit still and paid 100% attention to the movie to enjoy it, now we can just watch it from a few-inch-wide screen on a train. But the price is we keep being interrupted by the surrounding noise and people. When the character is saying something moving, we would just realize we’ve missed the stop and have to rush to get off. It may be free to watch a movie like this but I prefer paying to buy a ticket to go to the cinema.
We don’t need to worry about missing the best part of a TV show because our friends always share them on Facebook. We don’t need to watch every scene but you know what is going on in every story. But why is there still something missing? It turns out that we only keep the concentrated part of everything while the every well panned detail has been wasted. We don’t spend time building a connection with the characters in the story. However, if we don’t even spend time watching the the TV show by ourself, how can we feel the same way as the characters do, like we did in the past?
You don’t feel the pain losing something if you have never made any effort. It is just like we keep those old comics that we spent all our pocket money on even they are old and worn , but we are able to uninstall an app on our phone without a thought. Well, just take a couple seconds to download and we will own it again anytime.
While we are expecting making no effort, we are also destroying creativity. Creators lack of motivation. Creativity is worth nothing nowadays. People will search for replacement when one creativity starts to charge. This is not just about the USD0.99 of WhatsApp, it’s about our value on Give and Take.
Technology has changed our life, but we should never let it change our values.
We avoid Giving. But giving is vital for us to learn to cherish. Sometimes we get back more by giving than not giving, not just about money but also about love. Think about it, if we get what we want easily without paying any effort, comparing with that you devote yourself to a relationship while the other devotes to the relationship as much as you. Then none of you will give up on the relationship easily.
If you think WhatsApp is good, it deserves the USD0.99. Although I am still annoyed by the evil functions such as the Two Ticks and Last Seen on. WeChat is free but you have to pay your liberty of speech for it. One user once tried to send the name of Southern Weekly in Chinese, the system reminded him that “The message has involved sensitive words, please try again after making modification.” What’s wrong with the name of Southern Weekly? The even more ridiculous thing is, while I am writing this article, I get the news that WeChat now has tightened up the regulation that users have to use their real name, phone number when posting on the public forum and are even required to upload the photo of them with their ID card, like you have committed some serious crime.
To avoid paying USD0.99, you need to escape to somewhere that and be monitored. One day if you really encounter some sensitive issue, you will realize not paying actually pays more than paying. I believe most of readers are willing to pay for this USD0.99. We hope WhatsApp will open up more channels for payments.
Don’t let the wheels of Time make us forget the value of giving.
Writer for Yam Taiwan, Roy Kwong
http://goo.gl/aQD8B
what to do after cinema date 在 The Thirsty Sisters Youtube 的最讚貼文
30 Men to Date Before 30— What does a Musician, Banker, Raffles' Boy and Jujubee have in common?
How do you screen for your ideal type? From getting over heartbreaks, to dating a 37 year old man at 20. The Thirsty Sisters reminisce their Best and Worst First Dates and what turns them on!
Be it Puppy Love and Playing with Popcorn, to learning about Ma Ti (Water Chestnut) from a guy almost twice our age. What are some of the best things someone can offer during a first date? Do you have a secret dating list too? ;)
Share with us your memorable first date experiences in the comments section below! We're here waiting to slurp up all things private...
1:42 Topic of the day
3:01 Nina's best date
9:05 Sylvia's first date with Ryan
11:27 Sylvia's dating experience
15:28 Sylvia's list of men to date
23:46 Activities that we like to do on dates
26:16 Unconventional dating
Listen to us on Spotify: Listen to us on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5yx8txjfb7dMkosumEv6lQ?si=5CYe6CV6SuOSpTklWKySlQ
Sylvia and Nina are not your typical influencers; they give it to you raw and real! Join them as they quench their never-ending thirst for wisdom, trends, success and men.
They explore hot and pressing issues you never thought you needed to know in this extremely in-depth podcast. Sisters, brothers and everyone in between or beyond; jump in and be thirsty!
Support us! https://www.patreon.com/noc. Join our Patreon to watch our videos early!
CLICK TO BE A THIRSTY SISTER
https://www.youtube.com/thethirstysisters
FOLLOW
https://www.instagram.com/thethirstysisterstts
http://www.noc.com.sg
anchor.fm/thethirstysisters
FIND THE TEAM ON INSTAGRAM
Find us on Instagram:
Sylvia - https://www.instagram.com/sylsylnoc
Nina - https://www.instagram.com/ninatsf
EMAIL
For business/brand features: thirstysisters@noc.com.sg.
For talent engagements: bella@noc.com.sg, sylvia@noc.com.sg.
ADDRESS
North View Bizhub
6 Yishun Industrial Street 1, #01-14
Singapore 768090
NOC PARTNERS
Cathay Photo - http://www.cathayphoto.com.sg/
MyRepublic - https://secure.myrepublic.com.sg/
Shunji Matsuo - http://www.shunjimatsuo.com.sg/
Flesh Imp - http://shop.fleshimp.com
Imba Interactive - https://www.facebook.com/IMBAinteractive
TopGear PC - https://www.topgearpc.com /
Bosch - https://www.bosch-home.com.sg/
Aftershock - https://www.aftershockpc.com/
The Thirsty Sisters STAFF
Co-Founder - Sylvia Chan
Co-Founder - Nina Tan
Assistant Director/Editor - Virus Tan
Crew Lead/Editor - Bryant Lee
Crew/Editor - Brandon Gwee
Crew/Editor - Charmaine Zheng
Crew/Editor - Priscilia Tan
Crew/Editor - Charmaine Zheng
Crew/Editor - Isaac Lim
Crew/Editor - Matt Mohamed
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Kher Chyn
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Bryan Seah
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Vanessa
Crew/Sound Engineer - Yu En
PSSST...
While we respect everyone's views and opinions, we hope you respect ours too. We are entertainers after all! So if you're going to be butt-hurt by our videos, simply click X :confused: But for those who share our sense of humour, enjoy and watch on! Comment below with what you want to see next! ? Thank you!