毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過7萬的網紅肥貓丸 FatCatBall,也在其Youtube影片中提到,OTK:04:13 BGM:https://youtu.be/qIIOza9ZaXw?t=50s 前面BGM:Fresh_Fallen_Snow ※本牌組不一定要用法術石複製藍龍,請斟酌使用 更多貓貓請看:https://youtu.be/NAAATYKbbos 瑪里苟斯 Malygos 法術傷...
「greater用法」的推薦目錄:
- 關於greater用法 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於greater用法 在 椪皮仔 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於greater用法 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於greater用法 在 肥貓丸 FatCatBall Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於greater用法 在 C++ std::sort 排序用法與範例完整介紹 的評價
- 關於greater用法 在 大家好,我是Wesley。我來簡單整... - Karen on Ivy League ... 的評價
- 關於greater用法 在 Iozone Github iozone github. Drobo, DroboShare, Drobo FS ... 的評價
- 關於greater用法 在 Q trader github GitHub Download Website Bugtracker Help ... 的評價
greater用法 在 椪皮仔 Facebook 的最佳貼文
「每日英文閱讀分享#002」
【compound】
當一個字同時擁有好幾個詞性與意思的時候,就值得我們多看一眼!
最準確的方式就是查字典,體會每一個單字的用法
compound可以當名詞、形容詞、動詞
(發音也不同:動詞重音在後,名詞重音在前)
n. 混合物、複合字
a. 複合的、合成的
vt.
1. to mix sth together
2. to make greater or worse
3. to be formed from sth (此時用法為:be compounded of/from )
那大家可以猜猜看此時的compound是什麼詞性與意思!
例句:The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Increasing Vaccination Model acknowledges that people’s thoughts and feelings about vaccines — including their perceived risk, worry, confidence, trust, and safety concerns — can reduce their motivation to get vaccinated, compounding the practical issues and challenges to expanding access to and uptake of the services that provide them.
ps. 如果你也想跟我一起培養每日閱讀習慣,可以在下面留言用這個單字造個句子,我就會把整篇筆記傳給你喔!
#言之有物
#英語學習
#商業英文
#Economics
#Society
#每日英文閱讀分享
#一起來建立英文閱讀習慣吧
greater用法 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的精選貼文
【每日國際選讀】
#文末挑戰多益選擇題📝
消費性貸款拖欠量大增,中國「討債產業」蓬勃發展
開啟「接收通知」和「搶先看」每天吸收雙語時事新知
來讀華爾街日報獨家
🏦 In China, banks and internet lenders trying to collect on a growing pile of overdue credit-card bills and personal loans are resorting to sometimes aggressive tactics to get borrowers to repay.在中國,銀行和網路貸款機構正試圖收回愈來愈多的逾期信用卡欠款和個人貸款,這些機構有時會採取激進手段讓借款人償還債務。
-overdue: 逾期未付的
-resort to: 訴諸某種手段、採取
-aggressive: 激進的
⚒Since January, when the coronavirus began spreading across China, the country’s lenders have been grappling with rising volumes of delinquent consumer loans after many people were confined to their homes for months, suffered pay cuts or lost their jobs.
今年1月新冠病毒疫情開始在中國蔓延,許多人被困家中數月,遭遇減薪或失業,消費貸款拖欠數量不斷增加,從那時起中國貸款機構一直努力應對這種狀況。
-grapple with: 設法解決、努力應對
-delinquent: 拖欠的、逾期未付的
-be confined to: 被困於…、受限
-pay cuts: 減薪
🔎Some banks and online lenders were also hamstrung in their debt collection efforts during a more than 10-week lockdown of the central Chinese city of Wuhan, where many call centers are located.
在武漢長達10幾個星期的封鎖期間,有些銀行和在線貸款機構的追債業務也無法進行——武漢是許多呼叫中心的所在地。
-hamstring: 令人受挫、使人無法施展
-debt collecting: 討債、追債
-lockdown: 封鎖
🌊Before the downturn, the country’s consumers racked up record volumes of credit-card debt and short-term loans, as well as mortgages and auto loans as banks and online lenders jockeyed for business while the economy was booming.
在這波經濟低迷期前,隨著銀行和線上貸款機構在經濟繁榮期間競相爭取業務,中國消費者的信用卡債務、短期貸款以及抵押貸款和汽車貸款規模達到創紀錄的水準。
-economic downturn 景氣低迷
-rack up 累計、累加
-jockey for sth: 謀取、爭取某事
✍常見搭配:jockey with sb 和…競爭,用法同 compete with
🌿The proliferation of smartphones and mobile apps in recent years also gave millions of people greater access to loans from online lenders. Many borrowers provided the contact details for their family members and friends when applying for loans.
近年來,智慧型手機和行動應用程式的普及也讓數以百萬計的人更容易從線上貸款機構獲得貸款。許多借款人在申請貸款時提供了家人和朋友的聯繫方式。
-proliferation: 快速增長、急速擴張、普及
-give access to: 給予…的管道、得以取得
未完待續...
討債業何以成為疫情下的商機?
加入文末每日國際選讀計畫,解鎖完整語音導讀版
——
原文連結請看留言
——
❓❓多益模擬題❓:
Wang Xiaoting, founder of Beijing-based He Sheng Fintech Co., a company that ______ hundreds of individuals to collect debts __________ banks and licensed online lenders, said loan delinquencies are rising among young Chinese who borrowed heavily to fund their free-spending ways before the pandemic hit.
🙋🏻♀️🙋🏼♀️
A. deploys/ in the name of
B. employs/ on behalf of
C. ploys/ on the part of
-
【每日商業英文計畫,熱烈招生中!】
華爾街日報訂閱超值方案 📰
專屬 #臉書社團,浩爾 #每日語音導讀
「留言+1」,就送你 #優惠碼 及 #導讀試聽!
greater用法 在 肥貓丸 FatCatBall Youtube 的最佳貼文
OTK:04:13
BGM:https://youtu.be/qIIOza9ZaXw?t=50s
前面BGM:Fresh_Fallen_Snow
※本牌組不一定要用法術石複製藍龍,請斟酌使用
更多貓貓請看:https://youtu.be/NAAATYKbbos
瑪里苟斯
Malygos
法術傷害+5
Spell Damage +5
強效藍晶法術石
Greater Sapphire Spellstone
召喚3個友方手下的複製體
Summon 3 copies of a friendly minion.
法術石7+先祖之喚4+閃電箭1+轟雷(熔岩震擊)2
共14費
需有4張降費
手上有藍龍且已經降費且法術時已經升級,可以用先祖之喚拉出來
如果手上已經有大帝,可以用巴奈斯保證拉出藍龍
整副牌只有三個手下
傷害:
23+23~26=46~49
※本牌組不一定要用法術石複製藍龍,請斟酌使用
附上牌組:
### 法術石藍龍
# 職業:薩滿
# 規則:開放
#
# 2x (1) 閃電箭
# 2x (2) 先祖知識
# 2x (2) 大漩渦傳送門
# 2x (2) 熔岩震擊
# 2x (2) 轟雷
# 2x (2) 退化
# 2x (3) 元素毀滅
# 2x (3) 治療波
# 2x (3) 治癒之雨
# 2x (3) 視界術
# 1x (3) 閃電風暴
# 1x (4) 先祖之喚
# 1x (4) 妖術
# 1x (4) 巴奈斯
# 2x (5) 火山爆發
# 1x (6) 索瑞森大帝
# 2x (7) 弱效藍晶法術石
# 1x (9) 瑪里苟斯
#
AAEBAfe5Aga0A/UE/gXOD9YRhbgCDPkDsgbWD/ER0hO0FLwUoLYC9r0Cx8ECw9IC8+cCAA==
#
# 想要使用這副套牌的話,先複製它,然後在爐石戰記中建立一副新的套牌
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eolOWZmaXF4/hqdefault.jpg)
greater用法 在 大家好,我是Wesley。我來簡單整... - Karen on Ivy League ... 的推薦與評價
大家好,我是Wesley。我來簡單整理一下more than 的用法。more than 可視為一個片語,修飾其後接的名詞、動詞、形容詞、副詞等。分述如下(所有例句均取自COCA, ... ... <看更多>
greater用法 在 Iozone Github iozone github. Drobo, DroboShare, Drobo FS ... 的推薦與評價
... 2018/1/19 发布到WY_stutdy的博客性能测试工具VTune的功能和用法介绍. ... Record size must not be greater than file size and hence there are only six valid ... ... <看更多>
greater用法 在 C++ std::sort 排序用法與範例完整介紹 的推薦與評價
本篇介紹C++ 的std::sort 排序用法,C++ 最常用到的就是對vector sort ... 第三個參數傳入 std::greater<int>() 來達成降冪(降序/由大到小)的排序,. ... <看更多>